Counterintelligence Operation Deployed Against Trump's Campaign...By OBAMA Administration / Agencies

easyt65

Diamond Member
Aug 4, 2015
90,307
61,048
2,645
After 2 years of multiple investigations by Liberals into illegal Trump collusion with Russians the Liberals - even their top dog, Special Counsel Mueller, has come up with ZERO EVICENE to support their accusations.

To continue to believe that the President engaged in such activity is to suggest that illegally conspired with Russia and was so good at covering it up he’s managed to outwit our best intel and media minds who've searched for irrefutable evidence for those two years.



But there’s a growing appearance of alleged wrongdoing equally as insidious, if not more so, because it implies widespread misuse of America’s intelligence and law enforcement apparatus.

Here are eight signs pointing to a counterintelligence operation deployed against Trump for political reasons:

1. Secret surveillance was conducted on no fewer than seven Trump associates

The FBI wire-tapped Trump tower and listened in on Trump Transition Team members Flynn, Bannon, and Kushner while they conducted transition business.


2. Another controversial tool reportedly used by the FBI to obtain phone records and other documents in the investigation were national security letters, which bypass judicial approval. Improper use of such letters has been an ongoing theme at the FBI.


3. 'Un-Masking': “Unmasking” — identifying protected names of Americans captured by government surveillance — was frequently deployed by at least four top Obama officials who have subsequently spoken out against President Trump: James Clapper former Director of National Intelligence; Samantha Powerformer U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations; Susan Rice, former national security adviser; Sally Yatesformer deputy attorney general.

Names of Americans caught communicating with monitored foreign targets must be “masked,” or hidden within government agencies, so the names cannot be misused or shared. However, it’s been revealed that Power made near-daily unmasking requests in 2016.

The Obama administration illegally un-masked Trump team members. Clapper was proven to have committed Perjury (AGAIN) by claiming he knew nothing of this, and it was proven he did.

"Clapper also admitted to requesting the unmasking of “Mr. Trump, his associates or any members of Congress.” Clapper and Yates admitted they also personally reviewed unmasked documents and shared unmasked material with other officials."


4. Changing the Rules: "On Dec. 15, 2016 — the same day the government listened in on Trump officials at Trump Tower — Rice reportedly unmasked the names of Bannon, Kushner and Flynn. And Clapper made a new rule allowing the National Security Agency to widely disseminate surveillance material within the government without the normal privacy protections."


8 signs pointing to a counterintelligence operation deployed against Trump's campaign
 
5. Coordinated Media Strategy - "Former CIA Director John Brennanand Clapper, two of the most integral intel officials in this ongoing controversy, have joined national news organizations where they have regular opportunities to shape the news narrative — including on the very issues under investigation.

Clapper reportedly secretly leaked salacious political opposition research against Trump to CNN in fall 2017 and later was hired as a CNN political analyst. In February, Brennan was
hired as a paid analyst for MSNBC."

6. Leaks - There’s been a steady and apparently orchestrated campaign of CRIMINAL leaks — some true, some false, but nearly all of them damaging to President Trump’s interests.
--
Comey leaked classified info, for example


7.
Friends, Informants, Snoops, & Spies

The FBI reportedly used one-time CIA operative Stefan Halper in 2016 as an informant to spy on Trump officials.

Another player is Comey friend Daniel Richman, a Columbia University law professor, who leaked Comey’s memos against Trump to The New York Times after Comey was fired. We later learned that Richman actually worked for the FBI under a status called “Special Government Employee.”

The FBI used former reporter Glenn Simpson, his political opposition research firm Fusion GPS, and ex-British spy Christopher Steele to compile allegations against Trump, largely from Russian sources, which were distributed to the press and used as part of wiretap applications.



Code name

The operation reportedly had at least one code name that was leaked to The New York Times: “Crossfire Hurricane.”


The traitorous 'Secret Society' b@st@rds were even cocky enough to give their treasonous operation a Code name......
 
Special Counsel Mueller, has come up with ZERO EVICENE
If Mueller had zero evidence, Tramp would not have fabricated his "Spy Lie."
What 'spy lie'?

Evidence has come out showing the CIA / FBI had moles....

Papa was discovered wearing a wire and shopping a book deal shortly after he was set up by a Hillary donor who gave an 'anonymous tip' t the FBI about their 'drunken British Pub bathroom conversation'....

There are so many signs of 'set-up', illegal spying, moles / spies, and that the FBI was 'working for Hillary' its almost undeniable.

Again, this is breaking wide open - the biggest scandal in US history...and Barrry is buried in it.
 
Can anything protect Comey from repercussions of the expected IG Report?




Trump warns Comey over looming IG report on Clinton emails as 'spying' claims swirl

President Trump issued a thiny veiled warning to James Comey on Wednesday as he suggested a forthcoming inspector general report will cause new problems for the fired FBI director.

God help Comey if the pending IG Report exposes / reports crimes perpetrated by former FBI Director Comey and he is recommended for Indictment as the IG did with his Deputy Director Andrew McCabe.

The President will demand the full weight of the DOJ come down on his head for his role in this butt-hurt coup attempt.

Mueller's investigation is unraveling as evidence of the grand Obama administration Conspiracy to prevent Trump from winning the WH and to affect the coup should he win continues to pour out.

The only thing that may save Comey is if his mentor, Mueller, miraculously comes up with evidence against Trump in the nick of time.

After 2 years and being unable to even provide evidence that a crime was ever committed warranting an investigation, that happening is almost as much evidence as he has so far - ZERO!





Trump warns Comey over looming IG report on Clinton case: 'A lot of problems'
 
5. Coordinated Media Strategy - "Former CIA Director John Brennanand Clapper, two of the most integral intel officials in this ongoing controversy, have joined national news organizations where they have regular opportunities to shape the news narrative — including on the very issues under investigation.

Clapper reportedly secretly leaked salacious political opposition research against Trump to CNN in fall 2017 and later was hired as a CNN political analyst. In February, Brennan was
hired as a paid analyst for MSNBC."

6. Leaks - There’s been a steady and apparently orchestrated campaign of CRIMINAL leaks — some true, some false, but nearly all of them damaging to President Trump’s interests.
--
Comey leaked classified info, for example


7.
Friends, Informants, Snoops, & Spies

The FBI reportedly used one-time CIA operative Stefan Halper in 2016 as an informant to spy on Trump officials.

Another player is Comey friend Daniel Richman, a Columbia University law professor, who leaked Comey’s memos against Trump to The New York Times after Comey was fired. We later learned that Richman actually worked for the FBI under a status called “Special Government Employee.”

The FBI used former reporter Glenn Simpson, his political opposition research firm Fusion GPS, and ex-British spy Christopher Steele to compile allegations against Trump, largely from Russian sources, which were distributed to the press and used as part of wiretap applications.



Code name

The operation reportedly had at least one code name that was leaked to The New York Times: “Crossfire Hurricane.”


The traitorous 'Secret Society' b@st@rds were even cocky enough to give their treasonous operation a Code name......
You also left out Steele's relationship with The Skirpals (Ex Russian Spies) who helped to craft the Fake Russian Dossier, and who were poisoned in the UK recently.
 
5. Coordinated Media Strategy - "Former CIA Director John Brennanand Clapper, two of the most integral intel officials in this ongoing controversy, have joined national news organizations where they have regular opportunities to shape the news narrative — including on the very issues under investigation.

Clapper reportedly secretly leaked salacious political opposition research against Trump to CNN in fall 2017 and later was hired as a CNN political analyst. In February, Brennan was
hired as a paid analyst for MSNBC."

6. Leaks - There’s been a steady and apparently orchestrated campaign of CRIMINAL leaks — some true, some false, but nearly all of them damaging to President Trump’s interests.
--
Comey leaked classified info, for example


7.
Friends, Informants, Snoops, & Spies

The FBI reportedly used one-time CIA operative Stefan Halper in 2016 as an informant to spy on Trump officials.

Another player is Comey friend Daniel Richman, a Columbia University law professor, who leaked Comey’s memos against Trump to The New York Times after Comey was fired. We later learned that Richman actually worked for the FBI under a status called “Special Government Employee.”

The FBI used former reporter Glenn Simpson, his political opposition research firm Fusion GPS, and ex-British spy Christopher Steele to compile allegations against Trump, largely from Russian sources, which were distributed to the press and used as part of wiretap applications.



Code name

The operation reportedly had at least one code name that was leaked to The New York Times: “Crossfire Hurricane.”


The traitorous 'Secret Society' b@st@rds were even cocky enough to give their treasonous operation a Code name......
You also left out Steele's relationship with The Skirpals (Ex Russian Spies) who helped to craft the Fake Russian Dossier, and who were poisoned in the UK recently.
oops
 
After 2 years of multiple investigations by Liberals into illegal Trump collusion with Russians the Liberals - even their top dog, Special Counsel Mueller, has come up with ZERO EVICENE to support their accusations.

To continue to believe that the President engaged in such activity is to suggest that illegally conspired with Russia and was so good at covering it up he’s managed to outwit our best intel and media minds who've searched for irrefutable evidence for those two years.



But there’s a growing appearance of alleged wrongdoing equally as insidious, if not more so, because it implies widespread misuse of America’s intelligence and law enforcement apparatus.

Here are eight signs pointing to a counterintelligence operation deployed against Trump for political reasons:

1. Secret surveillance was conducted on no fewer than seven Trump associates

The FBI wire-tapped Trump tower and listened in on Trump Transition Team members Flynn, Bannon, and Kushner while they conducted transition business.


2. Another controversial tool reportedly used by the FBI to obtain phone records and other documents in the investigation were national security letters, which bypass judicial approval. Improper use of such letters has been an ongoing theme at the FBI.


3. 'Un-Masking': “Unmasking” — identifying protected names of Americans captured by government surveillance — was frequently deployed by at least four top Obama officials who have subsequently spoken out against President Trump: James Clapper former Director of National Intelligence; Samantha Powerformer U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations; Susan Rice, former national security adviser; Sally Yatesformer deputy attorney general.

Names of Americans caught communicating with monitored foreign targets must be “masked,” or hidden within government agencies, so the names cannot be misused or shared. However, it’s been revealed that Power made near-daily unmasking requests in 2016.

The Obama administration illegally un-masked Trump team members. Clapper was proven to have committed Perjury (AGAIN) by claiming he knew nothing of this, and it was proven he did.

"Clapper also admitted to requesting the unmasking of “Mr. Trump, his associates or any members of Congress.” Clapper and Yates admitted they also personally reviewed unmasked documents and shared unmasked material with other officials."


4. Changing the Rules: "On Dec. 15, 2016 — the same day the government listened in on Trump officials at Trump Tower — Rice reportedly unmasked the names of Bannon, Kushner and Flynn. And Clapper made a new rule allowing the National Security Agency to widely disseminate surveillance material within the government without the normal privacy protections."


8 signs pointing to a counterintelligence operation deployed against Trump's campaign

ConspiraciesRUs is still going strong.

There is no evidence that any of Trump’s conversations were picked up by the FBI, but if they were that would have been “incidental collection” of information. Nunes said in March that he reviewed “intelligence reports” that show “incidental collection” on some unnamed Trump transition team members. Nunes said he did not know if any of Trump’s conversations were picked up during surveillance. The CNN story also said, “It’s unclear whether Trump himself was picked up on the surveillance.”

That is Trump toady Nunes who contradicts your claim.
Revisiting Trump's Wiretap Tweets - FactCheck.org

Unmasking is not illegal. The recipient only has to have the proper security clearances.

You have nothing so far.
 
After 2 years of multiple investigations by Liberals into illegal Trump collusion with Russians the Liberals - even their top dog, Special Counsel Mueller, has come up with ZERO EVICENE to support their accusations.

To continue to believe that the President engaged in such activity is to suggest that illegally conspired with Russia and was so good at covering it up he’s managed to outwit our best intel and media minds who've searched for irrefutable evidence for those two years.



But there’s a growing appearance of alleged wrongdoing equally as insidious, if not more so, because it implies widespread misuse of America’s intelligence and law enforcement apparatus.

Here are eight signs pointing to a counterintelligence operation deployed against Trump for political reasons:

1. Secret surveillance was conducted on no fewer than seven Trump associates

The FBI wire-tapped Trump tower and listened in on Trump Transition Team members Flynn, Bannon, and Kushner while they conducted transition business.


2. Another controversial tool reportedly used by the FBI to obtain phone records and other documents in the investigation were national security letters, which bypass judicial approval. Improper use of such letters has been an ongoing theme at the FBI.


3. 'Un-Masking': “Unmasking” — identifying protected names of Americans captured by government surveillance — was frequently deployed by at least four top Obama officials who have subsequently spoken out against President Trump: James Clapper former Director of National Intelligence; Samantha Powerformer U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations; Susan Rice, former national security adviser; Sally Yatesformer deputy attorney general.

Names of Americans caught communicating with monitored foreign targets must be “masked,” or hidden within government agencies, so the names cannot be misused or shared. However, it’s been revealed that Power made near-daily unmasking requests in 2016.

The Obama administration illegally un-masked Trump team members. Clapper was proven to have committed Perjury (AGAIN) by claiming he knew nothing of this, and it was proven he did.

"Clapper also admitted to requesting the unmasking of “Mr. Trump, his associates or any members of Congress.” Clapper and Yates admitted they also personally reviewed unmasked documents and shared unmasked material with other officials."


4. Changing the Rules: "On Dec. 15, 2016 — the same day the government listened in on Trump officials at Trump Tower — Rice reportedly unmasked the names of Bannon, Kushner and Flynn. And Clapper made a new rule allowing the National Security Agency to widely disseminate surveillance material within the government without the normal privacy protections."


8 signs pointing to a counterintelligence operation deployed against Trump's campaign

ConspiraciesRUs is still going strong.

There is no evidence that any of Trump’s conversations were picked up by the FBI, but if they were that would have been “incidental collection” of information. Nunes said in March that he reviewed “intelligence reports” that show “incidental collection” on some unnamed Trump transition team members. Nunes said he did not know if any of Trump’s conversations were picked up during surveillance. The CNN story also said, “It’s unclear whether Trump himself was picked up on the surveillance.”

That is Trump toady Nunes who contradicts your claim.
Revisiting Trump's Wiretap Tweets - FactCheck.org

Unmasking is not illegal. The recipient only has to have the proper security clearances.

You have nothing so far.
then how do you know trump did anything with Russia? damn, just when I thought I had you all figured out, you changed the rules again. would you please make up your fking mind.
 
5. Coordinated Media Strategy - "Former CIA Director John Brennanand Clapper, two of the most integral intel officials in this ongoing controversy, have joined national news organizations where they have regular opportunities to shape the news narrative — including on the very issues under investigation.

Clapper reportedly secretly leaked salacious political opposition research against Trump to CNN in fall 2017 and later was hired as a CNN political analyst. In February, Brennan was
hired as a paid analyst for MSNBC."

6. Leaks - There’s been a steady and apparently orchestrated campaign of CRIMINAL leaks — some true, some false, but nearly all of them damaging to President Trump’s interests.
--
Comey leaked classified info, for example


7.
Friends, Informants, Snoops, & Spies

The FBI reportedly used one-time CIA operative Stefan Halper in 2016 as an informant to spy on Trump officials.

Another player is Comey friend Daniel Richman, a Columbia University law professor, who leaked Comey’s memos against Trump to The New York Times after Comey was fired. We later learned that Richman actually worked for the FBI under a status called “Special Government Employee.”

The FBI used former reporter Glenn Simpson, his political opposition research firm Fusion GPS, and ex-British spy Christopher Steele to compile allegations against Trump, largely from Russian sources, which were distributed to the press and used as part of wiretap applications.



Code name

The operation reportedly had at least one code name that was leaked to The New York Times: “Crossfire Hurricane.”


The traitorous 'Secret Society' b@st@rds were even cocky enough to give their treasonous operation a Code name......

A lot of people work for the news media. Fox has a number of Republicans. No conspiracy here.

There have been few if any leaks from Mueller. Comey leaked no classified information.

There was nothing treasonous about it. It would have been treasonous if they had ignored it. Essentially they interviewed the Australian ambassador about information he overheard. Then a informant asked a couple of members of Trump's campaign who were involved in it questions.
 
After 2 years of multiple investigations by Liberals into illegal Trump collusion with Russians the Liberals - even their top dog, Special Counsel Mueller, has come up with ZERO EVICENE to support their accusations.

To continue to believe that the President engaged in such activity is to suggest that illegally conspired with Russia and was so good at covering it up he’s managed to outwit our best intel and media minds who've searched for irrefutable evidence for those two years.



But there’s a growing appearance of alleged wrongdoing equally as insidious, if not more so, because it implies widespread misuse of America’s intelligence and law enforcement apparatus.

Here are eight signs pointing to a counterintelligence operation deployed against Trump for political reasons:

1. Secret surveillance was conducted on no fewer than seven Trump associates

The FBI wire-tapped Trump tower and listened in on Trump Transition Team members Flynn, Bannon, and Kushner while they conducted transition business.


2. Another controversial tool reportedly used by the FBI to obtain phone records and other documents in the investigation were national security letters, which bypass judicial approval. Improper use of such letters has been an ongoing theme at the FBI.


3. 'Un-Masking': “Unmasking” — identifying protected names of Americans captured by government surveillance — was frequently deployed by at least four top Obama officials who have subsequently spoken out against President Trump: James Clapper former Director of National Intelligence; Samantha Powerformer U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations; Susan Rice, former national security adviser; Sally Yatesformer deputy attorney general.

Names of Americans caught communicating with monitored foreign targets must be “masked,” or hidden within government agencies, so the names cannot be misused or shared. However, it’s been revealed that Power made near-daily unmasking requests in 2016.

The Obama administration illegally un-masked Trump team members. Clapper was proven to have committed Perjury (AGAIN) by claiming he knew nothing of this, and it was proven he did.

"Clapper also admitted to requesting the unmasking of “Mr. Trump, his associates or any members of Congress.” Clapper and Yates admitted they also personally reviewed unmasked documents and shared unmasked material with other officials."


4. Changing the Rules: "On Dec. 15, 2016 — the same day the government listened in on Trump officials at Trump Tower — Rice reportedly unmasked the names of Bannon, Kushner and Flynn. And Clapper made a new rule allowing the National Security Agency to widely disseminate surveillance material within the government without the normal privacy protections."


8 signs pointing to a counterintelligence operation deployed against Trump's campaign

ConspiraciesRUs is still going strong.

There is no evidence that any of Trump’s conversations were picked up by the FBI, but if they were that would have been “incidental collection” of information. Nunes said in March that he reviewed “intelligence reports” that show “incidental collection” on some unnamed Trump transition team members. Nunes said he did not know if any of Trump’s conversations were picked up during surveillance. The CNN story also said, “It’s unclear whether Trump himself was picked up on the surveillance.”

That is Trump toady Nunes who contradicts your claim.
Revisiting Trump's Wiretap Tweets - FactCheck.org

Unmasking is not illegal. The recipient only has to have the proper security clearances.

You have nothing so far.
then how do you know trump did anything with Russia? damn, just when I thought I had you all figured out, you changed the rules again. would you please make up your fking mind.

You are the fking one who has no mind. You have sold your soul to Trump. The FBI had every reason to open up a investigation. There is no doubt that Trump campaign officials were willing to meet with a Russian national to get dirt on Trump.
 
Special Counsel Mueller, has come up with ZERO EVICENE
If Mueller had zero evidence, Tramp would not have fabricated his "Spy Lie."

Another trip down "Fiction Lane", courtesy of the crazy person....

Wow. That article is from the Hill, not exactly a partisan source.

It is really time to give up the ghost guys and admit to the reality of what is going on.

It really doesn't matter if you are left, or right, conservative or liberal, Democrat or Republican.

Why do you think so many folks supported Bernie, and then when they saw the clear corruption that her people were willing to go to, voted for Trump? Is he odious? Sure. Is he silly? You bet. Does he appear to bring down the dignity of the office, absolutely.

But many items in this article I have warned you folks about over the past six months.


The Democratic Money Behind Russia-gate
October 29, 2017
The Democratic Money Behind Russia-gate

On the Criminal Referral of Comey, Clinton et al: Will the Constitution Hold and the Media Continue to Suppress the Story?
April 19, 2018

On the Criminal Referral of Comey, Clinton et al: Will the Constitution Hold and the Media Continue to Suppress the Story?

‘Deep State’ Veterans find New Homes in Mainstream Media
February 5, 2018
‘Deep State’ Veterans find New Homes in Mainstream Media

This article in the Hill, was an excellent summation of what folks in D.C. already KNOW.

And it leans slightly left? Don't you think it is time to wake the hell up?

The Hill even is known for having a left-center bias. Though they do spin, usually for the LEFT!

leftcenter10.png

LEFT-CENTER BIAS

These media sources have a slight to moderate liberal bias. They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes) to favor liberal causes. These sources are generally trustworthy for information, but may require further investigation. See all Left-Center sources.

Factual Reporting: MIXED

The Hill - Media Bias/Fact Check

But I would recommend that second article I posted, from Consortium News; On the Criminal Referral of Comey, Clinton et al: Will the Constitution Hold and the Media Continue to Suppress the Story?

leastbiased011.png


These sources have minimal bias and use very few loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes). The reporting is factual and usually sourced. These are the most credible media sources. See all Least Biased sources.


Factual Reporting: HIGH

<snip>
(New) Consortium News has articles that many on the right may consider left biased: The Fat Cats of Fast-Food


While also having articles the left won’t like: Do High-Level Leaks Suggest a Conspiracy?


The reporting from consortium news cites itself as trying to find the truth. However, I would say that they do often report on things with a left leaning focus. With articles like the above pro-minimum wage or anything regarding the environment. I can see how some on the left would feel that articles like the above or another titled “Europe May Finally Rethink NATO Costs” can come off as right leaning. The reality is that truth has no side. Sometimes somebody on the right is correct and somebody on the left is wrong. The bigger issue is that the political environment of America has been moving the goal posts, of left and right, to the right for the last 30+ years. Meaning that somebody who is “left” today may in fact have been right 20 years ago. Consortium News has experts from various backgrounds and not just pure journalist which also helps with its reporting to keep it as centered as one can get these days. They have articles about Hillary, Obama, Bush, and Trump all of which have negative things to say about them. They cite factual data with real sources and with minimum usage of loaded wording that you often find in other online only magazines. I would put this news source in your feed to get a more grounded perspective on many of the issues that are shaping up today. (M. Allen 6/3/17)


Source: Consortiumnews
 
5. Coordinated Media Strategy - "Former CIA Director John Brennanand Clapper, two of the most integral intel officials in this ongoing controversy, have joined national news organizations where they have regular opportunities to shape the news narrative — including on the very issues under investigation.

Clapper reportedly secretly leaked salacious political opposition research against Trump to CNN in fall 2017 and later was hired as a CNN political analyst. In February, Brennan was
hired as a paid analyst for MSNBC."

6. Leaks - There’s been a steady and apparently orchestrated campaign of CRIMINAL leaks — some true, some false, but nearly all of them damaging to President Trump’s interests.
--
Comey leaked classified info, for example


7.
Friends, Informants, Snoops, & Spies

The FBI reportedly used one-time CIA operative Stefan Halper in 2016 as an informant to spy on Trump officials.

Another player is Comey friend Daniel Richman, a Columbia University law professor, who leaked Comey’s memos against Trump to The New York Times after Comey was fired. We later learned that Richman actually worked for the FBI under a status called “Special Government Employee.”

The FBI used former reporter Glenn Simpson, his political opposition research firm Fusion GPS, and ex-British spy Christopher Steele to compile allegations against Trump, largely from Russian sources, which were distributed to the press and used as part of wiretap applications.



Code name

The operation reportedly had at least one code name that was leaked to The New York Times: “Crossfire Hurricane.”


The traitorous 'Secret Society' b@st@rds were even cocky enough to give their treasonous operation a Code name......
You also left out Steele's relationship with The Skirpals (Ex Russian Spies) who helped to craft the Fake Russian Dossier, and who were poisoned in the UK recently.
oops
Clinton, DNC connections to Trump dossier funding could create election law issues
Clinton, DNC connections to Trump dossier funding could create election law issues

Hillary for America, DNC Failed to Disclose Legally Required Information about Funding of Trump-Russia Dossier
Hillary for America, DNC Failed to Disclose Legally Required Information about Funding of Trump-Russia Dossier

Federal Politics
Politicos beware: Court ruling could prompt more transparent campaign spending
How will the Federal Election Commission apply new decision?
Politicos beware: Court ruling could prompt more transparent campaign spending

Now you know why this Stormy thing is being made into such an issue, b/c Hillary did it first, with far more slimy reasons.
 
After 2 years of multiple investigations by Liberals into illegal Trump collusion with Russians the Liberals - even their top dog, Special Counsel Mueller, has come up with ZERO EVICENE to support their accusations.

To continue to believe that the President engaged in such activity is to suggest that illegally conspired with Russia and was so good at covering it up he’s managed to outwit our best intel and media minds who've searched for irrefutable evidence for those two years.



But there’s a growing appearance of alleged wrongdoing equally as insidious, if not more so, because it implies widespread misuse of America’s intelligence and law enforcement apparatus.

Here are eight signs pointing to a counterintelligence operation deployed against Trump for political reasons:

1. Secret surveillance was conducted on no fewer than seven Trump associates

The FBI wire-tapped Trump tower and listened in on Trump Transition Team members Flynn, Bannon, and Kushner while they conducted transition business.


2. Another controversial tool reportedly used by the FBI to obtain phone records and other documents in the investigation were national security letters, which bypass judicial approval. Improper use of such letters has been an ongoing theme at the FBI.


3. 'Un-Masking': “Unmasking” — identifying protected names of Americans captured by government surveillance — was frequently deployed by at least four top Obama officials who have subsequently spoken out against President Trump: James Clapper former Director of National Intelligence; Samantha Powerformer U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations; Susan Rice, former national security adviser; Sally Yatesformer deputy attorney general.

Names of Americans caught communicating with monitored foreign targets must be “masked,” or hidden within government agencies, so the names cannot be misused or shared. However, it’s been revealed that Power made near-daily unmasking requests in 2016.

The Obama administration illegally un-masked Trump team members. Clapper was proven to have committed Perjury (AGAIN) by claiming he knew nothing of this, and it was proven he did.

"Clapper also admitted to requesting the unmasking of “Mr. Trump, his associates or any members of Congress.” Clapper and Yates admitted they also personally reviewed unmasked documents and shared unmasked material with other officials."


4. Changing the Rules: "On Dec. 15, 2016 — the same day the government listened in on Trump officials at Trump Tower — Rice reportedly unmasked the names of Bannon, Kushner and Flynn. And Clapper made a new rule allowing the National Security Agency to widely disseminate surveillance material within the government without the normal privacy protections."


8 signs pointing to a counterintelligence operation deployed against Trump's campaign

ConspiraciesRUs is still going strong.

There is no evidence that any of Trump’s conversations were picked up by the FBI, but if they were that would have been “incidental collection” of information. Nunes said in March that he reviewed “intelligence reports” that show “incidental collection” on some unnamed Trump transition team members. Nunes said he did not know if any of Trump’s conversations were picked up during surveillance. The CNN story also said, “It’s unclear whether Trump himself was picked up on the surveillance.”

That is Trump toady Nunes who contradicts your claim.
Revisiting Trump's Wiretap Tweets - FactCheck.org

Unmasking is not illegal. The recipient only has to have the proper security clearances.

You have nothing so far.


Wow, did you even read the article posted in the OP. . . or are you just REALLY REALLY dumb? Perhaps it is just cognitive bias that will not allow you to see the truth? Mind boggling.

The article in the OP is indicating there is criminal behavior by the folks that the article your FactCheck.org piece relies on to debunk Trumps claims.

Don't you get it yet, you are taking the word of folks that have engaged in criminal behavior, THAT IS WHAT THIS IS ABOUT.

The FactCheck.org piece you quoted stated. . .

"Incidental collection of information is legal with a FISA court order. Trump claimed that Obama was responsible for illegal Watergate-style wiretapping, but CNN wrote that the FISA court authorized the wiretapping of Manafort. That would make the incidental collection of information on Trump, or anyone else, perfectly legal. Nunes made the same point in March."

FALSE.

This article is over a year old, new evidence has come to light.

Aren't you understanding how that works?

FactCheck.org is taking the word of folks that are clearly corrupt and have been referred by Congress for investigation for what amounts to a soft coup.

https://desantis.house.gov/_cache/f...9E830D37CF96376A2.final-criminal-referral.pdf

The date on this interview was a few months ago, not last year. February 18, 2018 - Russia Probe

That FactCheck.org information is dated September 22, 2017.



Nunes: FBI and DOJ Perps Could Be Put on Trial

Nunes: FBI and DOJ Perps Could Be Put on Trial

"Throwing down the gauntlet on alleged abuse of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) by the Department of Justice and the FBI, House Intelligence Committee Chair Devin Nunes (R-Calif.) stated that there could be legal consequences for officials who may have misled the FISA court. “If they need to be put on trial, we will put them on trial,” he said. “The reason Congress exists is to oversee these agencies that we created.”


Nunes took this highly unusual, no-holds-barred stance during an interview with Emmy-award winning investigative journalist Sharyl Attkisson, which aired on Sunday.

Attkisson said she had invited both Nunes and House Intelligence Committee Ranking Member Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) but that only Nunes agreed. She asked him about Schiff’s charge that Nunes’ goal was “to put the FBI and DOJ on trial.” What followed was very atypical bluntness — candor normally considered quite unacceptable in polite circles of the Washington Establishment.

Rather than play the diplomat and disavow what Schiff contended was Nunes’ goal, Nunes said, in effect, let the chips fall where they may. He unapologetically averred that, yes, a criminal trial might well be the outcome. “DOJ and FBI are not above the law,” he stated emphatically. “If they are committing abuse before a secret court getting warrants on American citizens, you’re darn right that we’re going to put them on trial.”

So if there is criminal behavior going on at the DOJ and FBI, obviously when FactCheck.org depends on them for it's facts, you aren't getting the facts, you are getting the lies of criminals covering up their crimes.

 

Forum List

Back
Top