Corporate Welfare = Creeping Facism

Democracy - New World Encyclopedia


Forms of democracy





Representative democracy

Representative democracy involves the selection of the legislature and executive by a popular election. Representatives are to make make decisions on behalf of those they represent. They retain the freedom to exercise their own judgment. Their constituents can communicate with them on important issues and choose a new representative in the next election if they are dissatisfied.

There are a number of systems of varying degrees of complexity for choosing representatives. They may be elected by a particular district (or constituency), or represent the electorate as a whole as in many proportional systems.



Liberal democracy

Classical liberal democracy is normally a representative democracy along with the protection of minorities, the rule of law, a separation of powers, and protection of liberties (thus the name "liberal") of speech, assembly, religion, and property.

Since the 1960s the term "liberal" has been used, often pejoratively, towards those legislatures that are liberal with state money and redistribute it to create a welfare state. However, this would be an illiberal democracy in classical terms, because it does not protect the property its citizens acquire.



Direct democracy

Direct democracy is a political system in which the citizens vote on major policy decisions and laws. Issues are resolved by popular vote, or referenda. Many people think direct democracy is the purest form of democracy. Direct democracies function better in small communities or in areas where people have a high degree of independence and self-sufficiency. Switzerland is a direct democracy where new laws often need a referendum in order to be passed. As it is a very stable and prosperous country, few people see any urgent need for change and so few new laws are passed. The system is also very decentralized, with few policies decided on a national level. This means that the French, Italian, and Romance language speaking minorities can order their affairs the way they choose and the large Swiss-German-speaking majority cannot over rule the local level, even if it wanted to.



Socialist democracy

Socialism, where the state economy is shaped by the government, has some forms that are based on democracy. Social democracy, democratic socialism, and the dictatorship of the proletariat are some examples of names applied to the ideal of a socialist democracy. Many democratic socialists and social democrats believe in a form of welfare state and workplace democracy produced by legislation by a representative democracy.

Marxist-Leninists, Stalinists, Maoists, and other "orthodox Marxists" generally promote democratic centralism, but they have never formed actual societies which were not ruled by elites who had acquired government power. Libertarian socialists generally believe in direct democracy and Libertarian Marxists often believe in a consociational state that combines consensus democracy with representative democracy. Such consensus democracy has existed in local-level community groups in rural communist China.



Anarchist democracy

The only form of democracy considered acceptable to many anarchists is direct democracy, which historically discriminates against minorities. However, some anarchists oppose direct democracy. Pierre-Joseph Proudhon argued that the only acceptable form of direct democracy is one in which it is recognized that majority decisions are not binding on the minority, even when unanimous.[18] However, anarcho-communist Murray Bookchin criticized individualist anarchists for opposing democracy,[19] and says "majority rule" is consistent with anarchism.



Sortition

Sortition (or allotment) has formed the basis of systems randomly selecting officers from the population. A much noted classical example would be the ancient Athenian democracy. Drawing by lot from a pool of qualified people elected by the citizens would be a democratic variation on sortition. Such a process would reduce the ability of wealthy contributors or election rigging to guarantee an outcome, and the problems associated with incumbent advantages would be eliminated.



Tribal and consensus democracy

Certain ethnic tribes organized themselves using different forms of participatory democracy or consensus democracy.[20] However, these are generally face-to-face communities, and it is difficult to develop consensus in a large impersonal modern bureaucratic state. Consensus democracy and deliberative democracy seek consensus among the people.[21
 
Last edited:
Yeah, because aren't nearly enough sweat shops or child labor and the work week is way too short.

of course as a liberal you're nearly illiterate. Unions don't prevent sweat shops, capitalism does. If you don't provide the best jobs possible you lose your best workers to those who do pay the most possible. Just as you must provide the best products in the world to survive you also must provide the best jobs.

You were perfectly brainwashed but now you know better.

Do they have unions in China? Any wonder we get sweat shop prices from them? Want to pretend it wouldn't be that way here too, if you had your way? :doubt:


This guys believes

Unions don't prevent sweat shops, capitalism does. If you don't provide the best jobs possible you lose your best workers to those who do pay the most possible. Just as you must provide the best products in the world to survive you also must provide the best jobs.

Priceless
 
Last edited:
USA capitalism breeds sweat shops! Wal-Mart loves it which is why this household has not shopped Wal-Mart for several years. It's easy to live without Wal-Mart!!

Wal-Mart wants sweat shop wages in the USA keep that in mind.

In fact I would say it is USA capitalism that brought on sweat shops......

It is the RINO party fueling the new facism as well!!!
 
USA capitalism breeds sweat shops! Wal-Mart loves it which is why this household has not shopped Wal-Mart for several years. It's easy to live without Wal-Mart!!

Wal-Mart wants sweat shop wages in the USA keep that in mind.

In fact I would say it is USA capitalism that brought on sweat shops......

It is the RINO party fueling the new facism as well!!!

So you're saying that Walmart is paying less than minimum wages? :confused:
You do realize that actual sweat shops pays a lot lower, and I mean a lot lower than that.
 
of course as a liberal you're nearly illiterate. Unions don't prevent sweat shops, capitalism does. If you don't provide the best jobs possible you lose your best workers to those who do pay the most possible. Just as you must provide the best products in the world to survive you also must provide the best jobs.

You were perfectly brainwashed but now you know better.

Are you this naive in real life or is it just an internet thing?

Knowing the facts isn't "naivete." I'm not in a union, but I make far above minimum wage. How does your theory about unions explain that?
 
USA capitalism breeds sweat shops! Wal-Mart loves it which is why this household has not shopped Wal-Mart for several years. It's easy to live without Wal-Mart!!

Wal-Mart wants sweat shop wages in the USA keep that in mind.

In fact I would say it is USA capitalism that brought on sweat shops......

It is the RINO party fueling the new facism as well!!!


Liberal Dictionary:
==============================
Sweatshop - any business that isn't unionized even if it pays 10 times the minimum wage.
 
Knowing the facts isn't "naivete." I'm not in a union, but I make far above minimum wage. How does your theory about unions explain that?

in a free market the law of supply and demand determines the price of your labor. Where would your wage be if you were in a union? Where would your job be if you were in a union?
 
In 1973, more than one-third of private production workers were unionized, which drove up wages.

Yes and then drove 30 million jobs offshore. That is a liberals idea of a positive thing??

And then the very intelligent Merrill wants more and more liberal power in Washington but less and less crony fascist capitalism? As a liberal she simply lacks the IQ to understand that the more power in Washington the more incentive to buy and sell that power.

What do you call a person who is liberal but against crony fascist capitalism: deeply confused.
 
It's not unions breaking the economy!

It is Big Dollar White Collar ENTITLEMENTS, Wall Street crooks, the nations largest banks, the war for oil control and the medical insurance industry!

Big Dollar White Collar ENTITLEMENTS are killing the economy and our wallets... damn right:

Talk about Entitlements or where in the hell did the Free Market go?

Still a Bad Idea | Dollars & Sense

"Free Lunch: How the Wealthiest Americans Enrich Themselves at Government Expense (And Stick You with the Bill)"

UUA: A Voice of Economic Populism
 
Big Dollar White Collar ENTITLEMENTS are killing the economy and our wallets... damn right:

of course if this was true merrill would not be so afraid to name the single biggest white collar entitlement that is killing the economy!!
 

Forum List

Back
Top