no1tovote4
Gold Member
SmarterThanYou said:then what we need to do is differentiate between a corporation as a public entity(which had no rights til a supreme court ruling around 10-20 years ago) and a corporation as a privately owned venture. Further, If a corporation called 'Baptist specialties inc.' were to specify that they would only hire baptists then this could be understandable. But IBM or Verizon couldn't and shouldn't be allowed to fire a person because they celebrate sam hain by pretending to ride around on a broom on Oct 31 when it doesn't affect their work performance and they don't do it on national tv.
Once again, it was based on the premise of the corporation. However a Corporation that is publicly traded subjects itself to the will of the shareholders and likely would no longer be a "Christian-only" Corporation once publicly traded. However if they remained just such a corporation, even if they were publicly traded rules could be set on who they can hire. They just could not be a Government Contractor.