Corporate Primacy Causes People Poverty

[blastoff]

Wowzers!....Yet another dreary, envious and covetous screed form HRPuffinstuffPost?

My cup runneth over!

STFU, if you don't have any commentary please STFU GayBall.

That was all the commentary such a dreary, envious and covetous screed form HRPuffinstuffPost deserves.

Don't like it?....Quit spamming the forum with that dreck.

Clarification: If you don't have commentary that agrees with Flayshat's you're not allowed to post it. The fact that the dumb ass doesn't even understand the meaning of 'commentary' we should not make fun of, laugh at, etc.

 

[Oddball]

Ah, nice deflection. The answer is no, they often don't, which is why I'm a Libertarian. We absofuckinglutely support individual liberty and equality.

Have you now conceded that Democrats do not support these ideals either?

You all don't support equality, its bullshit. Your dicked up party has distorted notions of equality.

So now you're attacking Libertarians as well as Republicans, yet you can't seem to muster any evidence in support of Democrats and their record of...what was it...equality and individual liberty.

You're really not very good at this are you?

No, no he isn't.

But it's certain he does have some more gray water pumped from the bilge over at HuffyPuffy.

 

[Claudette]

Leo W. Gerard: Corporate Primacy Causes People Poverty




Well fucking said!

What a fucking load of horseshit.

HuffPo strikes again.

Horseshit is what your BREFFF smells like, GOP lemmings, working class dumbasses who lick the ass cracks of the rich and worship them. Checkmate fucktard!

LMAO Hate to tell ya but I don't like ass cracks. Never have and never will.

You, however, seem to lick HuffPo's ass crack often and apparantly quite well.

Checkmate fucktard.

 

[GHook93]

Leo W. Gerard: Corporate Primacy Causes People Poverty

For all the fancy talk in Ohio on Thursday, it comes down to this: Do Americans want a government of the people by the people for the people, one conceived in liberty and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal? Or do Americans want a government of the corporations by the corporations for the corporations, one dedicated to the proposition that the rich are better than everyone else?

For the rich, like Mitt Romney, the proposition that they are better than everyone else is a given. Romney believes that he, the son of a wealthy car company executive and governor, the youth who attended exclusive private schools and wallowed in every privilege, is a self-made man.

That is basic Republican philosophy: Every wealthy person and every successful corporation achieved that all by themselves. They didn't inherit; they didn't benefit from taxpayer-funded infrastructure like roads, schools and patent enforcement; there was no luck involved. They achieved it alone by virtue of their own grit, hard work and dedication.
Anyone can do it, the GOP believes, if they would just buckle down, work hard and follow all the rules. As a result, in Republican world, anyone who isn't rich has only himself to blame.

Therefore, in GOP-logic, the poor and middle class are inferior beings. Government should not serve them. The government, Republicans think, should bow to the successful, who earned service. The government must not, according to the GOP, reward shiftlessness by providing benefits to middle class scallywags who have failed to do what it takes to get rich.This doctrine of primacy for corporations and the 1 percent has set back the middle class. And the nation's economy. Middle class income has stagnated. Meanwhile, the wealth of the top 1 percent and corporations has skyrocketed, so that now as much wealth is concentrated at the top as was during the robber-baron age immediately before the Great Depression.

Well fucking said!

Always the liberal line. Evil corporations are bad!!! All Rich people got rich off of dead people's backs!

This author needs to do some investigative reporting on Romney's life after college. They struggled bigtime, living in a basement apartment costing $75 a month, when they had their first son in 1970 and second in 1971!!! Third son in 1975 and fourth in 1978.

They struggled at first for Mitt to make a name for himself, but he got break in 1977 in Bain Capital, then he worked his way up the ladder in Bain, but only to middle and upper middle class. He then broke off and started his own private equity co in 1983! Like all new businesses they struggled bigtime. It took 3 years to show a profit. Finally by the end of 1986 they started turning profits and never looked back. This enable Romney to make his fortune!

Mitt Romney, as a student at a chaotic time for BYU, focused on family, church - The Washington Post
By then, the couple had married and moved into a shabby, $62-a-month basement apartment, with cracked tiles in the kitchen floor.

See the liberals will collectivel IGNORE, that Romney struggled, worked hard, scarificed and eventually made it! They instead preach the narrative that Romney was rich his entire life and never had to work for a thing. It's utter bullshit and insulting!

Small Business (which can be as big as 500 employees) hire 60% of Americans! They are HURT the most by the over-regulation on business, they pay State and Federal taxation (see Corps always get back door tax breaks to) and always get the brunt of the liberal antibusiness charge/assault on Corporations/"Big Business!"

Nevertheless, Corporations still employ 40% of Americans (like myself)! They spend a TON of dollars in the economy, in the form of taxes (including payroll taxes and income taxes from their employees), from other companies in goods and services, in charitable contributions, business travel, hotels, convention etc.

Some corporation, like individuals and governments, do bad things, but the majority are forces of good, that employee Americans, provide Americans healthcare, provide goods and services the public needs, contributes a lot to charity and funds government!

I would say Fagyo, you should quite blaming the white man and instead get some fire in your belly, work hard and try to better your situation on your own! Blame people all you want for your own failure it will get you no where!

 

[Avatar4321]

No. What causes individual poverty is: high taxes, Pride, idleness, dishonesty, carlessness, excessive debt, and a failure to take responsibility for oneself.

Other people creating a corporation cant make people poor simply becaues that corporation has no power to take money from them. They have to provide people with a good or service. Otherwise, they have no power. It's an individuals choice whether to pay for a good or service.

 

[buckeye45_73]

Doesnt Tim Geitner and John Kerry and Charles RAngle use those same roads, so why do they get out of paying taxes, hmmmmmmm

 

[buckeye45_73]

Ah, nice deflection. The answer is no, they often don't, which is why I'm a Libertarian. We absofuckinglutely support individual liberty and equality.

Have you now conceded that Democrats do not support these ideals either?

You all don't support equality, its bullshit. Your dicked up party has distorted notions of equality.

So now you're attacking Libertarians as well as Republicans, yet you can't seem to muster any evidence in support of Democrats and their record of...what was it...equality and individual liberty.

You're really not very good at this are you?

Yeah the democrats are awesome on this issue, they supported slavery, jim crow, and they love to keep blacks on the government roll, since it's esier to control them, yeah whew, democrat party liberty, its non existant, nut flayo belives in single payer....wait that's not liberty either, man he just cant win this arguement.

 

[Sallow]

Leo W. Gerard: Corporate Primacy Causes People Poverty

For all the fancy talk in Ohio on Thursday, it comes down to this: Do Americans want a government of the people by the people for the people, one conceived in liberty and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal? Or do Americans want a government of the corporations by the corporations for the corporations, one dedicated to the proposition that the rich are better than everyone else?

For the rich, like Mitt Romney, the proposition that they are better than everyone else is a given. Romney believes that he, the son of a wealthy car company executive and governor, the youth who attended exclusive private schools and wallowed in every privilege, is a self-made man.

That is basic Republican philosophy: Every wealthy person and every successful corporation achieved that all by themselves. They didn't inherit; they didn't benefit from taxpayer-funded infrastructure like roads, schools and patent enforcement; there was no luck involved. They achieved it alone by virtue of their own grit, hard work and dedication.
Anyone can do it, the GOP believes, if they would just buckle down, work hard and follow all the rules. As a result, in Republican world, anyone who isn't rich has only himself to blame.

Therefore, in GOP-logic, the poor and middle class are inferior beings. Government should not serve them. The government, Republicans think, should bow to the successful, who earned service. The government must not, according to the GOP, reward shiftlessness by providing benefits to middle class scallywags who have failed to do what it takes to get rich.This doctrine of primacy for corporations and the 1 percent has set back the middle class. And the nation's economy. Middle class income has stagnated. Meanwhile, the wealth of the top 1 percent and corporations has skyrocketed, so that now as much wealth is concentrated at the top as was during the robber-baron age immediately before the Great Depression.

Well fucking said!

That in a nutshell sums it all up.

 

[Sallow]

Doesnt Tim Geitner and John Kerry and Charles RAngle use those same roads, so why do they get out of paying taxes, hmmmmmmm

They didn't.

What's your point?

 

[buckeye45_73]

Leo W. Gerard: Corporate Primacy Causes People Poverty

For all the fancy talk in Ohio on Thursday, it comes down to this: Do Americans want a government of the people by the people for the people, one conceived in liberty and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal? Or do Americans want a government of the corporations by the corporations for the corporations, one dedicated to the proposition that the rich are better than everyone else?

For the rich, like Mitt Romney, the proposition that they are better than everyone else is a given. Romney believes that he, the son of a wealthy car company executive and governor, the youth who attended exclusive private schools and wallowed in every privilege, is a self-made man.

That is basic Republican philosophy: Every wealthy person and every successful corporation achieved that all by themselves. They didn't inherit; they didn't benefit from taxpayer-funded infrastructure like roads, schools and patent enforcement; there was no luck involved. They achieved it alone by virtue of their own grit, hard work and dedication.
Anyone can do it, the GOP believes, if they would just buckle down, work hard and follow all the rules. As a result, in Republican world, anyone who isn't rich has only himself to blame.

Therefore, in GOP-logic, the poor and middle class are inferior beings. Government should not serve them. The government, Republicans think, should bow to the successful, who earned service. The government must not, according to the GOP, reward shiftlessness by providing benefits to middle class scallywags who have failed to do what it takes to get rich.This doctrine of primacy for corporations and the 1 percent has set back the middle class. And the nation's economy. Middle class income has stagnated. Meanwhile, the wealth of the top 1 percent and corporations has skyrocketed, so that now as much wealth is concentrated at the top as was during the robber-baron age immediately before the Great Depression.

Well fucking said!

That in a nutshell sums it all up.

Ok, since liberals are crazy, explain to me why this is a burn, he had some luck, ok, he used roads like everyone else, ok, he inherited money, ok (never see the kennedys ripped about that one). So tell me why I should care about that?

 

[Sallow]

You all don't support equality, its bullshit. Your dicked up party has distorted notions of equality.

So now you're attacking Libertarians as well as Republicans, yet you can't seem to muster any evidence in support of Democrats and their record of...what was it...equality and individual liberty.

You're really not very good at this are you?

Yeah the democrats are awesome on this issue, they supported slavery, jim crow, and they love to keep blacks on the government roll, since it's esier to control them, yeah whew, democrat party liberty, its non existant, nut flayo belives in single payer....wait that's not liberty either, man he just cant win this arguement.

The conservative wing of the Democratic party supported those things..until the civil rights act..then they became Republicans.

It was the Liberal wing of the Whigs..that formed the Republican party.

 

[Toro]

Isn't that guy the head of a union?

 

[flacaltenn]

Gee Flaylo___

I thought from the title we were get to agree about govt/Corp collusion being a bad thing. And how we should all work to make markets free-er and politicians less corrupt.. But instead the OP misses the WHOLE POINT of where the corporate primacy comes from... Instead -- it ends up to be a screwed up emotional screed of how much worse the REPS are...

So dissapointing that the OP DIDN'T discuss all those corp handouts, subsidies, favorable law-making, etc.. Wonder why that is? Could it still be too close to discovering how DEMS use Govt/Corp collusion to reward their own? Nawwwww.....

 

[kaz]

corporate

Liberals crack me up with the "corporate" bogey man. Businesses are people. But you put the word "corporate" and then it turns in your shallow minds into Nightmare on Elm Street. Businesses can't make you do business with them, government can. Businesses can't use the force of guns, government can. But government you trust, and business is the bogey man.

 

[flacaltenn]

corporate

Liberals crack me up with the "corporate" bogey man. Businesses are people. But you put the word "corporate" and then it turns in your shallow minds into Nightmare on Elm Street. Businesses can't make you do business with them, government can. Businesses can't use the force of guns, government can. But government you trust, and business is the bogey man.

Some of these people sound like they've been raped by Safeway recently.. Or had their car keyed by WalMart..

 

[bripat9643]

...it comes down to this: Do Americans want a government of the people by the people for the people, one conceived in liberty and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal?

So you're saying Democrats support individual liberty and are dedicated to the proposition of equality? Really? What proof do you have of that?

Do Repugs? WTF?

Everything libturds in Congress vote for is an assault on the Constitution.

 

[JoeNormal]

corporate

Liberals crack me up with the "corporate" bogey man. Businesses are people. But you put the word "corporate" and then it turns in your shallow minds into Nightmare on Elm Street. Businesses can't make you do business with them, government can. Businesses can't use the force of guns, government can. But government you trust, and business is the bogey man.

Common argument but it's not true. You use the product of countless corporations you've never even heard of because they produce items that are needed by the ones you're aware of.

 

[flacaltenn]

corporate

Liberals crack me up with the "corporate" bogey man. Businesses are people. But you put the word "corporate" and then it turns in your shallow minds into Nightmare on Elm Street. Businesses can't make you do business with them, government can. Businesses can't use the force of guns, government can. But government you trust, and business is the bogey man.

Common argument but it's not true. You use the product of countless corporations you've never even heard of because they produce items that are needed by the ones you're aware of.

Say WHAT?? Because that weedeater you bought last week has parts from different companies in it --- you're somehow getting screwed????

 

[JoeNormal]

Leo W. Gerard: Corporate Primacy Causes People Poverty




Well fucking said!

That in a nutshell sums it all up.

Ok, since liberals are crazy, explain to me why this is a burn, he had some luck, ok, he used roads like everyone else, ok, he inherited money, ok (never see the kennedys ripped about that one). So tell me why I should care about that?

There's saying that's popular within the conservative community that goes: correlation does not equal causation. I think it's ironic that they never apply this concept to the correlation between effort and reward. Once the minimum level of effort is exerted, success becomes as much a function of luck and timing as it is of talent and dedication.

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

Oh boy.. a new Huff 'n Puff Compost thread from FailBlowMe.