SSDD
Gold Member
- Nov 6, 2012
- 16,672
- 1,965
- 280
Earlier this year, the usual suspects were making posts about a catastrophic coral bleaching event involving the Great Barrier Reef. It was just one more opportunity for what we call scientists to demonstrate that their education is profoundly lacking and that the press and alarmists are just as clueless and willing to spout any sort of nonsense so long as it supports the CAGW narrative.
Lets revisit some of the comments that were made, both by "scientists" and the alarmist wack jobs on this board.
This thread was started by coyote: Two Thirds of the Great Barrier Reef Bleached
Prof Terry Hughes, who led the surveys, said the length of time coral needed to recover – about 10 years for fast-growing types – raised serious concerns about the increasing frequency of mass bleaching events.
Here is a good one....
I said: "And when the reef is recovered in a year or so...it will be something else and something else and something else...how many times do the envirowackos get to cry wolf before you weenies wake up to the fact that you are being played?"
To which old rocks replied: "SSo DDumb, ever hear of links? Or do you realize that you are so full of shit that there are no credible links for your nonsense."
Clearly rocks is the one who is so full of shit that it is running out of his ears.
This thread was started by crick: 95% of Great Barrier Reef, norther section, bleached
This one is a classic posted by sealyboo
"These same people want to ban abortion and stop providing birth control to the masses as if they want the population to increase not decrease.
I hope poor people have no kids or fewer. I hope middle class people have fewer kids. I hope poor Indians Africans and Arabs stop having so many kids. We are a parasite on this planet. The Pacific ocean is a toilet bowl."
This is what rolling thunder had to say regarding the level headed skeptics who had the nerve to say it has all happened before
" This thread is a classic example of their efforts and success in taking the debate way off-topic from the information about the increasing pace of coral bleaching and die-offs that was brought up in the OP, and derailing the OP topic into random irrelevant nonsense."
Here is crick chiming to defend pseudoscience everywhere:
"All of us on the side of normal intelligence and mainstream science have repeated over and over again that the problem isn't the absolute CO2 levels, the absolute temperatures or the absolute pH values to be reached, but the RATE at which they are changing. I've explained that over and over again. Mamooth, Rolling Thunder, Old Rocks, Isaac Newton and virtually every non-denier to visit this board has explained it REPEATEDLY. And yet, when I made a comment obliquely referencing the point, I get astonished queries that tells us that our readers H A V E - N O T - G O T - I T."
Here is a thread started by one of our new wack jobs...sciencerocks.
Great Barrier Reef scientists confirm largest die-off of corals recorded
Here is crick: Due to global warming.
Again...crick chimes in on science...
"Laboratory studies have long ago clearly shown at what temperatures corals thrive and at what temperatures corals die. Guess what dipwad?"
Guess what crick...your pseudoscience is quite wrong...AGAIN...
And I could go on and on and on...thread after thread proclaiming doom...and even extinction...skeptics pointing out that corals evolved when temperatures were much warmer and that the reef would recover in a year or so...wakos completely ignoring the facts in favor of alarmism...well...guess what?...it hasn't even been a year and pseudoscientists are "surprised" at how fast the reef is recovering while actual scientists and those of us who bother to look at the facts aren't in the least bit surprised that the coral is recovering...we said as much when the doomsayers were lamenting the modeled warming that never happened.
Great Barrier Reef shows signs of recovery after coral bleaching
Scientists surprised that reef that survived the hotter holocene is already recovering from 2016 bleaching « JoNova
Aussie Coral Reef Rises from the Dead
How climate scientists mislead the world about the Great Barrier Reef
Lets revisit some of the comments that were made, both by "scientists" and the alarmist wack jobs on this board.
This thread was started by coyote: Two Thirds of the Great Barrier Reef Bleached
Prof Terry Hughes, who led the surveys, said the length of time coral needed to recover – about 10 years for fast-growing types – raised serious concerns about the increasing frequency of mass bleaching events.
Here is a good one....
I said: "And when the reef is recovered in a year or so...it will be something else and something else and something else...how many times do the envirowackos get to cry wolf before you weenies wake up to the fact that you are being played?"
To which old rocks replied: "SSo DDumb, ever hear of links? Or do you realize that you are so full of shit that there are no credible links for your nonsense."
Clearly rocks is the one who is so full of shit that it is running out of his ears.
This thread was started by crick: 95% of Great Barrier Reef, norther section, bleached
This one is a classic posted by sealyboo
"These same people want to ban abortion and stop providing birth control to the masses as if they want the population to increase not decrease.
I hope poor people have no kids or fewer. I hope middle class people have fewer kids. I hope poor Indians Africans and Arabs stop having so many kids. We are a parasite on this planet. The Pacific ocean is a toilet bowl."
This is what rolling thunder had to say regarding the level headed skeptics who had the nerve to say it has all happened before
" This thread is a classic example of their efforts and success in taking the debate way off-topic from the information about the increasing pace of coral bleaching and die-offs that was brought up in the OP, and derailing the OP topic into random irrelevant nonsense."
Here is crick chiming to defend pseudoscience everywhere:
"All of us on the side of normal intelligence and mainstream science have repeated over and over again that the problem isn't the absolute CO2 levels, the absolute temperatures or the absolute pH values to be reached, but the RATE at which they are changing. I've explained that over and over again. Mamooth, Rolling Thunder, Old Rocks, Isaac Newton and virtually every non-denier to visit this board has explained it REPEATEDLY. And yet, when I made a comment obliquely referencing the point, I get astonished queries that tells us that our readers H A V E - N O T - G O T - I T."
Here is a thread started by one of our new wack jobs...sciencerocks.
Great Barrier Reef scientists confirm largest die-off of corals recorded
Here is crick: Due to global warming.
Again...crick chimes in on science...
"Laboratory studies have long ago clearly shown at what temperatures corals thrive and at what temperatures corals die. Guess what dipwad?"
Guess what crick...your pseudoscience is quite wrong...AGAIN...
And I could go on and on and on...thread after thread proclaiming doom...and even extinction...skeptics pointing out that corals evolved when temperatures were much warmer and that the reef would recover in a year or so...wakos completely ignoring the facts in favor of alarmism...well...guess what?...it hasn't even been a year and pseudoscientists are "surprised" at how fast the reef is recovering while actual scientists and those of us who bother to look at the facts aren't in the least bit surprised that the coral is recovering...we said as much when the doomsayers were lamenting the modeled warming that never happened.
Great Barrier Reef shows signs of recovery after coral bleaching
Scientists surprised that reef that survived the hotter holocene is already recovering from 2016 bleaching « JoNova
Aussie Coral Reef Rises from the Dead
How climate scientists mislead the world about the Great Barrier Reef
