Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I don't think it was temporary insanity.... the guy had mental issues for a while and should not have been allowed to garnish a gun....Could be temp, mental condition. It would be a good defense.Zimmerman 2.0
No comparison. Zimmerman broke off his stalking. Martin caught up with him and attacked, at which point the responsibility became his.
This guy was pushed to the ground (provocation could be argued), and that was it. The attack stopped. He drew and killed the guy without cause.
Not necessary.Could be temp, mental condition. It would be a good defense.Zimmerman 2.0
No comparison. Zimmerman broke off his stalking. Martin caught up with him and attacked, at which point the responsibility became his.
This guy was pushed to the ground (provocation could be argued), and that was it. The attack stopped. He drew and killed the guy without cause.
then he should have gotten up and pushed him back...not shoot the guy....but then he knew he would have gotten his ass kicked....Good. Asshole deserves to be punished for what he did over a fucking parking space.
Drejka was shoved to the ground by McGlockton. Isn't that battery?
Zimmerman 2.0
No comparison. Zimmerman broke off his stalking. Martin caught up with him and attacked, at which point the responsibility became his.
This guy was pushed to the ground (provocation could be argued), and that was it. The attack stopped. He drew and killed the guy without cause.
Both were deemed justified by investigators only to have politically motivated prosecutors champion the case for political reasons only to have their ass handed to them at trail and putting an innocent man through that.
Zimmerman was justified.
This other guy was not. Keep in mind that there is no one more pro-gun and self-defense than I am.
Zimmerman 2.0
No comparison. Zimmerman broke off his stalking. Martin caught up with him and attacked, at which point the responsibility became his.
This guy was pushed to the ground (provocation could be argued), and that was it. The attack stopped. He drew and killed the guy without cause.
Both were deemed justified by investigators only to have politically motivated prosecutors champion the case for political reasons only to have their ass handed to them at trail and putting an innocent man through that.
Zimmerman was justified.
This other guy was not. Keep in mind that there is no one more pro-gun and self-defense than I am.
Zimmerman was not justified.
Justice may get served in the case of man being shot defending his girlfriend that parked in handicap spot.
White man charged with fatally shooting black man in Florida | My Connection from Cox
Zimmerman 2.0
Zimmerman 2.0
No comparison. Zimmerman broke off his stalking. Martin caught up with him and attacked, at which point the responsibility became his.
This guy was pushed to the ground (provocation could be argued), and that was it. The attack stopped. He drew and killed the guy without cause.
Both were deemed justified by investigators only to have politically motivated prosecutors champion the case for political reasons only to have their ass handed to them at trail and putting an innocent man through that.
Zimmerman was justified.
This other guy was not. Keep in mind that there is no one more pro-gun and self-defense than I am.
Zimmerman was not justified.
Zimmerman 2.0
No comparison. Zimmerman broke off his stalking. Martin caught up with him and attacked, at which point the responsibility became his.
This guy was pushed to the ground (provocation could be argued), and that was it. The attack stopped. He drew and killed the guy without cause.
Both were deemed justified by investigators only to have politically motivated prosecutors champion the case for political reasons only to have their ass handed to them at trail and putting an innocent man through that.
Zimmerman was justified.
This other guy was not. Keep in mind that there is no one more pro-gun and self-defense than I am.
Nex thing ya know, anyone that shoves or pushes someone else will be shot. Its bullshit. Dude was a pussy. Dude shoved him and he SHOT HIM. IF the guy was making a move to hurt him further..possibly self defense would come into play. But the guy didn't. He pushed, pansy ass fell down, pulled his gun when dude was backing up, and SHOT HIM.
Fucker needs to be in jail.
it didnt look that way to me....according to the story i read.....McGlockton leaving the store, walking toward Drejka and shoving him with both hands. Drejka lands on his back and McGlockton takes a step toward him. Drejka sits up, pulls his gun and points it at McGlockton, who takes three steps back until he is about 12 feet away (3.6 meters). Drejka fires, hitting McGlockton, who runs back into the store clutching his chest....if i was on the jury the guy is guilty....then he should have gotten up and pushed him back...not shoot the guy....but then he knew he would have gotten his ass kicked....Good. Asshole deserves to be punished for what he did over a fucking parking space.
Drejka was shoved to the ground by McGlockton. Isn't that battery?
According to the story, Drejka was shoved to the ground by McGlockton. McGlockton continued toward Drejka. Drejka sat up, pulled his weapon and fired. One has to expect this in a stand your ground state and a gun happy society such as the United States.
If that is all verified...that sounds like premeditated murder.I don't think it was temporary insanity.... the guy had mental issues for a while and should not have been allowed to garnish a gun....Could be temp, mental condition. It would be a good defense.Zimmerman 2.0
No comparison. Zimmerman broke off his stalking. Martin caught up with him and attacked, at which point the responsibility became his.
This guy was pushed to the ground (provocation could be argued), and that was it. The attack stopped. He drew and killed the guy without cause.
from the op link...
In court documents, McCabe and Pinellas sheriff's Detective George Moffett cited three other drivers who said Drejka threatened them during confrontations that preceded his run-in with McGlockton. Two of them said he displayed a gun.
A black man who drives a septic truck told Moffett he parked in the same handicapped-accessible spot three months before McGlockton's shooting, the documents show. The man said Drejka began yelling at him and said he would shoot him. The driver said he left, but as he pulled away Drejka shouted racial slurs. The man's boss told Moffett that Drejka later called, telling him "that he was lucky he didn't blow his employee's head off."
In separate 2012 cases, drivers reported that Drejka waved a gun at them during road rage confrontations. In both cases, officers stopped Drejka and found a gun in his car, but he denied showing it to the other drivers.
The jury found him guilty of Murder 2...the prosecution over charged.Zimmerman 2.0
No comparison. Zimmerman broke off his stalking. Martin caught up with him and attacked, at which point the responsibility became his.
This guy was pushed to the ground (provocation could be argued), and that was it. The attack stopped. He drew and killed the guy without cause.
Both were deemed justified by investigators only to have politically motivated prosecutors champion the case for political reasons only to have their ass handed to them at trail and putting an innocent man through that.
Zimmerman was justified.
This other guy was not. Keep in mind that there is no one more pro-gun and self-defense than I am.
Zimmerman was not justified.
The jury seemed to think so.
it didnt look that way to me....according to the story i read.....McGlockton leaving the store, walking toward Drejka and shoving him with both hands. Drejka lands on his back and McGlockton takes a step toward him. Drejka sits up, pulls his gun and points it at McGlockton, who takes three steps back until he is about 12 feet away (3.6 meters). Drejka fires, hitting McGlockton, who runs back into the store clutching his chest....if i was on the jury the guy is guilty....then he should have gotten up and pushed him back...not shoot the guy....but then he knew he would have gotten his ass kicked....Good. Asshole deserves to be punished for what he did over a fucking parking space.
Drejka was shoved to the ground by McGlockton. Isn't that battery?
According to the story, Drejka was shoved to the ground by McGlockton. McGlockton continued toward Drejka. Drejka sat up, pulled his weapon and fired. One has to expect this in a stand your ground state and a gun happy society such as the United States.
how far was he away from the guy before he began stepping back?......it didnt look that way to me....according to the story i read.....McGlockton leaving the store, walking toward Drejka and shoving him with both hands. Drejka lands on his back and McGlockton takes a step toward him. Drejka sits up, pulls his gun and points it at McGlockton, who takes three steps back until he is about 12 feet away (3.6 meters). Drejka fires, hitting McGlockton, who runs back into the store clutching his chest....if i was on the jury the guy is guilty....then he should have gotten up and pushed him back...not shoot the guy....but then he knew he would have gotten his ass kicked....Good. Asshole deserves to be punished for what he did over a fucking parking space.
Drejka was shoved to the ground by McGlockton. Isn't that battery?
According to the story, Drejka was shoved to the ground by McGlockton. McGlockton continued toward Drejka. Drejka sat up, pulled his weapon and fired. One has to expect this in a stand your ground state and a gun happy society such as the United States.
Three steps back is 12 feet?
The jury found him guilty of Murder 2...the prosecution over charged.No comparison. Zimmerman broke off his stalking. Martin caught up with him and attacked, at which point the responsibility became his.
This guy was pushed to the ground (provocation could be argued), and that was it. The attack stopped. He drew and killed the guy without cause.
Both were deemed justified by investigators only to have politically motivated prosecutors champion the case for political reasons only to have their ass handed to them at trail and putting an innocent man through that.
Zimmerman was justified.
This other guy was not. Keep in mind that there is no one more pro-gun and self-defense than I am.
Zimmerman was not justified.
The jury seemed to think so.
how far was he away from the guy before he began stepping back?......it didnt look that way to me....according to the story i read.....McGlockton leaving the store, walking toward Drejka and shoving him with both hands. Drejka lands on his back and McGlockton takes a step toward him. Drejka sits up, pulls his gun and points it at McGlockton, who takes three steps back until he is about 12 feet away (3.6 meters). Drejka fires, hitting McGlockton, who runs back into the store clutching his chest....if i was on the jury the guy is guilty....then he should have gotten up and pushed him back...not shoot the guy....but then he knew he would have gotten his ass kicked....Drejka was shoved to the ground by McGlockton. Isn't that battery?
According to the story, Drejka was shoved to the ground by McGlockton. McGlockton continued toward Drejka. Drejka sat up, pulled his weapon and fired. One has to expect this in a stand your ground state and a gun happy society such as the United States.
Three steps back is 12 feet?
