Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
He’s not pointing out facts. He’s making an argument. A bad one.Dershowitz is first and foremost a Defense Lawyer who will say whatever it takes to get his client off the charges. Just ask OJ and Epstein.
Trump is really not his client. He doesn't work for Trump. Explaining the Constitution and the founders intent is not saying anything, it's saying a lot.
Okay, so the Republicans don't really need Dershowitz. But what happens after the Senate votes against the impeachment? Do you really think the Democrats are going to go on CNN, and say "Well it was a fair trial, we just have to live with the outcome????" I'll bet my dollar to your dime that won't happen no matter what. However with Dershowitz testimony, it's at least some defense against their expected reaction.
He is part of the Trump defense team.
By pointing out constitutional facts only???
That is what he was hired to do, point out the constitutional facts that help Trump.
CNN isn't even trying to hide their contemptible bias against Trump by asking his lawyer, who is a well-known liberal and former Harvard professor Alan Dershowitz, "Just who's side are you on"?
Dershowitz is no longer a liberal. He is now a wholly owned property of Faux noise. He is no longer allowed to have his own opinions, only theirs, and his sole job is to find ways to justify them through the manipulation of the legal system.
CNN isn't even trying to hide their contemptible bias against Trump by asking his lawyer, who is a well-known liberal and former Harvard professor Alan Dershowitz, "Just who's side are you on"?
Dershowitz is no longer a liberal. He is now a wholly owned property of Faux noise. He is no longer allowed to have his own opinions, only theirs, and his sole job is to find ways to justify them through the manipulation of the legal system.
Faux News is owned by foreign liberals after all.
So....they're batting for your team anyway.
Yes. He claims that it requires criminal violations to be impeached. He’s arguing against himself from 20 years ago. It’s clearly not what the founders intended. Sorry it’s ambiguous but it’s not possible to write a code of law that encompasses all possible abuses of power for the president given their unique situation.He’s not pointing out facts. He’s making an argument. A bad one.Trump is really not his client. He doesn't work for Trump. Explaining the Constitution and the founders intent is not saying anything, it's saying a lot.
Okay, so the Republicans don't really need Dershowitz. But what happens after the Senate votes against the impeachment? Do you really think the Democrats are going to go on CNN, and say "Well it was a fair trial, we just have to live with the outcome????" I'll bet my dollar to your dime that won't happen no matter what. However with Dershowitz testimony, it's at least some defense against their expected reaction.
He is part of the Trump defense team.
By pointing out constitutional facts only???
That is what he was hired to do, point out the constitutional facts that help Trump.
How is it bad when he's pointing out that they discussed abuse of power, and decided not to include that in the articles of impeachment. He also pointed out that such an ambiguous charge could apply to just about any past President. You call that a bad argument?
Yes. He claims that it requires criminal violations to be impeached. He’s arguing against himself from 20 years ago. It’s clearly not what the founders intended. Sorry it’s ambiguous but it’s not possible to write a code of law that encompasses all possible abuses of power for the president given their unique situation.He’s not pointing out facts. He’s making an argument. A bad one.He is part of the Trump defense team.
By pointing out constitutional facts only???
That is what he was hired to do, point out the constitutional facts that help Trump.
How is it bad when he's pointing out that they discussed abuse of power, and decided not to include that in the articles of impeachment. He also pointed out that such an ambiguous charge could apply to just about any past President. You call that a bad argument?
Technically we don't have a free press anymore.....they are owned by the Democrat Party and their donors.Wow.
Journalism was my minor in college. This is such a huge nono.
Dem's have owned the press since the 1960's. The biased press only came out of the closet (e.g. stopped pretending to be fare and balanced) after Bush whooped their ass twice in a row, then all bets were off. Today they are openly over the top in the tank for Democrats. They lie, tell half truths, spin, twist, rush false stories to air without fact checking, whatever it takes to RIG elections in favor of Democrats.
Yes. He claims that it requires criminal violations to be impeached. He’s arguing against himself from 20 years ago. It’s clearly not what the founders intended. Sorry it’s ambiguous but it’s not possible to write a code of law that encompasses all possible abuses of power for the president given their unique situation.He’s not pointing out facts. He’s making an argument. A bad one.He is part of the Trump defense team.
By pointing out constitutional facts only???
That is what he was hired to do, point out the constitutional facts that help Trump.
How is it bad when he's pointing out that they discussed abuse of power, and decided not to include that in the articles of impeachment. He also pointed out that such an ambiguous charge could apply to just about any past President. You call that a bad argument?
CNN isn't even trying to hide their contemptible bias against Trump by asking his lawyer, who is a well-known liberal and former Harvard professor Alan Dershowitz, "Just who's side are you on"?
Dershowitz is no longer a liberal. He is now a wholly owned property of Faux noise. He is no longer allowed to have his own opinions, only theirs, and his sole job is to find ways to justify them through the manipulation of the legal system.
Faux News is owned by foreign liberals after all.
So....they're batting for your team anyway.
Wrong. Fox news is the only part Murdoch didn't sell.
CNN isn't even trying to hide their contemptible bias against Trump by asking his lawyer, who is a well-known liberal and former Harvard professor Alan Dershowitz, "Just who's side are you on"?
Dershowitz is no longer a liberal. He is now a wholly owned property of Faux noise. He is no longer allowed to have his own opinions, only theirs, and his sole job is to find ways to justify them through the manipulation of the legal system.
Faux News is owned by foreign liberals after all.
So....they're batting for your team anyway.
Wrong. Fox news is the only part Murdoch didn't sell.
Murdoch is an Australian born naturalized citizen. He isn't an American native.
His sons took over Fox and they're living in the UK.
Tony Blair is Godfather to one of his kids.
CNN isn't even trying to hide their contemptible bias against Trump by asking his lawyer, who is a well-known liberal and former Harvard professor Alan Dershowitz, "Just who's side are you on"?
Dershowitz is no longer a liberal. He is now a wholly owned property of Faux noise. He is no longer allowed to have his own opinions, only theirs, and his sole job is to find ways to justify them through the manipulation of the legal system.
Faux News is owned by foreign liberals after all.
So....they're batting for your team anyway.
Wrong. Fox news is the only part Murdoch didn't sell.
Murdoch is an Australian born naturalized citizen. He isn't an American native.
His sons took over Fox and they're living in the UK.
Tony Blair is Godfather to one of his kids.
And? They still aren't "foreign liberals".
Murdoch and family have lived in the states since the 70s.Oh......so people who where born and live in foreign countries and are citizens of those countries aren't foreigners now???And? They still aren't "foreign liberals".Murdoch is an Australian born naturalized citizen. He isn't an American native.Wrong. Fox news is the only part Murdoch didn't sell.Faux News is owned by foreign liberals after all.Dershowitz is no longer a liberal. He is now a wholly owned property of Faux noise. He is no longer allowed to have his own opinions, only theirs, and his sole job is to find ways to justify them through the manipulation of the legal system.
So....they're batting for your team anyway.
His sons took over Fox and they're living in the UK.
Tony Blair is Godfather to one of his kids.
That's news to me!!!
Good thing they all help Trump.Dershowitz is a dyed in wool Democrat. If he says what the President did is not impeachable, what more credibility can we have than that?
Dershowitz is first and foremost a Defense Lawyer who will say whatever it takes to get his client off the charges. Just ask OJ and Epstein.
Trump is really not his client. He doesn't work for Trump. Explaining the Constitution and the founders intent is not saying anything, it's saying a lot.
Okay, so the Republicans don't really need Dershowitz. But what happens after the Senate votes against the impeachment? Do you really think the Democrats are going to go on CNN, and say "Well it was a fair trial, we just have to live with the outcome????" I'll bet my dollar to your dime that won't happen no matter what. However with Dershowitz testimony, it's at least some defense against their expected reaction.
He is part of the Trump defense team.
By pointing out constitutional facts only???
That is what he was hired to do, point out the constitutional facts that help Trump.
