C_Clayton_Jones
Diamond Member
Have you read DC v. Heller and McDonald v. Chicago.Actually no, it doesn't.
The right to bear arms is the right to be in the militia.
There's no point in having a right to carry arms around, it serves no purpose that would have got it into the Bill of Rights.
It's hard to believe people are still stuck on the militia idiocy.
It's hard to believe that someone will reply to a post without knowing what the fuck they're talking about....
But happens all the time, doesn't it? And you've just added to the huge pile of shitty posts.
Though, here's the difference between you and me, I can back my argument up with lots of evidence, you can't.
Oh, well.Actually no, it doesn't.
The right to bear arms is the right to be in the militia.
There's no point in having a right to carry arms around, it serves no purpose that would have got it into the Bill of Rights.
It's hard to believe people are still stuck on the militia idiocy.
It's hard to believe that someone will reply to a post without knowing what the fuck they're talking about....
But happens all the time, doesn't it? And you've just added to the huge pile of shitty posts.
Though, here's the difference between you and me, I can back my argument up with lots of evidence, you can't.
Oh, well.
Yep I'm amazed that lefty doesn't understand what a militia is, or was. I guess history and civics aren't important to the ignorant.
Actually I understand perfectly.
The reality is you're making massive assumptions based on nothing. And you keep hammering something when you have no idea what you're hammering.
You've decided you know what I know, and you're arguing that. It's rather common for people to do this, and it's ridiculous. Can you not see that you have no idea what my position is? You just assume you know it.
Have you read what the Co-sponsors of the second amendment said about it?
Have you read what the Federalist papers have to say about the second amendment?
Have you learned what the meaning of the word Militia meant in the 1700's?
You have some research to do.......................
Do you understand that the Supreme Court alone determines what the Constitution means, including the Second Amendment, not the Federalist Papers or other primary source documents.
Clearly you're the one who needs to do some research.