conspiracy vs coincidence

Discussion in 'Conspiracy Theories' started by tommywho70x, May 25, 2010.

  1. tommywho70x
    Offline

    tommywho70x BANNED

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2010
    Messages:
    826
    Thanks Received:
    59
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +59
    it seems to me that it is has become easier and easier to dismiss just about anything as just another silly conspiracy theory by the mentally unbalanced.

    the author, robert anton wilson, gave what seemed to me the most reasonable argument in favor of looking past the standard spin on events when he stated that world-shaping events rarely occur by accident or at the hand of only one man.

    the mozarts and einsteins of the world are the exception. most things that happen, require the concerted actions of more than one person, which by definition, is a conspiracy.

    he goes on to assert that conspiracy is what makes the world go round --- that all corporations are conspiracies by their very nature --- totally open and above board, but a conspiracy.

    he also made some brilliant observations about secret conspiracies. he says that the most important aspect of planning a secret operation is the development of a cover story to protect the principals in the event of exposure. mark lane calls that "plausible deniability"

    it just seems highly improbable to me that every high profile assassination in the united states was a random act by a nut acting alone. too easy.

    it has also become too easy to just write off anybody's arguments suggesting a conspiracy to be nuts.
     
  2. LA RAM FAN
    Offline

    LA RAM FAN Gold Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2008
    Messages:
    20,797
    Thanks Received:
    923
    Trophy Points:
    205
    Ratings:
    +2,761
    great post.Yeah Mark lane in his book Plausible Denial does an outstanding job of showing how governments invent a cover story to protect their story they sell to the american people such as 9/11,the kennedy assassination,oklahoma city,ect ect and how its planned in such secrecy with nothing written down so that the top players involved can claim plausible deniability.

    What cracks me up about many of the official conspiracy theory apologists for 9/11 is many of them dont even know what a conspiracy means.:lol::lol: I have seen many of them say 9/11 was not a conspiracy.:lol:cracks me up on their ignorance because even if you accept the official theory of the governments that 19 muslins were behind the attacks,9/11 IS a conspiracy because there were twoo or more people involved.therefore since at least two people were involved,its a conspiracy.:lol::cuckoo: the official version isnt like the kennedy assassination were the governments version was it was some lone nut involved.Now in THAT case it would be appropritate to say it wasnt a conspiracy if you buy into the fairy tales of the warren commission that oswald was the lone assassin.

    what cracks me up about the people who accept the government versions of 9/11 and the kennedy assassination is that in both cases,to accept them,you have to say that the laws of physics that scientists have gone by for thousands of years now no longer applies anymore.:lol:

    The government labels people who dont accept the official versions of their cases conspiracy theorists,will to accept their version of events in both cases,you got to be a "COINCIDENCE THEORIST." because to accept it you got to believe in all these bizarre wierd coincidences that people have bought into.:lol:

    oh and welcome to USMB.
     
  3. Fizz
    Offline

    Fizz BANNED

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2009
    Messages:
    4,391
    Thanks Received:
    345
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +349
    saddam was behind the OKC bombing.... not the usa.
     
  4. tommywho70x
    Offline

    tommywho70x BANNED

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2010
    Messages:
    826
    Thanks Received:
    59
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +59
    thanks for digging my brain fart.

    we've been getting bushwhacked. ike called the shot and we have just bellied up to the bar with them.

    poppy bush and his pals have been putting it over on us since dealey plaza.

    he was in dallas that day and he allegedly made a few million off some insurance underwriting paper on the wtc that he bought shortly before 9/11.

    even the day that it happened was likely to have been chosen carefully for the psychological effect on americans already mentally conditioned to associate those numbers with emergency.
     
  5. tommywho70x
    Offline

    tommywho70x BANNED

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2010
    Messages:
    826
    Thanks Received:
    59
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +59
    so, the usa was behind saddam
     
  6. LA RAM FAN
    Offline

    LA RAM FAN Gold Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2008
    Messages:
    20,797
    Thanks Received:
    923
    Trophy Points:
    205
    Ratings:
    +2,761
    so very true.what people dont get is Bush sr is a dictater.He has been running the country since his days of Vice President Under Reagan.Him and Clinton have been long time buddies dating back to at least the early 80's.While Clinton was president,he was getting his orders from Bush same with Bush jr.

    Politicians from different partys are like pro wrestlers,in the ring they pretend to hate each other but outside the ring they are buddy buddy chums who hang out for a few beers together.same with politicians.Clinton has been photographed golfing and fishing with the Bush's.Matter of fact Barbara Bush has said he is like a second son to her and you are so right,Poppy Bush was heavily involved in the Kennedy assassination.That was his reward for his involvement.First CIA director,then the oval office.

    btw what did you mean in your first sentence there?
     
    Last edited: May 26, 2010
  7. tommywho70x
    Offline

    tommywho70x BANNED

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2010
    Messages:
    826
    Thanks Received:
    59
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +59
    brain fart?

    a post that is at least built around an original idea as opposed to a whack and cut job done on an article or video.
     
  8. Fizz
    Offline

    Fizz BANNED

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2009
    Messages:
    4,391
    Thanks Received:
    345
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +349
    not in 1995 :cuckoo:
     
  9. tommywho70x
    Offline

    tommywho70x BANNED

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2010
    Messages:
    826
    Thanks Received:
    59
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +59
    that's just what they would like you to believe.

    it probably wouldn't surprise me to learn that somebody was covertly running saddam right up until the day they pulled him from his hole.
     
  10. Shorebreak
    Offline

    Shorebreak Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2009
    Messages:
    395
    Thanks Received:
    102
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Ratings:
    +102
    Yup. It turns out that during interrogation he also fessed up to 9/11, the Lockerbie Bombing, the Lindbergh kidnapping, the attempted assisination of Pope John Paul II, The Bolshevik Revolution, and the great potato famine, plus he took full responsibility for the TV show CHIP's being pulled off the air, basically ending Eric Estrada's acting career.

    And some people say waterboarding isn't effective.
     

Share This Page