Conservatives like to blame the government for our economic problems, but the blame must go...

[Kosh]

And you have been answered far left drone..

So in other words you have no idea?

AS posted it was answered when you asked then far left drone..

If your far left programming would not accept it then, it definitely will not accept now.

Now here is hint for you: The far left is what you voted twice and support without hesitation or question.

Humor me then. If the answer is so obvious I'm sure you could just explain it.

It has been far left drone, but you did not accept then and you certainly will not accept now. Case and point my hint!

Please show all the policies that you agree with that reside outside of the far left.

Here is another hint: Your title shows that you are far left!

Just admit you don't have an answer.

Just admit you are a far left drone..

The answers have been given over and over again even with hints. Proof that the far left drones can not see anything beyond their programming!

 

[Billy000]

So in other words you have no idea?

AS posted it was answered when you asked then far left drone..

If your far left programming would not accept it then, it definitely will not accept now.

Now here is hint for you: The far left is what you voted twice and support without hesitation or question.

Humor me then. If the answer is so obvious I'm sure you could just explain it.

It has been far left drone, but you did not accept then and you certainly will not accept now. Case and point my hint!

Please show all the policies that you agree with that reside outside of the far left.

Here is another hint: Your title shows that you are far left!

Just admit you don't have an answer.

Just admit you are a far left drone..

The answers have been given over and over again even with hints. Proof that the far left drones can not see anything beyond their programming!

Oh I feel sorry for you really.

 

[Kosh]

AS posted it was answered when you asked then far left drone..

If your far left programming would not accept it then, it definitely will not accept now.

Now here is hint for you: The far left is what you voted twice and support without hesitation or question.

Humor me then. If the answer is so obvious I'm sure you could just explain it.

It has been far left drone, but you did not accept then and you certainly will not accept now. Case and point my hint!

Please show all the policies that you agree with that reside outside of the far left.

Here is another hint: Your title shows that you are far left!

Just admit you don't have an answer.

Just admit you are a far left drone..

The answers have been given over and over again even with hints. Proof that the far left drones can not see anything beyond their programming!

Oh I feel sorry for you really.

Says the far left drone that can not see answer that are right in front them, including in their own title.

Just admit you are a far left drone..

 

[Billy000]

Humor me then. If the answer is so obvious I'm sure you could just explain it.

It has been far left drone, but you did not accept then and you certainly will not accept now. Case and point my hint!

Please show all the policies that you agree with that reside outside of the far left.

Here is another hint: Your title shows that you are far left!

Just admit you don't have an answer.

Just admit you are a far left drone..

The answers have been given over and over again even with hints. Proof that the far left drones can not see anything beyond their programming!

Oh I feel sorry for you really.

Says the far left drone that can not see answer that are right in front them, including in their own title.

Just admit you are a far left drone..

Sure, I'll admit I'm a "far left drone" as soon as you give me a detailed description on the difference between the far left and moderate left.

 

[Kosh]

It has been far left drone, but you did not accept then and you certainly will not accept now. Case and point my hint!

Please show all the policies that you agree with that reside outside of the far left.

Here is another hint: Your title shows that you are far left!

Just admit you don't have an answer.

Just admit you are a far left drone..

The answers have been given over and over again even with hints. Proof that the far left drones can not see anything beyond their programming!

Oh I feel sorry for you really.

Says the far left drone that can not see answer that are right in front them, including in their own title.

Just admit you are a far left drone..

Sure, I'll admit I'm a "far left drone" as soon as you give me a detailed description on the difference between the far left and moderate left.

Already have with hints and your very own title, not to mention your sig.

Now admit you are a far left drone..

 

[TheGreatGatsby]

...to the job creators themselves.

Sure, government COULD hinder job growth, but it really doesn't currently. Regulations, for instance, have an insignificant effect on job growth. The BLS statistics prove that. Revenue as a percentage of GDP is near the historic low. Of course high taxes on the wealthy historically does very little to hinder growth. In the 50s the tax percentage on the wealthy was signficantly higher and we still had great growth.

Let's look at the facts. Corporate profits are at an all time high. The wealthy are wealthier than EVER BEFORE. Where is the outrage at these people? Why don't they invest in a stronger labor force? Wel gee it's obviously because they only care about themselves. If the mimum wage in one state is $8.00, you can damn well bet they will pay it to their entry level workers despite the fact that people can't fucking live off of it.

The truth is that government can do a lot to help economic growth and cutting taxes for the wealthy and throwing away regulations isn't the way to do it. Boosting consumer demand is how you grow the economy. Tax cuts for the middle class is one. Raising the minimum wage is another. Any jobs lost from this (which would be small depending on how high you raised it) would be regained and more with the boost to consumer spending from the poor. Giving unemoyment benefits to those who really need it boosts demand. As a short term strategy, boosting food stamps will stimulate the economy as well (like it or not it does).

God I wish liberals could take over. New and improved democrats would be great.

Fuck republicans.

You wouldn't have to worry about the minimum wage at all if you got rid of all the waste building taxes and other artificial costs of lame regulations. You'd save more of your money and have cheaper goods to boot....

 

[NYcarbineer]

I find it sad how the losertrians oppose cutting taxes for the middle class. They're stooges for the super rich...That hate investing in this country.

I thought the talking point was that 47% don't pay any federal income tax, and that was some sort of a problem that needed to be fixed;

it would be 'fixed' only by raising taxes. And that would include the middle class.

Make up your minds.

 

[NYcarbineer]

...to the job creators themselves.

Sure, government COULD hinder job growth, but it really doesn't currently. Regulations, for instance, have an insignificant effect on job growth. The BLS statistics prove that. Revenue as a percentage of GDP is near the historic low. Of course high taxes on the wealthy historically does very little to hinder growth. In the 50s the tax percentage on the wealthy was signficantly higher and we still had great growth.

Let's look at the facts. Corporate profits are at an all time high. The wealthy are wealthier than EVER BEFORE. Where is the outrage at these people? Why don't they invest in a stronger labor force? Wel gee it's obviously because they only care about themselves. If the mimum wage in one state is $8.00, you can damn well bet they will pay it to their entry level workers despite the fact that people can't fucking live off of it.

The truth is that government can do a lot to help economic growth and cutting taxes for the wealthy and throwing away regulations isn't the way to do it. Boosting consumer demand is how you grow the economy. Tax cuts for the middle class is one. Raising the minimum wage is another. Any jobs lost from this (which would be small depending on how high you raised it) would be regained and more with the boost to consumer spending from the poor. Giving unemoyment benefits to those who really need it boosts demand. As a short term strategy, boosting food stamps will stimulate the economy as well (like it or not it does).

God I wish liberals could take over. New and improved democrats would be great.

Fuck republicans.

You wouldn't have to worry about the minimum wage at all if you got rid of all the waste building taxes and other artificial costs of lame regulations. You'd save more of your money and have cheaper goods to boot....

Where in the world is that happening?

 

[NYcarbineer]

It has been far left drone, but you did not accept then and you certainly will not accept now. Case and point my hint!

Please show all the policies that you agree with that reside outside of the far left.

Here is another hint: Your title shows that you are far left!

Just admit you don't have an answer.

Just admit you are a far left drone..

The answers have been given over and over again even with hints. Proof that the far left drones can not see anything beyond their programming!

Oh I feel sorry for you really.

Says the far left drone that can not see answer that are right in front them, including in their own title.

Just admit you are a far left drone..

Sure, I'll admit I'm a "far left drone" as soon as you give me a detailed description on the difference between the far left and moderate left.

He's still working on 'shit' and 'shinola'.

 

[NYcarbineer]

So in other words you have no idea?

AS posted it was answered when you asked then far left drone..

If your far left programming would not accept it then, it definitely will not accept now.

Now here is hint for you: The far left is what you voted twice and support without hesitation or question.

Humor me then. If the answer is so obvious I'm sure you could just explain it.

It has been far left drone, but you did not accept then and you certainly will not accept now. Case and point my hint!

Please show all the policies that you agree with that reside outside of the far left.

Here is another hint: Your title shows that you are far left!

Just admit you don't have an answer.

Just admit you are a far left drone..

The answers have been given over and over again even with hints. Proof that the far left drones can not see anything beyond their programming!

Who programmed you to blurt out 'far left drone' a hundred times a day?

 

[NYcarbineer]

It has been far left drone, but you did not accept then and you certainly will not accept now. Case and point my hint!

Please show all the policies that you agree with that reside outside of the far left.

Here is another hint: Your title shows that you are far left!

Just admit you don't have an answer.

Just admit you are a far left drone..

The answers have been given over and over again even with hints. Proof that the far left drones can not see anything beyond their programming!

Oh I feel sorry for you really.

Says the far left drone that can not see answer that are right in front them, including in their own title.

Just admit you are a far left drone..

Sure, I'll admit I'm a "far left drone" as soon as you give me a detailed description on the difference between the far left and moderate left.

What's funniest is that he sounds like a school kid just trolling for attention and Kosh is actually in his 50's.

lol

 

[The Rabbi]

...to the job creators themselves.

Sure, government COULD hinder job growth, but it really doesn't currently. Regulations, for instance, have an insignificant effect on job growth. The BLS statistics prove that. Revenue as a percentage of GDP is near the historic low. Of course high taxes on the wealthy historically does very little to hinder growth. In the 50s the tax percentage on the wealthy was signficantly higher and we still had great growth.

Let's look at the facts. Corporate profits are at an all time high. The wealthy are wealthier than EVER BEFORE. Where is the outrage at these people? Why don't they invest in a stronger labor force? Wel gee it's obviously because they only care about themselves. If the mimum wage in one state is $8.00, you can damn well bet they will pay it to their entry level workers despite the fact that people can't fucking live off of it.

The truth is that government can do a lot to help economic growth and cutting taxes for the wealthy and throwing away regulations isn't the way to do it. Boosting consumer demand is how you grow the economy. Tax cuts for the middle class is one. Raising the minimum wage is another. Any jobs lost from this (which would be small depending on how high you raised it) would be regained and more with the boost to consumer spending from the poor. Giving unemoyment benefits to those who really need it boosts demand. As a short term strategy, boosting food stamps will stimulate the economy as well (like it or not it does).

God I wish liberals could take over. New and improved democrats would be great.

Fuck republicans.

Its another ignorant fucked up troll thread from Billy Triple O.
Hey, Billy. Workers are investments in business. Why arent companies investing their money in additional workers, since every worker produces a return to the company?
Oops. Guess you thought hiring someone was an act of charity. You thought that because you're an ignorant dumbshit.

 

[Kosh]

Just admit you don't have an answer.

Just admit you are a far left drone..

The answers have been given over and over again even with hints. Proof that the far left drones can not see anything beyond their programming!

Oh I feel sorry for you really.

Says the far left drone that can not see answer that are right in front them, including in their own title.

Just admit you are a far left drone..

Sure, I'll admit I'm a "far left drone" as soon as you give me a detailed description on the difference between the far left and moderate left.

What's funniest is that he sounds like a school kid just trolling for attention and Kosh is actually in his 50's.

lol

\Oh look another far left drone chimes in and shows how far to the left they truly are..

 

[Kosh]

AS posted it was answered when you asked then far left drone..

If your far left programming would not accept it then, it definitely will not accept now.

Now here is hint for you: The far left is what you voted twice and support without hesitation or question.

Humor me then. If the answer is so obvious I'm sure you could just explain it.

It has been far left drone, but you did not accept then and you certainly will not accept now. Case and point my hint!

Please show all the policies that you agree with that reside outside of the far left.

Here is another hint: Your title shows that you are far left!

Just admit you don't have an answer.

Just admit you are a far left drone..

The answers have been given over and over again even with hints. Proof that the far left drones can not see anything beyond their programming!

Who programmed you to blurt out 'far left drone' a hundred times a day?

Another prime example of far left drone programming where they agree with another. Even more proof that these two are far left drones.

 

[Fugazi]

But the blame must go,.......to ourselves.

We are so lazy nowadays, we want everyone else to take care of all our problems. While the government has a role to play, it cannot be looked to as the solution to everything.

Every time you buy something, it's like casting a vote. Information is power, and we have access to more of it than ever before, yet we still throw our hands up in the air, and claim we can't do anything about it.

Let's say raising the minimum wage is important to you, the next time you buy something, take 5 minutes online to find out, which company pays its employees the most, and buy from them.
Perhaps American jobs are important to you, find out which companies are outsourcing labor to other countries and don't buy product from them.

 

[Billy000]

...to the job creators themselves.

Sure, government COULD hinder job growth, but it really doesn't currently. Regulations, for instance, have an insignificant effect on job growth. The BLS statistics prove that. Revenue as a percentage of GDP is near the historic low. Of course high taxes on the wealthy historically does very little to hinder growth. In the 50s the tax percentage on the wealthy was signficantly higher and we still had great growth.

Let's look at the facts. Corporate profits are at an all time high. The wealthy are wealthier than EVER BEFORE. Where is the outrage at these people? Why don't they invest in a stronger labor force? Wel gee it's obviously because they only care about themselves. If the mimum wage in one state is $8.00, you can damn well bet they will pay it to their entry level workers despite the fact that people can't fucking live off of it.

The truth is that government can do a lot to help economic growth and cutting taxes for the wealthy and throwing away regulations isn't the way to do it. Boosting consumer demand is how you grow the economy. Tax cuts for the middle class is one. Raising the minimum wage is another. Any jobs lost from this (which would be small depending on how high you raised it) would be regained and more with the boost to consumer spending from the poor. Giving unemoyment benefits to those who really need it boosts demand. As a short term strategy, boosting food stamps will stimulate the economy as well (like it or not it does).

God I wish liberals could take over. New and improved democrats would be great.

Fuck republicans.

Its another ignorant fucked up troll thread from Billy Triple O.
Hey, Billy. Workers are investments in business. Why arent companies investing their money in additional workers, since every worker produces a return to the company?
Oops. Guess you thought hiring someone was an act of charity. You thought that because you're an ignorant dumbshit.

I've stopped listening to you a long time ago. Why do you bother?

 

[The Rabbi]

...to the job creators themselves.

Sure, government COULD hinder job growth, but it really doesn't currently. Regulations, for instance, have an insignificant effect on job growth. The BLS statistics prove that. Revenue as a percentage of GDP is near the historic low. Of course high taxes on the wealthy historically does very little to hinder growth. In the 50s the tax percentage on the wealthy was signficantly higher and we still had great growth.

Let's look at the facts. Corporate profits are at an all time high. The wealthy are wealthier than EVER BEFORE. Where is the outrage at these people? Why don't they invest in a stronger labor force? Wel gee it's obviously because they only care about themselves. If the mimum wage in one state is $8.00, you can damn well bet they will pay it to their entry level workers despite the fact that people can't fucking live off of it.

The truth is that government can do a lot to help economic growth and cutting taxes for the wealthy and throwing away regulations isn't the way to do it. Boosting consumer demand is how you grow the economy. Tax cuts for the middle class is one. Raising the minimum wage is another. Any jobs lost from this (which would be small depending on how high you raised it) would be regained and more with the boost to consumer spending from the poor. Giving unemoyment benefits to those who really need it boosts demand. As a short term strategy, boosting food stamps will stimulate the economy as well (like it or not it does).

God I wish liberals could take over. New and improved democrats would be great.

Fuck republicans.

Its another ignorant fucked up troll thread from Billy Triple O.
Hey, Billy. Workers are investments in business. Why arent companies investing their money in additional workers, since every worker produces a return to the company?
Oops. Guess you thought hiring someone was an act of charity. You thought that because you're an ignorant dumbshit.

I've stopped listening to you a long time ago. Why do you bother?

Translation: I get pwned by you like a little girl every time but I'll still post stupid shit
Yes, it's true Billy.

 

[Nyvin]

Humor me then. If the answer is so obvious I'm sure you could just explain it.

It has been far left drone, but you did not accept then and you certainly will not accept now. Case and point my hint!

Please show all the policies that you agree with that reside outside of the far left.

Here is another hint: Your title shows that you are far left!

Just admit you don't have an answer.

Just admit you are a far left drone..

The answers have been given over and over again even with hints. Proof that the far left drones can not see anything beyond their programming!

Who programmed you to blurt out 'far left drone' a hundred times a day?

Another prime example of far left drone programming where they agree with another. Even more proof that these two are far left drones.

Lol, agreeing with another is proof of something far left? What do conservatives do? Disagree on everything?

 

[Billy000]

It has been far left drone, but you did not accept then and you certainly will not accept now. Case and point my hint!

Please show all the policies that you agree with that reside outside of the far left.

Here is another hint: Your title shows that you are far left!

Just admit you don't have an answer.

Just admit you are a far left drone..

The answers have been given over and over again even with hints. Proof that the far left drones can not see anything beyond their programming!

Who programmed you to blurt out 'far left drone' a hundred times a day?

Another prime example of far left drone programming where they agree with another. Even more proof that these two are far left drones.

Lol, agreeing with another is proof of something far left? What do conservatives do? Disagree on everything?

He has absolutely no idea.

 

[BULLDOG]

kosh, I've asked you this before and I'll ask it again: what, to you, is the difference between the far left and moderate left?

And you have been answered far left drone..

So in other words you have no idea?

AS posted it was answered when you asked then far left drone..

If your far left programming would not accept it then, it definitely will not accept now.

Now here is hint for you: The far left is what you voted twice and support without hesitation or question.

Humor me then. If the answer is so obvious I'm sure you could just explain it.

It has been far left drone, but you did not accept then and you certainly will not accept now. Case and point my hint!

Please show all the policies that you agree with that reside outside of the far left.

Here is another hint: Your title shows that you are far left!

I haven't been able to find it either. Give me a hint where to find what you think is the difference. Is it some kind of secret?