Conservatives Have Hearts

Liberals also believe welfare should be a true hand up and not a hand-out. But you will never get a conservative to say that...

Liberal bashing by the right far outweighs anything liberals do or say...

Liberals also believe welfare should be a true hand up and not a hand-out. But you will never get a conservative to say that...

Liberal bashing by the right far outweighs anything liberals do or say...

How is giving people money rewarding bad behavior a "hand up?"

You may believe what you want, but the current execution results in people being stuck in the claws of government assistance.
How is being poor "bad behavior"? Is poverty a character flaw?

We pay mothers to have more kids they can't support, we pay drug addicts to keep relapsing, we pay lazy people to not work. we make it harder for them to improve themselves, because the benefits cut off when they make a certain amount of $$.

The whole system is designed to keep the poor poor, and voting democrat.
Let's work backwards. Do you really think that the poor vote in great numbers? If we get 40% of the eligible voters to the polls, it's thought of as a great turnout. I think this "the poor vote Democrat because of freebies" is a hollow argument.

And do you think the poor are lazy? They are working at jobs paying minimum wage, a wage Conservatives would hate to see raised! Do you think the poor are lazy, or are they poor because the 'job creators' packed up the factories and moved them to Latin America and Asia to avoid paying living wages and cleaning up the mess they make?

WE pay drug addicts who relapse? How about fully funding drug programs to help those addicts clean up once and for all?

And mothers having babies they cannot support? How about making access to women's health centers freer and easier so those poor women have options above and beyond public support?

You blame everything on the poor and accept no responsibility for the actions of Conservatives when you deny abortions, take jobs away from Americans, defund health clinics and ignore the havoc such policies leave behind.
 
Liberals also believe welfare should be a true hand up and not a hand-out. But you will never get a conservative to say that...

Liberal bashing by the right far outweighs anything liberals do or say...

Liberals also believe welfare should be a true hand up and not a hand-out. But you will never get a conservative to say that...

Liberal bashing by the right far outweighs anything liberals do or say...

How is giving people money rewarding bad behavior a "hand up?"

You may believe what you want, but the current execution results in people being stuck in the claws of government assistance.
How is being poor "bad behavior"? Is poverty a character flaw?

We pay mothers to have more kids they can't support, we pay drug addicts to keep relapsing, we pay lazy people to not work. we make it harder for them to improve themselves, because the benefits cut off when they make a certain amount of $$.

The whole system is designed to keep the poor poor, and voting democrat.
Let's work backwards. Do you really think that the poor vote in great numbers? If we get 40% of the eligible voters to the polls, it's thought of as a great turnout. I think this "the poor vote Democrat because of freebies" is a hollow argument.

And do you think the poor are lazy? They are working at jobs paying minimum wage, a wage Conservatives would hate to see raised! Do you think the poor are lazy, or are they poor because the 'job creators' packed up the factories and moved them to Latin America and Asia to avoid paying living wages and cleaning up the mess they make?

WE pay drug addicts who relapse? How about fully funding drug programs to help those addicts clean up once and for all?

And mothers having babies they cannot support? How about making access to women's health centers freer and easier so those poor women have options above and beyond public support?

You blame everything on the poor and accept no responsibility for the actions of Conservatives when you deny abortions, take jobs away from Americans, defund health clinics and ignore the havoc such policies leave behind.


YAWN

is there a left-winger alive that isnt an idiot incapable of making an argument or advancing a viewpoint without using straw man argments and hypocritical stereotyping of others?
 
Yeah sure, white Republican dude has a huge heart. Here's what he's offering ya...

He'll pay you the lowest wage possible, he'll Outsource your job whenever possible, and he'll replace you with Illegal Slave Labor whenever possible.

Buncha great guys no? Why wouldn't you vote for them?
 
Liberals also believe welfare should be a true hand up and not a hand-out. But you will never get a conservative to say that...

Liberal bashing by the right far outweighs anything liberals do or say...

Liberals also believe welfare should be a true hand up and not a hand-out. But you will never get a conservative to say that...

Liberal bashing by the right far outweighs anything liberals do or say...

How is giving people money rewarding bad behavior a "hand up?"

You may believe what you want, but the current execution results in people being stuck in the claws of government assistance.
How is being poor "bad behavior"? Is poverty a character flaw?

We pay mothers to have more kids they can't support, we pay drug addicts to keep relapsing, we pay lazy people to not work. we make it harder for them to improve themselves, because the benefits cut off when they make a certain amount of $$.

The whole system is designed to keep the poor poor, and voting democrat.
Let's work backwards. Do you really think that the poor vote in great numbers? If we get 40% of the eligible voters to the polls, it's thought of as a great turnout. I think this "the poor vote Democrat because of freebies" is a hollow argument.

And do you think the poor are lazy?
nobody said poor people are all lazy. are there lazy poor people? of course. are some of the poor poor BECAUSE they are lazy? of course. does the Left FOSTER laziness and a bad work ethic? OF COURSE
They are working at jobs paying minimum wage, a wage Conservatives would hate to see raised!
BECAUSE IT PUTS THOSE POOR PEOPLE OUT OF WORK. It's already happening; companies are looking to automate even more. try again
Do you think the poor are lazy, or are they poor because the 'job creators' packed up the factories and moved them to Latin America and Asia to avoid paying living wages and cleaning up the mess they make?
what's a living wage? meaningless catchphrase

WE pay drug addicts who relapse? How about fully funding drug programs to help those addicts clean up once and for all?
"fully funding"; another idiotic excuse for PROGRESSIVE FAILURE
And mothers having babies they cannot support? How about making access to women's health centers freer and easier so those poor women have options above and beyond public support?
MORE STUPIDITY; WHAT DOES A BOX OV CONDOMS COST? COMPREHENSIVE SEX EDUCATION IS AVAILABLE in areas where people are still getting abortions AND having babies they cant support

You blame everything on the poor and accept no responsibility for the actions of Conservatives when you deny abortions, take jobs away from Americans, defund health clinics and ignore the havoc such policies leave behind.

YAWN

NOBODY BLAMES THE POOR; WE BLAME YOU PANDERING PORGRESSIVE DOUCHEBAGS WHO CREATED THE ANYTHING GOES MINDSET.........................FOR VOTES
 
Yeah sure, white Republican dude has a huge heart. Here's what he's offering ya...

He'll pay you the lowest wage possible, he'll Outsource your job whenever possible, and he'll replace you with Illegal Slave Labor whenever possible.

Buncha great guys no? Why wouldn't you vote for them?


BECAUSE LEFT-WING LOSERS MADE THE POOREST POORER AND THE RICHEST RICHER?

just keeping it real for the leftardz out there
 
Conservatives believe........Give a man a fish and he will eat for a day, teach a man to fish and he will eat for a lifetime

But what do you do when there are no fish in the pond? Conservatives reply....not my problem
 
Why do we pay more to women who have more kids they can't afford? Why do we cut back benefits when the poor make more money, but not enough to support themselves? Why do we pay able bodied people to do nothing instead of shipping them off somewhere to work and maybe learn a trade?

"The simplest description of the War on Poverty is that it is a means of making life available for any and all pursuers. It does not try to make men good -- because that is moralizing. It does not try to give men what they want -- because that is catering. It does not try to give men false hopes -- because that is deception. Instead, the War on Poverty tries only to create the conditions by which the good life can be lived -- and that is humanism."
Robert Sargent "Sarge" Shriver, Jr.


Sounds like you would support the War on Poverty...the REAL one, not the false one characterization by conservatives...

Here are some FACTS for you on what the War on Poverty.

When President Kennedy's brother-in law Sargent Shriver accepted President Johnson's challenge and took on the 'War on Poverty' the first thing he discovered was rather startling and disturbing. Half of the Americans living in poverty were children. Another large segment were elderly and another segment were mentally and/or physically disabled. So a HUGE segment of the poor fit the TRUE definition of a dependent. So there is an obligation as a civil society to make sure those real dependents are not trampled on or extinguished.

To address some of the players in your fairy tale, voila! We have an unabashed flaming liberal...Sargent Shriver. But I hate to disappoint you. Sargent Shriver hated welfare and had no intention of creating a handout program. He didn't believe in handouts, he believed in community action, opportunity, responsibility, and empowerment.

The 'War on Poverty' was called the Office of Economic Opportunity. The core principles were opportunity, responsibility, community and empowerment. The program's goal was maximum feasible participation. One of the concepts of empowerment was poor people had a right to one-third of the seats on every local poverty program board. It was a community based program that focused on education as the keys to the city. Programs such as VISTA, Job Corps, Community Action Program, and Head Start were created to increase opportunity for the poor so they could pull themselves out of poverty with a hand UP, not a hand out. Even when Johnson effectively pulled the plug on the War on Poverty to fund the war in Vietnam, Shriver fought on and won. During the Shriver years more Americans got out of poverty than during any similar time in our history. (The Clinton years - employing the same philosophy - were the second best.) Ref

Here is one of the agencies created by the WOP...

Job Corps is a program administered by the United States Department of Labor that offers free-of-charge education and vocational training to youth ages 16 to 24.

Job Corps offers career planning, on-the-job training, job placement, residential housing, food service, driver's education, basic health and dental care, a bi-weekly basic living allowance and clothing allowance. Some centers offer childcare programs for single parents as well.

Besides vocational training, the Job Corps program also offers academic training, including basic reading and math, GED attainment, college preparatory, and Limited English Proficiency courses. Some centers also offer programs that allow students to remain in residence at their center while attending college.[citation needed] Job Corps provides career counseling and transition support to its students for up to one year after they graduate from the program.

Career paths

Career paths offered by Job Corps include:

Advanced manufacturing

Communication design
Drafting
Electronic assembly
Machine appliance repair
Machining
Welding
Manufacturing technology
Sign, billboard, and display

Automotive and machine repair

Automobile technician
General services technician
Collision repair and refinish
Heavy construction equipment mechanic
Diesel mechanic
Medium/heavy truck repair
Electronics tech
Stationary engineering

Construction

Bricklaying
Carpentry
Cement masonry
Concrete and terrazzo
Construction craft laborer
Electrical
Electrical overhead line
Facilities maintenance
Floor covering
Glazing
HVAC
Industrial engineering technician
Licensed electrician (bilingual)
Mechanical engineering technician
Painting
Plastering
Plumbing
Roto-Rooter plumbing
Tile setting

Extension programs

Advanced Career Training (ACT)
General Educational Development (GED)
Commercial driver's license (CDL)
Off-Center Training (OCT Program)
High school diploma (HSD Program)

Finance and Business

Accounting services
Business management
Clerical occupations
Legal secretary
Insurance and financial services
Marketing
Medical insurance specialist
Office administration
Paralegal
Purchasing

Health care/allied health professions

Clinical medical assistant
Dental assistant
EKG technician
Emergency medical technician
Exercise/massage therapy
Hemodialysis technician
Licensed practical/vocational nurse
Medical office support
Nurse assistant/home health aide
Opticianry
Pharmacy technician
Phlebotomy
Physical therapy assistant
Rehabilitation therapy
Rehabilitation technician
Registered nurse
Respiratory therapy
Sterile processing
Surgical technician

Homeland security

Corrections officer
Seamanship
Security and protective services

Hospitality

Culinary arts
Hotel and lodging

Information technology

A+ Microsoft MSCE
Computer Networking/Cisco
Computer systems administrator
Computer support specialist
Computer technician
Integrated system tech
Network cable installation
Visual communications

Renewable resources and energy

Forest conservation and urban forestry
Firefighting
Wastewater
Landscaping

Retail sales and services

Behavioral health aide
Criminal justice
Child development
Residential advisor
Cosmetology
Retail sales

Transportation

Asphalt paving
Material and distribution operations
Clerical occupations
Heavy equipment operations
Roustabout operator
Heavy truck driving
TCU administrative clerk
 
Yeah sure, white Republican dude has a huge heart. Here's what he's offering ya...

He'll pay you the lowest wage possible, he'll Outsource your job whenever possible, and he'll replace you with Illegal Slave Labor whenever possible.

Buncha great guys no? Why wouldn't you vote for them?


BECAUSE LEFT-WING LOSERS MADE THE POOREST POORER AND THE RICHEST RICHER?

just keeping it real for the leftardz out there

Real nice Platform y'all got there. What's not to like? Yeah, i would say you guys won't be sniffing the White House anytime soon.
 
Liberals also believe welfare should be a true hand up and not a hand-out. But you will never get a conservative to say that...

Liberal bashing by the right far outweighs anything liberals do or say...

Liberals also believe welfare should be a true hand up and not a hand-out. But you will never get a conservative to say that...

Liberal bashing by the right far outweighs anything liberals do or say...

How is giving people money rewarding bad behavior a "hand up?"

You may believe what you want, but the current execution results in people being stuck in the claws of government assistance.
How is being poor "bad behavior"? Is poverty a character flaw?

We pay mothers to have more kids they can't support, we pay drug addicts to keep relapsing, we pay lazy people to not work. we make it harder for them to improve themselves, because the benefits cut off when they make a certain amount of $$.

The whole system is designed to keep the poor poor, and voting democrat.
Let's work backwards. Do you really think that the poor vote in great numbers? If we get 40% of the eligible voters to the polls, it's thought of as a great turnout. I think this "the poor vote Democrat because of freebies" is a hollow argument.

And do you think the poor are lazy?
nobody said poor people are all lazy. are there lazy poor people? of course. are some of the poor poor BECAUSE they are lazy? of course. does the Left FOSTER laziness and a bad work ethic? OF COURSE
They are working at jobs paying minimum wage, a wage Conservatives would hate to see raised!
BECAUSE IT PUTS THOSE POOR PEOPLE OUT OF WORK. It's already happening; companies are looking to automate even more. try again
Do you think the poor are lazy, or are they poor because the 'job creators' packed up the factories and moved them to Latin America and Asia to avoid paying living wages and cleaning up the mess they make?
what's a living wage? meaningless catchphrase

WE pay drug addicts who relapse? How about fully funding drug programs to help those addicts clean up once and for all?
"fully funding"; another idiotic excuse for PROGRESSIVE FAILURE
And mothers having babies they cannot support? How about making access to women's health centers freer and easier so those poor women have options above and beyond public support?
MORE STUPIDITY; WHAT DOES A BOX OV CONDOMS COST? COMPREHENSIVE SEX EDUCATION IS AVAILABLE in areas where people are still getting abortions AND having babies they cant support

You blame everything on the poor and accept no responsibility for the actions of Conservatives when you deny abortions, take jobs away from Americans, defund health clinics and ignore the havoc such policies leave behind.

YAWN

NOBODY BLAMES THE POOR; WE BLAME YOU PANDERING PORGRESSIVE DOUCHEBAGS WHO CREATED THE ANYTHING GOES MINDSET.........................FOR VOTES

Nah, you do blame the poor and struggling workers for everything. You've been brainwashed on Corporate Propaganda B.S.
 
'My house shall be called a house of prayer; but you are making it a Robber's Den' -Jesus Christ.

That's what the greedy hateful white Republican dudes are doing to our Nation. But most of em actually believe they're 'Good Christians.' Boy are they lost.
The money-changers will like the guy in the OP about as much as they did Jesus that day.

The left only supports thing when it pushes the anti capatalist agenda. This is why the new pope is so popular with the left and we see a new wave of support for Christianity among the left. It's just a means to an end.
The new Pope is popular because he's damn near a Christian, which means of course, your side doesn't like him...

Incredible isn't it. The first Pope in eons that is actually close to be a Christian in thought AND DEED and conservatives around the world hate this guy.

Much as they hated the guy he tries to emulate.

Good example is, i talked to a greedy white Republican dude the other day, and he was bitchin & moanin about his Taxes going to Public Schools. He went on ranting & raving about leaving his area because of the Taxes going to more schools. He felt he shouldn't pay Taxes on schools because his kids were grown up and out of school.

So after listening to the Bullshit for awhile, i asked him a simple question, 'How were your kids' educations paid for?' Well he stammered and stumbled along, but then finally told me his kids went to Public Schools and one even received Government entitlements to go to College.

I then said to him, 'Oh, you mean it was ok for everyone to pay for your kids' educations, but you're extremely offended & outraged you're paying?' He didn't say much after that. That's your typical greedy hateful white Republican dude. It's a 'Too bad for you. I got mine. Go fuck yourself' mentality. Jesus is not proud of them.


You failed Creative Writing for Partisan Racists 101, didn't you?
 
This is something liberals will instant attack. We suck up to greedy corporations and want to leave the poor without their rightful backup. Want more defense spending? We're warmongers. On and on it goes.


So, what does a conservative do to combat it – other than simply ignoring it?


This article - How to Make the Case to Liberals That Conservatives Have Hearts, Too @ Making the Case to Liberals That Conservatives Have Hearts Too provides some good tips.


Check out this video @

Making sure that welfare is a true hand up and not a hand-out is, in fact, the true compassionate stance.


As conservatives, we know that our policies help provide opportunity for all. But we can never assume others know that. It’s time to take “heart”—and make sure they do.


Originally published in the ED FEULNER Creating a case for conservatism - Washington Times


Out of all that, this guy said liberal policies are bad, conservative policies are good, and since my wife and I adopted a Chinese girl, all poor people should become conservatives. That is priceless, and I'm sure it will move a lot of conservatives. He should have just said that we need to get rid of the minimum wage and all welfare so poor people can learn to make it on their own working a $3 per hour job. The problem with conservatives and their ideas when it comes to the poor is that it is extremely rare that they have ever been poor or known anyone who really was poor. Growing up poor with parents who really don't care about their kids' futures puts these people at an extreme disadvantage, and getting out from under that is not easy, with or without the help of government assistance. For the most part, everyone here grew up not being poor. For conservatives who grew up not being poor, it's easy to believe since they are self sufficient then everyone else should be able to be also, because it's really not that hard. But again, it is that hard when you grow up poor with less than an adequate education, with gangs trying to recruit you, and with a view of life that the hood is all there is. That is reality for many of these people. This guy is actually clueless.
 
How is giving people money rewarding bad behavior a "hand up?"

You may believe what you want, but the current execution results in people being stuck in the claws of government assistance.
How is being poor "bad behavior"? Is poverty a character flaw?

We pay mothers to have more kids they can't support, we pay drug addicts to keep relapsing, we pay lazy people to not work. we make it harder for them to improve themselves, because the benefits cut off when they make a certain amount of $$.

The whole system is designed to keep the poor poor, and voting democrat.
Let's work backwards. Do you really think that the poor vote in great numbers? If we get 40% of the eligible voters to the polls, it's thought of as a great turnout. I think this "the poor vote Democrat because of freebies" is a hollow argument.

And do you think the poor are lazy?
nobody said poor people are all lazy. are there lazy poor people? of course. are some of the poor poor BECAUSE they are lazy? of course. does the Left FOSTER laziness and a bad work ethic? OF COURSE
They are working at jobs paying minimum wage, a wage Conservatives would hate to see raised!
BECAUSE IT PUTS THOSE POOR PEOPLE OUT OF WORK. It's already happening; companies are looking to automate even more. try again
Do you think the poor are lazy, or are they poor because the 'job creators' packed up the factories and moved them to Latin America and Asia to avoid paying living wages and cleaning up the mess they make?
what's a living wage? meaningless catchphrase

WE pay drug addicts who relapse? How about fully funding drug programs to help those addicts clean up once and for all?
"fully funding"; another idiotic excuse for PROGRESSIVE FAILURE
And mothers having babies they cannot support? How about making access to women's health centers freer and easier so those poor women have options above and beyond public support?
MORE STUPIDITY; WHAT DOES A BOX OV CONDOMS COST? COMPREHENSIVE SEX EDUCATION IS AVAILABLE in areas where people are still getting abortions AND having babies they cant support

You blame everything on the poor and accept no responsibility for the actions of Conservatives when you deny abortions, take jobs away from Americans, defund health clinics and ignore the havoc such policies leave behind.

YAWN

NOBODY BLAMES THE POOR; WE BLAME YOU PANDERING PORGRESSIVE DOUCHEBAGS WHO CREATED THE ANYTHING GOES MINDSET.........................FOR VOTES

Nah, you do blame the poor and struggling workers for everything. You've been brainwashed on Corporate Propaganda B.S.
you have nothing to back that up; but actual facts never stopped you from making a fool of yourself
 
This is something liberals will instant attack. We suck up to greedy corporations and want to leave the poor without their rightful backup. Want more defense spending? We're warmongers. On and on it goes.


So, what does a conservative do to combat it – other than simply ignoring it?


This article - How to Make the Case to Liberals That Conservatives Have Hearts, Too @ Making the Case to Liberals That Conservatives Have Hearts Too provides some good tips.


Check out this video @

Making sure that welfare is a true hand up and not a hand-out is, in fact, the true compassionate stance.


As conservatives, we know that our policies help provide opportunity for all. But we can never assume others know that. It’s time to take “heart”—and make sure they do.


Originally published in the ED FEULNER Creating a case for conservatism - Washington Times


Out of all that, this guy said liberal policies are bad, conservative policies are good, and since my wife and I adopted a Chinese girl, all poor people should become conservatives. That is priceless, and I'm sure it will move a lot of conservatives. He should have just said that we need to get rid of the minimum wage and all welfare so poor people can learn to make it on their own working a $3 per hour job. The problem with conservatives and their ideas when it comes to the poor is that it is extremely rare that they have ever been poor or known anyone who really was poor. Growing up poor with parents who really don't care about their kids' futures puts these people at an extreme disadvantage, and getting out from under that is not easy, with or without the help of government assistance. For the most part, everyone here grew up not being poor. For conservatives who grew up not being poor, it's easy to believe since they are self sufficient then everyone else should be able to be also, because it's really not that hard. But again, it is that hard when you grow up poor with less than an adequate education, with gangs trying to recruit you, and with a view of life that the hood is all there is. That is reality for many of these people. This guy is actually clueless.


you think you've been arond more poor people lil ol conservative me?

i find you left-wing losers to be laughable. you left-wing nutjobs love to accuse others of not having facts; yet you can never begin to back your main assertion that "it is extremely rare that they have ever been poor or known anyone who really was poor.". GO AHEAD AND TRY; I'LL WAIT OK?

WHAT would left-wingers do if they have to have a shred of credibility and try making a point without using straw men, demanding to dictate the parameters of every issue with their false narratives?
 
Yeah sure, white Republican dude has a huge heart. Here's what he's offering ya...

He'll pay you the lowest wage possible, he'll Outsource your job whenever possible, and he'll replace you with Illegal Slave Labor whenever possible.

Buncha great guys no? Why wouldn't you vote for them?


BECAUSE LEFT-WING LOSERS MADE THE POOREST POORER AND THE RICHEST RICHER?

just keeping it real for the leftardz out there

Real nice Platform y'all got there. What's not to like? Yeah, i would say you guys won't be sniffing the White House anytime soon.


it would be great if you were man enough to say what part of that isnt true lefrard; or how it's so bad to say the truth?
i'll wait................
 
This is something liberals will instant attack. We suck up to greedy corporations and want to leave the poor without their rightful backup. Want more defense spending? We're warmongers. On and on it goes.


So, what does a conservative do to combat it – other than simply ignoring it?


This article - How to Make the Case to Liberals That Conservatives Have Hearts, Too @ Making the Case to Liberals That Conservatives Have Hearts Too provides some good tips.


Check out this video @

Making sure that welfare is a true hand up and not a hand-out is, in fact, the true compassionate stance.


As conservatives, we know that our policies help provide opportunity for all. But we can never assume others know that. It’s time to take “heart”—and make sure they do.


Originally published in the ED FEULNER Creating a case for conservatism - Washington Times


Out of all that, this guy said liberal policies are bad, conservative policies are good, and since my wife and I adopted a Chinese girl, all poor people should become conservatives. That is priceless, and I'm sure it will move a lot of conservatives. He should have just said that we need to get rid of the minimum wage and all welfare so poor people can learn to make it on their own working a $3 per hour job. The problem with conservatives and their ideas when it comes to the poor is that it is extremely rare that they have ever been poor or known anyone who really was poor. Growing up poor with parents who really don't care about their kids' futures puts these people at an extreme disadvantage, and getting out from under that is not easy, with or without the help of government assistance. For the most part, everyone here grew up not being poor. For conservatives who grew up not being poor, it's easy to believe since they are self sufficient then everyone else should be able to be also, because it's really not that hard. But again, it is that hard when you grow up poor with less than an adequate education, with gangs trying to recruit you, and with a view of life that the hood is all there is. That is reality for many of these people. This guy is actually clueless.



your description of the environment of gangs and underperforming schools is the status quo of virtually almost every liberal-run city in the USA. HOW REVEALING that you would rather create a false narrative that Republicans hate all the products of an environment the Left created and is helpless to do anything about; rather than take responsiblity for your failed ideology
 
Last edited:
This is something liberals will instant attack. We suck up to greedy corporations and want to leave the poor without their rightful backup. Want more defense spending? We're warmongers. On and on it goes.


So, what does a conservative do to combat it – other than simply ignoring it?


This article - How to Make the Case to Liberals That Conservatives Have Hearts, Too @ Making the Case to Liberals That Conservatives Have Hearts Too provides some good tips.


Check out this video @

Making sure that welfare is a true hand up and not a hand-out is, in fact, the true compassionate stance.


As conservatives, we know that our policies help provide opportunity for all. But we can never assume others know that. It’s time to take “heart”—and make sure they do.


Originally published in the ED FEULNER Creating a case for conservatism - Washington Times


Out of all that, this guy said liberal policies are bad, conservative policies are good, and since my wife and I adopted a Chinese girl, all poor people should become conservatives. That is priceless, and I'm sure it will move a lot of conservatives. He should have just said that we need to get rid of the minimum wage and all welfare so poor people can learn to make it on their own working a $3 per hour job. The problem with conservatives and their ideas when it comes to the poor is that it is extremely rare that they have ever been poor or known anyone who really was poor. Growing up poor with parents who really don't care about their kids' futures puts these people at an extreme disadvantage, and getting out from under that is not easy, with or without the help of government assistance. For the most part, everyone here grew up not being poor. For conservatives who grew up not being poor, it's easy to believe since they are self sufficient then everyone else should be able to be also, because it's really not that hard. But again, it is that hard when you grow up poor with less than an adequate education, with gangs trying to recruit you, and with a view of life that the hood is all there is. That is reality for many of these people. This guy is actually clueless.



you're description of the environment of gangs and underperforming schools is the status quo of virtually almost every liberal-run city in the USA. HOW REVEALING that you would rather create a false narrative that Republicans hate all the products of an environment the Left created and is helpless to do anything about; rather than take responsiblity for your failed ideology


There is no ideology on my part. Welfare programs have drawbacks, but the idea that we should gut welfare completely, which pretty much is the conservative mantra, is fool's gold. Cons continually tell us that welfare keeps poor people poor, and that they should all go get a job and work for a living. You tell us this at the same time you tell us that there are no jobs and the unemployment rate is really 20%. If anyone is stuck on ideology it is conservatives who believe getting rid of the safety net would actually be good for everyone.
 
Conservatives believe........Give a man a fish and he will eat for a day, teach a man to fish and he will eat for a lifetime

But what do you do when there are no fish in the pond? Conservatives reply....not my problem



and right there is the Left's message; that there are no fish in the pond


way to give people hope leftard?

(or do you actually BELIEVE there are no fish in the pond?)

pandering Progressive douchebags, just pathetic
 
This is something liberals will instant attack. We suck up to greedy corporations and want to leave the poor without their rightful backup. Want more defense spending? We're warmongers. On and on it goes.


So, what does a conservative do to combat it – other than simply ignoring it?


This article - How to Make the Case to Liberals That Conservatives Have Hearts, Too @ Making the Case to Liberals That Conservatives Have Hearts Too provides some good tips.


Check out this video @

Making sure that welfare is a true hand up and not a hand-out is, in fact, the true compassionate stance.


As conservatives, we know that our policies help provide opportunity for all. But we can never assume others know that. It’s time to take “heart”—and make sure they do.


Originally published in the ED FEULNER Creating a case for conservatism - Washington Times


Out of all that, this guy said liberal policies are bad, conservative policies are good, and since my wife and I adopted a Chinese girl, all poor people should become conservatives. That is priceless, and I'm sure it will move a lot of conservatives. He should have just said that we need to get rid of the minimum wage and all welfare so poor people can learn to make it on their own working a $3 per hour job. The problem with conservatives and their ideas when it comes to the poor is that it is extremely rare that they have ever been poor or known anyone who really was poor. Growing up poor with parents who really don't care about their kids' futures puts these people at an extreme disadvantage, and getting out from under that is not easy, with or without the help of government assistance. For the most part, everyone here grew up not being poor. For conservatives who grew up not being poor, it's easy to believe since they are self sufficient then everyone else should be able to be also, because it's really not that hard. But again, it is that hard when you grow up poor with less than an adequate education, with gangs trying to recruit you, and with a view of life that the hood is all there is. That is reality for many of these people. This guy is actually clueless.



you're description of the environment of gangs and underperforming schools is the status quo of virtually almost every liberal-run city in the USA. HOW REVEALING that you would rather create a false narrative that Republicans hate all the products of an environment the Left created and is helpless to do anything about; rather than take responsiblity for your failed ideology


There is no ideology on my part. Welfare programs have drawbacks, but the idea that we should gut welfare completely, which pretty much is the conservative mantra, is fool's gold. Cons continually tell us that welfare keeps poor people poor, and that they should all go get a job and work for a living. You tell us this at the same time you tell us that there are no jobs and the unemployment rate is really 20%. If anyone is stuck on ideology it is conservatives who believe getting rid of the safety net would actually be good for everyone.



"there is no ideology on my part"

um yea; this is the part where i dismiss you
 
Yeah sure, white Republican dude has a huge heart. Here's what he's offering ya...

He'll pay you the lowest wage possible, he'll Outsource your job whenever possible, and he'll replace you with Illegal Slave Labor whenever possible.

Buncha great guys no? Why wouldn't you vote for them?


BECAUSE LEFT-WING LOSERS MADE THE POOREST POORER AND THE RICHEST RICHER?

just keeping it real for the leftardz out there

Real nice Platform y'all got there. What's not to like? Yeah, i would say you guys won't be sniffing the White House anytime soon.


it would be great if you were man enough to say what part of that isnt true lefrard; or how it's so bad to say the truth?
i'll wait................

Sorry, but paying Americans the lowest wages possible, Outsourcing their jobs whenever possible, replacing them with Illegal Slave Labor, just isn't a very appealing Platform. You guys are in trouble. Why should Americans be voting for you?
 

Forum List

Back
Top