Conservatives and the Power of Overly Positive Thinking

still stalking people?

:evil:


And she has the facking nerve to say I'm obsessed with here when all she does is troll me in every thread I make bitching about HP.

She used to be my personal stalker, but when her contract was up, she left for greener pastures. :lol:

caliboil.png

Liar. In fact, the opposite is true. You have consistently whined for attention... and I have, for the most part, ignored your attention seeking.

Key evidence: which one of us has gone to the trouble of creating attention seeking artwork about the other? Hmmmmmm. Yea.... that'll be you, Dainty. Carry on... you're meaningless drivel is meaningless.
 
Wow Dante...she nailed your sorry ass.
And it deserved it.
How can you be so foolish to refer to her as a stalker when you have your sig all about her?
LMAO.....you got hit and it was deserved.
 
Wow Dante...she nailed your sorry ass.
And it deserved it.
How can you be so foolish to refer to her as a stalker when you have your sig all about her?
LMAO.....you got hit and it was deserved.


She nailed Dante? this shat is a broken record among rightwingers on this forum, since no one believes your shat you have to turn to each other.
 
And she has the facking nerve to say I'm obsessed with here when all she does is troll me in every thread I make bitching about HP.

She used to be my personal stalker, but when her contract was up, she left for greener pastures. :lol:

caliboil.png

Liar. In fact, the opposite is true. You have consistently whined for attention... and I have, for the most part, ignored your attention seeking.

Key evidence: which one of us has gone to the trouble of creating attention seeking artwork about the other? Hmmmmmm. Yea.... that'll be you, Dainty. Carry on... you're meaningless drivel is meaningless.

In wingnut world, "responding to every post he makes" is how wingnuts "ignored your attention seeking". In the real world, I've never seen someone pay so much attention to someone they were ignoring
 
:lol: You start hundreds of threads.... each one linking to the HuffyPuffy and accuse me of trolling. That's some funneh shiat rite there. :lol:

still stalking people?

:evil:


And she has the facking nerve to say I'm obsessed with here when all she does is troll me in every thread I make bitching about HP.
You know when you have their number (zero)...like cowardly skinhead klans and cowardly ghetto gangs, they will attack in pairs or groups...

Wow Dante...she nailed your sorry ass.
And it deserved it.
How can you be so foolish to refer to her as a stalker when you have your sig all about her?
LMAO.....you got hit and it was deserved.

http://www.usmessageboard.com/polit...f-overly-positive-thinking-2.html#post3008947

http://www.usmessageboard.com/polit...f-overly-positive-thinking-2.html#post3009056
 
She used to be my personal stalker, but when her contract was up, she left for greener pastures. :lol:

caliboil.png

Liar. In fact, the opposite is true. You have consistently whined for attention... and I have, for the most part, ignored your attention seeking.

Key evidence: which one of us has gone to the trouble of creating attention seeking artwork about the other? Hmmmmmm. Yea.... that'll be you, Dainty. Carry on... you're meaningless drivel is meaningless.

In wingnut world, "responding to every post he makes" is how wingnuts "ignored your attention seeking". In the real world, I've never seen someone pay so much attention to someone they were ignoring

Please provide evidence that I have ever said I was ignoring anyone. You can't, of course, because the evidence doesn't exist. I don't ignore - but I do ridicule those who earn ridicule by their own consistent stupidity.

FYI: Fail&Go announced his dramatic exit from the board some time ago... (and even posted it on my profile page just to make sure I knew)... and yet he is still here. :lol:
 
Liar. In fact, the opposite is true. You have consistently whined for attention... and I have, for the most part, ignored your attention seeking.

Key evidence: which one of us has gone to the trouble of creating attention seeking artwork about the other? Hmmmmmm. Yea.... that'll be you, Dainty. Carry on... you're meaningless drivel is meaningless.

In wingnut world, "responding to every post he makes" is how wingnuts "ignored your attention seeking". In the real world, I've never seen someone pay so much attention to someone they were ignoring

Please provide evidence that I have ever said I was ignoring anyone. You can't, of course, because the evidence doesn't exist. I don't ignore - but I do ridicule those who earn ridicule by their own consistent stupidity.

FYI: Fail&Go announced his dramatic exit from the board some time ago... (and even posted it on my profile page just to make sure I knew)... and yet he is still here. :lol:

You don't ignore?? Really??

and I have, for the most part, ignored your attention seeking.

So you DO ignore?? Right?? Except when you DON'T ignore?? Right?? Because you never ignore, right?? Except when you ignored his attention seeking (which you never do) :lol::lol::lol:
 
Wow Dante...she nailed your sorry ass.
And it deserved it.
How can you be so foolish to refer to her as a stalker when you have your sig all about her?
LMAO.....you got hit and it was deserved.


She nailed Dante? this shat is a broken record among rightwingers on this forum, since no one believes your shat you have to turn to each other.

Lol...sort of like you just did for Dante?
LMAO...we are all assholes.
 
And there you go trolling again.

:lol: You start hundreds of threads.... each one linking to the HuffyPuffy and accuse me of trolling. That's some funneh shiat rite there. :lol:

You're trolling me so technically that makes you a troll.

And you're trolling the entire board with continuous bullshit HuffyPuffy opinion links.... (and trying to post them as 'fact')... that plus the fact that you are who you are... makes you not only a fucking troll but a stupid fucking troll
 
FROM THE ARTICLE:

In the midst of the worst recession since the Great Depression, we have the GOP coming out against extending unemployment benefits. Before Christmas.

Members of the GOP proclaim that they'll vote against raising the debt ceiling, which would effectively bankrupt the United States of America.

New Speaker of the House John Boehner has moved to shut down the Congressional Ethics Office.

Grover Norquist, influential head of the conservative Americans for Tax Reform, has suggested that shutting down the government would be good for the GOP.

Republicans are holding off tax breaks for all Americans so that the wealthiest 2% of Americans can get their taxes lowered for income over $250,000. And add $700 billion to the budget deficit which Republicans say they want to eliminate.

Roger Ailes, head of the "fair and balanced" Fox News has called the President of the United States a far left "socialist," described NPR executives as "of course Nazis," and declared that Jon Stewart was "crazy."

------------------------------------------------------------

The real problem here is the "liberal" news networks refuse to expose the Republicans on their positions. Listed above is a partial list of those positions. Not even right wingers on the USMB would dare to deny it. In fact, most are proud of those positions.

Network news has become a series of "fluff" feelgood stories, leaving networks such as "Fox" reporting that the president is spending 200 million dollars A DAY on a single trip. And the Fox base believes that nonsense. Why? Because they have been conditioned to believe honest reporting from days gone by.

Only a total moron could possibly believe the president could spend 200 million dollars a day on a "trip". Oh, sorry Republicans. I didn't mean to call you.....Well, if the shoe fits......

Thanks for doing the work of quoting the article, I may disagree with you but at least you took a bit of time to do something anyone who starts a thread should be required to do, quote what is relevant or makes the point they wish.

Too many people here simply link to an article, pretty lazy, sorry if this is critical of anyone who has supported my threads or posts, but fact is, I am not going to take the time to follow a link unless a portion of the article is quoted and commented on. If I feel this way others do as well.

I know the president did spend over 200 million on the trip per day, one must remember our military is pretty expensive.

Uh, gee, I hate to break the news to you, but Afghanistan costs 190 million dollars a day. That's 10 million LESS than his trip?

So how many tens of thousands of troops did he take along with him?

You know that saying the president spent 200 million a day on a trip to Asia puts you squarely in the middle of "delusional retarded fucking moron"? I hate to be cruel and shatter delusions, but if the shoe fits.......

This is why I feel pity for......
 
And there you go trolling again.

:lol: You start hundreds of threads.... each one linking to the HuffyPuffy and accuse me of trolling. That's some funneh shiat rite there. :lol:

You're trolling me so technically that makes you a troll.

watch the bullies come out in full. they can't resist a gang bang.

cowards. Why would people want to edit and restrict what you say here while defending the 'rights' of corporations to destroy the political system?
 
:lol: You start hundreds of threads.... each one linking to the HuffyPuffy and accuse me of trolling. That's some funneh shiat rite there. :lol:

You're trolling me so technically that makes you a troll.

And you're trolling the entire board with continuous bullshit HuffyPuffy opinion links.... (and trying to post them as 'fact')... that plus the fact that you are who you are... makes you not only a fucking troll but a stupid fucking troll

to paraphrase HAL: With your space helmet on, Dave, you're going to find it rather difficult to be taken seriously.
 

Forum List

Back
Top