Conservative Republicans are least supportive of making it easy for everyone to vote

Yep, there is voter fraud, how much we donā€™t know,
Yes, you do know, you just ignore facts that don't fit your narrative. For instance, when the SoS of New Mexico mounted a massive investigation in voter fraud ID, she managed to find 19! suspect cases, none of which were proven.
But feel free to continue to ignore evidence of the rarity of voter ID fraud.
 
Yep, there is voter fraud, how much we donā€™t know,
Yes, you do know, you just ignore facts that don't fit your narrative. For instance, when the SoS of New Mexico mounted a massive investigation in voter fraud ID, she managed to find 19! suspect cases, none of which were proven.
But feel free to continue to ignore evidence of the rarity of voter ID fraud.

Read it and weep snowflake. Or ignore it because it doesnā€™t fit your perfect world narrative. Stay dumb, I couldnā€™t care less.
 
Yep, there is voter fraud, how much we donā€™t know,
Yes, you do know, you just ignore facts that don't fit your narrative. For instance, when the SoS of New Mexico mounted a massive investigation in voter fraud ID, she managed to find 19! suspect cases, none of which were proven.
But feel free to continue to ignore evidence of the rarity of voter ID fraud.

Read it and weep snowflake. Or ignore it because it doesnā€™t fit your perfect world narrative. Stay dumb, I couldnā€™t care less.
No, voter fraud isnā€™t a myth: 10 cases where itā€™s all too real
 
great piece of research:

Hmm...

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
Te database includes 749 ā€œcasesā€ involving almost 1,100 individuals.
  • A closer examination reveals:ā€¢ Only 105 cases come within the past ļ¬ve years, and 488 within the past 10 years. Tirty-two cases are from the 1980s and 1990s. Indicative of its overreach, the database even includes a case from 1948 (when Harry S. ī€€ruman beat Tomas Dewey) and a case from 1972 (when Richard Nixon defeated George McGovern). Over the period considered by Heritage, there have been over 3 billion votes cast in federal elections alone, and many more when you include the state and local elections also covered in the database. Te number of cases in the database represent a miniscule portion of the overall number of votes cast during this time span.

Interesting analysis and seriously difficult to dismiss, unlike the Heritage report

Heritage Fraud Database: An Assessment

Yep, there is voter fraud, how much we donā€™t know, but Libs like you think it is too inconvenient for a person to show an ID. You canā€™t get a bank account, a credit card, rent an apartment or let alone buy a house with out one, but when it comes to voting, well that just to hard for Libs to figure out.
If only it was about just ID's.

What about demanding a street address at an indian reservation? Where there are no street addresses?

Or shrinking the number of polling places in Democratic areas?

Or what's going on in North Carolina from Republicans.

It's way more than ID.

ID is the Kool Aid the dumpsters drink.
So you admit you lost the argument and agree there is no problem requiring an ID before someone can vote.
 
I checked out the first case. No links to anything but assertions. No unique identifiers are given, nor pertinent details, just names. Lots of people have the same names, especially if full names are not searched. Usually these allegations turn out to be administrative error.

The usual rightard bullshit.

Too, if it is correct, that is one alleged case given in all of Colorado. A real problem fer shure, highlighting how rare it is.
 
Last edited:
great piece of research:

Hmm...

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
Te database includes 749 ā€œcasesā€ involving almost 1,100 individuals.
  • A closer examination reveals:ā€¢ Only 105 cases come within the past ļ¬ve years, and 488 within the past 10 years. Tirty-two cases are from the 1980s and 1990s. Indicative of its overreach, the database even includes a case from 1948 (when Harry S. ī€€ruman beat Tomas Dewey) and a case from 1972 (when Richard Nixon defeated George McGovern). Over the period considered by Heritage, there have been over 3 billion votes cast in federal elections alone, and many more when you include the state and local elections also covered in the database. Te number of cases in the database represent a miniscule portion of the overall number of votes cast during this time span.

Interesting analysis and seriously difficult to dismiss, unlike the Heritage report

Heritage Fraud Database: An Assessment

Yep, there is voter fraud, how much we donā€™t know, but Libs like you think it is too inconvenient for a person to show an ID. You canā€™t get a bank account, a credit card, rent an apartment or let alone buy a house with out one, but when it comes to voting, well that just to hard for Libs to figure out.
We don't know?

Studies and investigations for decades say -- not any amount that matters
 
The voter rolls were looked at in an investigation and cross checked. They were discovered.
The investigations I've read about were flawed. They did not use full SS numbers and full names as identifiers, for instance, rather matching parts of names and the last four SS numbers. Probability insists there will be matches in such cases.
sure, and all the accusations were not flawed or bs conspiracy theories?

your comment without links to credible accounts of investigations being flawed, just sound like regurgitation of wingnutty newz
 

Forum List

Back
Top