Conservative Hypocrisy

Nov 29, 2012
579
23
16
Put plainly: conservatives want a country where they get big government
benefits and small government restrictions, while imposing small government benefits
and big government restrictions on everybody else.

Despite claiming to support a small and unobtrusive government, the
conservative movement has pushed heavily for increased governmental regulations
on personal activities that they find objectionable—gay marriage and abortion
rights being the most common things that modern conservatives decry and attempt
to legislate away.

Conservatives don’t see these restrictions as “big government
overreach” simply because such regulations don’t overreach into THEIR lives,
only the lives of others. The conservative hypocrisy in the realm of social
issues is indicative of their ideological mindset and gives us a clear look
into the conservative views on the size of government.

If conservatives truly claim to be about small government and personal responsibility, they why do they consistently act counter to this claim?
 
Conservatives are for smaller and less expensive, confusing and complicated bureaucracy. Maybe that's a foreign concept on the left coast which is drowning under a sea of red tape with confiscatory taxes to fund useless bureaucratic bull shat. Abortions are an expensive waste of human life and even Bill Clinton said he wanted to keep them rare. Abortion is still legal but Conservatives don't want to pay for them. That should be easy enough to understand even to victims of the sub-standard union based left coast education system.
 
Put plainly: conservatives want a country where they get big government
benefits and small government restrictions, while imposing small government benefits
and big government restrictions on everybody else.

Despite claiming to support a small and unobtrusive government, the
conservative movement has pushed heavily for increased governmental regulations
on personal activities that they find objectionable—gay marriage and abortion
rights being the most common things that modern conservatives decry and attempt
to legislate away.

Conservatives don’t see these restrictions as “big government
overreach” simply because such regulations don’t overreach into THEIR lives,
only the lives of others. The conservative hypocrisy in the realm of social
issues is indicative of their ideological mindset and gives us a clear look
into the conservative views on the size of government.

If conservatives truly claim to be about small government and personal responsibility, they why do they consistently act counter to this claim?

I think this explains why the left coast is truly the land of fruits and nuts.
 
Conservatives are for smaller and less expensive, confusing and complicated bureaucracy. Maybe that's a foreign concept on the left coast which is drowning under a sea of red tape with confiscatory taxes to fund useless bureaucratic bull shat. Abortions are an expensive waste of human life and even Bill Clinton said he wanted to keep them rare. Abortion is still legal but Conservatives don't want to pay for them. That should be easy enough to understand even to victims of the sub-standard union based left coast education system.
how does any of this address the issue of hypocrisy I addressed in the original post?

The question on the table is if conservatives truly claim to be about small government and personal responsibility, they why do they consistently act counter to this claim? can you stay on topic?
 
Put plainly: conservatives want a country where they get big government
benefits and small government restrictions, while imposing small government benefits
and big government restrictions on everybody else.

Despite claiming to support a small and unobtrusive government, the
conservative movement has pushed heavily for increased governmental regulations
on personal activities that they find objectionable—gay marriage and abortion
rights being the most common things that modern conservatives decry and attempt
to legislate away.

Conservatives don’t see these restrictions as “big government
overreach” simply because such regulations don’t overreach into THEIR lives,
only the lives of others. The conservative hypocrisy in the realm of social
issues is indicative of their ideological mindset and gives us a clear look
into the conservative views on the size of government.

If conservatives truly claim to be about small government and personal responsibility, they why do they consistently act counter to this claim?

I think this explains why the left coast is truly the land of fruits and nuts.
better than the land of the poor and ignorant like the south and midwest.
 
Put plainly: conservatives want a country where they get big government
benefits and small government restrictions, while imposing small government benefits
and big government restrictions on everybody else.

Despite claiming to support a small and unobtrusive government, the
conservative movement has pushed heavily for increased governmental regulations
on personal activities that they find objectionable—gay marriage and abortion
rights being the most common things that modern conservatives decry and attempt
to legislate away.

Conservatives don’t see these restrictions as “big government
overreach” simply because such regulations don’t overreach into THEIR lives,
only the lives of others. The conservative hypocrisy in the realm of social
issues is indicative of their ideological mindset and gives us a clear look
into the conservative views on the size of government.

If conservatives truly claim to be about small government and personal responsibility, they why do they consistently act counter to this claim?

They don't. Now go away.
 
Conservatives are for smaller and less expensive, confusing and complicated bureaucracy. Maybe that's a foreign concept on the left coast which is drowning under a sea of red tape with confiscatory taxes to fund useless bureaucratic bull shat. Abortions are an expensive waste of human life and even Bill Clinton said he wanted to keep them rare. Abortion is still legal but Conservatives don't want to pay for them. That should be easy enough to understand even to victims of the sub-standard union based left coast education system.
how does any of this address the issue of hypocrisy I addressed in the original post?

The question on the table is if conservatives truly claim to be about small government and personal responsibility, they why do they consistently act counter to this claim? can you stay on topic?

Smaller federal government and a limit on taxpayer funded abortions is far from being hypocritical issue. It must be nice to run as a democrat. They can never be called hypocritical when they don't claim to have any family or moral values.
 
I'm trying to figure out how blocking requests for new laws (laws that force everybody to recognize gay unions as marriage and laws that make it legal to commit murder) is condoning big government.

We didn't want those laws. We tried to prevent them from being made. We'd like them removed now. But the left insists on more laws to make us participate in their depraved society, and fund it.

So how again does the fact that we don't want any more laws that force us to partake of depravity make us *big* government again?
 
Last edited:
how does any of this address the issue of hypocrisy I addressed in the original post?

You didn't "address" shit. You spewed a bunch of mindless demagoguery that you were programmed with from a leftist hate site.

The question on the table is if conservatives truly claim to be about small government and personal responsibility, they why do they consistently act counter to this claim? can you stay on topic?

The answer is "they don't," you're just lying, as is the way of the left.
 
Put plainly: conservatives want a country where they get big government
benefits and small government restrictions, while imposing small government benefits
and big government restrictions on everybody else.

Despite claiming to support a small and unobtrusive government, the
conservative movement has pushed heavily for increased governmental regulations
on personal activities that they find objectionable—gay marriage and abortion
rights being the most common things that modern conservatives decry and attempt
to legislate away.

Conservatives don’t see these restrictions as “big government
overreach” simply because such regulations don’t overreach into THEIR lives,
only the lives of others. The conservative hypocrisy in the realm of social
issues is indicative of their ideological mindset and gives us a clear look
into the conservative views on the size of government.

If conservatives truly claim to be about small government and personal responsibility, they why do they consistently act counter to this claim?

It’s the consequence of adhering blindly to political dogma, exacerbated by the undue influence of the social right, fiscal extremists (TPM), and Christian fundamentalists.

In addition to blind dogma there is also blind arrogance, particularly among the religious right.
 
This from the loons who think that man has no God, has the right to kill babies, and that Christians are dummies.
 
No.

Thank you for the logical fallacy. Continue to adhere blindly to leftist political dogma/atheist play books.
 
I'm trying to figure out how blocking requests for new laws (laws that force everybody to recognize gay unions as marriage and laws that make it legal to commit murder) is condoning big government.

We didn't want those laws. We tried to prevent them from being made. We'd like them removed now. But the left insists on more laws to make us participate in their depraved society, and fund it.

So how again does the fact that we don't want any more laws that force us to partake of depravity make us *big* government again?

there are no laws forcing people to recognize gay marriage, there are laws being proposed by the right to eliminate gay marriage. that fact that you are this stupid says volumes.

point to a piece of legislation proposed by the left that proves your claim. then again i point to several pieces of legislation at both the state and federal level to the contrary on the right.

abortion was a right granted by the supreme court based on the right to privacy. (roe v. wade) there is no law on the books that specifically details the right to an abortion. or uses any of those exact words. however on the right, you would like to provide legislation that eliminates this right as defined by the courts. your ignorance is glaring at the point.
 

New Topics

Forum List

Back
Top