Conservatism: ingenuity, prosperity, and liberty

[P@triot]

Socialism is the abstract Concept

So are rights. And yet they are listed in the U.S. Constitution many times. So I’ll say it again, snowflake: please show me a single instance in the U.S. Constitution where socialism is mentioned.

 

[P@triot]

Our socialism and Mixed-market economy starts with our federal Constitution and supreme, social law of the land.

Repeating a lie over and over doesn’t make it any less of a lie, Daniel. The U.S. Constitution does not authorize socialism in any way.

 

[danielpalos]

Congress has the Power, not the privilege or right to Tax.

And what is "taxing", snowflake?

a compulsory contribution to state revenue, levied by the government on workers' income and business profits or added to the cost of some goods, services, and transactions.

See the apostrophe there, snowflake? In that case - it is used to show possession. The income belongs to the person earning. Notice how it does not state that the money belongs to "the people" or the government as you have ignorantly stated over and over and over (out of your desperation to mooch off of society)?

Listen - you can't even get basic terms right. Why don't you go play with your toys and let the adults talk now? You can come back in about 10 to 15 years when you're an adult. Mmm-k?

Appropriating private property for the good of the whole. Eminent domain would usually apply.

We’re talking about taxation right now - not “eminent domain”. You can’t even get the most basic terms right. Go play with your toys. The adults are trying to have a conversation.

Government money to pay government taxes.

 

[danielpalos]

Socialism is the abstract Concept

So are rights. And yet they are listed in the U.S. Constitution many times. So I’ll say it again, snowflake: please show me a single instance in the U.S. Constitution where socialism is mentioned.

Just right wing, lousy reading comprehension, like Usual.

3: of or relating to human society, the interaction of the individual and the group, or the welfare of human beings as members of society

• social institutions

Social-ism is what our federal Constitution defines.

 

[danielpalos]

Our socialism and Mixed-market economy starts with our federal Constitution and supreme, social law of the land.

Repeating a lie over and over doesn’t make it any less of a lie, Daniel. The U.S. Constitution does not authorize socialism in any way.

Nobody takes the right wing serious, about Any Thing, serious. Unless, there are Serious, Tax Rates involved.

 

[P@triot]

Socialism is the abstract Concept

So are rights. And yet they are listed in the U.S. Constitution many times. So I’ll say it again, snowflake: please show me a single instance in the U.S. Constitution where socialism is mentioned.

Just right wing, lousy reading comprehension, like Usual.

Stop dodging. Show me a single instance where the U.S. Constitution mentions socialism. Show me an enumerated power that permits for the taxation of feeding, housing, and providing healthcare for parasites.

 

[P@triot]

Government money to pay government taxes.

Government money doesn’t pay government taxes.

Citizen’s money pays government taxes.

 

[danielpalos]

Socialism is the abstract Concept

So are rights. And yet they are listed in the U.S. Constitution many times. So I’ll say it again, snowflake: please show me a single instance in the U.S. Constitution where socialism is mentioned.

Just right wing, lousy reading comprehension, like Usual.

Stop dodging. Show me a single instance where the U.S. Constitution mentions socialism. Show me an enumerated power that permits for the taxation of feeding, housing, and providing healthcare for parasites.

The term Power is social, not capital. It has Nothing to do with capitalism.

 

[Tax Man]

Socialism is the abstract Concept

So are rights. And yet they are listed in the U.S. Constitution many times. So I’ll say it again, snowflake: please show me a single instance in the U.S. Constitution where socialism is mentioned.

You really are a snowflake. Read the Constitution again and do it slowly so it can sink in to that depleted head.

 

[ScorpioRising007]

Time to embrace liberalism. New morals, new ideas, radical changes in the way we see the world.

And there you have it, folks. The most perfect comment to illustrate the lunacy of liberalism.

Morals are morals. They are as old as time and they cannot be changed or “new”. For instance, it is immoral to cheat on your wife. One cannot say “it’s time to embrace the ‘new moral’ of adultery” because there is nothing “moral” about it.

Morals are a subjective term. They change with what religion you are and with the times. Sticking to old archaic morals written by a bunch of jews thousands of years ago is ludicrous and ridiculous.

I believe in creating my own morals that suits my needs rather than what some jews wrote thousands of years ago. I believe in what many philosophers have said that morals you can make for yourself are much better, less archaic, less crazy, then what some way out of dated book that doesn't conform to society today and societies need today says.

I believe in doing ones own will as one pleases according to the pleasure principle just as long as I am not committing any crimes or interfering with anyone else's will.

My favorite phrase is "Sin is Restriction". Being too careful about not sinning is just making yourself miserable got live and enjoy life a little. If that means going to a strip club once in a while thats a lot of fun and a pleasurable experience that should not be passed up, worry about frying in hell later when your dead.

 

[Clementine]

Conservatism encompasses the absolute best of man in every capacity. It's built on liberty, which in turn spurs innovation, which in turn produces prosperity. With Republicans controlling everything coast-to-coast (the White House, the House, the Senate, and 33 of the 50 states), we are experiencing unprecedented prosperity. Things started to turn around with the results of the 2010 mid-terms and the final piece to the turbo-charged prosperity was President Trump taking the White House and removing all of MaObama's illegal Executive Orders designed to block his enemies and reward his pals.

At first the plan was working, but in 2016 something happened. U.S. oil rigs began coming back online. Oil production shot back up. OPEC was baffled. How were these yankees beating us? The answer? American ingenuity. We invented technological breakthroughs that made fracking cheaper and more efficient.

That's what conservatism does. Every time. And progressivism does the polar opposite every time (just ask the people of Venezuela). It restricts liberty, which in turn decimates ingenuity, which in turn results in perpetual poverty and misery.

As of last month, U.S. oil production hit a record high. We're pumping out over 10.7 million barrels a day. We just leapfrogged the Saudis who are pumping 10.4 million. Russia is number one at 11.1, but U.S. production is set to be near 12 million by next year. We will be the number one producer of oil by 2019.

If you had told someone 20 years ago that the U.S. would produce more oil than Saudi Arabia, you would have been laughed out of the country. Yet today, thanks to conservatism, here we sit producing more than anyone but Russia (and we will soon surpass them). Fracking has created energy independence, affordable energy, jobs, wealth, and prosperity. And the left has done everything in their power to prevent it. Fracking is just another example of how conservatism encompasses the absolute best that man has to offer, while progressivism produces the absolute worst that man has to offer.

Making American oil number one again

The left doesn't really like progress. They want us destroyed because they don't understand capitalism, or socialism for that matter. Our youth have been brainwashed by teachers to hate this country and embrace the socialist and communist countries.

We should rely on our own oil sources. The same idiots who complain about that use just as much energy as anyone else. If any of those braindead leftists really believed in what they are out there promoting, they'd give up their cars, big homes, electronic devices, and other luxuries.

So glad we have a president who actually does love this country and is fighting to keep this wonderful Republic.

The Hillary and Bernie supporters are crying about losing but don't appreciate the fact that the entire country is better off. They don't judge things for themselves. If they worked and paid taxes, they would see the changes. As it is, they repeat the doom and gloom fed to them by leftists. So glad Hillary isn't our president. Had she and the Dems won, we'd be a socialist country ruled by an oppressive one world government by now.

 

[P@triot]

Stop dodging. Show me a single instance where the U.S. Constitution mentions socialism. Show me an enumerated power that permits for the taxation of feeding, housing, and providing healthcare for parasites.

The term Power is social, not capital. It has Nothing to do with capitalism.

The term “power” is neither. Power is not a synonym for social. Now stop dodging. Show me a single instance where the U.S. Constitution mentions socialism. Show me an enumerated power that permits for the taxation of feeding, housing, and providing healthcare for parasites.

You clearly can’t do it (don’t worry - nobody can because it doesn’t exist). Once again you lose.

 

[P@triot]

I believe in creating my own morals that suits my needs

Then those aren’t “morals”, dimwit.

 

[P@triot]

I believe in doing ones own will as one pleases according to the pleasure principle...

Of course you do. All selfish, left-wing assholes do.

 

[P@triot]

If that means going to a strip club once in a while thats a lot of fun and a pleasurable experience that should not be passed up, worry about frying in hell later when your dead.

That is literally as idiotic as saying “point the gun at your head and pull the trigger... worry about the bullet later”.

Once the bullet leaves the chamber, it’s already too late. And once you’re already dead, it’s far too late to start “worrying about frying in hell” at that point.

 

[P@triot]

Socialism is the abstract Concept

So are rights. And yet they are listed in the U.S. Constitution many times. So I’ll say it again, snowflake: please show me a single instance in the U.S. Constitution where socialism is mentioned.

You really are a snowflake. Read the Constitution again and do it slowly so it can sink in to that depleted head.

Unlike you, I’ve read the U.S. Constitution. Which is why I own your ignorant ass here on USMB.

 

[danielpalos]

Stop dodging. Show me a single instance where the U.S. Constitution mentions socialism. Show me an enumerated power that permits for the taxation of feeding, housing, and providing healthcare for parasites.

The term Power is social, not capital. It has Nothing to do with capitalism.

The term “power” is neither. Power is not a synonym for social. Now stop dodging. Show me a single instance where the U.S. Constitution mentions socialism. Show me an enumerated power that permits for the taxation of feeding, housing, and providing healthcare for parasites.

You clearly can’t do it (don’t worry - nobody can because it doesn’t exist). Once again you lose.

Power is a Social term not a Capital term; that is the dichotomy we are working with.

 

[Tax Man]

Socialism is the abstract Concept

So are rights. And yet they are listed in the U.S. Constitution many times. So I’ll say it again, snowflake: please show me a single instance in the U.S. Constitution where socialism is mentioned.

You really are a snowflake. Read the Constitution again and do it slowly so it can sink in to that depleted head.

Unlike you, I’ve read the U.S. Constitution. Which is why I own your ignorant ass here on USMB.

So you admit you can not understand the document? You should be ashamed of your lack of intelligence to understand the subtle nuances of the language used therein.

 

[P@triot]

Socialism is the abstract Concept

So are rights. And yet they are listed in the U.S. Constitution many times. So I’ll say it again, snowflake: please show me a single instance in the U.S. Constitution where socialism is mentioned.

You really are a snowflake. Read the Constitution again and do it slowly so it can sink in to that depleted head.

Unlike you, I’ve read the U.S. Constitution. Which is why I own your ignorant ass here on USMB.

So you admit you can not understand the document? You should be ashamed of your lack of intelligence to understand the subtle nuances of the language used therein.

So you admit you never read the U.S. Constitution? What a shame. If you did, you would realize there are no “nuances” in the U.S. Constitution. It is written in black and white. There is nothing “nuance” about shall not be infringed, snowflake.