Conservapedia: E=mc2 Is A Liberal Conspiracy

[Modbert]

Threads Merged

 

[goldcatt]

Face it, QW. Whoever wrote, edited or otherwise contributed to that article is a certified nutbar of the chunkiest variety. We're talking extremely high caliber nuttliciousness here. The "S" on the big red cape stands for Supernut, Defender of All That is Nutrageous.

I'll pause to acknowledge that not all conservatives are galloping idiots and these particular people are short bus special in their own unique way. Feel better?

Now...back to your regularly scheduled pointing and laughing.

 

[Modbert]

Face it, QW. Whoever wrote, edited or otherwise contributed to that article is a certified nutbar of the chunkiest variety. We're talking extremely high caliber nuttliciousness here. The "S" on the big red cape stands for Supernut, Defender of All That is Nutrageous.

I'll pause to acknowledge that not all conservatives are galloping idiots and these particular people are short bus special in their own unique way. Feel better?

Now...back to your regularly scheduled pointing and laughing.

http://www.conservapedia.com/Conservative_Bible_Project

The Conservative Bible Project is a project utilizing the "best of the public" to render God's word into modern English without liberal translation distortions.[1] A Colbert Report interview featured this project.[2] We completed our translation of the New Testament on April 23, 2010.

 

[Quantum Windbag]

Face it, QW. Whoever wrote, edited or otherwise contributed to that article is a certified nutbar of the chunkiest variety. We're talking extremely high caliber nuttliciousness here. The "S" on the big red cape stands for Supernut, Defender of All That is Nutrageous.

I'll pause to acknowledge that not all conservatives are galloping idiots and these particular people are short bus special in their own unique way. Feel better?

Now...back to your regularly scheduled pointing and laughing.

You have my complete agreement on that. They are not only nuts, they are fanatical nuts.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

So the fact that current physics jams 94% of the Universe into energy and matter that no one can even yet envision as "Dark Matter" and "Dark Energy" is what, a rounding error?

There is something seriously flawed with our "understanding" of the Universe, that is, we don't seem to understand much at all.

 

[Flopper]

I don't who's nuttier, the author or the student.

 

[rdean]

When you point out that 90% of the Republican party is white, Republicans will say, "We are not ALL white".

Then you say, "I never said Republicans are ALL white".

Then Republicans will say, "Oh, now you flip flop".

Then you say, "Oh, never-mind".

Then Republicans say, "See how easy it is to prove Democrats lie?"

 

[CrusaderFrank]

When you point out that 90% of the Republican party is white, Republicans will say, "We are not ALL white".

Then you say, "I never said Republicans are ALL white".

Then Republicans will say, "Oh, now you flip flop".

Then you say, "Oh, never-mind".

Then Republicans say, "See how easy it is to prove Democrats lie?"

You should have another lobotomy, the first two must have missed.

 

[Greenbeard]

There is something seriously flawed with our "understanding" of the Universe, that is, we don't seem to understand much at all.

Is modern physics a conspiracy perpetuated to validate liberal philosophies?

 

[CrusaderFrank]

There is something seriously flawed with our "understanding" of the Universe, that is, we don't seem to understand much at all.

Is modern physics a conspiracy perpetuated to validate liberal philosophies?

As I said, modern physics could stand a little humility and admit that our theory and most basic understanding of the Universe is off out in the quintillion column.

It's not a conspiracy by the physicists, but Liberals do have a fundamental misunderstanding about the Constitution and the American system of government, or rather they see the Constitution and American Founding Principles as obstacles to inflicting their Marxist Agenda so they'll use any means, even a perverse application of Einstein's Relativity, to subvert the Constitution.

 

[Ravi]

There is something seriously flawed with our "understanding" of the Universe, that is, we don't seem to understand much at all.

Is modern physics a conspiracy perpetuated to validate liberal philosophies?

As I said, modern physics could stand a little humility and admit that our theory and most basic understanding of the Universe is off out in the quintillion column.

It's not a conspiracy by the physicists, but Liberals do have a fundamental misunderstanding about the Constitution and the American system of government, or rather they see the Constitution and American Founding Principles as obstacles to inflicting their Marxist Agenda so they'll use any means, even a perverse application of Einstein's Relativity, to subvert the Constitution.

Did you read that on Conservapedia?

 

[edthecynic]

That's hysterical. As is Conservapedia.

Their rewriting the bible project is hilarious. Remember, do your duty and go through changing the names Moses or Jesus to Stephen Colbert.

Andy Schlafly - The Colbert Report - 12/8/09 - Video Clip | Comedy Central

 

[edthecynic]

Man, I couldn't make this stuff up if I tried.

Let me see if I understand what you are saying here.

You are not smart enough to make up stupid lies on your own, so you rely on others to do it for you, and then you are so stupid you think those lies are true.

Here is the actual article that the blog you are quoting claims to be citing.

he theory of relativity is a mathematical system that allows no exceptions. It is heavily promoted by liberals who like its encouragement of relativism and its tendency to mislead people in how they view the world.[1] Here is a list of counterexamples, and if only one of these is true, then the theory fails:

15. The theory predicts natural formation of highly ordered black holes despite the increase in entropy required by the Second Law of Thermodynamics[6]

Counterexamples to Relativity - Conservapedia

While it is not entirely accurate, it is at least as accurate as a typical
Wikipedia article, and it says nothing like your lying source claims it does.

Keep up the good work.

That's my favorite lie of the bunch.

The SLoT does not REQUIRE an INCREASE in Entropy! Of course, only a physicist would know it is a lie, so it is a very safe lie.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Is modern physics a conspiracy perpetuated to validate liberal philosophies?

As I said, modern physics could stand a little humility and admit that our theory and most basic understanding of the Universe is off out in the quintillion column.

It's not a conspiracy by the physicists, but Liberals do have a fundamental misunderstanding about the Constitution and the American system of government, or rather they see the Constitution and American Founding Principles as obstacles to inflicting their Marxist Agenda so they'll use any means, even a perverse application of Einstein's Relativity, to subvert the Constitution.

Did you read that on Conservapedia?

You'd have to be an idiot to come to that conclusion.

Oh, right.

 

[Barb]

Ever get a peek at Albert's FBI file? Hysterical stuff:
Federal Bureau of Investigation - Freedom of Information Privacy Act
Henrietta Frothingham...

 

[Barb]

That's hysterical. As is Conservapedia.

Their rewriting the bible project is hilarious. Remember, do your duty and go through changing the names Moses or Jesus to Stephen Colbert.

I was happier than a pig in shit when they came out with Conservapedia, and the Bible project is one of my favorite features. Its a gift that truly keeps giving.

 

[konradv]

The failure to discover gravitons, despite wasting hundreds of millions in taxpayer money in searching

The real reason for not believing the article. Like in the AGW debate, to conservatives it's about the poilitics and the science takes a back seat!

 

[THE LIGHT]

Man, I couldn't make this stuff up if I tried.

Let me see if I understand what you are saying here.

You are not smart enough to make up stupid lies on your own, so you rely on others to do it for you, and then you are so stupid you think those lies are true.

Here is the actual article that the blog you are quoting claims to be citing.

he theory of relativity is a mathematical system that allows no exceptions. It is heavily promoted by liberals who like its encouragement of relativism and its tendency to mislead people in how they view the world.[1] Here is a list of counterexamples, and if only one of these is true, then the theory fails:

1. The Pioneer "anomaly"
2. Increasingly precise measurements of the advance of the perihelion of Mercury, which show a shift beyond the margin of error predicted by relativity
3. The discontinuity in momentum as velocity approaches "c" for infinitesimal mass, compared to the momentum of light
4. The logical problem of a force which is applied at a right angle to the velocity of a relativistic mass - does this act on the rest mass or the relativistic mass?
5. The lack of curvature in overall space as observed by measurements
6. The universe shortly after its creation, when quantum effects dominate
7. The action-at-a-distance of quantum entanglement[2]
8. The action-at-a-distance by Jesus, described in John 4:46-54
9. The failure to discover gravitons, despite wasting hundreds of millions in taxpayer money in searching
10. The inability of the theory to produce anything of value, contrary to every other theory of physics
11. The change in mass over time of standard kilograms preserved under ideal conditions
12. The uniformity in temperature throughout the universe[3]
13. "The snag is that in quantum mechanics, time retains its Newtonian aloofness, providing the stage against which matter dances but never being affected by its presence. These two [QM and Relativity] conceptions of time don’t gel."[4]
14. The theory predicts wormholes just as it predicts black holes, but wormholes violated causality and permit absurd time travel.[5]
15. The theory predicts natural formation of highly ordered black holes despite the increase in entropy required by the Second Law of Thermodynamics.[6]

Counterexamples to Relativity - Conservapedia

While it is not entirely accurate, it is at least as accurate as a typical
Wikipedia article, and it says nothing like your lying source claims it does.

Keep up the good work.

The truth is (not all but many) libs don't understand science so you have to keep it real simple for them. If you present a difficulty with their theories they will object vehemently until they find a lie to explain it. They still cannot get over worshiping the sun.

 

[THE LIGHT]

There is something seriously flawed with our "understanding" of the Universe, that is, we don't seem to understand much at all.

Is modern physics a conspiracy perpetuated to validate liberal philosophies?

Modern physics isn't a conspiracy and doesn't validate liberal philosophies either. Twisted versions of it are used to validate liberal philosophies and prop up the lies of evolution.

 

[Old Rocks]

Odd, I see you posting what was in the article if you clicked on it. I don't see you refuting the fact they basically called it a Liberal conspiracy or that nobody "who believes in relativity continues to read the Bible."

Edit: Odd, I go to wikipedia and not one mention of Liberals in their article:

Theory of relativity - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

One person who posted on the site said something weird, and his post was deleted. Yet you claim all conservatives believe that, and when I call you on it you claim I am wrong.

Conservatives and science tend to make an odd mix. Almost all 'Conservatives', as opposed to conservatives, regard ideology as much more important than science. So when science, reality, points out the fallacies in their ideology, the Conservative simply denies the science. Whether it is the physical effects of smoking tobacco or global warming, denial of science is a primary pillar of modern Conservatism. The statement in the Conservapedia is pretty typical of all Conservatives appoach to anything scientific.