Connect The Dots: One World Government

[eots]

1. The big push by the Left at Global Governance, called 'global warming' was aimed at putting the nation under the control of the United Nations has all but petered out...as the fraud became revealed.
"In Obama’s second State of the Union address, he actually seemed to concede the scientific evidence as a weakness. He argued that we need to pursue a more enlightened energy strategy in spite of the doubts about the science of climate change."
Michael Mann 'Disappointed' In Obama's Global Warming Record


2. "[Justice] Ginsburg, whose job on the Supreme Court is to uphold the U.S. Constitution, has a curious but sadly widespread disdain for that document. A recent New York Times article suggested the American Constitution is losing its allure around the world. The main reason is it does not guarantee the right to, among other things, food, health care and education."
Ruth Bader Ginsburg Trashes Constitution; Should She Be Impeached? - Yahoo! News


3. "CIA Director Leon Panetta, President Obama’s nominee for secretary of defense, co-chaired an initiative to regulate U.S. oceans and cede them to United Nations-based international law.
Panetta’s oceans initiative was a key partner of an organization, Citizens for Global Solutions, that promotes world government.
As WND reported, billionaire George Soros is a primary funder and key proponent of the Global Centre for Responsibility to Protect, the main organization pushing the doctrine. The center includes the World Federalist Movement as one of its members and coordinators."
Obama’s DoD nominee caught in 1-world scheme


4. "We want to create what's called a global minimum tax," he [Biden] said, "because American taxpayers shouldn't be providing a larger subsidy for investing abroad than investing at home."... President Obama's National Economic Council director Gene Sperling also used the term "global minimum tax" last month.

But considering this administration's hostility to American exceptionalism, for all we know U.S. businesses could find themselves a couple of years from now subject to taxation dictated by corrupt international bodies like the United Nations, the International Monetary Fund or the World Bank. ObamaCare proves that you never can be sure what this president and his minions are really up to."
Vice President Joe Biden's Gaffes Are Legendary, But The Ideas Behind Them Are Worse - Investors.com


5. 'What's black and white and "red" all over? The Department of Justice's newly designed website. Gone are the standard red, white, and blue motifs, replaced by an all-black backdrop. And prominently placed on virtually every page of the site is a quote credited to a man who facilitated a greater role for socialists and communists at the U.N., and the global "workers rights movement." ' (...C. Wilfred Jenks, who back in the late 1930s and after World War II was a leading figure in the "international law" movement, which sought to impose a global, common law,...)
The American Spectator : Justice Loses Its Stars and Stripes


But, by now, all know who this President and his minions serve. A vote for Obama is ironically, a vote for unelected bureaucrats to rule the nation and the world.

Guess where his post-election "flexibility" would lead......

Globalism has been gaining strength and nationalism has been slowly dying for over a century and it's irreversible. Cultural, language, and economic barriers have been falling throughout the world. Problems such as global warming, terrorism, recessions, and natural disasters, have widespread global impacts and thus demand global cooperation. This did not start with Obama, but has increased and it will continue to do.

I doubt anyone alive today will ever seen world government, but it's coming.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O0B_UZNtEk4]From my cold dead hands - YouTube[/ame]

 

[francoHFW]

Connect The Dots: One World Government

It's not a conspiracy, you're a tin foil Pub dupe moron...LOL

 

[rdean]

1. The big push by the Left at Global Governance, called 'global warming' was aimed at putting the nation under the control of the United Nations has all but petered out...as the fraud became revealed.
"In Obama’s second State of the Union address, he actually seemed to concede the scientific evidence as a weakness. He argued that we need to pursue a more enlightened energy strategy in spite of the doubts about the science of climate change."
Michael Mann 'Disappointed' In Obama's Global Warming Record


2. "[Justice] Ginsburg, whose job on the Supreme Court is to uphold the U.S. Constitution, has a curious but sadly widespread disdain for that document. A recent New York Times article suggested the American Constitution is losing its allure around the world. The main reason is it does not guarantee the right to, among other things, food, health care and education."
Ruth Bader Ginsburg Trashes Constitution; Should She Be Impeached? - Yahoo! News


3. "CIA Director Leon Panetta, President Obama’s nominee for secretary of defense, co-chaired an initiative to regulate U.S. oceans and cede them to United Nations-based international law.
Panetta’s oceans initiative was a key partner of an organization, Citizens for Global Solutions, that promotes world government.
As WND reported, billionaire George Soros is a primary funder and key proponent of the Global Centre for Responsibility to Protect, the main organization pushing the doctrine. The center includes the World Federalist Movement as one of its members and coordinators."
Obama’s DoD nominee caught in 1-world scheme


4. "We want to create what's called a global minimum tax," he [Biden] said, "because American taxpayers shouldn't be providing a larger subsidy for investing abroad than investing at home."... President Obama's National Economic Council director Gene Sperling also used the term "global minimum tax" last month.

But considering this administration's hostility to American exceptionalism, for all we know U.S. businesses could find themselves a couple of years from now subject to taxation dictated by corrupt international bodies like the United Nations, the International Monetary Fund or the World Bank. ObamaCare proves that you never can be sure what this president and his minions are really up to."
Vice President Joe Biden's Gaffes Are Legendary, But The Ideas Behind Them Are Worse - Investors.com


5. 'What's black and white and "red" all over? The Department of Justice's newly designed website. Gone are the standard red, white, and blue motifs, replaced by an all-black backdrop. And prominently placed on virtually every page of the site is a quote credited to a man who facilitated a greater role for socialists and communists at the U.N., and the global "workers rights movement." ' (...C. Wilfred Jenks, who back in the late 1930s and after World War II was a leading figure in the "international law" movement, which sought to impose a global, common law,...)
The American Spectator : Justice Loses Its Stars and Stripes


But, by now, all know who this President and his minions serve. A vote for Obama is ironically, a vote for unelected bureaucrats to rule the nation and the world.

Guess where his post-election "flexibility" would lead......

Wow, you're really scared aren't you? More likely is that American Christians take over the country and start a Christian Taliban.

 

[Big Fitz]

1. The big push by the Left at Global Governance, called 'global warming' was aimed at putting the nation under the control of the United Nations has all but petered out...as the fraud became revealed.
"In Obama’s second State of the Union address, he actually seemed to concede the scientific evidence as a weakness. He argued that we need to pursue a more enlightened energy strategy in spite of the doubts about the science of climate change."
Michael Mann 'Disappointed' In Obama's Global Warming Record


2. "[Justice] Ginsburg, whose job on the Supreme Court is to uphold the U.S. Constitution, has a curious but sadly widespread disdain for that document. A recent New York Times article suggested the American Constitution is losing its allure around the world. The main reason is it does not guarantee the right to, among other things, food, health care and education."
Ruth Bader Ginsburg Trashes Constitution; Should She Be Impeached? - Yahoo! News


3. "CIA Director Leon Panetta, President Obama’s nominee for secretary of defense, co-chaired an initiative to regulate U.S. oceans and cede them to United Nations-based international law.
Panetta’s oceans initiative was a key partner of an organization, Citizens for Global Solutions, that promotes world government.
As WND reported, billionaire George Soros is a primary funder and key proponent of the Global Centre for Responsibility to Protect, the main organization pushing the doctrine. The center includes the World Federalist Movement as one of its members and coordinators."
Obama’s DoD nominee caught in 1-world scheme


4. "We want to create what's called a global minimum tax," he [Biden] said, "because American taxpayers shouldn't be providing a larger subsidy for investing abroad than investing at home."... President Obama's National Economic Council director Gene Sperling also used the term "global minimum tax" last month.

But considering this administration's hostility to American exceptionalism, for all we know U.S. businesses could find themselves a couple of years from now subject to taxation dictated by corrupt international bodies like the United Nations, the International Monetary Fund or the World Bank. ObamaCare proves that you never can be sure what this president and his minions are really up to."
Vice President Joe Biden's Gaffes Are Legendary, But The Ideas Behind Them Are Worse - Investors.com


5. 'What's black and white and "red" all over? The Department of Justice's newly designed website. Gone are the standard red, white, and blue motifs, replaced by an all-black backdrop. And prominently placed on virtually every page of the site is a quote credited to a man who facilitated a greater role for socialists and communists at the U.N., and the global "workers rights movement." ' (...C. Wilfred Jenks, who back in the late 1930s and after World War II was a leading figure in the "international law" movement, which sought to impose a global, common law,...)
The American Spectator : Justice Loses Its Stars and Stripes


But, by now, all know who this President and his minions serve. A vote for Obama is ironically, a vote for unelected bureaucrats to rule the nation and the world.

Guess where his post-election "flexibility" would lead......

It's about to all fly apart. No one world anything is very possible very soon. We're on the edge of a new dark age. All it will take is a little push in the right area, and off we go down the slope of global cultural ruin. We are only one John Galt, Francisco D'Anconia and Ragnar Danesskold away from it happening.

 

[Steelplate]

The OP has clearly gone over the edge into the realm of political idiocy.

Item two concerning Justice Ginsburg’s comments concerning Egypt’s efforts to compose a constitution, for example, Eugene Volokh correctly noted at the time:

This criticism strikes me as quite misplaced. Justice Ginsburg swore an oath to uphold the U.S. Constitution, and I suspect she thinks that the U.S. Constitution, as interpreted by the U.S. Supreme Court and U.S. political practice, works pretty well in the U.S. But why should she (or we) think that the 1787 constitutional text, coupled with the 27 amendments that have come in fits and spurts since then, would necessarily work well for a completely different country today?

To be sure, our Constitution has the merit of having endured with only one really huge constitutional crisis — the Civil War — for a long time, and of having produced a very rich and free country; that’s good. But much of that, I suspect, comes not from the constitutional text, but from the constitutional traditions that have emerged since then, both in the courts and elsewhere; adopting the U.S. Constitution would not adopt those traditions.

And it might well be that Egypt might be well-served by a very different approach than the U.S. Constitutions — for instance, with regard to relations between the federal government and more local governments, with regard to whether to have a Presidential system or a parliamentary system, with regard to how hard the constitution would be to amend, with regard to how judges are selected and how long they serve, with regard to how the President is selected, with regard to the relationship between the two chambers of the legislature, with regard to whether all executive officials work for the President or whether some are independently elected or selected, with regard to just how to craft the criminal justice system, and so on. (And here I just speak of the big picture questions, and not more specific details.) Remember that even our own states’ constitutions differ in many respects, especially with regard to separation of powers and the selection and tenure of judges, from the U.S. Constitution. Again, that the constitutional text, coupled with a wide range of extratextual political and legal practices, has worked well for us over 200+ years doesn’t tell us that it would work well for Egypt for the coming years.

Nor do I think that there’s something disloyal or bad for American policy for an American Justice to make such statements to a foreign country. Rather, I think it’s just sensible and sensibly (not excessively or falsely) modest.

And, returning to my first point, none of this tells us whether Justice Ginsburg is committed to following the U.S. Constitution in the U.S. Maybe you think she is so committed and maybe you think she isn’t, but you’d have to figure that out from other sources than from the advice she gives to a different country about whether to adopt the constitutional text in a completely different political and legal requirement.

The Volokh Conspiracy » U.S. Justices’ Foreign Statements About the U.S. Constitution

As for the rest of the OP, it’s too inane for any further consideration.

How kind of you to show up just in time to prove that when data accumulates to prove an anti-progressive thesis....

....Liberals can never.....

.....ever.....

...connect the dots.


Thanks much, Torte....

And crazed conspiracy driven right wingers can't recognize propaganda when they see it.

 

[eots]

The OP has clearly gone over the edge into the realm of political idiocy.

Item two concerning Justice Ginsburg’s comments concerning Egypt’s efforts to compose a constitution, for example, Eugene Volokh correctly noted at the time:



As for the rest of the OP, it’s too inane for any further consideration.

How kind of you to show up just in time to prove that when data accumulates to prove an anti-progressive thesis....

....Liberals can never.....

.....ever.....

...connect the dots.


Thanks much, Torte....

And crazed conspiracy driven right wingers can't recognize propaganda when they see it.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xhnHdnUewvs]Biden: "We Want To Create What's Called A Global Minimum Tax" - YouTube[/ame]

 

[Steelplate]

Yep.... that "Global minimum tax" is the start of a one world government.... You're a moron.

What that does is protect the AMERICAN people from the GLOBALIZATION of our financial and business sector. It's saying that Companies who choose to invest overseas instead of RIGHT HERE AT HOME will no longer get special government subsidies to do so.

So in fact, it's curtailing GLOBALIZATION, not promoting it.

Because trust me... ideological differences vary greatly from country to country.... Politics will not bring about a "one world government". But there is one common denominator that can.... MONEY.

Yes, I believe that if a One World Government is possible... it will ONLY be through the financial and business sector. Once again.... the right refuses to see the brainwashing that their media outlets bombard them with. Useful idiots indeed.

 

[eots]

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wc7C1kLecRs]Zbigniew Brzezinski Quotes - YouTube[/ame]

 

[eots]

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-0dkMVNiI9I&feature=related]Zbig Brzezinski Obama's Foreign Policy Advisor Video - YouTube[/ame]

 

[eots]

Yep.... that "Global minimum tax" is the start of a one world government.... You're a moron.

What that does is protect the AMERICAN people from the GLOBALIZATION of our financial and business sector. It's saying that Companies who choose to invest overseas instead of RIGHT HERE AT HOME will no longer get special government subsidies to do so.

So in fact, it's curtailing GLOBALIZATION, not promoting it.

Because trust me... ideological differences vary greatly from country to country.... Politics will not bring about a "one world government". But there is one common denominator that can.... MONEY.

Yes, I believe that if a One World Government is possible... it will ONLY be through the financial and business sector. Once again.... the right refuses to see the brainwashing that their media outlets bombard them with. Useful idiots indeed.

*doublethink*
The power of holding two contradictory beliefs in one's mind simultaneously, and accepting both of them....To tell deliberate lies while genuinely believing in them, to forget any fact that has become inconvenient, and then, when it becomes necessary again, to draw it back from oblivion for just as long as it is needed, to deny the existence of objective reality and all the while to take account of the reality which one denies - all this is indispensably necessary. Even in using the word doublethink it is necessary to exercise doublethink. For by using the word one admits that one is tampering with reality; by a fresh act of doublethink one erases this knowledge; and so on indefinitely, with the lie always one leap ahead of the truth.[2]

 

[konradv]

It's about to all fly apart. No one world anything is very possible very soon. We're on the edge of a new dark age. All it will take is a little push in the right area, and off we go down the slope of global cultural ruin. We are only one John Galt, Francisco D'Anconia and Ragnar Danesskold away from it happening.

Isn't that part of the plan? Magnify the misery to accelerate the change? Who's trying harder?

 

[PoliticalChic]

1. The big push by the Left at Global Governance, called 'global warming' was aimed at putting the nation under the control of the United Nations has all but petered out...as the fraud became revealed.
"In Obama’s second State of the Union address, he actually seemed to concede the scientific evidence as a weakness. He argued that we need to pursue a more enlightened energy strategy in spite of the doubts about the science of climate change."
Michael Mann 'Disappointed' In Obama's Global Warming Record


2. "[Justice] Ginsburg, whose job on the Supreme Court is to uphold the U.S. Constitution, has a curious but sadly widespread disdain for that document. A recent New York Times article suggested the American Constitution is losing its allure around the world. The main reason is it does not guarantee the right to, among other things, food, health care and education."
Ruth Bader Ginsburg Trashes Constitution; Should She Be Impeached? - Yahoo! News


3. "CIA Director Leon Panetta, President Obama’s nominee for secretary of defense, co-chaired an initiative to regulate U.S. oceans and cede them to United Nations-based international law.
Panetta’s oceans initiative was a key partner of an organization, Citizens for Global Solutions, that promotes world government.
As WND reported, billionaire George Soros is a primary funder and key proponent of the Global Centre for Responsibility to Protect, the main organization pushing the doctrine. The center includes the World Federalist Movement as one of its members and coordinators."
Obama’s DoD nominee caught in 1-world scheme


4. "We want to create what's called a global minimum tax," he [Biden] said, "because American taxpayers shouldn't be providing a larger subsidy for investing abroad than investing at home."... President Obama's National Economic Council director Gene Sperling also used the term "global minimum tax" last month.

But considering this administration's hostility to American exceptionalism, for all we know U.S. businesses could find themselves a couple of years from now subject to taxation dictated by corrupt international bodies like the United Nations, the International Monetary Fund or the World Bank. ObamaCare proves that you never can be sure what this president and his minions are really up to."
Vice President Joe Biden's Gaffes Are Legendary, But The Ideas Behind Them Are Worse - Investors.com


5. 'What's black and white and "red" all over? The Department of Justice's newly designed website. Gone are the standard red, white, and blue motifs, replaced by an all-black backdrop. And prominently placed on virtually every page of the site is a quote credited to a man who facilitated a greater role for socialists and communists at the U.N., and the global "workers rights movement." ' (...C. Wilfred Jenks, who back in the late 1930s and after World War II was a leading figure in the "international law" movement, which sought to impose a global, common law,...)
The American Spectator : Justice Loses Its Stars and Stripes


But, by now, all know who this President and his minions serve. A vote for Obama is ironically, a vote for unelected bureaucrats to rule the nation and the world.

Guess where his post-election "flexibility" would lead......

Globalism has been gaining strength and nationalism has been slowly dying for over a century and it's irreversible. Cultural, language, and economic barriers have been falling throughout the world. Problems such as global warming, terrorism, recessions, and natural disasters, have widespread global impacts and thus demand global cooperation. This did not start with Obama, but has increased and it will continue to do.

I doubt anyone alive today will ever seen world government, but it's coming.

Here we have a phenomenon so ubiquitous that it cries out for inspection...

1. Specific linked notes and quotes from or about “global warming,” a Supreme Court Justice, the CIA Director, the Vice-President, President Obama's National Economic Council director, and the Department of Justice…

Taken singly or together, they clearly represent an attack on the sovereignty and design of the Unite States of America.


2. Yet, Torte-boy, wingy, floppsy, paintball, deanie, Stalin, konny, in short….the ‘usual suspects’ unanimously post ‘is not, is not’ responses.

3. If every one of the five items in the is accurate and correct, isn’t ‘is not, is not’ tepid at the very best?

And is not an attack on the very nature of the United States pretty serious, if true? Isn’t our independence the reason for America’s exceptional history?


4. Are the Left’s posters so weak, so insipid that they can’t muster an insightful attack to show that
a. the items in the OP are untrue?
b. or that world governance is a good idea?


5. Seems Coulter was correct:
“Let me give you a little tip: if you want liberalism to continue in this country, you have to realize that liberal students are being let down by their professors! They have liberal school teachers, and read the liberal press! Because of this weak preparation, they are unable to argue, to think beyond the first knee-jerk impulse. They can’t put together a logical thought. Now, compare that to a college Republican…”

 

[rightwinger]

1. The big push by the Left at Global Governance, called 'global warming' was aimed at putting the nation under the control of the United Nations has all but petered out...as the fraud became revealed.
"In Obama’s second State of the Union address, he actually seemed to concede the scientific evidence as a weakness. He argued that we need to pursue a more enlightened energy strategy in spite of the doubts about the science of climate change."
Michael Mann 'Disappointed' In Obama's Global Warming Record


2. "[Justice] Ginsburg, whose job on the Supreme Court is to uphold the U.S. Constitution, has a curious but sadly widespread disdain for that document. A recent New York Times article suggested the American Constitution is losing its allure around the world. The main reason is it does not guarantee the right to, among other things, food, health care and education."
Ruth Bader Ginsburg Trashes Constitution; Should She Be Impeached? - Yahoo! News


3. "CIA Director Leon Panetta, President Obama’s nominee for secretary of defense, co-chaired an initiative to regulate U.S. oceans and cede them to United Nations-based international law.
Panetta’s oceans initiative was a key partner of an organization, Citizens for Global Solutions, that promotes world government.
As WND reported, billionaire George Soros is a primary funder and key proponent of the Global Centre for Responsibility to Protect, the main organization pushing the doctrine. The center includes the World Federalist Movement as one of its members and coordinators."
Obama’s DoD nominee caught in 1-world scheme


4. "We want to create what's called a global minimum tax," he [Biden] said, "because American taxpayers shouldn't be providing a larger subsidy for investing abroad than investing at home."... President Obama's National Economic Council director Gene Sperling also used the term "global minimum tax" last month.

But considering this administration's hostility to American exceptionalism, for all we know U.S. businesses could find themselves a couple of years from now subject to taxation dictated by corrupt international bodies like the United Nations, the International Monetary Fund or the World Bank. ObamaCare proves that you never can be sure what this president and his minions are really up to."
Vice President Joe Biden's Gaffes Are Legendary, But The Ideas Behind Them Are Worse - Investors.com


5. 'What's black and white and "red" all over? The Department of Justice's newly designed website. Gone are the standard red, white, and blue motifs, replaced by an all-black backdrop. And prominently placed on virtually every page of the site is a quote credited to a man who facilitated a greater role for socialists and communists at the U.N., and the global "workers rights movement." ' (...C. Wilfred Jenks, who back in the late 1930s and after World War II was a leading figure in the "international law" movement, which sought to impose a global, common law,...)
The American Spectator : Justice Loses Its Stars and Stripes


But, by now, all know who this President and his minions serve. A vote for Obama is ironically, a vote for unelected bureaucrats to rule the nation and the world.

Guess where his post-election "flexibility" would lead......

Globalism has been gaining strength and nationalism has been slowly dying for over a century and it's irreversible. Cultural, language, and economic barriers have been falling throughout the world. Problems such as global warming, terrorism, recessions, and natural disasters, have widespread global impacts and thus demand global cooperation. This did not start with Obama, but has increased and it will continue to do.

I doubt anyone alive today will ever seen world government, but it's coming.

Here we have a phenomenon so ubiquitous that it cries out for inspection...

1. Specific linked notes and quotes from or about “global warming,” a Supreme Court Justice, the CIA Director, the Vice-President, President Obama's National Economic Council director, and the Department of Justice…

Taken singly or together, they clearly represent an attack on the sovereignty and design of the Unite States of America.


2. Yet, Torte-boy, wingy, floppsy, paintball, deanie, Stalin, konny, in short….the ‘usual suspects’ unanimously post ‘is not, is not’ responses.

3. If every one of the five items in the is accurate and correct, isn’t ‘is not, is not’ tepid at the very best?

And is not an attack on the very nature of the United States pretty serious, if true? Isn’t our independence the reason for America’s exceptional history?


4. Are the Left’s posters so weak, so insipid that they can’t muster an insightful attack to show that
a. the items in the OP are untrue?
b. or that world governance is a good idea?


5. Seems Coulter was correct:
“Let me give you a little tip: if you want liberalism to continue in this country, you have to realize that liberal students are being let down by their professors! They have liberal school teachers, and read the liberal press! Because of this weak preparation, they are unable to argue, to think beyond the first knee-jerk impulse. They can’t put together a logical thought. Now, compare that to a college Republican…”

I realize you are just playing with us as you giggle "look at the line if shit I got those libbies to buy"

In fact, we cannot even gain cooperation in our own country, yet you somehow envision we can work out some global order of international brotherhood

Yes, I still reccomend you be fitted for those tin foil panties

 

[Big Fitz]

It's about to all fly apart. No one world anything is very possible very soon. We're on the edge of a new dark age. All it will take is a little push in the right area, and off we go down the slope of global cultural ruin. We are only one John Galt, Francisco D'Anconia and Ragnar Danesskold away from it happening.

Isn't that part of the plan? Magnify the misery to accelerate the change? Who's trying harder?

Who's behind the racial strife, civil disobedience groups like the Occupados, recall elections based on sour grapes, entitlement and unsustainable union protectionism, bankrupting profitable but politically unpopular industries for those that are darlings of their political sect, and shutting down free speech and the will of the people through the courts and intimidating sponsors? Oh and don't forget trying to force religions to knuckle under and obey the tenants of government rather than God.

Just who do you think is doing that? Where on the left is there any peacemaking, unifying force for this nation if it does not submit to your politics?

 

[konradv]

It's about to all fly apart. No one world anything is very possible very soon. We're on the edge of a new dark age. All it will take is a little push in the right area, and off we go down the slope of global cultural ruin. We are only one John Galt, Francisco D'Anconia and Ragnar Danesskold away from it happening.

Isn't that part of the plan? Magnify the misery to accelerate the change? Who's trying harder?

Who's behind the racial strife, civil disobedience groups like the Occupados, recall elections based on sour grapes, entitlement and unsustainable union protectionism, bankrupting profitable but politically unpopular industries for those that are darlings of their political sect, and shutting down free speech and the will of the people through the courts and intimidating sponsors? Oh and don't forget trying to force religions to knuckle under and obey the tenants of government rather than God.

Just who do you think is doing that? Where on the left is there any peacemaking, unifying force for this nation if it does not submit to your politics?

What about income imbalance, drives to turn back environmental laws, legislating against women, subordinating equal rights to religious doctrine? It goes both ways. Who's winning and will it really matter in the end, since One World Government is coming anyway?

 

[Dragon]

1. The big push by the Left at Global Governance, called 'global warming'

LOL I can't believe it. Even when, overall, you're right, you still get it wrong.

There is in fact a push for global governance. It has little to do with global warming, though. It arises from the fact that, economically and culturally, the world IS unifying. I communicate daily with people from all over the world; one of my clients is in Australia or New Zealand (not sure which), another is in Austria, and a third is in the Middle East somewhere.

One of the main tasks of government is to medicate conflicts among people in its jurisdiction, but in the new world that's emerging, there is no national government that has jurisdiction over all of the possible vectors of conflict. And so increasingly, pressure arises for governing institutions of global scope, and they are in the process of being created.

We cannot stop this. All we can hope to do, is to steer it in a preferred direction.

 

[Seawytch]

One World Government? HA!

Only if it is this one...

Nutters...

 

[PoliticalChic]

Globalism has been gaining strength and nationalism has been slowly dying for over a century and it's irreversible. Cultural, language, and economic barriers have been falling throughout the world. Problems such as global warming, terrorism, recessions, and natural disasters, have widespread global impacts and thus demand global cooperation. This did not start with Obama, but has increased and it will continue to do.

I doubt anyone alive today will ever seen world government, but it's coming.

Here we have a phenomenon so ubiquitous that it cries out for inspection...

1. Specific linked notes and quotes from or about “global warming,” a Supreme Court Justice, the CIA Director, the Vice-President, President Obama's National Economic Council director, and the Department of Justice…

Taken singly or together, they clearly represent an attack on the sovereignty and design of the Unite States of America.


2. Yet, Torte-boy, wingy, floppsy, paintball, deanie, Stalin, konny, in short….the ‘usual suspects’ unanimously post ‘is not, is not’ responses.

3. If every one of the five items in the is accurate and correct, isn’t ‘is not, is not’ tepid at the very best?

And is not an attack on the very nature of the United States pretty serious, if true? Isn’t our independence the reason for America’s exceptional history?


4. Are the Left’s posters so weak, so insipid that they can’t muster an insightful attack to show that
a. the items in the OP are untrue?
b. or that world governance is a good idea?


5. Seems Coulter was correct:
“Let me give you a little tip: if you want liberalism to continue in this country, you have to realize that liberal students are being let down by their professors! They have liberal school teachers, and read the liberal press! Because of this weak preparation, they are unable to argue, to think beyond the first knee-jerk impulse. They can’t put together a logical thought. Now, compare that to a college Republican…”

I realize you are just playing with us as you giggle "look at the line if shit I got those libbies to buy"

In fact, we cannot even gain cooperation in our own country, yet you somehow envision we can work out some global order of international brotherhood

Yes, I still reccomend you be fitted for those tin foil panties

My poor, poor buddy, wingy...

Straining to be relevant, to author a pity post....but reduced to this...what, adumbration?

Speaking of which....did you hear of the cartoonist found dead? Details are sketchy....



Did you find the following beyond your abilities?
" Are the Left’s posters so weak, so insipid that they can’t muster an insightful attack to show that
a. the items in the OP are untrue?
b. or that world governance is a good idea?"

 

[PoliticalChic]

It's about to all fly apart. No one world anything is very possible very soon. We're on the edge of a new dark age. All it will take is a little push in the right area, and off we go down the slope of global cultural ruin. We are only one John Galt, Francisco D'Anconia and Ragnar Danesskold away from it happening.

Isn't that part of the plan? Magnify the misery to accelerate the change? Who's trying harder?

Who's behind the racial strife, civil disobedience groups like the Occupados, recall elections based on sour grapes, entitlement and unsustainable union protectionism, bankrupting profitable but politically unpopular industries for those that are darlings of their political sect, and shutting down free speech and the will of the people through the courts and intimidating sponsors? Oh and don't forget trying to force religions to knuckle under and obey the tenants of government rather than God.

Just who do you think is doing that? Where on the left is there any peacemaking, unifying force for this nation if it does not submit to your politics?

A useful strategy that the KGB found highly successful...

....and added by the Main Stream Media.

Often difficult to see where KGB ends and MSM begins.....

They authored same as agitprop as far back as 1935. Today it is combined with Alinsky tactics, and, as you can see....pretty successful.
Latest edition is the Zimmerman-Martin case.

Smert Komitet Gossudarstvennoy Bezopasnosti-
(Death to the KGB)

 

[PoliticalChic]

Isn't that part of the plan? Magnify the misery to accelerate the change? Who's trying harder?

Who's behind the racial strife, civil disobedience groups like the Occupados, recall elections based on sour grapes, entitlement and unsustainable union protectionism, bankrupting profitable but politically unpopular industries for those that are darlings of their political sect, and shutting down free speech and the will of the people through the courts and intimidating sponsors? Oh and don't forget trying to force religions to knuckle under and obey the tenants of government rather than God.

Just who do you think is doing that? Where on the left is there any peacemaking, unifying force for this nation if it does not submit to your politics?

What about income imbalance, drives to turn back environmental laws, legislating against women, subordinating equal rights to religious doctrine? It goes both ways. Who's winning and will it really matter in the end, since One World Government is coming anyway?

1. Problem: income imbalance

Solution: work harder


...see how easy that was?

2. "...will it really matter in the end,..."
This could only be penned by a dunce who has never studied history.

Pinned the tail on the donkey, didn't I konny?