Congress Reaches Deal On $1T Bill To Fund Government Until Oct.

skews13

Diamond Member
Mar 18, 2017
9,422
11,817
2,265
BBAzsXZ.img


WASHINGTON (AP) — Top Capitol Hill negotiators reached a hard-won agreement on a huge $1 trillion-plus spending bill that would fund the day-to-day operations of virtually every federal agency through September, aides said Sunday night.

Details of the agreement were expected to be made public Sunday night, said aides to lawmakers involved in weeks of negotiations. The House and Senate had until midnight Friday to pass a measure to avert a government shutdown.

The catchall spending bill would be the first major piece of bipartisan legislation to advance during President Donald Trump's short tenure in the White House. It denies Trump a win on his oft-promised wall along the U.S.-Mexico border, but gives him a $15 billion down payment on his request to strengthen the military.

It also rejects White House budget director Mick Mulvaney's proposals to cut popular programs such as funding medical research and community development grants and adds $1.5 billion for border security measures such as additional detention beds.

Most of the core decisions about agency budgets had been worked out, but unrelated policy issues — such as a Democratic request to help the cash-strapped government of Puerto Rico with its Medicaid burden — were among the final holdups.

The aides required anonymity because they were not allowed to speak about the agreement by name.

Democrats have denied Trump a big-picture win on obtaining an initial down payment for his oft-promised border wall with Mexico, while anti-abortion lawmakers didn't even attempt to use the must-pass measure to try to cut off federal money for Planned Parenthood.

Details were being closely held ahead of an agreement, but Trump and Capitol Hill defense hawks procured a $15 billion infusion of cash for Pentagon readiness and won funding for other border security accounts, such as detention beds for people entering the country illegally.

Democrats praised a $2 billion funding increase for the National Institutes of Health — rejecting the steep cuts proposed by Trump — as well as additional funding to combat opioid abuse, fund Pell Grants for summer school and additional transit funding. A provision extending health care for 22,000 retired Appalachian coal miners and their families was on track to provide permanent health benefits, a priority of Senate Majority leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., and other Appalachia region lawmakers.

Democratic votes will be needed to pass the measure, so even though Republicans control both the White House and Congress, Democrats have been actively involved in the talks, which appear headed to produce a lowest-common-denominator measure that won't look too much different than the deal that could have been struck on President Barack Obama's watch last year.

Republicans had pressed for policy wins with so-called riders related to other abortion-related issues and blocking environmental regulations such as Obama's sweeping expansion of the Clean Water Act. They also hoped to chuck new financial rules. But Democrats pushed back and were hopeful that the measure would not contain many items they deemed "poison pills."

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct...RoIJ4_0O9G9OK8D0Q&sig2=J4mWYPXEqDHIWcis6TiJXQ
 
Why do we need to increase military spending during fiscal and real times of Peace, as indicated under our form of Capitalism, by a peacetime tax paradigm instead of a general warfare paradigm.

In consideration of the monstrous sacrifice in property and blood that each war demands of the people, personal enrichment through a war must be designated as a crime against the people. Therefore, we demand the total confiscation of all war profits.
 
Why do we need to increase military spending during fiscal and real times of Peace, as indicated under our form of Capitalism, by a peacetime tax paradigm instead of a general warfare paradigm.

In consideration of the monstrous sacrifice in property and blood that each war demands of the people, personal enrichment through a war must be designated as a crime against the people. Therefore, we demand the total confiscation of all war profits.

We're going to kill lil kim
 
Why do we need to increase military spending during fiscal and real times of Peace, as indicated under our form of Capitalism, by a peacetime tax paradigm instead of a general warfare paradigm.

In consideration of the monstrous sacrifice in property and blood that each war demands of the people, personal enrichment through a war must be designated as a crime against the people. Therefore, we demand the total confiscation of all war profits.

We're going to kill lil kim
That requires, real times of War, Tax Rates. We already know, the right will provide no, "second wave", and proclaim, "hell no, we won't go if there is Any tax Increase", to look, "fiscally tough".
 
Never has been. Only when they can increase the taxes on the middle class and reduce them on the very wealthy. The GOP is the epitome of hypocrisy.
 
Fiscally tough is spending but not increasing you income? The GOP are like a bunch of adolescents, all wants and no means.

Republicans always mock Democrats for their "tax and spend" ways but Democrats have the good sense to PAY for their programs. That's why Democrats balance the budget and Republicans balloon the deficit.

They lie and say that "growth will increase the revenue" to cover the tax cut. But it hasn't yet. Undeterred, Republicans are going to continue to sell this lie to a willing public until it does. Which will be never.
 

Forum List

Back
Top