Right now what kind of light bulb we can have is the least of our problems. NDAA
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Congress overturns incandescent light bulb ban - Washington Times
Good deal! It's a start.
We need to vote in a lot more conservatives before we can undo all the destructive Democrat policies of the last (almost) six years.
It was a backdoor moment up here. You have to slide around enviro whackos.
And don't get me wrong you libs. I'm a Ducks Unlimited conservationist kinda person. What we did is we got mercury banned as an enviromental hazard. The CFL's got this time a pass, but barely.
But I can work this. It's a start.
Thank goodness that Republicans have their priorities in order
LOL>... down with lightbulb tyranny!!!
What power source are you typing from?
Are you solar or wind? I'm from a renewable.
You?
Congress overturns incandescent light bulb ban - Washington Times
Good deal! It's a start.
We need to vote in a lot more conservatives before we can undo all the destructive Democrat policies of the last (almost) six years.
It was a backdoor moment up here. You have to slide around enviro whackos.
And don't get me wrong you libs. I'm a Ducks Unlimited conservationist kinda person. What we did is we got mercury banned as an enviromental hazard. The CFL's got this time a pass, but barely.
But I can work this. It's a start.
You do realize that there is only 2-4 mg of mercury in a CFL, right?
You do realize that all but 11% of that 2-4 mg gets permanently bonded to the glass on the inside of the bulb, right?
Then you must also realize that in the generation of electricity, there is Mercury dispersed into the air that comes back to the ground, and that because of generating LESS energy by using CFL's instead of incandescent light bulbs, that you end up with an overall savings of 5mg of mercury/light bulb by using CFL's.
Do the research... it's out there on the web.
Where the heck do you get these pictures. Holy geeze that one is hysterical!
Sorries, nothing to do with topic but thats freaking funny.
Thank you, I still have a few to go.
OMG I've got to keep a heads up. Too freaking funny. I'm still lmao over the kid in the bottom drawer.
Keep going and I'll now really watch for you.
It was a backdoor moment up here. You have to slide around enviro whackos.
And don't get me wrong you libs. I'm a Ducks Unlimited conservationist kinda person. What we did is we got mercury banned as an enviromental hazard. The CFL's got this time a pass, but barely.
But I can work this. It's a start.
You do realize that there is only 2-4 mg of mercury in a CFL, right?
You do realize that all but 11% of that 2-4 mg gets permanently bonded to the glass on the inside of the bulb, right?
Then you must also realize that in the generation of electricity, there is Mercury dispersed into the air that comes back to the ground, and that because of generating LESS energy by using CFL's instead of incandescent light bulbs, that you end up with an overall savings of 5mg of mercury/light bulb by using CFL's.
Do the research... it's out there on the web.
Of course, you could just bypass all that stuff and go to LED's.
This is big.....I mean BIG
After being accused of being a do nothing Congress, the Republicans pull off a major victory in protecting our rights to purchase obsolete lightbulbs
The Tea Party must be proud
You do realize that there is only 2-4 mg of mercury in a CFL, right?
You do realize that all but 11% of that 2-4 mg gets permanently bonded to the glass on the inside of the bulb, right?
Then you must also realize that in the generation of electricity, there is Mercury dispersed into the air that comes back to the ground, and that because of generating LESS energy by using CFL's instead of incandescent light bulbs, that you end up with an overall savings of 5mg of mercury/light bulb by using CFL's.
Do the research... it's out there on the web.
Of course, you could just bypass all that stuff and go to LED's.
Absolutely... and when they reach the right price point... I will.
LOL>... down with lightbulb tyranny!!!
What power source are you typing from?
Are you solar or wind? I'm from a renewable.
You?
2,500 watt solar panel.
Of course, you could just bypass all that stuff and go to LED's.
Absolutely... and when they reach the right price point... I will.
I'll give you this, 15 dollars for a bulb seems a bit much, but I did throw out an offer to do the math on how much you would save from using a single bulb compared to the same equivalent incandescent.
As though democratics expending the time and effort to pass the ban was any demonstration of having priorities in order?Thank goodness that Republicans have their priorities in order
if these things are so good and the amount of mercury inside them not a hazard then why the lengthy procedure to handle and dispose as well as clean up of broken CFL's?Congress overturns incandescent light bulb ban - Washington Times
Good deal! It's a start.
We need to vote in a lot more conservatives before we can undo all the destructive Democrat policies of the last (almost) six years.
It was a backdoor moment up here. You have to slide around enviro whackos.
And don't get me wrong you libs. I'm a Ducks Unlimited conservationist kinda person. What we did is we got mercury banned as an enviromental hazard. The CFL's got this time a pass, but barely.
But I can work this. It's a start.
You do realize that there is only 2-4 mg of mercury in a CFL, right?
You do realize that all but 11% of that 2-4 mg gets permanently bonded to the glass on the inside of the bulb, right?
Then you must also realize that in the generation of electricity, there is Mercury dispersed into the air that comes back to the ground, and that because of generating LESS energy by using CFL's instead of incandescent light bulbs, that you end up with an overall savings of 5mg of mercury/light bulb by using CFL's.
Do the research... it's out there on the web.
What power source are you typing from?
Are you solar or wind? I'm from a renewable.
You?
2,500 watt solar panel.
What does that get you in your house?
I've gone primal in my time which means nothing is on. Nothing. Radio with batteries to hear anything. But apart from that NOTHING.
Do you get that? Do you understand what that means? I lived that for years. I can do it again. I can live with that. Can you?
So what does your 2500 get you? I'm really curious because my neighbors who really tried solar had to bail because the expected too much I think.
Not being a smart ass here. I'm a serious conservationist.
It's a delay, not an overturn.The massive, 1,200-page omnibus spending bill being rushed through Congress to avoid a government shutdown include at least one small bit of good news: It suspends the energy regulations signed by George W. Bush in 2007 that would have effectively banned 100-watt incandescent light bulbs as of January 1, 2011.
Reports the Wash Times, "The spending bill doesnt actually amend the 2007 law, but does prohibit the administration from spending any money to carry out the light bulb standards which amounts to at least a temporary reprieve."
That means the regs will likely go into effect next fiscal year, which starts in October 2012.
Big Government should ban that bad ole Sun. It definitely uses too much energy and it's melting shit all the time. What about them Polar Icecaps? What did they ever do to anyone? Yea,something has to be done with the Sun. It's time for Big Government to act.