Tumblin Tumbleweed
Gold Member
- Mar 16, 2015
- 20,885
- 7,192
- 265
In other words, you have no credible arguments against it.I think no one under the age of 35 or over the age of 55 should be allowed to vote. The former are too gullible and naive and the later only care about getting as much out of the government as they can before they die. Also, No on who hasn't paid any net taxes to the government in the previous two years should be allowed to vote. You should also have to prove you have net assets over $50,000 to vote. Only someone who has something at stake should be entitled to choose the leaders of this county.Well, there you go....telling us that you support voter suppression. Why am I not surprised.Stupid people shouldn't vote. They're the reason we have Democrats in office.It's good that you voted...everyone should vote (those qualified), regardless of how you vote. It's a civic duty.
The last thing this country needs is more voters.
What an idiotic post.
Thanks for playing.
Anyone suggesting infringements on voting has no credible argument. The states, not you, decide eligibility. You are shouting at clouds spewing partisan nonsense and no one is listening.