Confederate patriotism is legal?

[Mike Dwight]

That is actually a very well phrased question, a timely question, a question no one ever really put to anyone in school, "is Confederate patriotism legal"? Many people have, very well founded, detractions and objections to violent patriotism, racism, or bigoted actions. Confederates were associated with this more than average. "Patriots were those colonists of the Thirteen Colonies who rejected British rule during the American Revolution and declared the United States of America as an independent nation in July 1776." Confederation was one of two competing political theories of the separation of the United States of America from British Empire. The State of the Union and Confederacy were repeated in equal dialogue from all 15 Presidents before Lincoln. In fact, Confederate relations just happened to be the political philosophy to drop off with one side of a war.
You won't hear anyone say that, a well-informed one third of the race of Southern farm men who fought and became casualties, heard a clear vocal argument about slavery, race relations, liberty, freedom, when that's not the case, and they just heard about rumored invasions, and they heard a call of government, defended the rights of government, were patriots, and upon capture asked about the aggressive cause of men from other states.
Is Confederate patriotism legal? Well, someone may ask, what is the occurrence, are we under state-specific alien invasion? Are all other governments bought out besides your county mailroom?What kind of high endeavor do we all find completely unobtrusive, within individual rights of every US citizen, and is Also Confederate Patriotism?!

No one will fully highlight this element of Woodrow Wilson, President Woodrow Wilson, as a real topic of discussion. The 14th Amendment I think created Natural Born Citizenship and made restrictions on Confederate Political office, but Woodrow Wilson was a child during the war, and wasn't subject to restriction to political office. What rallied a country to Confederate Patriotism in the 1913 election? The full depth of historian discussion is a split ticket with Theodore Roosevelt's Bull Moose party and the Republican party allowing the long-ousted Democrat party to win. Theodore Roosevelt would be President later. However this was a fully dedicated Confederate Patriotic man, as a Second George Washington, see "second war of independence". A ulster-scot Presbyterian leading minister, see Thomas "stonewall" Jackson, a defender of all the free people and their gender relations, see "bonnie blue flag". The occasion I assume, without all-male voter exit polls, stemmed from New York (bloody Yankees) and the Triangle Shirtwaist Factory Fire. Such incidents represent a shoe on the other foot, so to speak, that in the State of New York, the Labor practices involved, trapping up women of foreign lands to work for sweatshop bosses. In the Triangle Shirtwaist Factory Fire, some 120 various immigrant Romanian or Italian or Jewish women, burned alive because of an upper floor factory fire with locked doors among the abusive labor practices. Two years later, all election in both Houses and Presidency swung toward Democrats and limitations on indecent, perhaps read impious, Business.

In a very short time, a reluctant Woodrow Wilson would instead be known for his slow entry in World War I? His very own invention, the League of Nations, promoted not a Union of Europe, but the independent characters of these countries coming to the common cause. Their logo is a Star in blue background. Alma Gluck's old Southern Favorites would take off in this period on the LP. She was a Romanian born, immigrated, and married woman on a New York and island estate. (Sorry I forget all their little islands).

So how can people say that Confederate Patriotism might be illegal when after the war, its reconciled with American patriotism? More obscure information from a more obscure president than the last one. After World War II, General Eisenhower won election, and became some different Presbyterian entirely, in office. The kind that gets to repurpose the word to a Church of his own creation. It all seems pretty anti-scholar nationalist, but all the same, look into it! From President Eisenhower's Presbyterian Church, we now recite, "there is One Nation, Under God, Indivisible". Presbyterians used to lead all opposite direction of discussion on these issues. We now have patriotic Duties, note my original premise, to recite "One Nation, Under God, Indivisible". "In God We Trust" meant to be decorative, added to money, and its a Presbyterian suggestion. As we know, the Nations of the United Kingdom, as its often recited, are England, Scotland, and Northern Ireland. Presbyterianism by Scottish Parliament was established in Scotland and didn't catch on in England. Presbyterianism Should be scholarly inseparable since 1560 until 1958 with the vantage point, character, and Parish voice of the people of Scotland in or out of Union Jack. That is a very quiet viewpoint in the rebuilt "united Presbyterian Church" that every USA Presbyterian Church became a member.

How does "Confederate Patriotism" easily become a point of discussion then? There is a Huge Korean Presbyterian Church, and this Church of course, still promotes the idea of a Closer Bond of the People of the United States and Korea when Not subjected to a Federal Union, and that the South Korean Government is in the Right state of existence, which reasonable people can be led to believe the native Korean populace isn't receptive or benefitted from every bit of American trivia. Not until the Nationalist age of the 1900's was it so difficult for people to link the Church and friendly relations between castle-states. That's the Confederate mindset in the spiritual promotion of Presbyterianism during the war, and that is the interaction if you wish, with the Korean Presbyterian Church Abroad, that easily, any person, could be without much restraint concerning useful Confederate Patriotism.

 

[Moonglow]

Even though the Articles of Confederation and the first US president failed..

 

[Marion Morrison]

That is actually a very well phrased question, a timely question, a question no one ever really put to anyone in school, "is Confederate patriotism legal"? Many people have, very well founded, detractions and objections to violent patriotism, racism, or bigoted actions. Confederates were associated with this more than average. "Patriots were those colonists of the Thirteen Colonies who rejected British rule during the American Revolution and declared the United States of America as an independent nation in July 1776." Confederation was one of two competing political theories of the separation of the United States of America from British Empire. The State of the Union and Confederacy were repeated in equal dialogue from all 15 Presidents before Lincoln. In fact, Confederate relations just happened to be the political philosophy to drop off with one side of a war.
You won't hear anyone say that, a well-informed one third of the race of Southern farm men who fought and became casualties, heard a clear vocal argument about slavery, race relations, liberty, freedom, when that's not the case, and they just heard about rumored invasions, and they heard a call of government, defended the rights of government, were patriots, and upon capture asked about the aggressive cause of men from other states.
Is Confederate patriotism legal? Well, someone may ask, what is the occurrence, are we under state-specific alien invasion? Are all other governments bought out besides your county mailroom?What kind of high endeavor do we all find completely unobtrusive, within individual rights of every US citizen, and is Also Confederate Patriotism?!

No one will fully highlight this element of Woodrow Wilson, President Woodrow Wilson, as a real topic of discussion. The 14th Amendment I think created Natural Born Citizenship and made restrictions on Confederate Political office, but Woodrow Wilson was a child during the war, and wasn't subject to restriction to political office. What rallied a country to Confederate Patriotism in the 1913 election? The full depth of historian discussion is a split ticket with Theodore Roosevelt's Bull Moose party and the Republican party allowing the long-ousted Democrat party to win. Theodore Roosevelt would be President later. However this was a fully dedicated Confederate Patriotic man, as a Second George Washington, see "second war of independence". A ulster-scot Presbyterian leading minister, see Thomas "stonewall" Jackson, a defender of all the free people and their gender relations, see "bonnie blue flag". The occasion I assume, without all-male voter exit polls, stemmed from New York (bloody Yankees) and the Triangle Shirtwaist Factory Fire. Such incidents represent a shoe on the other foot, so to speak, that in the State of New York, the Labor practices involved, trapping up women of foreign lands to work for sweatshop bosses. In the Triangle Shirtwaist Factory Fire, some 120 various immigrant Romanian or Italian or Jewish women, burned alive because of an upper floor factory fire with locked doors among the abusive labor practices. Two years later, all election in both Houses and Presidency swung toward Democrats and limitations on indecent, perhaps read impious, Business.

In a very short time, a reluctant Woodrow Wilson would instead be known for his slow entry in World War I? His very own invention, the League of Nations, promoted not a Union of Europe, but the independent characters of these countries coming to the common cause. Their logo is a Star in blue background. Alma Gluck's old Southern Favorites would take off in this period on the LP. She was a Romanian born, immigrated, and married woman on a New York and island estate. (Sorry I forget all their little islands).

So how can people say that Confederate Patriotism might be illegal when after the war, its reconciled with American patriotism? More obscure information from a more obscure president than the last one. After World War II, General Eisenhower won election, and became some different Presbyterian entirely, in office. The kind that gets to repurpose the word to a Church of his own creation. It all seems pretty anti-scholar nationalist, but all the same, look into it! From President Eisenhower's Presbyterian Church, we now recite, "there is One Nation, Under God, Indivisible". Presbyterians used to lead all opposite direction of discussion on these issues. We now have patriotic Duties, note my original premise, to recite "One Nation, Under God, Indivisible". "In God We Trust" meant to be decorative, added to money, and its a Presbyterian suggestion. As we know, the Nations of the United Kingdom, as its often recited, are England, Scotland, and Northern Ireland. Presbyterianism by Scottish Parliament was established in Scotland and didn't catch on in England. Presbyterianism Should be scholarly inseparable since 1560 until 1958 with the vantage point, character, and Parish voice of the people of Scotland in or out of Union Jack. That is a very quiet viewpoint in the rebuilt "united Presbyterian Church" that every USA Presbyterian Church became a member.

How does "Confederate Patriotism" easily become a point of discussion then? There is a Huge Korean Presbyterian Church, and this Church of course, still promotes the idea of a Closer Bond of the People of the United States and Korea when Not subjected to a Federal Union, and that the South Korean Government is in the Right state of existence, which reasonable people can be led to believe the native Korean populace isn't receptive or benefitted from every bit of American trivia. Not until the Nationalist age of the 1900's was it so difficult for people to link the Church and friendly relations between castle-states. That's the Confederate mindset in the spiritual promotion of Presbyterianism during the war, and that is the interaction if you wish, with the Korean Presbyterian Church Abroad, that easily, any person, could be without much restraint concerning useful Confederate Patriotism.

TL ; DR

The south may rise again.

GFY.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

It's easy to find out. Look up the penal code section for Confederate Patriotism.

 

[Pogo]

That is actually a very well phrased question, a timely question, a question no one ever really put to anyone in school, "is Confederate patriotism legal"? Many people have, very well founded, detractions and objections to violent patriotism, racism, or bigoted actions. Confederates were associated with this more than average. "Patriots were those colonists of the Thirteen Colonies who rejected British rule during the American Revolution and declared the United States of America as an independent nation in July 1776." Confederation was one of two competing political theories of the separation of the United States of America from British Empire. The State of the Union and Confederacy were repeated in equal dialogue from all 15 Presidents before Lincoln. In fact, Confederate relations just happened to be the political philosophy to drop off with one side of a war.
You won't hear anyone say that, a well-informed one third of the race of Southern farm men who fought and became casualties, heard a clear vocal argument about slavery, race relations, liberty, freedom, when that's not the case, and they just heard about rumored invasions, and they heard a call of government, defended the rights of government, were patriots, and upon capture asked about the aggressive cause of men from other states.
Is Confederate patriotism legal? Well, someone may ask, what is the occurrence, are we under state-specific alien invasion? Are all other governments bought out besides your county mailroom?What kind of high endeavor do we all find completely unobtrusive, within individual rights of every US citizen, and is Also Confederate Patriotism?!

No one will fully highlight this element of Woodrow Wilson, President Woodrow Wilson, as a real topic of discussion. The 14th Amendment I think created Natural Born Citizenship and made restrictions on Confederate Political office, but Woodrow Wilson was a child during the war, and wasn't subject to restriction to political office. What rallied a country to Confederate Patriotism in the 1913 election? The full depth of historian discussion is a split ticket with Theodore Roosevelt's Bull Moose party and the Republican party allowing the long-ousted Democrat party to win. Theodore Roosevelt would be President later. However this was a fully dedicated Confederate Patriotic man, as a Second George Washington, see "second war of independence". A ulster-scot Presbyterian leading minister, see Thomas "stonewall" Jackson, a defender of all the free people and their gender relations, see "bonnie blue flag". The occasion I assume, without all-male voter exit polls, stemmed from New York (bloody Yankees) and the Triangle Shirtwaist Factory Fire. Such incidents represent a shoe on the other foot, so to speak, that in the State of New York, the Labor practices involved, trapping up women of foreign lands to work for sweatshop bosses. In the Triangle Shirtwaist Factory Fire, some 120 various immigrant Romanian or Italian or Jewish women, burned alive because of an upper floor factory fire with locked doors among the abusive labor practices. Two years later, all election in both Houses and Presidency swung toward Democrats and limitations on indecent, perhaps read impious, Business.

In a very short time, a reluctant Woodrow Wilson would instead be known for his slow entry in World War I? His very own invention, the League of Nations, promoted not a Union of Europe, but the independent characters of these countries coming to the common cause. Their logo is a Star in blue background. Alma Gluck's old Southern Favorites would take off in this period on the LP. She was a Romanian born, immigrated, and married woman on a New York and island estate. (Sorry I forget all their little islands).

So how can people say that Confederate Patriotism might be illegal when after the war, its reconciled with American patriotism? More obscure information from a more obscure president than the last one. After World War II, General Eisenhower won election, and became some different Presbyterian entirely, in office. The kind that gets to repurpose the word to a Church of his own creation. It all seems pretty anti-scholar nationalist, but all the same, look into it! From President Eisenhower's Presbyterian Church, we now recite, "there is One Nation, Under God, Indivisible". Presbyterians used to lead all opposite direction of discussion on these issues. We now have patriotic Duties, note my original premise, to recite "One Nation, Under God, Indivisible". "In God We Trust" meant to be decorative, added to money, and its a Presbyterian suggestion. As we know, the Nations of the United Kingdom, as its often recited, are England, Scotland, and Northern Ireland. Presbyterianism by Scottish Parliament was established in Scotland and didn't catch on in England. Presbyterianism Should be scholarly inseparable since 1560 until 1958 with the vantage point, character, and Parish voice of the people of Scotland in or out of Union Jack. That is a very quiet viewpoint in the rebuilt "united Presbyterian Church" that every USA Presbyterian Church became a member.

How does "Confederate Patriotism" easily become a point of discussion then? There is a Huge Korean Presbyterian Church, and this Church of course, still promotes the idea of a Closer Bond of the People of the United States and Korea when Not subjected to a Federal Union, and that the South Korean Government is in the Right state of existence, which reasonable people can be led to believe the native Korean populace isn't receptive or benefitted from every bit of American trivia. Not until the Nationalist age of the 1900's was it so difficult for people to link the Church and friendly relations between castle-states. That's the Confederate mindset in the spiritual promotion of Presbyterianism during the war, and that is the interaction if you wish, with the Korean Presbyterian Church Abroad, that easily, any person, could be without much restraint concerning useful Confederate Patriotism.

An inchoate ramble that should have been edited and focused on ------------ something. Whatever the intent was here.

Coupla immediate corrections: there was no election in 1913; in the 1912 one Roosevelt did run but would not be President again; there were no "Confederates" running; and there is no such thing as a "Democrat Party".

What does Woodrow Wilson ---- or anything else in this word salad ---- have to do with "Confederate patriotism"?

And where did anyone suggest it's "illegal" in the first place?

 

[Pogo]

That is actually a very well phrased question, a timely question, a question no one ever really put to anyone in school, "is Confederate patriotism legal"? Many people have, very well founded, detractions and objections to violent patriotism, racism, or bigoted actions. Confederates were associated with this more than average. "Patriots were those colonists of the Thirteen Colonies who rejected British rule during the American Revolution and declared the United States of America as an independent nation in July 1776." Confederation was one of two competing political theories of the separation of the United States of America from British Empire. The State of the Union and Confederacy were repeated in equal dialogue from all 15 Presidents before Lincoln. In fact, Confederate relations just happened to be the political philosophy to drop off with one side of a war.
You won't hear anyone say that, a well-informed one third of the race of Southern farm men who fought and became casualties, heard a clear vocal argument about slavery, race relations, liberty, freedom, when that's not the case, and they just heard about rumored invasions, and they heard a call of government, defended the rights of government, were patriots, and upon capture asked about the aggressive cause of men from other states.
Is Confederate patriotism legal? Well, someone may ask, what is the occurrence, are we under state-specific alien invasion? Are all other governments bought out besides your county mailroom?What kind of high endeavor do we all find completely unobtrusive, within individual rights of every US citizen, and is Also Confederate Patriotism?!

No one will fully highlight this element of Woodrow Wilson, President Woodrow Wilson, as a real topic of discussion. The 14th Amendment I think created Natural Born Citizenship and made restrictions on Confederate Political office, but Woodrow Wilson was a child during the war, and wasn't subject to restriction to political office. What rallied a country to Confederate Patriotism in the 1913 election? The full depth of historian discussion is a split ticket with Theodore Roosevelt's Bull Moose party and the Republican party allowing the long-ousted Democrat party to win. Theodore Roosevelt would be President later. However this was a fully dedicated Confederate Patriotic man, as a Second George Washington, see "second war of independence". A ulster-scot Presbyterian leading minister, see Thomas "stonewall" Jackson, a defender of all the free people and their gender relations, see "bonnie blue flag". The occasion I assume, without all-male voter exit polls, stemmed from New York (bloody Yankees) and the Triangle Shirtwaist Factory Fire. Such incidents represent a shoe on the other foot, so to speak, that in the State of New York, the Labor practices involved, trapping up women of foreign lands to work for sweatshop bosses. In the Triangle Shirtwaist Factory Fire, some 120 various immigrant Romanian or Italian or Jewish women, burned alive because of an upper floor factory fire with locked doors among the abusive labor practices. Two years later, all election in both Houses and Presidency swung toward Democrats and limitations on indecent, perhaps read impious, Business.

In a very short time, a reluctant Woodrow Wilson would instead be known for his slow entry in World War I? His very own invention, the League of Nations, promoted not a Union of Europe, but the independent characters of these countries coming to the common cause. Their logo is a Star in blue background. Alma Gluck's old Southern Favorites would take off in this period on the LP. She was a Romanian born, immigrated, and married woman on a New York and island estate. (Sorry I forget all their little islands).

So how can people say that Confederate Patriotism might be illegal when after the war, its reconciled with American patriotism? More obscure information from a more obscure president than the last one. After World War II, General Eisenhower won election, and became some different Presbyterian entirely, in office. The kind that gets to repurpose the word to a Church of his own creation. It all seems pretty anti-scholar nationalist, but all the same, look into it! From President Eisenhower's Presbyterian Church, we now recite, "there is One Nation, Under God, Indivisible". Presbyterians used to lead all opposite direction of discussion on these issues. We now have patriotic Duties, note my original premise, to recite "One Nation, Under God, Indivisible". "In God We Trust" meant to be decorative, added to money, and its a Presbyterian suggestion. As we know, the Nations of the United Kingdom, as its often recited, are England, Scotland, and Northern Ireland. Presbyterianism by Scottish Parliament was established in Scotland and didn't catch on in England. Presbyterianism Should be scholarly inseparable since 1560 until 1958 with the vantage point, character, and Parish voice of the people of Scotland in or out of Union Jack. That is a very quiet viewpoint in the rebuilt "united Presbyterian Church" that every USA Presbyterian Church became a member.

How does "Confederate Patriotism" easily become a point of discussion then? There is a Huge Korean Presbyterian Church, and this Church of course, still promotes the idea of a Closer Bond of the People of the United States and Korea when Not subjected to a Federal Union, and that the South Korean Government is in the Right state of existence, which reasonable people can be led to believe the native Korean populace isn't receptive or benefitted from every bit of American trivia. Not until the Nationalist age of the 1900's was it so difficult for people to link the Church and friendly relations between castle-states. That's the Confederate mindset in the spiritual promotion of Presbyterianism during the war, and that is the interaction if you wish, with the Korean Presbyterian Church Abroad, that easily, any person, could be without much restraint concerning useful Confederate Patriotism.

TL ; DR

The south may rise again.

GFY.

Well, it goes like this --- in the 1913 election Teddy Roosevelt made Woodrow Wilson win, which brought about the Presbyterians in Scotland, who fought the Koreans in the Union Jack war and that's why Confederate patriotism is illegal and punishable by your county mailroom.

I suspect the OP has been smoking Barr's Radiator Stop Leak.

 

[Marion Morrison]

That is actually a very well phrased question, a timely question, a question no one ever really put to anyone in school, "is Confederate patriotism legal"? Many people have, very well founded, detractions and objections to violent patriotism, racism, or bigoted actions. Confederates were associated with this more than average. "Patriots were those colonists of the Thirteen Colonies who rejected British rule during the American Revolution and declared the United States of America as an independent nation in July 1776." Confederation was one of two competing political theories of the separation of the United States of America from British Empire. The State of the Union and Confederacy were repeated in equal dialogue from all 15 Presidents before Lincoln. In fact, Confederate relations just happened to be the political philosophy to drop off with one side of a war.
You won't hear anyone say that, a well-informed one third of the race of Southern farm men who fought and became casualties, heard a clear vocal argument about slavery, race relations, liberty, freedom, when that's not the case, and they just heard about rumored invasions, and they heard a call of government, defended the rights of government, were patriots, and upon capture asked about the aggressive cause of men from other states.
Is Confederate patriotism legal? Well, someone may ask, what is the occurrence, are we under state-specific alien invasion? Are all other governments bought out besides your county mailroom?What kind of high endeavor do we all find completely unobtrusive, within individual rights of every US citizen, and is Also Confederate Patriotism?!

No one will fully highlight this element of Woodrow Wilson, President Woodrow Wilson, as a real topic of discussion. The 14th Amendment I think created Natural Born Citizenship and made restrictions on Confederate Political office, but Woodrow Wilson was a child during the war, and wasn't subject to restriction to political office. What rallied a country to Confederate Patriotism in the 1913 election? The full depth of historian discussion is a split ticket with Theodore Roosevelt's Bull Moose party and the Republican party allowing the long-ousted Democrat party to win. Theodore Roosevelt would be President later. However this was a fully dedicated Confederate Patriotic man, as a Second George Washington, see "second war of independence". A ulster-scot Presbyterian leading minister, see Thomas "stonewall" Jackson, a defender of all the free people and their gender relations, see "bonnie blue flag". The occasion I assume, without all-male voter exit polls, stemmed from New York (bloody Yankees) and the Triangle Shirtwaist Factory Fire. Such incidents represent a shoe on the other foot, so to speak, that in the State of New York, the Labor practices involved, trapping up women of foreign lands to work for sweatshop bosses. In the Triangle Shirtwaist Factory Fire, some 120 various immigrant Romanian or Italian or Jewish women, burned alive because of an upper floor factory fire with locked doors among the abusive labor practices. Two years later, all election in both Houses and Presidency swung toward Democrats and limitations on indecent, perhaps read impious, Business.

In a very short time, a reluctant Woodrow Wilson would instead be known for his slow entry in World War I? His very own invention, the League of Nations, promoted not a Union of Europe, but the independent characters of these countries coming to the common cause. Their logo is a Star in blue background. Alma Gluck's old Southern Favorites would take off in this period on the LP. She was a Romanian born, immigrated, and married woman on a New York and island estate. (Sorry I forget all their little islands).

So how can people say that Confederate Patriotism might be illegal when after the war, its reconciled with American patriotism? More obscure information from a more obscure president than the last one. After World War II, General Eisenhower won election, and became some different Presbyterian entirely, in office. The kind that gets to repurpose the word to a Church of his own creation. It all seems pretty anti-scholar nationalist, but all the same, look into it! From President Eisenhower's Presbyterian Church, we now recite, "there is One Nation, Under God, Indivisible". Presbyterians used to lead all opposite direction of discussion on these issues. We now have patriotic Duties, note my original premise, to recite "One Nation, Under God, Indivisible". "In God We Trust" meant to be decorative, added to money, and its a Presbyterian suggestion. As we know, the Nations of the United Kingdom, as its often recited, are England, Scotland, and Northern Ireland. Presbyterianism by Scottish Parliament was established in Scotland and didn't catch on in England. Presbyterianism Should be scholarly inseparable since 1560 until 1958 with the vantage point, character, and Parish voice of the people of Scotland in or out of Union Jack. That is a very quiet viewpoint in the rebuilt "united Presbyterian Church" that every USA Presbyterian Church became a member.

How does "Confederate Patriotism" easily become a point of discussion then? There is a Huge Korean Presbyterian Church, and this Church of course, still promotes the idea of a Closer Bond of the People of the United States and Korea when Not subjected to a Federal Union, and that the South Korean Government is in the Right state of existence, which reasonable people can be led to believe the native Korean populace isn't receptive or benefitted from every bit of American trivia. Not until the Nationalist age of the 1900's was it so difficult for people to link the Church and friendly relations between castle-states. That's the Confederate mindset in the spiritual promotion of Presbyterianism during the war, and that is the interaction if you wish, with the Korean Presbyterian Church Abroad, that easily, any person, could be without much restraint concerning useful Confederate Patriotism.

TL ; DR

The south may rise again.

GFY.

Well, it goes like this --- in the 1913 election Teddy Roosevelt made Woodrow Wilson win, which brought about the Presbyterians in Scotland, who fought the Koreans in the Union Jack war and that's why Confederate patriotism is illegal and punishable by your county mailroom.

I suspect the OP has been smoking Barr's Radiator Stop Leak.

I feel sorry for you that you did read, in that case.

 

[Pogo]

That is actually a very well phrased question, a timely question, a question no one ever really put to anyone in school, "is Confederate patriotism legal"? Many people have, very well founded, detractions and objections to violent patriotism, racism, or bigoted actions. Confederates were associated with this more than average. "Patriots were those colonists of the Thirteen Colonies who rejected British rule during the American Revolution and declared the United States of America as an independent nation in July 1776." Confederation was one of two competing political theories of the separation of the United States of America from British Empire. The State of the Union and Confederacy were repeated in equal dialogue from all 15 Presidents before Lincoln. In fact, Confederate relations just happened to be the political philosophy to drop off with one side of a war.
You won't hear anyone say that, a well-informed one third of the race of Southern farm men who fought and became casualties, heard a clear vocal argument about slavery, race relations, liberty, freedom, when that's not the case, and they just heard about rumored invasions, and they heard a call of government, defended the rights of government, were patriots, and upon capture asked about the aggressive cause of men from other states.
Is Confederate patriotism legal? Well, someone may ask, what is the occurrence, are we under state-specific alien invasion? Are all other governments bought out besides your county mailroom?What kind of high endeavor do we all find completely unobtrusive, within individual rights of every US citizen, and is Also Confederate Patriotism?!

No one will fully highlight this element of Woodrow Wilson, President Woodrow Wilson, as a real topic of discussion. The 14th Amendment I think created Natural Born Citizenship and made restrictions on Confederate Political office, but Woodrow Wilson was a child during the war, and wasn't subject to restriction to political office. What rallied a country to Confederate Patriotism in the 1913 election? The full depth of historian discussion is a split ticket with Theodore Roosevelt's Bull Moose party and the Republican party allowing the long-ousted Democrat party to win. Theodore Roosevelt would be President later. However this was a fully dedicated Confederate Patriotic man, as a Second George Washington, see "second war of independence". A ulster-scot Presbyterian leading minister, see Thomas "stonewall" Jackson, a defender of all the free people and their gender relations, see "bonnie blue flag". The occasion I assume, without all-male voter exit polls, stemmed from New York (bloody Yankees) and the Triangle Shirtwaist Factory Fire. Such incidents represent a shoe on the other foot, so to speak, that in the State of New York, the Labor practices involved, trapping up women of foreign lands to work for sweatshop bosses. In the Triangle Shirtwaist Factory Fire, some 120 various immigrant Romanian or Italian or Jewish women, burned alive because of an upper floor factory fire with locked doors among the abusive labor practices. Two years later, all election in both Houses and Presidency swung toward Democrats and limitations on indecent, perhaps read impious, Business.

In a very short time, a reluctant Woodrow Wilson would instead be known for his slow entry in World War I? His very own invention, the League of Nations, promoted not a Union of Europe, but the independent characters of these countries coming to the common cause. Their logo is a Star in blue background. Alma Gluck's old Southern Favorites would take off in this period on the LP. She was a Romanian born, immigrated, and married woman on a New York and island estate. (Sorry I forget all their little islands).

So how can people say that Confederate Patriotism might be illegal when after the war, its reconciled with American patriotism? More obscure information from a more obscure president than the last one. After World War II, General Eisenhower won election, and became some different Presbyterian entirely, in office. The kind that gets to repurpose the word to a Church of his own creation. It all seems pretty anti-scholar nationalist, but all the same, look into it! From President Eisenhower's Presbyterian Church, we now recite, "there is One Nation, Under God, Indivisible". Presbyterians used to lead all opposite direction of discussion on these issues. We now have patriotic Duties, note my original premise, to recite "One Nation, Under God, Indivisible". "In God We Trust" meant to be decorative, added to money, and its a Presbyterian suggestion. As we know, the Nations of the United Kingdom, as its often recited, are England, Scotland, and Northern Ireland. Presbyterianism by Scottish Parliament was established in Scotland and didn't catch on in England. Presbyterianism Should be scholarly inseparable since 1560 until 1958 with the vantage point, character, and Parish voice of the people of Scotland in or out of Union Jack. That is a very quiet viewpoint in the rebuilt "united Presbyterian Church" that every USA Presbyterian Church became a member.

How does "Confederate Patriotism" easily become a point of discussion then? There is a Huge Korean Presbyterian Church, and this Church of course, still promotes the idea of a Closer Bond of the People of the United States and Korea when Not subjected to a Federal Union, and that the South Korean Government is in the Right state of existence, which reasonable people can be led to believe the native Korean populace isn't receptive or benefitted from every bit of American trivia. Not until the Nationalist age of the 1900's was it so difficult for people to link the Church and friendly relations between castle-states. That's the Confederate mindset in the spiritual promotion of Presbyterianism during the war, and that is the interaction if you wish, with the Korean Presbyterian Church Abroad, that easily, any person, could be without much restraint concerning useful Confederate Patriotism.

TL ; DR

The south may rise again.

GFY.

Well, it goes like this --- in the 1913 election Teddy Roosevelt made Woodrow Wilson win, which brought about the Presbyterians in Scotland, who fought the Koreans in the Union Jack war and that's why Confederate patriotism is illegal and punishable by your county mailroom.

I suspect the OP has been smoking Barr's Radiator Stop Leak.

I feel sorry for you that you did read, in that case.

It was like trying to drive in New Jersey.

 

[Mike Dwight]

Welcome to Little Future , I now read Korean, the store is for UeBOp. tasty. 3rd floor for nele pink ham?. See we're going to clean up Little Future and impose Racial Segregation on the immigrants from the Future, back to the homosexual pile. In South Park's "GooBack" we all become one blend of race and language, and need past-jobs for future people, so we build a time machine to get present-jobs. Have you tried the yeneka at UeBOp delicious.

An inchoate ramble that should have been edited and focused on ------------ something. Whatever the intent was here.

Coupla immediate corrections: there was no election in 1913; in the 1912 one Roosevelt did run but would not be President again; there were no "Confederates" running; and there is no such thing as a "Democrat Party".

What does Woodrow Wilson ---- or anything else in this word salad ---- have to do with "Confederate patriotism"?

And where did anyone suggest it's "illegal" in the first place?

Well General Walker , old, "you can fall back to Pusan in a box", aka Old Hickory, was a general from a line of Confederates, maybe not Wilson's League of Nations, a United nations fought with the South Koreans, what did Pogo need exactly? Pogo needed clarity?Coming to the aid of native government is different than Afghanistan for quite a while. If you don't believe in the holy Covenanter men are in Heaven with mint julips I'm gonna whip Jezebel and Scarlet O'Hara one after the other. Pogo Totally, Totally missed, that Woodrow Wilson is a literal Confederate proponent historian, on a Civil War, in which we fought each other? And the Confederates met in veteran rallies with black server women every year, and paraded around the confederate flag and values in every parade every year , and were Americans, and were getting on the old side around the time of Film and Birth of a Nation, and its completely mythical invention of the Ku Klux Klan.

You know all the original colonists of America were people of the Reformed Religion. There were significant portions of English of the Puritan persuasion, the Dutch colony of New Jersey was taken over by the British, and there was a significant Scottish population after the 1702 Union of the two Kingdoms. The Scottish formed Princeton University in the former Dutch colony of New Jersey. Why, any other form of State, say a Catholic State, what happened to those? Maryland was the English Refuge colony for Catholicism. Louisiana is where we all Stuck the French Frontiersmen in a single French Colony. We bought or fought lands away from the Spanish and new Mexican Republic. They passed laws outlawing Christmas, what would we do now days without old men in pointy hats with toddler-intelligence holidays with guilt trips? CONFESS IT.

 

[Mike Dwight]

may 15 2009 first thing I said to her that day on topic, whats she think of how alabama portends to her positions, thus all your opinions and all your positions which are lies. He got asked whats a best theory for the endstate of the world, is he going to shut down the earth investigation? I got a theory, that went nowhere, and it cant be manipulated, about house and real estate. why every shady character around linked young, reckless, or arrogant, when Not, a Single One was the case, the opposite case in May 2010 as well, didn't have anything to fear or hide from the likes of a loser who physically stole my time for ten years too. without the slightest logic reason or points to listen to or reflect on now, or ever, or any 10 years. why they shouted untraditional vantage taking that isn't even possible, less likely, in any circumstances, shouted it, and think I ever agreed? It never was the case. It never is the possible case to link recklessness and again asking immediately for them to get other and more associates involved on longterm and responsible house discussion. They think they ever found someone in this society to single out for ridicule-like behavior, which also WAS NEVER slightly the case, and no one is of ever in a better position of causing any offense or ridiculous behavior. I still tell anybody about the raised efficiency of 2007 to 2009 and raised responsibility if you wanted to get those people to do other things, but all ive known ever since for a decade and more, is thinking that picking out me for ridicule will be someone else's material advantage. You're despicable and its all against me, everything you've done, every single twitch of a finger from everybody in every day of 10 years in close vested manipulation. I do not slightly leave to subjectivity the limited circumstance interpretations in which somebody manipulated the internet social interface to make me feel some sort of "guilt" to show up with the business at their choice location, then that very specific limited circumstance is read identically the next 5 years with exactly how it was openly and proudly associated for use earlier to "be continued", which won't provoke explained any ridiculous or offensive behavior involved on my part. Why how would any of these social sites limit anybody who swears off their 'personhood' to it, you have all choices as a person to connect with it and associate with others in real life about us messageboard or other locations.

I report home every day, and every two times every week, official arranged sanctioned and extra credit studygroup attendance, that is all directly graded extra credit in fixed ratios for all 3 semesters, to anybody slightly interested in me, and is left as the only motivation I give to any of my choices or judgments, and is left as the only evidential thing around about any circumstances. I haven't a clue about any other hidden or other circumstances, or other responsibilities of mine. I didn't communicate to anyone on the feelings of charity or relation-bargaining or owing, or sympathetic, and I exactly was responsive to responsibility and reinforcing responsible situations where they existed. No one else is slightly represented as expecting a solid performance and professionalism.

 

[Toro]

That is actually a very well phrased question, a timely question, a question no one ever really put to anyone in school, "is Confederate patriotism legal"? Many people have, very well founded, detractions and objections to violent patriotism, racism, or bigoted actions. Confederates were associated with this more than average. "Patriots were those colonists of the Thirteen Colonies who rejected British rule during the American Revolution and declared the United States of America as an independent nation in July 1776." Confederation was one of two competing political theories of the separation of the United States of America from British Empire. The State of the Union and Confederacy were repeated in equal dialogue from all 15 Presidents before Lincoln. In fact, Confederate relations just happened to be the political philosophy to drop off with one side of a war.
You won't hear anyone say that, a well-informed one third of the race of Southern farm men who fought and became casualties, heard a clear vocal argument about slavery, race relations, liberty, freedom, when that's not the case, and they just heard about rumored invasions, and they heard a call of government, defended the rights of government, were patriots, and upon capture asked about the aggressive cause of men from other states.
Is Confederate patriotism legal? Well, someone may ask, what is the occurrence, are we under state-specific alien invasion? Are all other governments bought out besides your county mailroom?What kind of high endeavor do we all find completely unobtrusive, within individual rights of every US citizen, and is Also Confederate Patriotism?!

No one will fully highlight this element of Woodrow Wilson, President Woodrow Wilson, as a real topic of discussion. The 14th Amendment I think created Natural Born Citizenship and made restrictions on Confederate Political office, but Woodrow Wilson was a child during the war, and wasn't subject to restriction to political office. What rallied a country to Confederate Patriotism in the 1913 election? The full depth of historian discussion is a split ticket with Theodore Roosevelt's Bull Moose party and the Republican party allowing the long-ousted Democrat party to win. Theodore Roosevelt would be President later. However this was a fully dedicated Confederate Patriotic man, as a Second George Washington, see "second war of independence". A ulster-scot Presbyterian leading minister, see Thomas "stonewall" Jackson, a defender of all the free people and their gender relations, see "bonnie blue flag". The occasion I assume, without all-male voter exit polls, stemmed from New York (bloody Yankees) and the Triangle Shirtwaist Factory Fire. Such incidents represent a shoe on the other foot, so to speak, that in the State of New York, the Labor practices involved, trapping up women of foreign lands to work for sweatshop bosses. In the Triangle Shirtwaist Factory Fire, some 120 various immigrant Romanian or Italian or Jewish women, burned alive because of an upper floor factory fire with locked doors among the abusive labor practices. Two years later, all election in both Houses and Presidency swung toward Democrats and limitations on indecent, perhaps read impious, Business.

In a very short time, a reluctant Woodrow Wilson would instead be known for his slow entry in World War I? His very own invention, the League of Nations, promoted not a Union of Europe, but the independent characters of these countries coming to the common cause. Their logo is a Star in blue background. Alma Gluck's old Southern Favorites would take off in this period on the LP. She was a Romanian born, immigrated, and married woman on a New York and island estate. (Sorry I forget all their little islands).

So how can people say that Confederate Patriotism might be illegal when after the war, its reconciled with American patriotism? More obscure information from a more obscure president than the last one. After World War II, General Eisenhower won election, and became some different Presbyterian entirely, in office. The kind that gets to repurpose the word to a Church of his own creation. It all seems pretty anti-scholar nationalist, but all the same, look into it! From President Eisenhower's Presbyterian Church, we now recite, "there is One Nation, Under God, Indivisible". Presbyterians used to lead all opposite direction of discussion on these issues. We now have patriotic Duties, note my original premise, to recite "One Nation, Under God, Indivisible". "In God We Trust" meant to be decorative, added to money, and its a Presbyterian suggestion. As we know, the Nations of the United Kingdom, as its often recited, are England, Scotland, and Northern Ireland. Presbyterianism by Scottish Parliament was established in Scotland and didn't catch on in England. Presbyterianism Should be scholarly inseparable since 1560 until 1958 with the vantage point, character, and Parish voice of the people of Scotland in or out of Union Jack. That is a very quiet viewpoint in the rebuilt "united Presbyterian Church" that every USA Presbyterian Church became a member.

How does "Confederate Patriotism" easily become a point of discussion then? There is a Huge Korean Presbyterian Church, and this Church of course, still promotes the idea of a Closer Bond of the People of the United States and Korea when Not subjected to a Federal Union, and that the South Korean Government is in the Right state of existence, which reasonable people can be led to believe the native Korean populace isn't receptive or benefitted from every bit of American trivia. Not until the Nationalist age of the 1900's was it so difficult for people to link the Church and friendly relations between castle-states. That's the Confederate mindset in the spiritual promotion of Presbyterianism during the war, and that is the interaction if you wish, with the Korean Presbyterian Church Abroad, that easily, any person, could be without much restraint concerning useful Confederate Patriotism.

tl;dr

 

[Toro]

may 15 2009 first thing I said to her that day on topic, whats she think of how alabama portends to her positions, thus all your opinions and all your positions which are lies. He got asked whats a best theory for the endstate of the world, is he going to shut down the earth investigation? I got a theory, that went nowhere, and it cant be manipulated, about house and real estate. why every shady character around linked young, reckless, or arrogant, when Not, a Single One was the case, the opposite case in May 2010 as well, didn't have anything to fear or hide from the likes of a loser who physically stole my time for ten years too. without the slightest logic reason or points to listen to or reflect on now, or ever, or any 10 years. why they shouted untraditional vantage taking that isn't even possible, less likely, in any circumstances, shouted it, and think I ever agreed? It never was the case. It never is the possible case to link recklessness and again asking immediately for them to get other and more associates involved on longterm and responsible house discussion. They think they ever found someone in this society to single out for ridicule-like behavior, which also WAS NEVER slightly the case, and no one is of ever in a better position of causing any offense or ridiculous behavior. I still tell anybody about the raised efficiency of 2007 to 2009 and raised responsibility if you wanted to get those people to do other things, but all ive known ever since for a decade and more, is thinking that picking out me for ridicule will be someone else's material advantage. You're despicable and its all against me, everything you've done, every single twitch of a finger from everybody in every day of 10 years in close vested manipulation. I do not slightly leave to subjectivity the limited circumstance interpretations in which somebody manipulated the internet social interface to make me feel some sort of "guilt" to show up with the business at their choice location, then that very specific limited circumstance is read identically the next 5 years with exactly how it was openly and proudly associated for use earlier to "be continued", which won't provoke explained any ridiculous or offensive behavior involved on my part.

You’re a bot, aren’t you?