Confederate constitution legalized slavery

Any dispute that the Confederates legalized slavery?
The Confederacy did not legalize slavery on the U.S. As slavey was already legal in the U.S, up until 1865. And post 1865, your U,S. Government continued its crusade to exterminate the Native American Indian. So, your question is yes, our CSA made slavey as legal as it existed LEGALY under your U.S. Government from 1789 until 1865, which was legal under YOUR U.S. CONstitution During the same years as it was under our CSA constitution.
 
Any dispute that the Confederates legalized slavery?
The Confederacy did not legalize slavery on the U.S. As slavey was already legal in the U.S, up until 1865. And post 1865, your U,S. Government continued its crusade to exterminate the Native American Indian. So, your question is yes, our CSA made slavey as legal as it existed LEGALY under your U.S. Government from 1789 until 1865, which was legal under YOUR U.S. CONstitution During the same years as it was under our CSA constitution.
Native Americans weren't slaves.
 
Any dispute that the Confederates legalized slavery?
The Confederacy did not legalize slavery on the U.S. As slavey was already legal in the U.S, up until 1865. And post 1865, your U,S. Government continued its crusade to exterminate the Native American Indian. So, your question is yes, our CSA made slavey as legal as it existed LEGALY under your U.S. Government from 1789 until 1865, which was legal under YOUR U.S. CONstitution During the same years as it was under our CSA constitution.
Native Americans weren't slaves.
No, they were considered of no value to YOUR government, they were considered on the same level as a rodent to be exterminated.
 
Any dispute that the Confederates legalized slavery?
The Confederacy did not legalize slavery on the U.S. As slavey was already legal in the U.S, up until 1865. And post 1865, your U,S. Government continued its crusade to exterminate the Native American Indian. So, your question is yes, our CSA made slavey as legal as it existed LEGALY under your U.S. Government from 1789 until 1865, which was legal under YOUR U.S. CONstitution During the same years as it was under our CSA constitution.
Native Americans weren't slaves.
No, they were considered of no value to YOUR government, they were considered on the same level as a rodent to be exterminated.
No argument there. But then again I don't pretend that the USA was a noble venture like you pretend the Confederacy was.
 
Any dispute that the Confederates legalized slavery?
The Confederacy did not legalize slavery on the U.S. As slavey was already legal in the U.S, up until 1865. And post 1865, your U,S. Government continued its crusade to exterminate the Native American Indian. So, your question is yes, our CSA made slavey as legal as it existed LEGALY under your U.S. Government from 1789 until 1865, which was legal under YOUR U.S. CONstitution During the same years as it was under our CSA constitution.
Native Americans weren't slaves.
No, they were considered of no value to YOUR government, they were considered on the same level as a rodent to be exterminated.
No argument there. But then again I don't pretend that the USA was a noble venture like you pretend the Confederacy was.
You are sadly mistaken, I find the Confederate Constitution every bit as flawed and repugnant to individual liberty as YOUR U.S. CONstitution. Our cause is simply to use the fact that the Southern States legally seceded to restore our Southern Confederacy, and then use the legal amendment process to return to the Founders' intent under the Articles if Confederation.
 
And the Confederates legalized slavery.
As was slavery legal under YOUR U.S. CONstitution.
No, it wasn't.
Yes it was legal under YOUR U.S. CONstitution from 1789 until 1865, when the 13th amendment was added to YOUR U.S. CONstitution making it illegal. What should be noted here is that YOUR CONstitution had a legal legislative avenue to make slavery illegal in the U.S. Even after the Southern States seceded but never utilized that legal process, but instead chose to prosecute a war in rebellion to the legal authority of their U.S. CONstitution.
 
And the Confederates legalized slavery.
As was slavery legal under YOUR U.S. CONstitution.
No, it wasn't.
You see, Ravi, when one is driven by pure emotion, whether that emotion be anger, hatred, blind dedication to a government, or even love, without logic, one becomes a pawn to be used by those in control of those emotion, or those in power who use misguided emotions to expand their power and jurisdiction.
One must use logic, to control emotions.In your current perversion of the Founders' system under the Articles, and the Framers system, under YOUR U.S. CONstitution wherein a two party duopoly has taken the place of the union of State governments, and use emotional strings absent of logic to divide and conquer the individual in order that that individual become emotionally attached to one of two a political party's or a label such as "conservative", "Liberal" "Left wing", "Right wing", etc, those in power use those blind emotions in order to increase their power and jurisdiction. Slavery is used in just such a way, wherein logic is abandoned, allowing one to choose a side, based on emotion rather than using legal logic. One people are noted as oppressed, while another is conveniently left out by those who slaughtered and oppressed in order to use the emotions of the people in order to gain power and jurisdiction over them.
 
James, you are our cannon fodder for shooting down your fake soldiers.

But . . . truce for Easter. I appreciate your passion for your cause.
 
The Articles of Confederation were a failure. That's why they had to be replaced. They are never coming back, no matter how much some uneducated idiot on the internet wishes otherwise.

Deal with it, or continue to make a fool of yourself this way.
Why do you keep offering me the opportunity to expose your ignorance?.....


You keep taking opportunities to reveal your ignorance, JohnnyRebDropOut.
 
The Articles of Confederation were a failure. That's why they had to be replaced. They are never coming back, no matter how much some uneducated idiot on the internet wishes otherwise.

Deal with it, or continue to make a fool of yourself this way.
Why do you keep offering me the opportunity to expose your ignorance?.....


You keep taking opportunities to reveal your ignorance, JohnnyRebDropOut.
Unk,
You ignorant Yankee.......
You are such a fool. The Articles were fine for the purpose of a union of States, however they did not suit the desires then just as today, for those who want a powerful national government to deny individual liberty while policing the rest of the world through hegemony and a state of perpetual war. No, the Articles were fine for a union/confederacy of States, but not so well for those who want government meddling in every aspect of their lives.
 

Forum List

Back
Top