Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Well that's because the feds have no respect for the Constitution.
Interesting comment! Although I disagree with you. Some violations were definitely made under the Bush administration though.
And now with the Obama administration.
Interesting comment! Although I disagree with you. Some violations were definitely made under the Bush administration though.
And now with the Obama administration.
On the contrary! The Obama administration is the one who got it straight with California.
What violations of the constitution do you believe the Obama administration has made? You do realize that he taught constitutional law, right?
Interesting comment! Although I disagree with you. Some violations were definitely made under the Bush administration though.
And now with the Obama administration.
On the contrary! The Obama administration is the one who got it straight with California.
What violations of the constitution do you believe the Obama administration has made? You do realize that he taught constitutional law, right?
What constitutes a viable nation? [/qupte]
Before we can answer that, we must be able to define the State and also 'viability'
[
On the contrary! The Obama administration is the one who got it straight with California.
The bailouts, the administration's role in choosing who runs private companies... these are powers not given to the fed by the Constitution
You do realize that he taught constitutional law, right?
Lawyers can't break law? Preposterous; rather, they know better how to get away with it
And now with the Obama administration.
On the contrary! The Obama administration is the one who got it straight with California.
What violations of the constitution do you believe the Obama administration has made? You do realize that he taught constitutional law, right?
I am well aware. The Stimulus Package comes to mind as unconstitutional, and taking over GM and Chrysler.
The confederate states wouldn't be a viable nation by themselves.
Cotton is no longer king.
Perhaps they might become a state funded by sending their soldiers off to die in other people's wars.
Lord knows that the South creates the sorts of guys who are used to having to go into the military because there's damned all little opportunity to make a living at home.
On the contrary! The Obama administration is the one who got it straight with California.
What violations of the constitution do you believe the Obama administration has made? You do realize that he taught constitutional law, right?
I am well aware. The Stimulus Package comes to mind as unconstitutional, and taking over GM and Chrysler.
However...technically the government hasn't "taken them over". They put up financing, but Obama has made it clear that he doesn't wanna make the daily decisions of running the companies.
Now...I will say that the firing of Rick Wagoner went a tad far! And also congress calling to task the GM bigwigs about the closure of dealerships seemed like stepping over the line a tad.
It remains to be seen just how far the government sticks their noses in the daily business of the two car makers. I think it's too early to make a definitive call on this one.
The FISA bill that HE voted for after he said he'd filibuster it?
Lawyers can't break law? Preposterous; rather, they know better how to get away with it
On the contrary! The Obama administration is the one who got it straight with California.
What violations of the constitution do you believe the Obama administration has made? You do realize that he taught constitutional law, right?
I am well aware. The Stimulus Package comes to mind as unconstitutional, and taking over GM and Chrysler.
However...technically the government hasn't "taken them over". They put up financing, but Obama has made it clear that he doesn't wanna make the daily decisions of running the companies.
Now...I will say that the firing of Rick Wagoner went a tad far! And also congress calling to task the GM bigwigs about the closure of dealerships seemed like stepping over the line a tad.
It remains to be seen just how far the government sticks their noses in the daily business of the two car makers. I think it's too early to make a definitive call on this one.
The FISA bill that HE voted for after he said he'd filibuster it?
How is that unconstitutional?
Lawyers can't break law? Preposterous; rather, they know better how to get away with it
I didn't say that! My statement was just to point out that Obama is well versed in constitutional law...unlike his predecessor.
Interesting comment! Although I disagree with you. Some violations were definitely made under the Bush administration though.
And now with the Obama administration.
On the contrary! The Obama administration is the one who got it straight with California.
What violations of the constitution do you believe the Obama administration has made? You do realize that he taught constitutional law, right?
The FISA bill that HE voted for after he said he'd filibuster it?
How is that unconstitutional?
Lawyers can't break law? Preposterous; rather, they know better how to get away with it
I didn't say that! My statement was just to point out that Obama is well versed in constitutional law...unlike his predecessor.
Politicians lying? That's not unconstitutional. good point.
You should NEVER take any politician at his word. What do you expect him to say? "We're renaming it Government Motors?"
And now with the Obama administration.
On the contrary! The Obama administration is the one who got it straight with California.
What violations of the constitution do you believe the Obama administration has made? You do realize that he taught constitutional law, right?
Oh great here we go again. Hang another GD halo on his bed post. The man does nothing wrong.
I wonder how many smokes he had today after signing that tobacco legislation?
How is that unconstitutional?
I didn't say that! My statement was just to point out that Obama is well versed in constitutional law...unlike his predecessor.
Politicians lying? That's not unconstitutional. good point.
FISA itself is unconstitutional, however.
On the contrary! The Obama administration is the one who got it straight with California.
What violations of the constitution do you believe the Obama administration has made? You do realize that he taught constitutional law, right?
I am well aware. The Stimulus Package comes to mind as unconstitutional, and taking over GM and Chrysler.
However...technically the government hasn't "taken them over". They put up financing, but Obama has made it clear that he doesn't wanna make the daily decisions of running the companies.
Now...I will say that the firing of Rick Wagoner went a tad far! And also congress calling to task the GM bigwigs about the closure of dealerships seemed like stepping over the line a tad.
It remains to be seen just how far the government sticks their noses in the daily business of the two car makers. I think it's too early to make a definitive call on this one.
Too early? It's clear the government has already gone beyond what the Constitution says it's allowed to do with private businesses, which is nothing.
FISA itself is unconstitutional, however.
You should NEVER take any politician at his word. What do you expect him to say? "We're renaming it Government Motors?"
Just a tad cynical there, aren't ya? I think the jury is still out on the Obama administration.
"Confederacy... will it return? "
No.
Next.
