complete exoneration

[Douger]

Whew. Thanks for telling me.
I think I'll run over to my other mountain and cut down all of the trees and sell them.
Fucking idiots.

 

[konradv]

Whew. Thanks for telling me.
I think I'll run over to my other mountain and cut down all of the trees and sell them.
Fucking idiot.

Don't be so hard on yourself. Nothing a little maturity training can't fix.

 

[westwall]

Whew. Thanks for telling me.
I think I'll run over to my other mountain and cut down all of the trees and sell them.
Fucking idiots.

Actually you should build a big bonfire then hop right in!

 

[westwall]

You really don't understand much do you? What's so tough to understand about, if CO2 traps energy, more CO2 means more trapped energy?

BBC: Do you agree that from 1995 to the present there has been no statistically-significant global warming?
Phil Jones: Yes

Is he on your side or isn't he? You're trying to have it both ways. How is THAT not FRAUD?!?!

konrad,

He is on your side. Which is why whenever he agrees with us it is astonishing and we go to pains to point it out to the clueless of which you are a leading example.

 

[skookerasbil]

Oh..........and another word to the curious who peek in here trying to make up their minds about all this global warming stuff...................

Ever ask yourself?

Where are all these hysterical global warming religion assholes when we are experiencing weeks and weeks of bitter temperatures due to a prevailing weather pattern? Guess what? Their asses are hiding because they dont want to look like fckukking clowns. Meanwhile...........what's going on in the atmosphere? Well..........the jet stream drops south more than normal and the pattern persists for days or weeks. Sometimes months. All the true believers know this.............but they also know the BIG HEAT WAVE IS COMING!!! Guess what? Thats what we're seeing this summer in the east...........and 100% certianty it'll happen again and again as you age. Why? Its called fcukking weather!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!! Just depends on where you happen to be. In the northeast here it was cold as hell from November right up until late May......record cold in some cases, especially in places like the deep south. But where were the k00ks then?????


They KNOW if they get the alarmist sh!t going enough, its the perfect scam. Because they can FULLY count on the arbitrary nature of weather patterns and roll out all the hysterical crap when the time is right. LIKE NOW..........in mid summer when global dynamics are such that we are experiencing significant heat in some places. But not in others..................

Just last weekend they were skiiing in northern California...........the latest the mountain was open that late ever!!! This is the kind of stuff the k00ks never want you to hear about.....................

You really don't understand much do you? What's so tough to understand about, if CO2 traps energy, more CO2 means more trapped energy?

hey what can I say s0n...............people who think all the "man-made" global warming
stuff is about the environment are the same people who will gladly buy a bag of dog doo for $1,000 a pop if its packaged just right. Then there are of who see the windfall coming for so many with a green economy...........to the tune of tens of billions. Then again, Ive never been one to buy sh!t hook line and stinker my whole life. Im in a field of work where scheming is a way of life, so I get to see it every day for the past 25 years. Many look at those who seem well intentioned and just automatically buy their line of sh!t. Not me..........when you cant prove something and can make bold pronouncements, my radar goes up.
This whole global warming thing is an absolutely brilliant scheme..............its fcukking brilliant: take something that NOBODY in the world truly understands and make it a "science". Its the perfect fraud...........and the same concept is used as those who market diet products on cable TV in the middle of the night!! They know there are millions and millions of people out there who are so easily duped by information, even if it is ripe with fraud.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

The 'climate gate' shown to be a total fraud, Phil Jones back as research head.

Climate scientists exonerated in 'climategate' but public trust damaged - CSMonitor.com

A six-month investigation into the leaked e-mails that formed the "climategate" scandal has largely exonerated key scientists, including Phil Jones, the former – and now reinstated – director of the University of East Anglia's (UEA) Climate Research Unit (CRU). The CRU's key findings have a major impact on the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), which in turn influences climate policy on a global scale, including pending cap-and-trade carbon offset legislation in the US. Critics charged that the "climategate" e-mails proved that researchers were gaming the science to win public support for the idea that countries need to act to correct global warming

So if I hire a set of Republican big wigs to "investigate" Watergate, and they find no crime was committed, you will be fine with that?

 

[konradv]

The 'climate gate' shown to be a total fraud, Phil Jones back as research head.

Climate scientists exonerated in 'climategate' but public trust damaged - CSMonitor.com

A six-month investigation into the leaked e-mails that formed the "climategate" scandal has largely exonerated key scientists, including Phil Jones, the former – and now reinstated – director of the University of East Anglia's (UEA) Climate Research Unit (CRU). The CRU's key findings have a major impact on the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), which in turn influences climate policy on a global scale, including pending cap-and-trade carbon offset legislation in the US. Critics charged that the "climategate" e-mails proved that researchers were gaming the science to win public support for the idea that countries need to act to correct global warming

So if I hire a set of Republican big wigs to "investigate" Watergate, and they find no crime was committed, you will be fine with that?

You're perpetrating the lie that people are exonerating themselves. Typical, since confusion and distraction are all the deniers have.

 

[westwall]

The 'climate gate' shown to be a total fraud, Phil Jones back as research head.

Climate scientists exonerated in 'climategate' but public trust damaged - CSMonitor.com

A six-month investigation into the leaked e-mails that formed the "climategate" scandal has largely exonerated key scientists, including Phil Jones, the former – and now reinstated – director of the University of East Anglia's (UEA) Climate Research Unit (CRU). The CRU's key findings have a major impact on the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), which in turn influences climate policy on a global scale, including pending cap-and-trade carbon offset legislation in the US. Critics charged that the "climategate" e-mails proved that researchers were gaming the science to win public support for the idea that countries need to act to correct global warming

So if I hire a set of Republican big wigs to "investigate" Watergate, and they find no crime was committed, you will be fine with that?

You're perpetrating the lie that people are exonerating themselves. Typical, since confusion and distraction are all the deniers have.

Then what do you call this konrad?

- Bishop Hill blog - More on Oxburgh'seleven

 

[Chris]

The 'climate gate' shown to be a total fraud, Phil Jones back as research head.

Climate scientists exonerated in 'climategate' but public trust damaged - CSMonitor.com

A six-month investigation into the leaked e-mails that formed the "climategate" scandal has largely exonerated key scientists, including Phil Jones, the former – and now reinstated – director of the University of East Anglia's (UEA) Climate Research Unit (CRU). The CRU's key findings have a major impact on the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), which in turn influences climate policy on a global scale, including pending cap-and-trade carbon offset legislation in the US. Critics charged that the "climategate" e-mails proved that researchers were gaming the science to win public support for the idea that countries need to act to correct global warming

Climate deniers are mostly financed by the oil and coal companies.

Like Senator Oil Patch from Oklahoma.

 

[westwall]

The 'climate gate' shown to be a total fraud, Phil Jones back as research head.

Climate scientists exonerated in 'climategate' but public trust damaged - CSMonitor.com

A six-month investigation into the leaked e-mails that formed the "climategate" scandal has largely exonerated key scientists, including Phil Jones, the former – and now reinstated – director of the University of East Anglia's (UEA) Climate Research Unit (CRU). The CRU's key findings have a major impact on the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), which in turn influences climate policy on a global scale, including pending cap-and-trade carbon offset legislation in the US. Critics charged that the "climategate" e-mails proved that researchers were gaming the science to win public support for the idea that countries need to act to correct global warming

Climate deniers are mostly financed by the oil and coal companies.

Like Senator Oil Patch from Oklahoma.

Really? I am not funded by anyone. Phil Jones has recieved 22.6 million dollars alone. AGW proponents have recieved approximately 100 billion dollars over the last 15 years.
And these funds are taken from the PUBLIC. The public is pissed because you cultists have lied. The public is coming for you.
Please show me where the oil companies have put out anywhere near that amount of money.

 

[Old Rocks]

Now Walleyes, it costs a lot less to publish lies than to do real research. Of course, your money figures for the "AGW cultists" also includes the cost of the satellites and their launching.

Now if people like yourself would present some real evidence, instead of blogs that are completely fraudulent, you might get some respect. Show where the figures that have been in physics manuals for the last 150 years for the absorbtion spectra of GHGs is incorrect. Show where the energy that the atmosphere is absorbing is being tranmitted into space by some mechanism, rather than heating the oceans, as all the evidence indicates.

 

[daveman]

The 'climate gate' shown to be a total fraud, Phil Jones back as research head.

Climate scientists exonerated in 'climategate' but public trust damaged - CSMonitor.com

A six-month investigation into the leaked e-mails that formed the "climategate" scandal has largely exonerated key scientists, including Phil Jones, the former – and now reinstated – director of the University of East Anglia's (UEA) Climate Research Unit (CRU). The CRU's key findings have a major impact on the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), which in turn influences climate policy on a global scale, including pending cap-and-trade carbon offset legislation in the US. Critics charged that the "climategate" e-mails proved that researchers were gaming the science to win public support for the idea that countries need to act to correct global warming

Climate deniers are mostly financed by the oil and coal companies.

Like Senator Oil Patch from Oklahoma.

Funny how AGW cultists screech "Follow the money!!"...except about fellow cultists.

The cult is hugely profitable.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

Now Walleyes, it costs a lot less to publish lies than to do real research. Of course, your money figures for the "AGW cultists" also includes the cost of the satellites and their launching.

Now if people like yourself would present some real evidence, instead of blogs that are completely fraudulent, you might get some respect. Show where the figures that have been in physics manuals for the last 150 years for the absorbtion spectra of GHGs is incorrect. Show where the energy that the atmosphere is absorbing is being tranmitted into space by some mechanism, rather than heating the oceans, as all the evidence indicates.

IF those abstractions are so correct and infallible why hasn't your claim been tested. You have been ask numerous times why no one will do a simple test of the supposed theory. You IGNORE it every time. Or are you saying science LACKS the tools to test the theory? That it is nothing but a fallible theory untestable?

Science is supposed to back up its claims any way it can. Provide the test results of CURRENT scientific tests that back up your claims. Or admit it can not be tested.

If as usual you are going to fall back on a hypothesis from 150 years ago explain why you are afraid to allow science to do its duty and conduct current tests to prove the point.

 

[westwall]

Now Walleyes, it costs a lot less to publish lies than to do real research. Of course, your money figures for the "AGW cultists" also includes the cost of the satellites and their launching.

Now if people like yourself would present some real evidence, instead of blogs that are completely fraudulent, you might get some respect. Show where the figures that have been in physics manuals for the last 150 years for the absorbtion spectra of GHGs is incorrect. Show where the energy that the atmosphere is absorbing is being tranmitted into space by some mechanism, rather than heating the oceans, as all the evidence indicates.

The 100 billion is for "research" alone. Satellites are not included in that figure.

Try again.

 

[Oddball]

The 'climate gate' shown to be a total fraud, Phil Jones back as research head.

Climate scientists exonerated in 'climategate' but public trust damaged - CSMonitor.com

A six-month investigation into the leaked e-mails that formed the "climategate" scandal has largely exonerated key scientists, including Phil Jones, the former – and now reinstated – director of the University of East Anglia's (UEA) Climate Research Unit (CRU). The CRU's key findings have a major impact on the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), which in turn influences climate policy on a global scale, including pending cap-and-trade carbon offset legislation in the US. Critics charged that the "climategate" e-mails proved that researchers were gaming the science to win public support for the idea that countries need to act to correct global warming

So if I hire a set of Republican big wigs to "investigate" Watergate, and they find no crime was committed, you will be fine with that?

You're perpetrating the lie that people are exonerating themselves. Typical, since confusion and distraction are all the deniers have.

It's no lie...The fix was in.

I believe one of you warmist fundamentalists said something about following the money?