complete exoneration

[Old Rocks]

The 'climate gate' shown to be a total fraud, Phil Jones back as research head.

Climate scientists exonerated in 'climategate' but public trust damaged - CSMonitor.com

A six-month investigation into the leaked e-mails that formed the "climategate" scandal has largely exonerated key scientists, including Phil Jones, the former – and now reinstated – director of the University of East Anglia's (UEA) Climate Research Unit (CRU). The CRU's key findings have a major impact on the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), which in turn influences climate policy on a global scale, including pending cap-and-trade carbon offset legislation in the US. Critics charged that the "climategate" e-mails proved that researchers were gaming the science to win public support for the idea that countries need to act to correct global warming

 

[Truthmatters]

Facts wont matter to many of these clowns

 

[Old Rocks]

True, but the fact that the truth is now out in the open will have the ignoramouses gnashing their teeth, dressing is sackcloth, and throwing ashes.

 

[boedicca]

This investigation has as much credibility as the Obama White House's investigations of the Obama White House which determined that the Obama White House did nothing wrong (although they won't tell us what actually happened).

Just sayin'.

 

[Old Rocks]

Just sayn' that you are full of shit.

 

[westwall]

Yep complete exoneration all right. Of course when you don't ask the questions that matter it's a forgone conclusion.

Most seriously, it finds “evidence that emails might have been deleted in order to make them unavailable should a subsequent request be made for them [under Freedom of information law]“. Yet, extraordinarily, it emerged during questioning that Russell and his team never asked Jones or his colleagues whether they had actually done this.


That's allright. Just like all those other cases where companies try to lie their way out of trouble, these too will fall.

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

The 'climate gate' shown to be a total fraud, Phil Jones back as research head.

Climate scientists exonerated in 'climategate' but public trust damaged - CSMonitor.com

A six-month investigation into the leaked e-mails that formed the "climategate" scandal has largely exonerated key scientists, including Phil Jones, the former – and now reinstated – director of the University of East Anglia's (UEA) Climate Research Unit (CRU). The CRU's key findings have a major impact on the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), which in turn influences climate policy on a global scale, including pending cap-and-trade carbon offset legislation in the US. Critics charged that the "climategate" e-mails proved that researchers were gaming the science to win public support for the idea that countries need to act to correct global warming

This is huge news.

WWFS?


what will FOX say?

---

It appears that the "insular world" the guy works in is partly to blame for the hysteria. The general public almost always attacks academics and pointy headed intellectuals. Shit, I do sometimes.

 

[Old Rocks]

Walleyes, you Faux Geologist, your people lost this one on the basis of their lies.

 

[westwall]

Walleyes, you Faux Geologist, your people lost this one on the basis of their lies.

Really,

They state very clearly that they didn't review the science.

Claes Johnson on Mathematics and Science: Muir Russell: IPCC Conclusions Not Based on Science

This was completely expected just like we expected the Oxburgh crapola. It only slows down the end. Muir is heavily invested in AGW just like Oxburgh.

We don't lie unlike yourself old fraud, we don't have to

In the end they are doing themselves more harm than if they had just come clean.

So enjoy your little victory for now, just be prepared for the collapse, which I can safely say will come much sooner than your 30 year period of telling us the world is going to end.

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

Facts wont matter to many of these clowns

love your signature

Tim McVeigh was in the Tea Party?

 

[Old Rocks]

Walleyes, you Faux Geologist, your people lost this one on the basis of their lies.

Really,

They state very clearly that they didn't review the science.

Claes Johnson on Mathematics and Science: Muir Russell: IPCC Conclusions Not Based on Science

This was completely expected just like we expected the Oxburgh crapola. It only slows down the end. Muir is heavily invested in AGW just like Oxburgh.

We don't lie unlike yourself old fraud, we don't have to

In the end they are doing themselves more harm than if they had just come clean.

So enjoy your little victory for now, just be prepared for the collapse, which I can safely say will come much sooner than your 30 year period of telling us the world is going to end.

Hmmm...... So that is what you think Russel said

Claes Johnson on Mathematics and Science: Muir Russell: IPCC Conclusions Not Based on Science

Muir Russell: IPCC Conclusions Not Based on Science

Sir Muir Russell summarizes his CRU inquiry as follows:
This was not about forming a view on the content or quality of the scientific work and the conclusions drawn by CRU.
We did not find any evidence of behaviour that might undermine the conclusions of the IPCC assessments.
Let's subject these statements to a logical mathematical analysis:
(1) The scientific work was not an issue.
(2) The conclusions of the IPCC assessments were not undermined.
Combining (1) and (2) we conclude that what Muir Russell effectively says is:
IPCC conclusions are not based on scientific work.

 

[westwall]

Walleyes, you Faux Geologist, your people lost this one on the basis of their lies.

Really,

They state very clearly that they didn't review the science.

Claes Johnson on Mathematics and Science: Muir Russell: IPCC Conclusions Not Based on Science

This was completely expected just like we expected the Oxburgh crapola. It only slows down the end. Muir is heavily invested in AGW just like Oxburgh.

We don't lie unlike yourself old fraud, we don't have to

In the end they are doing themselves more harm than if they had just come clean.

So enjoy your little victory for now, just be prepared for the collapse, which I can safely say will come much sooner than your 30 year period of telling us the world is going to end.

Hmmm...... So that is what you think Russel said

Claes Johnson on Mathematics and Science: Muir Russell: IPCC Conclusions Not Based on Science

Muir Russell: IPCC Conclusions Not Based on Science

Sir Muir Russell summarizes his CRU inquiry as follows:
This was not about forming a view on the content or quality of the scientific work and the conclusions drawn by CRU.
We did not find any evidence of behaviour that might undermine the conclusions of the IPCC assessments.
Let's subject these statements to a logical mathematical analysis:
(1) The scientific work was not an issue.
(2) The conclusions of the IPCC assessments were not undermined.
Combining (1) and (2) we conclude that what Muir Russell effectively says is:
IPCC conclusions are not based on scientific work.

Yep that pretty much expalins it all

IPCC conclusions are not based on scientific work.

 

[westwall]

Facts wont matter to many of these clowns

love your signature

Tim McVeigh was in the Tea Party?

Rewriting some history there are we?

 

[westwall]

Facts wont matter to many of these clowns

It has certainly never mattered to your tiny little mind.

 

[Oddball]

Walleyes, you Faux Geologist, your people lost this one on the basis of their lies.

Really,

They state very clearly that they didn't review the science.

Claes Johnson on Mathematics and Science: Muir Russell: IPCC Conclusions Not Based on Science

This was completely expected just like we expected the Oxburgh crapola. It only slows down the end. Muir is heavily invested in AGW just like Oxburgh.

We don't lie unlike yourself old fraud, we don't have to

In the end they are doing themselves more harm than if they had just come clean.

So enjoy your little victory for now, just be prepared for the collapse, which I can safely say will come much sooner than your 30 year period of telling us the world is going to end.

An "investigation" not at all unlike the Waco whitewash.

Only invite the malefactors in to testify, then just buy into the story that the man was dead when they showed up on the scene.

 

[Old Rocks]

Really,

They state very clearly that they didn't review the science.

Claes Johnson on Mathematics and Science: Muir Russell: IPCC Conclusions Not Based on Science

This was completely expected just like we expected the Oxburgh crapola. It only slows down the end. Muir is heavily invested in AGW just like Oxburgh.

We don't lie unlike yourself old fraud, we don't have to

In the end they are doing themselves more harm than if they had just come clean.

So enjoy your little victory for now, just be prepared for the collapse, which I can safely say will come much sooner than your 30 year period of telling us the world is going to end.

Hmmm...... So that is what you think Russel said

Claes Johnson on Mathematics and Science: Muir Russell: IPCC Conclusions Not Based on Science

Muir Russell: IPCC Conclusions Not Based on Science

Sir Muir Russell summarizes his CRU inquiry as follows:
This was not about forming a view on the content or quality of the scientific work and the conclusions drawn by CRU.
We did not find any evidence of behaviour that might undermine the conclusions of the IPCC assessments.Let's subject these statements to a logical mathematical analysis:
(1) The scientific work was not an issue.
(2) The conclusions of the IPCC assessments were not undermined.
Combining (1) and (2) we conclude that what Muir Russell effectively says is:
IPCC conclusions are not based on scientific work.

Yep that pretty much expalins it all

IPCC conclusions are not based on scientific work.

What Russel stated was that they were not reviewing the science of the CRU or the IPCC, but the actions and methods of the CRU. And they found no problems that would change the scientific conclusions.

 

[Trajan]

the echo chamber is alive and well, they all live and work in a bubble, if anyone has read the e mails that much is evident, so they basically gave themselves a pass.

BP gave UC Berkeley NERSC tons of money for energy research, steven chu thinks he and BP will change the world, he said so, they can be bought just like the rest and Berkeley has NOT given any of the grant money back to BP in lieu of the leak either....yes they are such stalwarts.

 

[Oddball]

the echo chamber is alive and well, they all live and work in a bubble, if anyone has read the e mails that much is evidently, so they basically gave themselves a pass.

BP gave UC Berkeley NERSC tons of money for energy research, steven chu thinks he and BP will change the world, he said so, they can be bought just like the rest and Berkeley has NOT given any of the grant money back to BP in lieu of the leak either....yes they are such stalwarts.

The published computer code has lots of incriminating evidence in it, as well.

Doesn't it seem odd that the primary focus is on the e-mails?

 

[Trajan]

Walleyes, you Faux Geologist, your people lost this one on the basis of their lies.

Really,

They state very clearly that they didn't review the science.

Claes Johnson on Mathematics and Science: Muir Russell: IPCC Conclusions Not Based on Science

This was completely expected just like we expected the Oxburgh crapola. It only slows down the end. Muir is heavily invested in AGW just like Oxburgh.

We don't lie unlike yourself old fraud, we don't have to

In the end they are doing themselves more harm than if they had just come clean.

So enjoy your little victory for now, just be prepared for the collapse, which I can safely say will come much sooner than your 30 year period of telling us the world is going to end.

An "investigation" not at all unlike the Waco whitewash.

Only invite the malefactors in to testify, then just buy into the story that the man was dead when they showed up on the scene.

ruby ridge, another high water mark for the party of the people....

 

[Old Rocks]

Ruby Ridge happened in 1992, during the presidency of George H. W. Bush. Is all your information and posting going to reflect this level of accuracy?