Immanuel
Gold Member
- May 15, 2007
- 16,828
- 2,269
- 183
For the record, I'm not angry about any of this stuff, but there are other things that I am pissed off about. As as for AB's treatment of Senator Kennedy after his death, well, I did not and do not read anything at all from AB. Don't like his methods which happen to be used here all the time.
I don't know what he said about Senator Kennedy, so you might have to fill me in.
Immie
That's all I'm saying.
Frankly I don't care about Breitbart's politics.
There are a whole lot of people I like on the right.
It was his methods I have an issue with.
This is what he said about Kennedy:
Andrew Breitbart, a Washington Times columnist who oversees Breitbart.com and BigHollywood.com, tapped into the anti-Kennedy vein in the hours after the senator’s death was announced, posting a series of Twitter messages in which he called Kennedy a “villain,” a “duplicitous bastard” and a “prick.”
"I'm more than willing to go off decorum to ensure THIS MAN is not beatified,” Breitbart wrote. “Sorry, he destroyed lives. And he knew it."
Source: Not all Kennedy critics hold fire - Michael Calderone - POLITICO.com
I'd say that was pretty damn bad.
Hey, are you and ClosedCaption one in the same?
I didn't like AB's style. I got to the point when a link would lead me to something he did, I would simply stop reading and close the tab ASAP. I may have conservative blood in me, but, because of that blood, I despise dishonest tactics especially dishonest tactics from conservatives. I also never read an article from AB that didn't turn out to be filled with half truths and lies.
Nothing worse than defending an article and then to have to eat crow because when you actually do the research you find out that you were more than likely fed five pounds of cow manure.
RIP AB
Immie
Last edited: