CDZ Comparing the Polls; Why Are Monmouth and Rasmussen so far Apart?

At this point in 2012, IBD was calling Romney 5 points ahead. They're a joke pollster, along with Rasmussen. They get paid to push polls that are deliberately heavily Republican-biased, to help build enthusiasm in the Republican base. Then, in their final poll, they'll lose that bias, so that they can point to that one decent poll and pretend that they weren't shills the whole time.
Everything you just said is a lie.

IBD is the most accurate of the polls according to the NEw York Times.

http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytime...and-worst-in-the-2012-presidential-race/?_r=1

fivethirtyeight-1110-accuracy2012-1-blog480.png


And at this time in 2012 they had Obama up by 1% and Obama won by 3%.

2012 - General Election: Romney vs. Obama | RealClearPolitics

Democrats seem to be completely unconcerned about being truthful in this election.
 
Everything you just said is a lie.

Unlike you, I can back up everything I say. This October poll from IBD has Romney at +5.

Romney Lead Over Obama Widens To 5 Points: IBD/TIPP

Curious, how your sources left out such bad polls. No wonder you fell for the shilling. You only see what your masters want you to see.

So, we know how this goes. IBD's last poll will show Clinton well ahead again. In 2020, as IBD puts out some polls with a wild pro-Republican bias, IBD will point to that final poll and brag about how great they are. And you'll fall for it, again.
 
At this point in 2012, IBD was calling Romney 5 points ahead. They're a joke pollster, along with Rasmussen. They get paid to push polls that are deliberately heavily Republican-biased, to help build enthusiasm in the Republican base. Then, in their final poll, they'll lose that bias, so that they can point to that one decent poll and pretend that they weren't shills the whole time.
Everything you just said is a lie.

IBD is the most accurate of the polls according to the NEw York Times.

http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytime...and-worst-in-the-2012-presidential-race/?_r=1

fivethirtyeight-1110-accuracy2012-1-blog480.png


And at this time in 2012 they had Obama up by 1% and Obama won by 3%.

2012 - General Election: Romney vs. Obama | RealClearPolitics

Democrats seem to be completely unconcerned about being truthful in this election.

Rasmussen was at the top of the list in prior elections but was near the bottom in 2012. That's why it's better to look at an average of polls rather than one single poll.
 

Forum List

Back
Top