Common sense might prevail in the filibuster

Discussion in 'Politics' started by Quantum Windbag, Jan 5, 2011.

  1. Quantum Windbag
    Offline

    Quantum Windbag Gold Member

    Joined:
    May 9, 2010
    Messages:
    58,308
    Thanks Received:
    5,016
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Ratings:
    +5,225
    Not perfect, but a lot better than what happens now.

    Gulp. I Agree With the Democrats on Filibuster Reform - By Daniel Foster - The Corner - National Review Online

    The Plum Line - Here it is: The filibuster reform package!
     
  2. Baruch Menachem
    Offline

    Baruch Menachem '

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2008
    Messages:
    14,204
    Thanks Received:
    3,235
    Trophy Points:
    185
    Ratings:
    +3,307
    I agree with all of them.


    But there must be something fishy going on, with the proposal, a little hook in the shiny package that we haven't heard about. I just don't trust them an angstrom unit.
     
  3. uscitizen
    Offline

    uscitizen Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2007
    Messages:
    45,941
    Thanks Received:
    4,792
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    My Shack
    Ratings:
    +4,810
    Common sense might prevail in the filibuster


    don't hold your breath.
     
  4. Revere
    Offline

    Revere BANNED

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2010
    Messages:
    7,427
    Thanks Received:
    416
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Watching you in my profile page
    Ratings:
    +417
    Why is the destruction of institutions in this country referred to as "reform?"
     
  5. Zander
    Offline

    Zander Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2009
    Messages:
    17,962
    Thanks Received:
    6,698
    Trophy Points:
    390
    Location:
    Los Angeles CA
    Ratings:
    +13,785
    I disagree with any and all attempts to end the filibuster. These fuckwads are dangerous. They pass thousands of useless laws every year, most of which they've never even read! If anything we should make it easier to filibuster, not harder.

    My suggestion for a new rule: To show that it’s serious, any new bill must be presented along with a member of Congress’s Finger. Stop wasting our fucking time with stupid new laws.

    Here's another - Any bill can be blocked by a challenge to a riddle contest.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
    Last edited: Jan 5, 2011
  6. Ropey
    Offline

    Ropey Rainy Days and Mondays Always Get Me Up Gold Supporting Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2010
    Messages:
    43,028
    Thanks Received:
    6,743
    Trophy Points:
    1,870
    Ratings:
    +16,848
    I have never seen a politician give up power willingly (well, maybe Carter :razz: ) unless there was a payoff for them later on.
     
  7. RetiredGySgt
    Offline

    RetiredGySgt Diamond Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2007
    Messages:
    40,483
    Thanks Received:
    6,166
    Trophy Points:
    1,840
    Location:
    North Carolina
    Ratings:
    +10,137
    Who gets to decide what is Germane?
     
  8. Avatar4321
    Offline

    Avatar4321 Diamond Member Gold Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2004
    Messages:
    72,805
    Thanks Received:
    8,568
    Trophy Points:
    2,070
    Location:
    Minnesota
    Ratings:
    +14,370
    Restore the Fillibuster to where the Constitution says it should be.
     
  9. rightwinger
    Online

    rightwinger Paid Messageboard Poster Gold Supporting Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2009
    Messages:
    128,865
    Thanks Received:
    20,877
    Trophy Points:
    2,190
    Location:
    NJ & MD
    Ratings:
    +51,217
    Works for me

    You can still filibuster major legislation you object to but it makes it less convenient to filibuster the routine shit
     

Share This Page