Common Sense and Our Dangerous National Debt

[Where_r_my_Keys]

At latest count, we are now $18 trillion in debt, which is more than our GDP, and the government continues to run a deficit of around half a trillion dollars each year.

Common sense and basic math tell us that we will never get out of debt unless we first stop going into debt.

Yet Obama and the Democrats continue to want to increase federal spending. They also want to raise taxes--on gas, on investments, on just about everything.

How do Democrats expect the economy to grow if the government keeps taking more and more money out of it? How do the Democrats expect to ever balance the budget, much less to start paying down the debt, when they constantly want to increase federal spending? Have they learned nothing from Greece, Spain, Italy? You can't tax and spend your way to a balanced budget and prosperity.

If you wanna be pro-abortion, pro-gay marriage, pro-
card check, pro-amnesty, fine. But why can't you follow basic math when it comes to the budget and the debt? No sensible, rational person would run their personal finances the way the Democrats want to run the federal budget.

When you're $18 trillion in debt and rising, that is not the time for more "investing" (read: more federal spending)--that's the time to cut spending down to revenue, to balance the budget, and start the long process of paying down the debt. When you're $18 trillion in debt, you don't try to get an increase in your line of credit--it's time to bite the bullet and stop charging on the national credit card.

Raygun tripled the national debt, cons said nothing

Shrub daddy doubled it again in only four years, cons said nothing.

Shrub Jr. doubled it again adding more than all POTUS's added together WITH A REPUBLICAN CONGRESS AND SENATE, cons said nothing.

You whine is real cheesy.

ROFLMNAO!

Obama has spent more money in 6 years, than Reagan spent in 1.

Now, with that said... 100% of the US Federal Debt is the direct result of Social Justice Spending and by Social Justice Spending, I am speaking of spending which subsidizes perfectly healthy, perfectly capable individuals... who have merely succumbed to the Left's vacuous notions.... .

Remove Social Justice Spending and the US Federal Government is operating within a balanced budget.

So enough with the "Reagan Spent this and Bush spent that, Clinton paid off the debt', blah, blah, blah nonsense.

The Ideological Left is a cancer, from which the United States will die and it will do so by the end of 2017, from the cancer which metastasized in 1965, with the launch of "The Great Society" and the enormous obama bacteria that exploded in 2009 and from which the US economy could never recover.

Find your charts and track it... . Entitlements now make up more than 60% of the US Federal BUDGET!

You can't balance the budget without stripping entitlements and they're not going to strip the entitlements and there is NO WAY TO TAX YOURSELF OUT OF ENTITLEMENT SPENDING.

The Party is over kids and when it is... we, the Americans, are going to erase the Ideological Left from the soil formerly known as The United States.

It will make Moa's purge look like a fender-bender.

The difference being that YOU IDIOTS are not innocent. You literally ARE: THE PEOPLE THAT MURDERED THE UNITED STATES.

The difference between cons a liberals is, liberals spend money on the health and well being of the elderly, children and the rest of society, and cons waste trillions on welfare for millionaires and the industrial military complex, invading countries and creating terrorists.

If your heart is in the right place, it's on the left.

There are core beliefs to liberalism and conservatism. You have just mentioned one of the most important liberal core beliefs, and that is how people feel about their fellow man. That one core belief explains how a lot of political actions are viewed. re belief. For example, we often see "small government" used as a liberal or conservative belief but the size of government is somewhat unimportant, it is what the government does that is more the key to liberalism or conservatism.

The Ideological Left has no core beliefs... The Ideological Left rests ENTIRELY, WHOLLY, SOLELY and IRRETRIEVABLY in RELATIVISM.

Relativism is the doctrine which holds that knowledge, truth, and morality exist only in relation to one's cultural, societal, historical and personal context, and, as such can never be the result of soundly reasoned absolutes.

It is through this deviation in reason that relativism axiomatically rejects the objectivity which is essential to truth.

And with truth being essential to trust and, both of those being critical to the establishment of a soundly reasoned morality, and because a soundly reasoned morality is essential to Justice... it becomes clear to reasonable people, that Relativism can never serve justice. And why the Ideological Left produces absolutely nothing accept, chaos, calamity and catastrophe, everywhere it is found.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

The Ideological Left has no core beliefs...

The core beliefs are known as Liberalism. We used it to found this nation. If you don't like then get out, you aren't wanted or needed.

 

[g5000]

To start paying down the debt you need a cool 1,000 billion. 500 billion to balance the budget and 500 to send back to China. With a 3,500 billion Federal Budget, go find the programs and do the math. We want to see numbers not ideology this time.

I can provide you with $1.2 trillion.

Easily.

Show us, and bring the numbers. TY.

I did show you. See post 73.

 

[g5000]

When is anyone going to find the 500 billion needed to balance the budget and the one trillion to start paying off the debt?

Oh right, never.

I showed you in post 73. So much for "never"!

 

[g5000]

I just provided $1.2 trillion in cash. Budget not only balanced, but bringing in a surplus! You can pay down the debt AND lower everyone's tax rates.

You're welcome.

 

[rdean]

At latest count, we are now $18 trillion in debt, which is more than our GDP, and the government continues to run a deficit of around half a trillion dollars each year.

Common sense and basic math tell us that we will never get out of debt unless we first stop going into debt.

Yet Obama and the Democrats continue to want to increase federal spending. They also want to raise taxes--on gas, on investments, on just about everything.

How do Democrats expect the economy to grow if the government keeps taking more and more money out of it? How do the Democrats expect to ever balance the budget, much less to start paying down the debt, when they constantly want to increase federal spending? Have they learned nothing from Greece, Spain, Italy? You can't tax and spend your way to a balanced budget and prosperity.

If you wanna be pro-abortion, pro-gay marriage, pro-
card check, pro-amnesty, fine. But why can't you follow basic math when it comes to the budget and the debt? No sensible, rational person would run their personal finances the way the Democrats want to run the federal budget.

When you're $18 trillion in debt and rising, that is not the time for more "investing" (read: more federal spending)--that's the time to cut spending down to revenue, to balance the budget, and start the long process of paying down the debt. When you're $18 trillion in debt, you don't try to get an increase in your line of credit--it's time to bite the bullet and stop charging on the national credit card.

Only idiot morons would cut taxes during a time of war. Could you be any more stupid? At a time when the mostly poor make up the bulk of the military, Republicans gave tax cuts to the wealthy while sending our military off to die in a country that never attacked us and was no threat. Worse, the ignorant feel we "almost won". Ask them what we "almost won" and they shoot back with "liberal scum".

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

The Ideological Left has no core beliefs...

The core beliefs are known as Liberalism.

Thank you. That is a wonderful demonstration of the unprincipled vacuum that is 'liberalism'.

Even Webster's Dictionary could not escape the Circular nature of the invalid concept: believing that government should be active in supporting social and political change : relating to or supporting political liberalism.

"Liberals-liberalism" OH! Well Why didn't ya SAY SO! That explains everything.

Now some people would say that the answer is found in the definition of: Liberalism. LOL! Sure... let's...

Liberalism: the quality or state of being liberal. Liberal: The core beliefs are known as Liberalism. Liberalism: the quality or state of being liberal. Liberal: The core beliefs are known as Liberalism. Liberalism: the quality or state of being liberal. Liberal: The core beliefs are known as Liberalism. Liberalism: the quality or state of being liberal. Liberal: The core beliefs are known as Liberalism. Liberalism: the quality or state of being liberal. Liberal: The core beliefs are known as Liberalism. Liberalism: the quality or state of being liberal. Liberal: The core beliefs are known as Liberalism. Liberalism: the quality or state of being liberal. Liberal: The core beliefs are known as Liberalism. Liberalism: the quality or state of being liberal. Liberal: The core beliefs are known as Liberalism. Liberalism: the quality or state of being liberal. Liberal: The core beliefs are known as Liberalism. Liberalism: the quality or state of being liberal. Liberal: The core beliefs are known as Liberalism. Liberalism: the quality or state of being liberal. Liberal: The core beliefs are known as Liberalism. Liberalism: the quality or state of being liberal. Liberal: The core beliefs are known as Liberalism. Liberalism: the quality or state of being liberal. Liberal: The core beliefs are known as Liberalism. Liberalism: the quality or state of being liberal. Liberal: The core beliefs are known as Liberalism. Liberalism: the quality or state of being liberal. Liberal: The core beliefs are known as Liberalism. Liberalism: the quality or state of being liberal. Liberal: The core beliefs are known as Liberalism. Liberalism: the quality or state of being liberal. Liberal: The core beliefs are known as Liberalism. Liberalism: the quality or state of being liberal. Liberal: The core beliefs are known as Liberalism. Liberalism: the quality or state of being liberal. Liberal: The core beliefs are known as Liberalism. Liberalism: the quality or state of being liberal. Liberal: The core beliefs are known as Liberalism. Liberalism: the quality or state of being liberal. Liberal: The core beliefs are known as Liberalism. Liberalism: the quality or state of being liberal. Liberal: The core beliefs are known as Liberalism. Liberalism: the quality or state of being liberal. Liberal: The core beliefs are known as Liberalism. ..."

WHOA! IT'S A TRAP! TURN IT OFF!

 

[hangover]

Ladies and Gentlemen of the USMB, I present you:

THE PROBLEM:
OKA:
THE BIG LIE!​

The difference between cons a liberals is, liberals spend money on the health and well being of the elderly, children and the rest of society, and cons waste trillions on welfare for millionaires and the industrial military complex, invading countries and creating terrorists.

If your heart is in the right place, it's on the left.

.

.

.

Now HERE is the TRUTH:

In point of FACT... With the money we are spending to subsidize the otherwise perfectly healthy, but thoroughly lazy to make them dependent upon the Ideological Left, we could set the Elderly and those physically and mentally unable to take care of themselves up in the a massive assisted living center that was a combination of the Mayo-Clinic and The Ritz Carlton and have enough money left over to pave the United States over from border to border and coast to coast, with bridges made of carbon fiber and platinum.

Of course, the biggest problem which is insurmountable... is that since the 1930s, the Socialists, comprising the US Federal government have promised the US worker that the money they were confiscating from them, in the name of Social Security, was being 'invested'... and would be there for them as insurance against poverty in their old age.

Instead, those socialists took those confiscated funds, and spent them in the same year as they were taken.

Year after year...

I recall listening to Bawney Fwank, a sexual deviant; thus we know that he is a person who suffers a serious mental disorder and a long standing member of the US Federal Legislature as a Democrat representative of Massachusetts, he was among the mouthier proponents of the soundness of the US Social Security System.

"There isth abtholutely no weathon to belieth that theruh iths any pwobwem with thosial thecuwity. Those monieths are invethsted in US Federwull Thescurities, where millionths of Americanths investhed in Fedewull bonths that funth the Sotheal Thecuwity Thysthem"

Of course in reality, the money was confiscated from the worker, where it went directly into the general fund and spent as quickly as it arrived on whatever new 'social program' came along and everything else.

They then issued bonds, for the amount of that years confiscated SS monies... (The Investment) which amounts to me taking your $100, telling you that I am investing it... I spend your money on whatever I want... but then I issue a BOND for the same amount. Which you buy for $100 ... You've now invested $200 with me. I owe you the first $100, the Bond's $100 and the $5 that I promised to pay you when you cashed in your bond. So I now owe you $205. So I spend the first $100 and the second $100... on whatever the hell I want and I do this to MILLIONS of PEOPLE... and for as long as it will last I pay people back using the monies I confiscate in the name of SS, and the Bonds that I issued, causing GREATER DEBT, that I sold as INVESTMENTS.

In the MEAN TIME... I am accruing MASSIVE AMOUNTS OF DEBT. And considering that I do not PRODUCE ANYTHING... and I have NO MEANS TO PAY ANYONE ANYTHING except what I confiscate from people, it is only a matter of time before it implodes and the people who I stole from, THE SAME PEOPLE THAT DEPEND UPON ME AND TRUST ME... ARE SCREWED, BLUED AND TATTOOED!

It is a scam developed by a guy named Charles Ponzi... the HIS-STORY of such came and went by the 1920s.

10 years later... in the 1930s Franklin D. Roosevelt used the SAME idea in the creation of Old Age Insurance... which quickly came to be known as Social Security.

Ponsi Schemes are illegal, because they are immoral... Anyone who invested with Bernie Madoff will tell you anything you need to know about Social Security as the US Federal Government has schemed it.

The GOP wasting trillions on war and killing and creating terrorists sooo morally superior to taking care of the elderly and children. You wouldn't know the truth if it smacked you in the face. BTW it just did.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

At latest count, we are now $18 trillion in debt, which is more than our GDP, and the government continues to run a deficit of around half a trillion dollars each year.

Common sense and basic math tell us that we will never get out of debt unless we first stop going into debt.

Yet Obama and the Democrats continue to want to increase federal spending. They also want to raise taxes--on gas, on investments, on just about everything.

How do Democrats expect the economy to grow if the government keeps taking more and more money out of it? How do the Democrats expect to ever balance the budget, much less to start paying down the debt, when they constantly want to increase federal spending? Have they learned nothing from Greece, Spain, Italy? You can't tax and spend your way to a balanced budget and prosperity.

If you wanna be pro-abortion, pro-gay marriage, pro-
card check, pro-amnesty, fine. But why can't you follow basic math when it comes to the budget and the debt? No sensible, rational person would run their personal finances the way the Democrats want to run the federal budget.

When you're $18 trillion in debt and rising, that is not the time for more "investing" (read: more federal spending)--that's the time to cut spending down to revenue, to balance the budget, and start the long process of paying down the debt. When you're $18 trillion in debt, you don't try to get an increase in your line of credit--it's time to bite the bullet and stop charging on the national credit card.

Only idiot morons would cut taxes during a time of war. Could you be any more stupid? At a time when the mostly poor make up the bulk of the military, Republicans gave tax cuts to the wealthy while sending our military off to die in a country that never attacked us and was no threat. Worse, the ignorant feel we "almost won". Ask them what we "almost won" and they shoot back with "liberal scum".

Only an fool would need to describe an idiot as a moron.

Lowering taxes, increases the likelihood that the reduction in liability for a given activity would increase participation in that activity... where that activity is the generation of revenue, increasing activity in the generation of revenue will generate greater income for entities who's revenue is realized through the taxation of revenue.

But... honestly, THERE WAS NO WAY THAT A FOOL COULD HAVE POSSIBLE KNOWN THAT!

 

[ChristOrthodox]

Preposterous. Russia's Ruble is collapsing with 10% debt/gdp and $150million deficit.

The more we spend and the more debt we have the STRONGER the economy.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

Preposterous. Russia's Ruble is collapsing with 10% debt/gdp and $150million deficit.

The more we spend and the more debt we have the STRONGER the economy.

LOL! Well, sure.. because even if the US Dollar implodes, as it absolutely MUST... the unicorns will fly in and piss money, causing new money to rain from the sky. And with that sort of backup. We're solid gold!

 

[ChristOrthodox]

Preposterous. Russia's Ruble is collapsing with 10% debt/gdp and $150million deficit.

The more we spend and the more debt we have the STRONGER the economy.

LOL! Well, sure.. because even if the US Dollar implodes, as it absolutely MUST... the unicorns will fly in and piss money, causing new money to rain from the sky. And with that sort of backup. We're solid gold!

The World describes the US as an Empire, hates the US as an Empire, and is merely trying to stay out of the collapsing Empire's wrathful plunge from the sky.

 

[regent]

The Ideological Left has no core beliefs...

The core beliefs are known as Liberalism.

Thank you. That is a wonderful demonstration of the unprincipled vacuum that is 'liberalism'.

Even Webster's Dictionary could not escape the Circular nature of the invalid concept: believing that government should be active in supporting social and political change : relating to or supporting political liberalism.

"Liberals-liberalism" OH! Well Why didn't ya SAY SO! That explains everything.

Now some people would say that the answer is found in the definition of: Liberalism. LOL! Sure... let's...

Liberalism: the quality or state of being liberal. Liberal: The core beliefs are known as Liberalism. Liberalism: the quality or state of being liberal. Liberal: The core beliefs are known as Liberalism. Liberalism: the quality or state of being liberal. Liberal: The core beliefs are known as Liberalism. Liberalism: the quality or state of being liberal. Liberal: The core beliefs are known as Liberalism. Liberalism: the quality or state of being liberal. Liberal: The core beliefs are known as Liberalism. Liberalism: the quality or state of being liberal. Liberal: The core beliefs are known as Liberalism. Liberalism: the quality or state of being liberal. Liberal: The core beliefs are known as Liberalism. Liberalism: the quality or state of being liberal. Liberal: The core beliefs are known as Liberalism. Liberalism: the quality or state of being liberal. Liberal: The core beliefs are known as Liberalism. Liberalism: the quality or state of being liberal. Liberal: The core beliefs are known as Liberalism. Liberalism: the quality or state of being liberal. Liberal: The core beliefs are known as Liberalism. Liberalism: the quality or state of being liberal. Liberal: The core beliefs are known as Liberalism. Liberalism: the quality or state of being liberal. Liberal: The core beliefs are known as Liberalism. Liberalism: the quality or state of being liberal. Liberal: The core beliefs are known as Liberalism. Liberalism: the quality or state of being liberal. Liberal: The core beliefs are known as Liberalism. Liberalism: the quality or state of being liberal. Liberal: The core beliefs are known as Liberalism. Liberalism: the quality or state of being liberal. Liberal: The core beliefs are known as Liberalism. Liberalism: the quality or state of being liberal. Liberal: The core beliefs are known as Liberalism. Liberalism: the quality or state of being liberal. Liberal: The core beliefs are known as Liberalism. Liberalism: the quality or state of being liberal. Liberal: The core beliefs are known as Liberalism. Liberalism: the quality or state of being liberal. Liberal: The core beliefs are known as Liberalism. Liberalism: the quality or state of being liberal. Liberal: The core beliefs are known as Liberalism. Liberalism: the quality or state of being liberal. Liberal: The core beliefs are known as Liberalism. ..."

WHOA! IT'S A TRAP! TURN IT OFF!

If you have a university near you, you might try one of their bookstores for a small booklet on political ideologies. They usually have three or four different types and they do have definitions more elaborate and definitive than a dictionary or even "make up your own.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

Ladies and Gentlemen of the USMB, I present you:

THE PROBLEM:
OKA:
THE BIG LIE!​

The difference between cons a liberals is, liberals spend money on the health and well being of the elderly, children and the rest of society, and cons waste trillions on welfare for millionaires and the industrial military complex, invading countries and creating terrorists.

If your heart is in the right place, it's on the left.

.

.

.

Now HERE is the TRUTH:

In point of FACT... With the money we are spending to subsidize the otherwise perfectly healthy, but thoroughly lazy to make them dependent upon the Ideological Left, we could set the Elderly and those physically and mentally unable to take care of themselves up in the a massive assisted living center that was a combination of the Mayo-Clinic and The Ritz Carlton and have enough money left over to pave the United States over from border to border and coast to coast, with bridges made of carbon fiber and platinum.

Of course, the biggest problem which is insurmountable... is that since the 1930s, the Socialists, comprising the US Federal government have promised the US worker that the money they were confiscating from them, in the name of Social Security, was being 'invested'... and would be there for them as insurance against poverty in their old age.

Instead, those socialists took those confiscated funds, and spent them in the same year as they were taken.

Year after year...

I recall listening to Bawney Fwank, a sexual deviant; thus we know that he is a person who suffers a serious mental disorder and a long standing member of the US Federal Legislature as a Democrat representative of Massachusetts, he was among the mouthier proponents of the soundness of the US Social Security System.

"There isth abtholutely no weathon to belieth that theruh iths any pwobwem with thosial thecuwity. Those monieths are invethsted in US Federwull Thescurities, where millionths of Americanths investhed in Fedewull bonths that funth the Sotheal Thecuwity Thysthem"

Of course in reality, the money was confiscated from the worker, where it went directly into the general fund and spent as quickly as it arrived on whatever new 'social program' came along and everything else.

They then issued bonds, for the amount of that years confiscated SS monies... (The Investment) which amounts to me taking your $100, telling you that I am investing it... I spend your money on whatever I want... but then I issue a BOND for the same amount. Which you buy for $100 ... You've now invested $200 with me. I owe you the first $100, the Bond's $100 and the $5 that I promised to pay you when you cashed in your bond. So I now owe you $205. So I spend the first $100 and the second $100... on whatever the hell I want and I do this to MILLIONS of PEOPLE... and for as long as it will last I pay people back using the monies I confiscate in the name of SS, and the Bonds that I issued, causing GREATER DEBT, that I sold as INVESTMENTS.

In the MEAN TIME... I am accruing MASSIVE AMOUNTS OF DEBT. And considering that I do not PRODUCE ANYTHING... and I have NO MEANS TO PAY ANYONE ANYTHING except what I confiscate from people, it is only a matter of time before it implodes and the people who I stole from, THE SAME PEOPLE THAT DEPEND UPON ME AND TRUST ME... ARE SCREWED, BLUED AND TATTOOED!

It is a scam developed by a guy named Charles Ponzi... the HIS-STORY of such came and went by the 1920s.

10 years later... in the 1930s Franklin D. Roosevelt used the SAME idea in the creation of Old Age Insurance... which quickly came to be known as Social Security.

Ponsi Schemes are illegal, because they are immoral... Anyone who invested with Bernie Madoff will tell you anything you need to know about Social Security as the US Federal Government has schemed it.

Ladies and Gentlemen of the USMB, I present you:

THE PROBLEM:
OKA:
THE BIG LIE!
____
Part Deux
"More of the Same"​

The GOP wasting trillions on war and killing and creating terrorists sooo morally superior to taking care of the elderly and children. You wouldn't know the truth if it smacked you in the face. BTW it just did.

 

[ScienceRocks]

Can the op point out to me how infrastructure, science(grants, nws, noaa, nasa, jpl, usgs, nhc, fda, cdc), and r&d investment is a respectable % of this debt? Make your case why we should slice our throats within areas that make us respected world wide.

If not, then sit down and look at what is really causing the debt. SSI, Healthcare, Military, etc. I think we should slash the military to 500 billion and find away to reduce waste. Accountablity...Use to be something that the republicans believed.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

The Ideological Left has no core beliefs...

The core beliefs are known as Liberalism.

Thank you. That is a wonderful demonstration of the unprincipled vacuum that is 'liberalism'.

Even Webster's Dictionary could not escape the Circular nature of the invalid concept: believing that government should be active in supporting social and political change : relating to or supporting political liberalism.

"Liberals-liberalism" OH! Well Why didn't ya SAY SO! That explains everything.

Now some people would say that the answer is found in the definition of: Liberalism. LOL! Sure... let's...

Liberalism: the quality or state of being liberal. Liberal: The core beliefs are known as Liberalism. Liberalism: the quality or state of being liberal. Liberal: The core beliefs are known as Liberalism. Liberalism: the quality or state of being liberal. Liberal: The core beliefs are known as Liberalism. Liberalism: the quality or state of being liberal. Liberal: The core beliefs are known as Liberalism. Liberalism: the quality or state of being liberal. Liberal: The core beliefs are known as Liberalism. Liberalism: the quality or state of being liberal. Liberal: The core beliefs are known as Liberalism. Liberalism: the quality or state of being liberal. Liberal: The core beliefs are known as Liberalism. Liberalism: the quality or state of being liberal. Liberal: The core beliefs are known as Liberalism. Liberalism: the quality or state of being liberal. Liberal: The core beliefs are known as Liberalism. Liberalism: the quality or state of being liberal. Liberal: The core beliefs are known as Liberalism. Liberalism: the quality or state of being liberal. Liberal: The core beliefs are known as Liberalism. Liberalism: the quality or state of being liberal. Liberal: The core beliefs are known as Liberalism. Liberalism: the quality or state of being liberal. Liberal: The core beliefs are known as Liberalism. Liberalism: the quality or state of being liberal. Liberal: The core beliefs are known as Liberalism. Liberalism: the quality or state of being liberal. Liberal: The core beliefs are known as Liberalism. Liberalism: the quality or state of being liberal. Liberal: The core beliefs are known as Liberalism. Liberalism: the quality or state of being liberal. Liberal: The core beliefs are known as Liberalism. Liberalism: the quality or state of being liberal. Liberal: The core beliefs are known as Liberalism. Liberalism: the quality or state of being liberal. Liberal: The core beliefs are known as Liberalism. Liberalism: the quality or state of being liberal. Liberal: The core beliefs are known as Liberalism. Liberalism: the quality or state of being liberal. Liberal: The core beliefs are known as Liberalism. Liberalism: the quality or state of being liberal. Liberal: The core beliefs are known as Liberalism. Liberalism: the quality or state of being liberal. Liberal: The core beliefs are known as Liberalism. ..."

WHOA! IT'S A TRAP! TURN IT OFF!

If you have a university near you, you might try one of their bookstores for a small booklet on political ideologies. They usually have three or four different types and they do have definitions more elaborate and definitive than a dictionary or even "make up your own.

Oh... Did I break out of the addled construct wherein Ideologies are defined by the Left to excuse the Left, isolating it from itself, projecting the consequences of such upon its opposition and holding itself blameless as it redefines itself into perpetuity to escape accountability for its catastrophic product?

OH! Wait... that's right. I reject that nonsense.

But I ADORED the appeal to misleading authority! Nothing gets me going like a little ipse dixit after lunch..

Reader: Isn't it cool that when the Left needs to define itself... there's always some place where such is defined... properly... and that 'place' is never 'here'?

I mean I used "Webster's Dictionary".

Webster's has been establishing the reference for the definition of words for going on two hundred ten years.

But to hear the Left tell it, Webster's Dictionary is not NEARLY sufficient to define the mind-numbing complexities that are, the Ideological Left.

Of course in reality, The Ideological Left is a common virus. And like all viruses they are the essence of simplicity. In short the Left is a parasite, that due to the simplicity of it composition is incapable of replicating itself. We see from the above circular flaw, why the Left is incapable of replicating. It consumes itself through its circular construct. So it requires a host, upon which it feeds and once it has infected that host, it attaches itself to the hosts auto-replication system and survives there, until the fatally flawed concept causes the demise of that host... at which time is dies along with the host... unless it can find a way to spread to another host, and so on and so forth through perpetuity... until the cycle is broken and the virus isolated, unable to infect another and it is gone.

The Ideological Left is a lie. And that is all there is to it.

It claims to defend 'the children'... even as its most notorious clamber is the RIGHT to MURDER the most innocent and defenseless of children, BY NO LESS THAN ITS OWN MOTHER.

Now, friend... if you cannot see that such an organism is little more the wicked deceit common to pedestrian evil... then you, yourself are part and parcel of that evil and there is likely little hope for you. If there is any hope at all, you should use this moment's opportunity to turn from the BIG LIE and begin to make your way back to the light, through your means to reason objectively which the Left has so desperately tried to smother.

Best of luck...

OH! Almost forget.

Huckleberry... your concession is duly noted and summarily accepted.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

Can the op point out to me how infrastructure, science(grants, nws, noaa, nasa, jpl, usgs, nhc, fda, cdc), and r&d investment is a respectable % of this debt? Make your case why we should slice our throats within areas that make us respected world wide.

If not, then sit down and look at what is really causing the debt. SSI, Healthcare, Military, etc. I think we should slash the military to 500 billion and find away to reduce waste. Accountablity...Use to be something that the republicans believed.

What do you feel the US Military Budget is?

I mean at this moment, the US Military has roughly the same number of personnel in uniform as it did in 1940. Or just over 540 billion.

So... there's not much left on that bone to cut from that.

But there's 2.4 TRILLION or 2400 billion in Entitlement spending. What would ya cut from that?

 

[ChristOrthodox]

Can the op point out to me how infrastructure, science(grants, nws, noaa, nasa, jpl, usgs, nhc, fda, cdc), and r&d investment is a respectable % of this debt? Make your case why we should slice our throats within areas that make us respected world wide.

If not, then sit down and look at what is really causing the debt. SSI, Healthcare, Military, etc. I think we should slash the military to 500 billion and find away to reduce waste. Accountablity...Use to be something that the republicans believed.

What do you feel the US Military Budget is?

I mean at this moment, the US Military has roughly the same number of personnel in uniform as it did in 1940. Or just over 540 billion.

So... there's not much left on that bone to cut from that.

But there's 2.4 TRILLION or 2400 billion in Entitlement spending. What would ya cut from that?

Let's cut money for the American people who cannot find work because all the jobs were shipped over seas, and give it to a bloated-Imperialist Army?

Eisenhower, Military Industrial Complex...something something

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

Let's cut money for the American people who cannot find work

Yes... do that and do so immediately.

And wont' you BE SURPRISED when THEY DO FIND WORK... and they do so at a price that some one who needs them can afford... and their talents are set to work in that small shop, which can relieve some poor overworked individual and allow him or her to regain some sense of perspective... allowing them to go get other contracts to do more work, which provides that those who were formerly unemployed to exercise their skills, to improve their productivity, whereupon they become more valuable, resulting in their receiving higher wages... and so on and so forth until the next thing ya know... the US GDP is not ~2% based upon the most optimistic of interpretations but +7.5% qrtr after qrtr... and TRUE US UNEMPLOYMENT returns to +/-5% as it was throughout most of the late 20th and early 21st century.... before darkness fell, as a result of the rise of the Ideological Left and, the unenviable consequences of that madness.

 

[ChristOrthodox]

Can the op point out to me how infrastructure, science(grants, nws, noaa, nasa, jpl, usgs, nhc, fda, cdc), and r&d investment is a respectable % of this debt? Make your case why we should slice our throats within areas that make us respected world wide.

If not, then sit down and look at what is really causing the debt. SSI, Healthcare, Military, etc. I think we should slash the military to 500 billion and find away to reduce waste. Accountablity...Use to be something that the republicans believed.

What do you feel the US Military Budget is?

I mean at this moment, the US Military has roughly the same number of personnel in uniform as it did in 1940. Or just over 540 billion.

So... there's not much left on that bone to cut from that.

But there's 2.4 TRILLION or 2400 billion in Entitlement spending. What would ya cut from that?

Let's cut money for the American people who cannot find work

Yes... do that immediately.

And wont' you BE SURPRISED when THEY DO FIND WORK... and they do so at a price that some one who needs them can afford... and their talents are set to work in that small shop, which can relieve some poor overworked individual and allow him or her to regain some sense of perspective... allowing them to go get other contracts to do more work, which provides that those who were formerly unemployed to exercise their skills, to improve their productivity, whereupon they become more valuable, resulting in their receiving higher wages... and so on and so forth until the next thing ya know... the US GDP is not ~2% based upon the most optimistic of interpretations but +7.5% qrtr after qrtr... and TRUE US UNEMPLOYMENT returns to +/-5% as it was throughout most of the late 20th and early 21st century.... before darkness fell, as a result of the rise of the Ideological Left and, the unenviable consequences of that madness.

No they won't find work, just like the GREAT DEPRESSION there is no work to be FOUND.