Comments about killing the President = "free speech" to 9th Circus

Why wish this boob relief from the economic chaos he has authored?

Instead, may he live long and watch his children and his children's children labour under the serfdom he is bringing to this (once) nation.
 
What a well thought out ruling. I support it for now.
We know. If it had been directed at Palin you would have been melting down big time and demanding blood.
Palin should be protected at ALL COSTS. Obama is not even the president. He is a ineligible ururper not qualified for Article 2 Section 1. Palin is very important to this country for she is the only one who can save it from financial and moral ruin.

Now that is some funny shit!

:clap2:
 
Lets be honest. No one actually planning on killing a politician is going to leave such a wide trail that would lead back to him so quickly.

Except they actually do. That's because the kind of folks that take a potshot at a President tend to be not right in the head. So the Secret Service checks up and keeps tabs on these guys.

And like it or not, threats against Elected officials and their families is indeed against the law. It isn't freedom of speech.

There's a lot you can say about Obama. What this guy said is across the line just as much as what that Indian Graduate student said was across the line.

And you can be sure this place is watched by the FBI/CIA as most political message boards are.
Good. Then they know what a horses' ASS they work for...as if Eric Holder wasn't enough for them.
 
Lets be honest. No one actually planning on killing a politician is going to leave such a wide trail that would lead back to him so quickly.

Except they actually do. That's because the kind of folks that take a potshot at a President tend to be not right in the head. So the Secret Service checks up and keeps tabs on these guys.

And like it or not, threats against Elected officials and their families is indeed against the law. It isn't freedom of speech.

There's a lot you can say about Obama. What this guy said is across the line just as much as what that Indian Graduate student said was across the line.

Thats what I thought, thanks for clarifying this.
 
Keep spreading your lies neo-con hack. PROVE where anyone on this message board have wished death on Bush. You can't, but keep posting your same drivel over and over, it's getting funny to watch you, since you can't back up your claims.

I love pointing out hypocrisy for hacks like you. It's entertaining.

Now what about the guy who is in jail for threatening to kill Bush? Any comments about that?

He's your Hero. :(


Nice try hack.

You just can't stand it that I'm pointing out what an idiot you are. A guy who threatened to kill Bush is in jail, while another who threatened to kill Obama is not.

Yet you keep yapping the same mantra over and over.....do you copy and paste it for each post you make?


Anyway, Liability had an interesting OP about this, and without having to resort to name calling, until you and the T entered the fray.



Sorry Liability for derailing your thread, but I had to point out the stupidly of this neo-con troll whose only mantra is:

Libs=Bad
Neo-Cons=Good

over and over and over and over.............:cuckoo:

Your deranged hissy-fit only proves i'm right. You guys wished death on BOOOOSH and his Family for years. So you guys are the last ones who should be bitching about this one. Your dishonesty & hypocrisy is astounding and pathetic. You guys actually believe everyone just forgot about your despicable behavior in the past. Well many haven't forgotten. No one hates more than you Left/Progressives. That's the reality. And btw,Socialists/Progressives & Neo-Cons = Bad. True Libs are just fine. Have a nice day.
 
I don't see how talking about killing anyone can be legal, aren't death threats against the law?

No.

Talk is cheap.

I'm going to hunt you down, gut you like a fish, skin ya and wear your teeth in a necklace.

Did I threaten you? I do have knives and tranportation [assuming I could find you]. or am I talking trash?

The crime comes if I say that while holding a knife or am standing close enough to throw punches.

Sayin I'd like to shoot the pres is internet tuff guy talk.

Well, it could go either way. Some people are stupid enough to plan their intent to murder publicly on the internet.

That is, sadly, probably true. But I'm fairly certain that the first fool to get caught would be, almost, the last.
 
What a well thought out ruling. I support it for now.
We know. If it had been directed at Palin you would have been melting down big time and demanding blood.
Palin should be protected at ALL COSTS. Obama is not even the president. He is a ineligible ururper not qualified for Article 2 Section 1. Palin is very important to this country for she is the only one who can save it from financial and moral ruin.

:clap2:
:clap2:
:clap2:


That goes right into 2nd place on my list of dumbest things I ever heard.

It was "the only one" part that clinched it for you. :lol:
 
No.

Talk is cheap.

I'm going to hunt you down, gut you like a fish, skin ya and wear your teeth in a necklace.

Did I threaten you? I do have knives and tranportation [assuming I could find you]. or am I talking trash?

The crime comes if I say that while holding a knife or am standing close enough to throw punches.

Sayin I'd like to shoot the pres is internet tuff guy talk.

Well, it could go either way. Some people are stupid enough to plan their intent to murder publicly on the internet.

That is, sadly, probably true. But I'm fairly certain that the first fool to get caught would be, almost, the last.

A girl I used to date threatened an old female of friend of hers on myspace, she said she was going to kick her ass in a private message. Her ex friend called the police and showed them the message on Myspace, a few hours later they were knocking on my girls door to investigate, so I'm pretty sure if you say you are going to kill someone online and it gets reported, the authorities will look into it.
 
Well, it could go either way. Some people are stupid enough to plan their intent to murder publicly on the internet.

Bet you really threw a fit when your fellow fascists were making death threats against Bush, right?

ROFL

Fucking hypocrite.

uhm

The rest of her post seem to support this as a freedom of speech stance.

so your reply makes no sense, especially considering what she replied to.
 
Lets be honest. No one actually planning on killing a politician is going to leave such a wide trail that would lead back to him so quickly.

Except they actually do. That's because the kind of folks that take a potshot at a President tend to be not right in the head. So the Secret Service checks up and keeps tabs on these guys.

And like it or not, threats against Elected officials and their families is indeed against the law. It isn't freedom of speech.

There's a lot you can say about Obama. What this guy said is across the line just as much as what that Indian Graduate student said was across the line.

And you can be sure this place is watched by the FBI/CIA as most political message boards are.

:lol: :laugh2: :rofl: :eek:


wait a minute, I just saw a black helocopter fly across my screen. :blues:







:tinfoil:
 
He's your Hero. :(


Nice try hack.

You just can't stand it that I'm pointing out what an idiot you are. A guy who threatened to kill Bush is in jail, while another who threatened to kill Obama is not.

Yet you keep yapping the same mantra over and over.....do you copy and paste it for each post you make?


Anyway, Liability had an interesting OP about this, and without having to resort to name calling, until you and the T entered the fray.



Sorry Liability for derailing your thread, but I had to point out the stupidly of this neo-con troll whose only mantra is:

Libs=Bad
Neo-Cons=Good

over and over and over and over.............:cuckoo:

Your deranged hissy-fit only proves i'm right. You guys wished death on BOOOOSH and his Family for years. So you guys are the last ones who should be bitching about this one. Your dishonesty & hypocrisy is astounding and pathetic. You guys actually believe everyone just forgot about your despicable behavior in the past. Well many haven't forgotten. No one hates more than you Left/Progressives. That's the reality. And btw,Socialists/Progressives & Neo-Cons = Bad. True Libs are just fine. Have a nice day.
Just like "ALL" you idiot Ron Paul supporters believe Bush blew up the World Trade Center.
gotcha.
 
I am a long way from a supporter of Barry or his administration but I find the ruling ludicrous.

This guy threatened a sitting US Senator who happened to be running for POTUS.

IMHO they should have thrown the book at him.
 
Keep spreading your lies neo-con hack. PROVE where anyone on this message board have wished death on Bush. You can't, but keep posting your same drivel over and over, it's getting funny to watch you, since you can't back up your claims.

I love pointing out hypocrisy for hacks like you. It's entertaining.

Now what about the guy who is in jail for threatening to kill Bush? Any comments about that?

He's your Hero. :(


Nice try hack.

You just can't stand it that I'm pointing out what an idiot you are. A guy who threatened to kill Bush is in jail, while another who threatened to kill Obama is not.

Yet you keep yapping the same mantra over and over.....do you copy and paste it for each post you make?


Anyway, Liability had an interesting OP about this, and without having to resort to name calling, until you and the T entered the fray.



Sorry Liability for derailing your thread, but I had to point out the stupidly of this neo-con troll whose only mantra is:

Libs=Bad
Neo-Cons=Good

over and over and over and over.............:cuckoo:

EZ:

No worries.

Threads often take meandering courses.

I am actually fascinated by this thread. It started with me being pretty irked by the 9th Circus (again) but in reading all the replies, I have to say, their point is not necessarily all that far off. I still prefer the dissenting opinion, but the majority opinion is not necessarily just "crap" on that basis.

It's almost an historic thread, too. I had a chat with Ravi in this thread that didn't involve any flaming or ad hominems by either of us. It's one of the few times I have personally witnessed her being quite reasonable and on topic. She may do that more than I am aware of. I just haven't seen a lot of it in the threads we have both joined. (I imagine that I don't bring out the best in her. :eusa_angel: )

Anyway, I thought the topic was interesting. It's kinda cool to see liberals and conservatives agreeing on some topics: in this case the agreement is that the ballot is superior to the bullet.
 
He's your Hero. :(


Nice try hack.

You just can't stand it that I'm pointing out what an idiot you are. A guy who threatened to kill Bush is in jail, while another who threatened to kill Obama is not.

Yet you keep yapping the same mantra over and over.....do you copy and paste it for each post you make?


Anyway, Liability had an interesting OP about this, and without having to resort to name calling, until you and the T entered the fray.



Sorry Liability for derailing your thread, but I had to point out the stupidly of this neo-con troll whose only mantra is:

Libs=Bad
Neo-Cons=Good

over and over and over and over.............:cuckoo:

EZ:

No worries.

Threads often take meandering courses.

I am actually fascinated by this thread. It started with me being pretty irked by the 9th Circus (again) but in reading all the replies, I have to say, their point is not necessarily all that far off. I still prefer the dissenting opinion, but the majority opinion is not necessarily just "crap" on that basis.

It's almost an historic thread, too. I had a chat with Ravi in this thread that didn't involve any flaming or ad hominems by either of us. It's one of the few times I have personally witnessed her being quite reasonable and on topic. She may do that more than I am aware of. I just haven't seen a lot of it in the threads we have both joined. (I imagine that I don't bring out the best in her. :eusa_angel: )

Anyway, I thought the topic was interesting. It's kinda cool to see liberals and conservatives agreeing on some topics: in this case the agreement is that the ballot is superior to the bullet.
:lol:
 
Nice try hack.

You just can't stand it that I'm pointing out what an idiot you are. A guy who threatened to kill Bush is in jail, while another who threatened to kill Obama is not.

Yet you keep yapping the same mantra over and over.....do you copy and paste it for each post you make?


Anyway, Liability had an interesting OP about this, and without having to resort to name calling, until you and the T entered the fray.



Sorry Liability for derailing your thread, but I had to point out the stupidly of this neo-con troll whose only mantra is:

Libs=Bad
Neo-Cons=Good

over and over and over and over.............:cuckoo:

Your deranged hissy-fit only proves i'm right. You guys wished death on BOOOOSH and his Family for years. So you guys are the last ones who should be bitching about this one. Your dishonesty & hypocrisy is astounding and pathetic. You guys actually believe everyone just forgot about your despicable behavior in the past. Well many haven't forgotten. No one hates more than you Left/Progressives. That's the reality. And btw,Socialists/Progressives & Neo-Cons = Bad. True Libs are just fine. Have a nice day.
Just like "ALL" you idiot Ron Paul supporters believe Bush blew up the World Trade Center.
gotcha.
Good God...not this again?
 
Your deranged hissy-fit only proves i'm right. You guys wished death on BOOOOSH and his Family for years. So you guys are the last ones who should be bitching about this one. Your dishonesty & hypocrisy is astounding and pathetic. You guys actually believe everyone just forgot about your despicable behavior in the past. Well many haven't forgotten. No one hates more than you Left/Progressives. That's the reality. And btw,Socialists/Progressives & Neo-Cons = Bad. True Libs are just fine. Have a nice day.
Just like "ALL" you idiot Ron Paul supporters believe Bush blew up the World Trade Center.
gotcha.
Good God...not this again?

no. it's not this. I just made the same lame-ass argument libo made.
 
"Palin should be protected at ALL COSTS. Obama is not even the president. He is a ineligible ururper not qualified for Article 2 Section 1. Palin is very important to this country for she is the only one who can save it from financial and moral ruin."

Here's a typical Foxbot- so full of hateful BS he's dangerous. 25% of Pubs are sociopathic they're so brainwashed, and their talk of all the Dems threatening Bush is just more Fox/Rush hate talk...
 
Before I even read the decision (story was linked on Drudge), I knew it was the 9th Circus.

Call for Obama’s assassination ruled free speech - Los Angeles Times

The idiot defendant spoke of the then candidate Obama getting some 50 cal ammo in his head. When the Secret Service investigated the tip from another user of that same message board, they found not only that the idiot was "armed" but armed with -- you guessed it -- a 50 cal weapon. Of course, the idiot had said even more in other internet communications.

He got indicted, tried and convicted.

But the 9th Circus reversed the conviction on the ground that the "threat" wasn't a threat in context and that what the idiot said was protected "free speech."

Fucking 9th Circus.




wait, so if someone says I am going to kill you, it all depends on what they have in the garage as to how serious he is?
 
Before I even read the decision (story was linked on Drudge), I knew it was the 9th Circus.

Call for Obama’s assassination ruled free speech - Los Angeles Times

The idiot defendant spoke of the then candidate Obama getting some 50 cal ammo in his head. When the Secret Service investigated the tip from another user of that same message board, they found not only that the idiot was "armed" but armed with -- you guessed it -- a 50 cal weapon. Of course, the idiot had said even more in other internet communications.

He got indicted, tried and convicted.

But the 9th Circus reversed the conviction on the ground that the "threat" wasn't a threat in context and that what the idiot said was protected "free speech."

Fucking 9th Circus.




wait, so if someone says I am going to kill you, it all depends on what they have in the garage as to how serious he is?

Wait. Your reading comprehension skills are tragically impaired.

Try to smarten up.

But to answer your one stupid question: "no."

It is however ONE factor that should be taken into consideration.
 

Forum List

Back
Top