Commander-In-Chief tells America's enemies when he won't use nukes

No surprise, those living up Obama's ass can't see what is wrong with this.

The only reason to have nukes is as a deterrent to attacks by others.

Your idiot boiking just annouced they won't be that anymore, and like the mindless dickheads you are you respond with glee and began attacks on those who see the stupidity of Barry's policy here.

God, listen to the chicken hawks!!!
This might be the all time lamest post on this board, attacking people when the President says he will NOT respond to a MASSIVE chemical or biological attack on the USA by calling them 'chickenhawks.'

You even know what the fucking phrase means you two bit half wit?
 
No surprise, those living up Obama's ass can't see what is wrong with this.

The only reason to have nukes is as a deterrent to attacks by others.

Your idiot boiking just annouced they won't be that anymore, and like the mindless dickheads you are you respond with glee and began attacks on those who see the stupidity of Barry's policy here.

God, listen to the chicken hawks!!!
This might be the all time lamest post on this board, attacking people when the President says he will NOT respond to a MASSIVE chemical or biological attack on the USA by calling them 'chickenhawks.'

You even know what the fucking phrase means you two bit half wit?

So, our conventional weapons are not a deterrent?
 
No surprise, those living up Obama's ass can't see what is wrong with this.

The only reason to have nukes is as a deterrent to attacks by others.

Your idiot boiking just annouced they won't be that anymore, and like the mindless dickheads you are you respond with glee and began attacks on those who see the stupidity of Barry's policy here.

God, listen to the chicken hawks!!!
This might be the all time lamest post on this board, attacking people when the President says he will NOT respond to a MASSIVE chemical or biological attack on the USA by calling them 'chickenhawks.'

You even know what the fucking phrase means you two bit half wit?

Duuuuuuhhhh, which way did he go George, which way did he go?

Brilliant post, shows your incredible intelligence:lol:
 
We spend more on defense than every other country in the world combined.

If we can't get the job done without the use of nukes, then (a) we the tax payers are getting screwed or (b) somebody doesn't know what the fuck they're doing.
 
No surprise, those living up Obama's ass can't see what is wrong with this.

The only reason to have nukes is as a deterrent to attacks by others.

Your idiot boiking just annouced they won't be that anymore, and like the mindless dickheads you are you respond with glee and began attacks on those who see the stupidity of Barry's policy here.

God, listen to the chicken hawks!!!
This might be the all time lamest post on this board, attacking people when the President says he will NOT respond to a MASSIVE chemical or biological attack on the USA by calling them 'chickenhawks.'

You even know what the fucking phrase means you two bit half wit?

You show so little faith in the capabilities of our military. They are the most powerful military force in the history of mankind. And that is WITHOUT using our nuclear weapons.

I have no doubt that they could respond in force to any attack against the US, without resorting to nuclear weapons
 
I'm sure Putin is having another hardy laugh over this one. He signs a massive arms deal with Venezuela and continues to build Iran's Nuclear facilities while the goofy American "Community Organizer" rambles on about nothing. I have to agree with Putin. This stuff is pretty funny.

The agreement cuts by about one-third "the nuclear weapons that the United States and Russia will deploy," the president said.


U.S., Russia reach new arms control deal - CNN.com

As for Russia's arms deal with Venezuela, we're doing the same with Taiwain and others. But you'd have to remove your blinders in order to see that. It would seem to me, that the US and Russia only help in destabilizing the planet with these arms sales.
 
I'm pretty sure at some point down the line we will be discussing what to do or not do about Russia building Venezuela's Nuclear facilities. This will happen in my opinion.
 
No surprise, those living up Obama's ass can't see what is wrong with this.

The only reason to have nukes is as a deterrent to attacks by others.

Your idiot boiking just annouced they won't be that anymore, and like the mindless dickheads you are you respond with glee and began attacks on those who see the stupidity of Barry's policy here.

God, listen to the chicken hawks!!!
This might be the all time lamest post on this board, attacking people when the President says he will NOT respond to a MASSIVE chemical or biological attack on the USA by calling them 'chickenhawks.'

You even know what the fucking phrase means you two bit half wit?

So, our conventional weapons are not a deterrent?
Obviously not if someone launched such an attack.
 
To be fair, how often have we actually used nuclear weapons against an enemy? Twice.

Does anyone honestly think our enemies are expecting us to ever use them?

It doesn't look to me like he is actually ruling the idea out:

But the president said in an interview that he was carving out an exception for “outliers like Iran and North Korea” that have violated or renounced the main treaty to halt nuclear proliferation.

I don't expect us to use them, but it doesn't look like he has ruled the idea out and it sounds like he might even consider it "preemptively".

Immie
 
No surprise, those living up Obama's ass can't see what is wrong with this.

The only reason to have nukes is as a deterrent to attacks by others.

Your idiot boiking just annouced they won't be that anymore, and like the mindless dickheads you are you respond with glee and began attacks on those who see the stupidity of Barry's policy here.

God, listen to the chicken hawks!!!
This might be the all time lamest post on this board, attacking people when the President says he will NOT respond to a MASSIVE chemical or biological attack on the USA by calling them 'chickenhawks.'

You even know what the fucking phrase means you two bit half wit?

You show so little faith in the capabilities of our military. They are the most powerful military force in the history of mankind. And that is WITHOUT using our nuclear weapons.

I have no doubt that they could respond in force to any attack against the US, without resorting to nuclear weapons
So when exactly is the Taliban surrender cerimony going to take place again?
 
No surprise, those living up Obama's ass can't see what is wrong with this.

The only reason to have nukes is as a deterrent to attacks by others.

Your idiot boiking just annouced they won't be that anymore, and like the mindless dickheads you are you respond with glee and began attacks on those who see the stupidity of Barry's policy here.

This might be the all time lamest post on this board, attacking people when the President says he will NOT respond to a MASSIVE chemical or biological attack on the USA by calling them 'chickenhawks.'

You even know what the fucking phrase means you two bit half wit?

You show so little faith in the capabilities of our military. They are the most powerful military force in the history of mankind. And that is WITHOUT using our nuclear weapons.

I have no doubt that they could respond in force to any attack against the US, without resorting to nuclear weapons
So when exactly is the Taliban surrender cerimony going to take place again?

Are you really implying that we should've nuked Afghanistan to end the war? Once again, our carpet bombing has done far more damage than one conventional nuke would do,s o your theory fails.

As for libo., Russia is building Iran's nuclear facilities so that they don't get nukes. It is NOT in russia's best interest for Iran to have extra bargaining power in the region, nor is it salutary for them to have someone in their backyard with nukes threatening to destabilize the region. The fact that Russia will be in control of their nuclear programme is a good thing.

venezuela, really man, who cares? Venezuela isn't using a nuke, and if Russia does sign an arms deal with them, it will be for nuclear facilities for energy.

By the way, sorry to burst your bubble, but South Korea, essentially our lapdog (sorry to the S. Koreans out there, just trying to be realistic), is busy establishing nuclear facilities for energy in places like Turkey, Dubai and Jordan. It's time to stop being so scared of the word nuclear.
 
No surprise, those living up Obama's ass can't see what is wrong with this.

The only reason to have nukes is as a deterrent to attacks by others.

Your idiot boiking just annouced they won't be that anymore, and like the mindless dickheads you are you respond with glee and began attacks on those who see the stupidity of Barry's policy here.

This might be the all time lamest post on this board, attacking people when the President says he will NOT respond to a MASSIVE chemical or biological attack on the USA by calling them 'chickenhawks.'

You even know what the fucking phrase means you two bit half wit?

So, our conventional weapons are not a deterrent?
Obviously not if someone launched such an attack.

So, WHY do we have so much of our Federal budget allocated to them???
 
Actually, the fear of some terrorist framing a country for an act leads to international problems. This is not a Pre-911 world, folks. You have to figure out what is the best way to sink the global economy and promoting war between western powers and some third world countis a great idea.



Now on the issue of Chemical and Biological weaponry. We can say the terrorists already has these. Remember that stockpile of WMD's that we never found! It must have been sold on the black market by now...
 
I'm still waiting for a logical explanation as to why this is a bad thing?

There is no logical explanation...

Other than the "nuke the world" fringe, it appeals to everyone

This is a GOOD thing. Think of all of the money it will save the US!

A world economy thrown into chaos by even one nuclear weapon blown up in a major city regardless of the country might cost magnitudes in the "world economy;" what did WW-1 cost? In that event we'd have to spend vast sums in other ways to establish a new secure balance of power.

We already have the nuclear deterrent, all we need do is up-keep, at this point. Up-keep means upgrading the technology which right now is something out of the 70's.

We have made it clear to our friends and allies that they can depend on us to provide their nuclear deterrent. This is critically important for Japan, South Korea, the nations of NATO and our "friends" in the Middle East. If our allies cannot depend on us, then they will be motivated to develop or purchase their own nuclear weapons and the means to deliver them. Most of them are capable of doing that in a few years. Extended deterrence enforces nonproliferation, a connection often overlooked in deterrence strategy.

We are not presently keeping the umbrella up to scratch, and it will cost us a lot more later. I think the president's thinking is a lot like the ref'd posts. The president figures we need to cut back anyway; re-testing will cost, so he makes an announcement to claim a new nuclear policy, cutting spending specifically where federal spending is dictated by the constitution.

He is in fact making the world more dangerous in that regard, meaning that we'll spend a lot more later in a more dangerous world. The status quo, put in place by the best minds of the twentieth century, is about to be dismantled by a president who makes unilateral cuts and foreswears options with littlle if any thought of the consequences.

There will be no real effect in holding Iran back from developing nuclear weapons, that much is pretty obvious; now we can expect Saudi Arabia, Syria, even some of the lesser ME states will go shopping for nuclear weapons. This will begin a new world arms race.
That is just my opinion.
 
Last edited:
Obama's whole problem with foreign policy is that it lacks any degree of intellect and relies solely upon regurgitated ideology.

You don't telegraph your response to your enemies unless you're doing it as a deterrent. Telling people who want to kill you that your response to an attack will be less rather than more... is simply an encouragement.

He's a moron.
Wow, a Con defending intellect, what a rarity.
 

Forum List

Back
Top