Comey, Lynch, Agents All Knew Clinton Wouldn’t Be Charged Way Before Her FBI Interview

Weatherman2020

Diamond Member
Mar 3, 2013
91,616
62,429
2,605
Right coast, classified
Time for prosecutions and make an example.

Former Attorney General Loretta Lynch knew well in advance of FBI Director James Comey’s 2016 press conference that he would recommend against charging Hillary Clinton, according to information turned over to the Senate Homeland Security Committee on Friday.

The revelation was included in 384 pages of text messages exchanged between FBI officials Peter Strzok and Lisa Page, and it significantly diminishes the credibility of Lynch’s earlier commitment to accept Comey’s recommendation — a commitment she made under the pretense that the two were not coordinating with each other.

And it gets worse. Comey and Lynch reportedly knew that Clinton would never face charges even before the FBI conducted its three-hour interview with Clinton, which was supposedly meant to gather more information into her mishandling of classified information.

On July 1, 2016, as the Lynch announcement became public, Page texted Strzok:

Page: And yeah, it’s a real profile in couragw [sic], since she knows no charges will be brought.

There are other revelations within the text messages. But in the cover letter accompanying them, the FBI notified Congress that many additional text messages are missing. According to the FBI, its “technical system for retaining text messages sent and received on FBI mobile devices failed to preserve text messages for Mr. Strzok and Ms. Page from December 14, 2016 to approximately to [sic] May 17, 2017.”

The reason?

(M)any FBI-provided Samsung 5 mobile devices did not capture or store text messages due to misconfiguration issues related to rollouts, provisioning, and software upgrades that conflicted with the FBI’s collection capabilities. The result was that data that should have been automatically collected and retained for long-term storage and retrieval was not collected.

In a letter to FBI Director Christopher Wray sent yesterday, the head of the Senate Homeland Security Committee Ron Johnson, a Republican from Wisconsin, called the loss of records “concerning.”

Keep reading…
 
Time for prosecutions and make an example.

Former Attorney General Loretta Lynch knew well in advance of FBI Director James Comey’s 2016 press conference that he would recommend against charging Hillary Clinton, according to information turned over to the Senate Homeland Security Committee on Friday.

The revelation was included in 384 pages of text messages exchanged between FBI officials Peter Strzok and Lisa Page, and it significantly diminishes the credibility of Lynch’s earlier commitment to accept Comey’s recommendation — a commitment she made under the pretense that the two were not coordinating with each other.

And it gets worse. Comey and Lynch reportedly knew that Clinton would never face charges even before the FBI conducted its three-hour interview with Clinton, which was supposedly meant to gather more information into her mishandling of classified information.

On July 1, 2016, as the Lynch announcement became public, Page texted Strzok:

Page: And yeah, it’s a real profile in couragw [sic], since she knows no charges will be brought.

There are other revelations within the text messages. But in the cover letter accompanying them, the FBI notified Congress that many additional text messages are missing. According to the FBI, its “technical system for retaining text messages sent and received on FBI mobile devices failed to preserve text messages for Mr. Strzok and Ms. Page from December 14, 2016 to approximately to [sic] May 17, 2017.”

The reason?

(M)any FBI-provided Samsung 5 mobile devices did not capture or store text messages due to misconfiguration issues related to rollouts, provisioning, and software upgrades that conflicted with the FBI’s collection capabilities. The result was that data that should have been automatically collected and retained for long-term storage and retrieval was not collected.

In a letter to FBI Director Christopher Wray sent yesterday, the head of the Senate Homeland Security Committee Ron Johnson, a Republican from Wisconsin, called the loss of records “concerning.”

Keep reading…


yes all should be charged with crimes enough is enough
 
So, this is an opinion piece.
But Sharyl Attkisson lost all credibility back when she reported she was hacked, we she actually just had her delete key stuck.

But i gotta thank you for reminding me of that, i'm busting a gut.
"according to information turned over to the Senate Homeland Security Committee on Friday."

Dumbass.
 
Falsifying a Federal Criminal investigation, Obstruction of Justice, Lying to Congress, Etc...

And Clinton was fully briefed.... SO Clinton, Lynch, Obama, Comey among many others were committing a crime in an organized manner using the federal government to do it...

These people need to be lined up and hung from gallows... For subversion and treason against the people of the United States.

When Hillary made the statement "if Trump wins we will all swing", she knew exactly what they were doing and what was at stake..
 
Last edited:
OF COURSE they knew, it was in the newspaper a month PLUS before her interview, (but after all other interviews and the investigation was over... but the final interview with Hillary....) that they had nothing to charge her with...

We have threads on this site on it....

the investigation was all over before the final interview....

that's why it did not matter that Bill caught up with Lynch at the Tarmac meeting....the investigation had already come to its conclusion....it just had not been announced to the public yet...and I'm certain Clinton was told before the announcement to the public.... that's simply protocol, any citizen under investigation for a year, would be told the result of the investigation before the public, whether charges are being brought or not....

Lynch's recusing herself was for appearance.... the decision was made long before Bill's airplane visit...

the two lovers were right...
 
So, this is an opinion piece.
But Sharyl Attkisson lost all credibility back when she reported she was hacked, we she actually just had her delete key stuck.

But i gotta thank you for reminding me of that, i'm busting a gut.
False. There's been computer forensic evidence discovered that has proven Attkisson's computer was hacked. The evidence is in litigation right now.
 
So, this is an opinion piece.
But Sharyl Attkisson lost all credibility back when she reported she was hacked, we she actually just had her delete key stuck.

But i gotta thank you for reminding me of that, i'm busting a gut.
LMAO! A stuck delete key? Really? Damn you have to be stupid to be a democrat and believe that is the excuse. The delete key got stuck...not any of the other keys actually used to type shit but the delete key. You're an idiot.
 
OF COURSE they knew, it was in the newspaper a month PLUS before her interview, (but after all other interviews and the investigation was over... but the final interview with Hillary....) that they had nothing to charge her with...

We have threads on this site on it....

the investigation was all over before the final interview....

that's why it did not matter that Bill caught up with Lynch at the Tarmac meeting....the investigation had already come to its conclusion....it just had not been announced to the public yet...and I'm certain Clinton was told before the announcement to the public.... that's simply protocol, any citizen under investigation for a year, would be told the result of the investigation before the public, whether charges are being brought or not....

Lynch's recusing herself was for appearance.... the decision was made long before Bill's airplane visit...

the two lovers were right...
So your OK with Obstruction of Justice....

If it was over why did they even interview her? Your line of thinking is total bull shit...
 
If Godzilla...I mean Chris Christie was in Hillarys debacle. There wouldn't even be A trial. The left would just throw him in jail. But that would take 5 guards
 
OF COURSE they knew, it was in the newspaper a month PLUS before her interview, (but after all other interviews and the investigation was over... but the final interview with Hillary....) that they had nothing to charge her with...

We have threads on this site on it....

the investigation was all over before the final interview....

that's why it did not matter that Bill caught up with Lynch at the Tarmac meeting....the investigation had already come to its conclusion....it just had not been announced to the public yet...and I'm certain Clinton was told before the announcement to the public.... that's simply protocol, any citizen under investigation for a year, would be told the result of the investigation before the public, whether charges are being brought or not....

Lynch's recusing herself was for appearance.... the decision was made long before Bill's airplane visit...

the two lovers were right...
So your OK with Obstruction of Justice....

If it was over why did they even interview her? Your line of thinking is total bull shit...
the interview is a final, formal step....they know all the answers to every question they were going to ask her and would know immediately if she was lying about any of which they knew.... she didn't lie to them, case dismissed....if she had lied, then the investigation would take a turn and have to continue so they could find out why she lied....

Just like the FBI will know every answer to every question they are going to ask Trump, before they ask him...
 
OF COURSE they knew, it was in the newspaper a month PLUS before her interview, (but after all other interviews and the investigation was over... but the final interview with Hillary....) that they had nothing to charge her with...

We have threads on this site on it....

the investigation was all over before the final interview....

that's why it did not matter that Bill caught up with Lynch at the Tarmac meeting....the investigation had already come to its conclusion....it just had not been announced to the public yet...and I'm certain Clinton was told before the announcement to the public.... that's simply protocol, any citizen under investigation for a year, would be told the result of the investigation before the public, whether charges are being brought or not....

Lynch's recusing herself was for appearance.... the decision was made long before Bill's airplane visit...

the two lovers were right...
So your OK with Obstruction of Justice....

If it was over why did they even interview her? Your line of thinking is total bull shit...
the interview is a final, formal step....they know all the answers to every question they were going to ask her and would know immediately if she was lying about any of which they knew.... she didn't lie to them, case dismissed....if she had lied, then the investigation would take a turn and have to continue so they could find out why she lied....

Just like the FBI will know every answer to every question they are going to ask Trump, before they ask him...

b25dd7f832d543aadeee8997afdde1d3.jpg
 
OF COURSE they knew, it was in the newspaper a month PLUS before her interview, (but after all other interviews and the investigation was over... but the final interview with Hillary....) that they had nothing to charge her with...

We have threads on this site on it....

the investigation was all over before the final interview....

that's why it did not matter that Bill caught up with Lynch at the Tarmac meeting....the investigation had already come to its conclusion....it just had not been announced to the public yet...and I'm certain Clinton was told before the announcement to the public.... that's simply protocol, any citizen under investigation for a year, would be told the result of the investigation before the public, whether charges are being brought or not....

Lynch's recusing herself was for appearance.... the decision was made long before Bill's airplane visit...

the two lovers were right...
So your OK with Obstruction of Justice....

If it was over why did they even interview her? Your line of thinking is total bull shit...
the interview is a final, formal step....they know all the answers to every question they were going to ask her and would know immediately if she was lying about any of which they knew.... she didn't lie to them, case dismissed....if she had lied, then the investigation would take a turn and have to continue so they could find out why she lied....

Just like the FBI will know every answer to every question they are going to ask Trump, before they ask him...
As a retired LEO your full of SHIT!

Had there been insufficient evidence there would have been no interview. Thus the investigation was still ongoing. Clinton being fully briefed means she was in on the whole thing and was NEVER going to be charged in any eventuality. This is wholly UNETHICAL AND CRIMINAL BEHAVIOR. Falsifying a Federal Investigation is a Felony punishable up to 20 years in prison.

What this group did was acting as an Ongoing Criminal Enterprise with the office of president in their sites.. They weaponized the full power of the FBI, CIA, NSA, and other federal agencies to complete their take over of the US GOVERNMENT. And now they are exposed..

Your an idiot who believes the lies your told by your left wing masters..

This was a blatant act of TREASON against the United States..
 

Forum List

Back
Top