Coldest Winter in 100 Years

[Old Rocks]

Total crock of shit, Fitz. There is not micro and macro evolution. Enough micro and you have macro. No differance at all.

How many Biologists claim that evolution did not happen?

And how do you square up what we have learned since 1953 about the genetics of life with creationism?

 

[CrusaderFrank]

The peppered moth moved evolution into the realm of "settled science"

"Another common criticism involves well-known pictures of moths resting on trunks, used in many textbooks. These photos were prepared (dead moths pinned to branches), which has been conflated into the idea that all the studies were staged, ignoring the point that professional photography to illustrate textbooks uses dead insects because of the considerable difficulty in getting good images of small, relatively fast moving, animals, and that the studies actually consisted of observational data rather than using such photographs. The photographs in Michael Majerus's 1998 book Melanism: Evolution in Action are unstaged pictures of live moths in the wild, and the photographs of moths on tree-trunks, apart from some slight blurring, look no different than the "staged" photographs.[19]"

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peppered_moth_evolution

Rather hockey stick like

 

[Sinatra]

I do love a peppered steak.

Damn I wish it was a wee bit warmer so I could fire up the grill!!!

Damn global cooling...

 

[Big Fitz]

There is not micro and macro evolution.

Shows what you know numbnuts.

And how do you square up what we have learned since 1953 about the genetics of life with creationism?

Read "Darwin's Black Box". Life is too complex to have been spontaneously generated. The laws of Thermodynamics itself speaks against the possibility as even astronomical odds to GETTING astronomical odds. To have even created a single cellular flagellum by random chemical connections... well to call it impossible is being kind.

The only RATIONAL response is that although the mechanism may be quantifiable, there must have been some INTELLIGENT force out there, whatever it may be, that created life. It could be aliens, or God, or robots, or this is an incredibly powerful dream or simulator... it doesn't matter. The point is, that it is more likely a supernatural (read, not natural and therefore unproven as of now) method for life to exist than there is the happenstance of victory in the galactic Keno game of random chance chemical concoctions.

To close yourself off to this mathematically MOST PROBABLE possibility, is foolishness.

But you've already proven yourself the fool, so, I doubt you'll get this either.

 

[edthecynic]

There is not micro and macro evolution.

Shows what you know numbnuts.

And how do you square up what we have learned since 1953 about the genetics of life with creationism?

Read "Darwin's Black Box". Life is too complex to have been spontaneously generated. The laws of Thermodynamics itself speaks against the possibility as even astronomical odds to GETTING astronomical odds. To have even created a single cellular flagellum by random chemical connections... well to call it impossible is being kind.

The only RATIONAL response is that although the mechanism may be quantifiable, there must have been some INTELLIGENT force out there, whatever it may be, that created life. It could be aliens, or God, or robots, or this is an incredibly powerful dream or simulator... it doesn't matter. The point is, that it is more likely a supernatural (read, not natural and therefore unproven as of now) method for life to exist than there is the happenstance of victory in the galactic Keno game of random chance chemical concoctions.

To close yourself off to this mathematically MOST PROBABLE possibility, is foolishness.

But you've already proven yourself the fool, so, I doubt you'll get this either.

You know nothing about science and even less about the Laws of Thermodynamics.

Creation VIOLATES the First Law of Thermodynamics!!!

Chemical "concoctions" do not form "random chance" molecules!!!!

 

[Big Fitz]

Creation VIOLATES the First Law of Thermodynamics!!!

What the FUCK does the word "SUPERNATURAL" mean to you?

Paralyzed from the neck UP I see.

 

[Old Rocks]

Supernatural, invoked for a physical process which we have enough understanding of to see how it works, and even engineer new species, means dumbass ignorance in this context.

We cannot engineer with what we know of gravity.

We cannot exceed the speed of light with what we know of Relitivity.

But we can now engineer the basic elements of life, creating new abilities in species. Our understanding of life and evolution is great enough we do not need myths and fairy tales from an illiterate agrarian past for explanations of abiogenisis or the evolution of life as we know it today.

 

[FactFinder]

Who is the 'we' Rocks?
Some think a bit more highly of themselves then they ought, heh?

 

[edthecynic]

Creation VIOLATES the First Law of Thermodynamics!!!

What the FUCK does the word "SUPERNATURAL" mean to you?

Paralyzed from the neck UP I see.

NONEXISTENT, FICTITIOUS, MADE UP, UNREAL, IMAGINARY, PHONY
There is no such THING as the "supernatural" it is merely a word and nothing more!!!!!
NATURE is SUPREME

I notice you could not deny the absolute truth of this statement,
Chemical "concoctions" do not form "random chance" molecules!!!!

 

[CrusaderFrank]

There is not micro and macro evolution.

Shows what you know numbnuts.

And how do you square up what we have learned since 1953 about the genetics of life with creationism?

Read "Darwin's Black Box". Life is too complex to have been spontaneously generated. The laws of Thermodynamics itself speaks against the possibility as even astronomical odds to GETTING astronomical odds. To have even created a single cellular flagellum by random chemical connections... well to call it impossible is being kind.

The only RATIONAL response is that although the mechanism may be quantifiable, there must have been some INTELLIGENT force out there, whatever it may be, that created life. It could be aliens, or God, or robots, or this is an incredibly powerful dream or simulator... it doesn't matter. The point is, that it is more likely a supernatural (read, not natural and therefore unproven as of now) method for life to exist than there is the happenstance of victory in the galactic Keno game of random chance chemical concoctions.

To close yourself off to this mathematically MOST PROBABLE possibility, is foolishness.

But you've already proven yourself the fool, so, I doubt you'll get this either.

You know nothing about science and even less about the Laws of Thermodynamics.

Creation VIOLATES the First Law of Thermodynamics!!!

Chemical "concoctions" do not form "random chance" molecules!!!!

Um, no it doesn't.

E=mc^2 tells us otherwise

 

[Old Rocks]

Hmmm..... The mass energy equation and the chemistry of abiogenisis. A bit of a stretch there, old man.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Hmmm..... The mass energy equation and the chemistry of abiogenisis. A bit of a stretch there, old man.

Yeah, I know, that realization is what fucked Einstein up in the end, it blew his mind

 

[edthecynic]

Shows what you know numbnuts.



Read "Darwin's Black Box". Life is too complex to have been spontaneously generated. The laws of Thermodynamics itself speaks against the possibility as even astronomical odds to GETTING astronomical odds. To have even created a single cellular flagellum by random chemical connections... well to call it impossible is being kind.

The only RATIONAL response is that although the mechanism may be quantifiable, there must have been some INTELLIGENT force out there, whatever it may be, that created life. It could be aliens, or God, or robots, or this is an incredibly powerful dream or simulator... it doesn't matter. The point is, that it is more likely a supernatural (read, not natural and therefore unproven as of now) method for life to exist than there is the happenstance of victory in the galactic Keno game of random chance chemical concoctions.

To close yourself off to this mathematically MOST PROBABLE possibility, is foolishness.

But you've already proven yourself the fool, so, I doubt you'll get this either.

You know nothing about science and even less about the Laws of Thermodynamics.

Creation VIOLATES the First Law of Thermodynamics!!!

Chemical "concoctions" do not form "random chance" molecules!!!!

Um, no it doesn't.

E=mc^2 tells us otherwise

And you know less about special relativity than thermodynamics.

The FLoT says you can't get SOMETHING from NOTHING.
Special relativity says energy and matter are THINGS that are related to each other.
Creation says NO THING (God) created EVERY THING from NOTHING.
Get it?????????