Coldest November since 1976

Hmmmmmmmmm.............. Wider and wilder swings with an overall warming.

The only thing swinging is a broken hockey stick.
Your alligence to your thoroughly debunked denier cult myths is....extremely retarded, to say the least.

I don't expect a Faither to convert over to reality.
I don't expect a reality denying cultist like you to ever wake up and see what is actually happening. You're much too ignorant, stupid and ideologically brainwashed for that to happen, no matter how much direct evidence you're confronted with. I have no illusions about convincing you; I'm just here to debunk the lies and misinformation you post for your greed-head puppetmasters in the fossil fuel industry.
 
The Kookster's OP is, as usual, complete bullshit.

NOAA - Global Analysis - November 2013
The average temperature across global land and ocean surfaces during November 2013 was record highest for November in the 134-year period of record, at 0.78°C (1.40°F) above the 20th century average. This is also the sixth highest monthly departure from average among all months on record and the highest since March 2010, one of the last months in which El Niño conditions were present in the eastern and central equatorial Pacific Ocean. During November, warmer-than-average temperatures across most of the world's ocean surfaces contributed to the anomalous warmth. Even with ENSO-neutral conditions holding for the 19th straight month, the November global ocean temperature tied with 2009 as the third highest for November, at 0.54°C (0.97°F) above the 20th century average. Regionally, the Northern and Southern Hemisphere oceans above 20° latitude (outside the tropics) both tied as second warmest, at 0.64°C (1.15°F) and 0.53°C (0.95°F) above their long-term averages, respectively.

Most of the world's land areas experienced warmer-than-average monthly temperatures, including much of Eurasia, coastal Africa, Central America, and central South America. Much of southern Russia, north west Kazakhstan, south India, and southern Madagascar were record warm. Meanwhile, northern Australia, parts of North America, south west Greenland, and parts of the Southern Ocean near South America were cooler than average. No regions of the globe were record cold. Overall, the globally-averaged temperature over land surfaces was the second highest for November in the 134-year period of record, at 1.43°C (2.57°F) above the 20th century average.

September–November (Northern Hemisphere fall / Southern Hemisphere spring) was the second warmest such period across global land and ocean surfaces since records began in 1880, behind only 2005, at 0.68°C (1.22°F) above the 20th century average. The Northern Hemisphere was also second warmest, while the Southern Hemisphere was fourth warmest for the period.

And Old Crock posts up manufactured crap.... Let me see, Yep the 1.2 deg C adjustment is still in use... Fucking moron will believe anything his masters and handlers tell him.. Never mind the empirical evidence..
 
God I love to come in here and observe the far left heads explode when they are pwned..........check post #28 above! Meanwhile, the NOAA predicts Americans will once again be freezing their nut sacks off this winter!!!
Cold Noaa Winter Forecast 2014 2015

Your idiotic and very fraudulent OP was debunked, as usual for your drivel, kookles. But you just keep on posting your bullshit. LOLOL. I guess it's all you got going for you in your demented little life.

See post #25 above.

Your crap lies are funny.... You cant even see the forest through the trees...
 
Plus the satellite data may be off by 30%.

Most people are unaware of just how twiddled and mysterious the satellite data is. In comparison, surface temperatures are beacons of simplicity, transparency and reliability. But since the unreliable RSS satellite data tells the deniers what they want to here, the deniers disregard the good data and rely almost exclusively on RSS now.

Here's a file from the UAH satellite data people, describing some of the fiddling they do. Their intentions are obviously good, but they're working a very difficult task. As soon as they work the bugs out of one satellite, it fails and they have to shift to a new satellite with a totally different calibration.

http://www.nsstc.uah.edu/data/msu/t2lt/readme.06Nov2014
 
Koch Industries: Secretly Funding the Climate Denial Machine

The Koch Brothers: Funding $67,042,064 to groups denying climate change since 1997.


Koch Industries Secretly Funding the Climate Denial Machine Greenpeace





A mere pittance compared to the funding levels of the climate fraudsters.


The US government has spent over $79 billion since 1989 on policies related to climate change, including science and technology research, administration, education campaigns, foreign aid, and tax breaks.


Carbon trading worldwide reached $126 billion in 2008. Banks are calling for more carbon-trading. And experts are predicting the carbon market will reach $2 - $10 trillion making carbon the largest single commodity traded.

Meanwhile in a distracting sideshow, Exxon-Mobil Corp is repeatedly attacked for paying a grand total of $23 million to skeptics—less than a thousandth of what the US government has put in, and less than one five-thousandth of the value of carbon trading in just the single year of 2008.

And of course the ultimate payoff.....

"New Carbon Finance, a London-based investment adviser that tracks the market, predicts the carbon market will reach $3 trillion by 2020.50
Richard L. Sandor, chairman and chief executive officer of Climate Exchange Plc, which owns the world’s biggest carbon dioxide exchange in London, sees an even larger market:
"We’re going to see a worldwide market, and carbon will unambiguously be the largest non-financial commodity in the world." He predicted trades eventually will total $10 trillion a year."51


So, tell us political junky, which is the bigger number? Don't be coy now.....

http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/images/stories/papers/originals/climate_money.pdf
 
Plus the satellite data may be off by 30%.

Most people are unaware of just how twiddled and mysterious the satellite data is. In comparison, surface temperatures are beacons of simplicity, transparency and reliability. But since the unreliable RSS satellite data tells the deniers what they want to here, the deniers disregard the good data and rely almost exclusively on RSS now.

Here's a file from the UAH satellite data people, describing some of the fiddling they do. Their intentions are obviously good, but they're working a very difficult task. As soon as they work the bugs out of one satellite, it fails and they have to shift to a new satellite with a totally different calibration.

http://www.nsstc.uah.edu/data/msu/t2lt/readme.06Nov2014

After 3 years of testing many different ways to solve uncertainties
with the MSU/AMSU data we are getting close to releasing v6.0. This
version will have completely new limb-corrections, diurnal corrections, and hot-target corrections. As noted before, we did not apply any diurnal corrections to the AMSUs (starting in 1998)
due to the fact AQUA and MetOP were non-drifting satellites.

Note the inclusion of when the warming stopped... they have to blame it on something and then they offer up a correction to solve their problem.

MANUFACTURING TEMP!

Going to have to send Roy and Danny a note asking them what it is they think they are correcting..
 
Koch Industries: Secretly Funding the Climate Denial Machine

The Koch Brothers: Funding $67,042,064 to groups denying climate change since 1997.


Koch Industries Secretly Funding the Climate Denial Machine Greenpeace

If you look at this list, very few of them deal primarily with climate issues. Organizations like Cato or the Heritage institute may publish the occasional paper on AGW, but that's only a small part of their agenda. The $67 million figure is therefore obvious bullshit.
 
Five worthless deranged denier cult posts in a row that ignore the fact that the OP on this thread was debunked. Globally this last November was at least the second hottest November on record, not the "coldest" as the OP claimed. That's straight from your own denier cult heroes.

November 2014 was the second warmest November in the 36-year global satellite temperature record, according to Dr. John Christy, a professor of atmospheric science and director of the Earth System Science Center at The University of Alabama in Huntsville.
(Ironically sourced from - Wattsupwiththat)
 
Last edited:
Five worthless deranged denier cult posts that ignore the fact that the OP on this thread was debunked. Globally November was the second hottest November on record.
Horseshit. That's based on "homogenized" data. It's based on caca, in other words.
 
Five worthless deranged denier cult posts that ignore the fact that the OP on this thread was debunked. Globally November was the second hottest November on record.
Horseshit. That's based on "homogenized" data. It's based on caca, in other words.
Nope. Your brain may be "caca", as your deranged posts would indicate, but the temperature data has been well verified and matchs the observed reality of melting ice and permafrost, rising sea levels, changing seasonal timing, etc.,etc..
 
Five worthless deranged denier cult posts that ignore the fact that the OP on this thread was debunked. Globally November was the second hottest November on record.
Horseshit. That's based on "homogenized" data. It's based on caca, in other words.
Nope. Your brain may be "caca", as your deranged posts would indicate, but the temperature data has been well verified and matchs the observed reality of melting ice and permafrost, rising sea levels, changing seasonal timing, etc.,etc..

The temperature "data" has been shown over and over again to be "homogenized" and massaged to produce the desired result. It's about as credible as Obama making promises about the ACA.
 
So all you've got is an insane conspiracy theory. The data disagrees with your cult, hence the data must be faked.

Don't you find it sad, how your cult has been reduced to peddling conspiracy theories? Rest assured, everyone else finds it sad. There was a time when deniers tried science, but that time is over. It's just a conspiracy cult now.
 
Five worthless deranged denier cult posts that ignore the fact that the OP on this thread was debunked. Globally November was the second hottest November on record.
Horseshit. That's based on "homogenized" data. It's based on caca, in other words.
Nope. Your brain may be "caca", as your deranged posts would indicate, but the temperature data has been well verified and matchs the observed reality of melting ice and permafrost, rising sea levels, changing seasonal timing, etc.,etc..

The temperature "data" has been shown over and over again to be "homogenized" and massaged to produce the desired result. It's about as credible as Obama making promises about the ACA.
You've been brainwashed into swallowing that nonsense but nobody outside your cult who is sane and rational buys your crackpot conspiracy theories about virtually the entire world scientific community.
 
So all you've got is an insane conspiracy theory. The data disagrees with your cult, hence the data must be faked.

Don't you find it sad, how your cult has been reduced to peddling conspiracy theories? Rest assured, everyone else finds it sad. There was a time when deniers tried science, but that time is over. It's just a conspiracy cult now.

Wrong, asshole. There have been numerous stories in the news showing that the NCDC altered its temperature data to make the past seem cooler and the present seem warmer. There is hard evidence demonstrating the fact.

Then, of course, we have the infamous climategate memos which show that the Cimate Center in England massaged its data.
 
Five worthless deranged denier cult posts that ignore the fact that the OP on this thread was debunked. Globally November was the second hottest November on record.
Horseshit. That's based on "homogenized" data. It's based on caca, in other words.
Nope. Your brain may be "caca", as your deranged posts would indicate, but the temperature data has been well verified and matchs the observed reality of melting ice and permafrost, rising sea levels, changing seasonal timing, etc.,etc..

The temperature "data" has been shown over and over again to be "homogenized" and massaged to produce the desired result. It's about as credible as Obama making promises about the ACA.
You've been brainwashed into swallowing that nonsense but nobody outside your cult who is sane and rational buys your crackpot conspiracy theories about virtually the entire world scientific community.
hear-no-evil_see-no-evil_speak-no-evil1.jpg
 
So all you've got is an insane conspiracy theory. The data disagrees with your cult, hence the data must be faked.

Don't you find it sad, how your cult has been reduced to peddling conspiracy theories? Rest assured, everyone else finds it sad. There was a time when deniers tried science, but that time is over. It's just a conspiracy cult now.

Wrong, asshole. There have been numerous stories in the news showing that the NCDC altered its temperature data to make the past seem cooler and the present seem warmer. There is hard evidence demonstrating the fact.

Then, of course, we have the infamous climategate memos which show that the Cimate Center in England massaged its data.
Nope. Wrong again, you poor denier cult retard. There may indeed be a lot of "stories" floating around in your deranged denier cult fantasy-land making all kinds of bogus claims, but they have nothing to do with reality, or the validity of the scientific data.
 

Forum List

Back
Top