CNN wants this summit to fail so badly

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

I have had CNN on all evening and it has been nothing but negative, negative, negative, regarding this summit, not to mention I’ve spent the last half hour listening about the food Kim Jong Un ate for dinner.

 

[Sherry]

Full blown TDS on display.

 

[frigidweirdo]

I have had CNN on all evening and it has been nothing but negative, negative, negative, regarding this summit, not to mention I’ve spent the last half hour listening about the food Kim Jong Un ate for dinner.

What's positive?

Let's sum it up.

1) The US will not accept a peace treaty unless North Korea gets rid of all its nukes.

2) North Korea will not get rid of all its nukes, see Libya and Iraq for evidence of why.

3) China will not accept a peace treaty unless the US removes all its troops from South Korea.

4) The US will not remove all its troops from South Korea.

5) Kim wants to be a major player, he wants to be taken seriously, he's just done what his father and grandfather couldn't do, meet a US president. He's already won.

So, what makes you think this can work, exactly?

 

[westwall]

I have had CNN on all evening and it has been nothing but negative, negative, negative, regarding this summit, not to mention I’ve spent the last half hour listening about the food Kim Jong Un ate for dinner.

Of course they do. The political class wants trump to fail because if he doesn't it will make them all look like morons. Which, for the most part, they are.

 

[fncceo]

CNN's target demographic would have a collective aneurysm if Trump were to actually get credit for doing anything right.

It's funny to compare the coverage of this historic summit to Nixon's 1972 visit to China where the media where ecstatic over the idea of US-Sino detente.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Democrats will just announce that the summit failed and Kim made Trump look like a fool. You know, what democrats always do.

 

[Ringel05]

I have had CNN on all evening and it has been nothing but negative, negative, negative, regarding this summit, not to mention I’ve spent the last half hour listening about the food Kim Jong Un ate for dinner.

You must be a glutton for punishment.......... Might as well involve April.......

 

[Billy_Bob]

And now they are going to sign an agreement? This will make the heads explode... priceless...

How are they going to spin a failure with success in writing?

 

[Billy_Bob]

CNN is dumbfounded...

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

I have had CNN on all evening and it has been nothing but negative, negative, negative, regarding this summit, not to mention I’ve spent the last half hour listening about the food Kim Jong Un ate for dinner.

Nonsense.

 

[Slyhunter]

Since I'm not going to watch CNN to find out I'll subscribe to this thread instead. You folks who watch it keep me informed.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

I have had CNN on all evening and it has been nothing but negative, negative, negative, regarding this summit, not to mention I’ve spent the last half hour listening about the food Kim Jong Un ate for dinner.

What's positive?

Let's sum it up.

1) The US will not accept a peace treaty unless North Korea gets rid of all its nukes.

2) North Korea will not get rid of all its nukes, see Libya and Iraq for evidence of why.

3) China will not accept a peace treaty unless the US removes all its troops from South Korea.

4) The US will not remove all its troops from South Korea.

5) Kim wants to be a major player, he wants to be taken seriously, he's just done what his father and grandfather couldn't do, meet a US president. He's already won.

So, what makes you think this can work, exactly?

Correct.

Absent consensus as to what constitutes ‘success,’ the notion of ‘failure’ is ridiculous.

The ‘summit’ will be a success for Kim, who will have elevated himself to the level of an American president, at the expense of Trump.

 

[westwall]

I have had CNN on all evening and it has been nothing but negative, negative, negative, regarding this summit, not to mention I’ve spent the last half hour listening about the food Kim Jong Un ate for dinner.

What's positive?

Let's sum it up.

1) The US will not accept a peace treaty unless North Korea gets rid of all its nukes.

2) North Korea will not get rid of all its nukes, see Libya and Iraq for evidence of why.

3) China will not accept a peace treaty unless the US removes all its troops from South Korea.

4) The US will not remove all its troops from South Korea.

5) Kim wants to be a major player, he wants to be taken seriously, he's just done what his father and grandfather couldn't do, meet a US president. He's already won.

So, what makes you think this can work, exactly?

Correct.

Absent consensus as to what constitutes ‘success,’ the notion of ‘failure’ is ridiculous.

The ‘summit’ will be a success for Kim, who will have elevated himself to the level of an American president, at the expense of Trump.

A laughable assertion. Kim has nukes, that makes him more powerful than 90% of the worlds leaders. Add to that the fact that he's a psychopath and he's a true worldwide threat. Trump realizes that flattering a psychopath, who then turns his nukes over to a neutral power is a SMART thing to do. You clowns ignore the forest for the trees.

 

[Slyhunter]

I have had CNN on all evening and it has been nothing but negative, negative, negative, regarding this summit, not to mention I’ve spent the last half hour listening about the food Kim Jong Un ate for dinner.

What's positive?

Let's sum it up.

1) The US will not accept a peace treaty unless North Korea gets rid of all its nukes.

2) North Korea will not get rid of all its nukes, see Libya and Iraq for evidence of why.

3) China will not accept a peace treaty unless the US removes all its troops from South Korea.

4) The US will not remove all its troops from South Korea.

5) Kim wants to be a major player, he wants to be taken seriously, he's just done what his father and grandfather couldn't do, meet a US president. He's already won.

So, what makes you think this can work, exactly?

Correct.

Absent consensus as to what constitutes ‘success,’ the notion of ‘failure’ is ridiculous.

The ‘summit’ will be a success for Kim, who will have elevated himself to the level of an American president, at the expense of Trump.

What did it cost Trump?

 

[frigidweirdo]

I have had CNN on all evening and it has been nothing but negative, negative, negative, regarding this summit, not to mention I’ve spent the last half hour listening about the food Kim Jong Un ate for dinner.

What's positive?

Let's sum it up.

1) The US will not accept a peace treaty unless North Korea gets rid of all its nukes.

2) North Korea will not get rid of all its nukes, see Libya and Iraq for evidence of why.

3) China will not accept a peace treaty unless the US removes all its troops from South Korea.

4) The US will not remove all its troops from South Korea.

5) Kim wants to be a major player, he wants to be taken seriously, he's just done what his father and grandfather couldn't do, meet a US president. He's already won.

So, what makes you think this can work, exactly?

Correct.

Absent consensus as to what constitutes ‘success,’ the notion of ‘failure’ is ridiculous.

The ‘summit’ will be a success for Kim, who will have elevated himself to the level of an American president, at the expense of Trump.

What will success be for Trump?

Right now the chances of him going home with anything is minimal.

 

[Slyhunter]

I have had CNN on all evening and it has been nothing but negative, negative, negative, regarding this summit, not to mention I’ve spent the last half hour listening about the food Kim Jong Un ate for dinner.

What's positive?

Let's sum it up.

1) The US will not accept a peace treaty unless North Korea gets rid of all its nukes.

2) North Korea will not get rid of all its nukes, see Libya and Iraq for evidence of why.

3) China will not accept a peace treaty unless the US removes all its troops from South Korea.

4) The US will not remove all its troops from South Korea.

5) Kim wants to be a major player, he wants to be taken seriously, he's just done what his father and grandfather couldn't do, meet a US president. He's already won.

So, what makes you think this can work, exactly?

Correct.

Absent consensus as to what constitutes ‘success,’ the notion of ‘failure’ is ridiculous.

The ‘summit’ will be a success for Kim, who will have elevated himself to the level of an American president, at the expense of Trump.

What will success be for Trump?

Right now the chances of him going home with anything is minimal.

How about NK agreeing to complete denuclearization.'
You kinda missed that part.

 

[frigidweirdo]

I have had CNN on all evening and it has been nothing but negative, negative, negative, regarding this summit, not to mention I’ve spent the last half hour listening about the food Kim Jong Un ate for dinner.

What's positive?

Let's sum it up.

1) The US will not accept a peace treaty unless North Korea gets rid of all its nukes.

2) North Korea will not get rid of all its nukes, see Libya and Iraq for evidence of why.

3) China will not accept a peace treaty unless the US removes all its troops from South Korea.

4) The US will not remove all its troops from South Korea.

5) Kim wants to be a major player, he wants to be taken seriously, he's just done what his father and grandfather couldn't do, meet a US president. He's already won.

So, what makes you think this can work, exactly?

Correct.

Absent consensus as to what constitutes ‘success,’ the notion of ‘failure’ is ridiculous.

The ‘summit’ will be a success for Kim, who will have elevated himself to the level of an American president, at the expense of Trump.

What will success be for Trump?

Right now the chances of him going home with anything is minimal.

How about NK agreeing to complete denuclearization.'
You kinda missed that part.

Is it going to happen?

Another thread is that NK will denuclearize if the US can GUARANTEE THEIR SAFETY. The US can do that.

A new president every 8 years at most, new foreign policy every eight years AT MOST says NO, the US can't guarantee ANYONE'S safety.

 

[Slyhunter]

I have had CNN on all evening and it has been nothing but negative, negative, negative, regarding this summit, not to mention I’ve spent the last half hour listening about the food Kim Jong Un ate for dinner.

What's positive?

Let's sum it up.

1) The US will not accept a peace treaty unless North Korea gets rid of all its nukes.

2) North Korea will not get rid of all its nukes, see Libya and Iraq for evidence of why.

3) China will not accept a peace treaty unless the US removes all its troops from South Korea.

4) The US will not remove all its troops from South Korea.

5) Kim wants to be a major player, he wants to be taken seriously, he's just done what his father and grandfather couldn't do, meet a US president. He's already won.

So, what makes you think this can work, exactly?

Correct.

Absent consensus as to what constitutes ‘success,’ the notion of ‘failure’ is ridiculous.

The ‘summit’ will be a success for Kim, who will have elevated himself to the level of an American president, at the expense of Trump.

What will success be for Trump?

Right now the chances of him going home with anything is minimal.

How about NK agreeing to complete denuclearization.'
You kinda missed that part.

Is it going to happen?

Another thread is that NK will denuclearize if the US can GUARANTEE THEIR SAFETY. The US can do that.

A new president every 8 years at most, new foreign policy every eight years AT MOST says NO, the US can't guarantee ANYONE'S safety.

Words on a paper.
We aren't going to replace regimes, even after an election, unless they give us a "new" reason to do so. Iran is begging us to do so. Flipping their nose at us. Building their nukes. We are going to be too busy to care about a petty dictator in the middle of no where with no nukes.

 

[blastoff]

And now they are going to sign an agreement? This will make the heads explode... priceless...

How are they going to spin a failure with success in writing?

They’re highly experienced professionals so this should be a piece of cake.

 

[Natural Citizen]

There was a pretty good speech and Q&A with Trump very early this morning. It was pretty good. And it was amazing how much more professional and respectful the media was to the President over there than the peckerheads we have on tv over here.

They were speechless after the thing was over. Couldn't find a darn thing of any relevance to complain about. Theylooked dumbfounded and upset. lol.

I'm not really a fan of Trump, but he did very good this morning with it.