CNN POLL: 75% Of Financial Experts Say Romney Victory Would Improve Markets...

paulitician

Platinum Member
Oct 7, 2011
38,401
4,162
1,130
Boy, this one should send all the CNN (Communist News Network/Clinton News Network) sicophants into a tizzy.


A recent CNNMoney survey found that 75% of money managers and investment strategists believe a Mitt Romney victory would lift U.S. markets. The survey also found that "many are also hoping for the GOP to gain control of both the House and the Senate."

Leading up to the November elections, 80 percent of those surveyed agreed that the stock market will remain volatile and possibly get worse.

John Praveen, managing director and chief investment strategist for Prudential International Investments Advisers says investors are not sanguine about lawmakers' ability to keep America from driving off the fiscal cliff:

"In case investors are not sufficiently convinced that policy makers and politicians are up to the task of handling the fiscal cliff in a reasonably effective manner, financial markets are likely to again fall sharply, similar to the plunge around the debt ceiling debacle in 2011."

Chase Investment Counsel President Peter Tuz was more direct:

"At this point, I think markets would appreciate a clear Republican mandate. That provides the best chance for continued low tax rates. If investors see the likelihood of an Obama victory, coupled with Democrats retaining control of the Senate, they will react by taking advantage of the low tax rates that still exist, so a sell-off in markets would be a distinct possibility."

The sputtering U.S. economic recovery, the European debt crisis, the slowing of growth in China, the need to cut government spending, and the looming expiration of the Bush tax cuts were cited as troubling economic signs for America's financial future.

CNN POLL: 75% Of Financial Experts Say Romney Victory Would Improve Markets
 
That depends on the definition of "improve". If they feel free to inflate another empty bubble based on worthless paper that is hardly an improvement.
 
That depends on the definition of "improve". If they feel free to inflate another empty bubble based on worthless paper that is hardly an improvement.

The method of financial gain by Romney is the antithesis of quantitative easing and thus he hath this Independent's vote.
 
That depends on the definition of "improve". If they feel free to inflate another empty bubble based on worthless paper that is hardly an improvement.
What the hell do you think has been going on the last 3+ years?

Sheeeesh!

And Romney will be different how?
He won't look at free enterprise as the enemy.

But you hate freedom and free markets too, so you'll stay firmly in the Boiking camp.
 
That depends on the definition of "improve". If they feel free to inflate another empty bubble based on worthless paper that is hardly an improvement.

The method of financial gain by Romney is the antithesis of quantitative easing and thus he hath this Independent's vote.

Romney will go along with whatever the Fed tells him to do like every other president. He will appoint a bunch of G+S alumni to regulatory positions like every other president. He will know who rules the economy like every other, he is no cure for any of that shit.
 
Romney will go along with whatever the Fed tells him to do like every other president. He will appoint a bunch of G+S alumni to regulatory positions like every other president. He will know who rules the economy like every other, he is no cure for any of that shit.

Perhaps. Out of the two choices, Romney still has the most experience turning around financial situations.

I am going with the warts that give me the best opportunity to succeed by my hand and abilities.
 
Financial experts are donors and that's why obama's finances are in the toilet.
 
Romney will go along with whatever the Fed tells him to do like every other president. He will appoint a bunch of G+S alumni to regulatory positions like every other president. He will know who rules the economy like every other, he is no cure for any of that shit.

Perhaps. Out of the two choices, Romney still has the most experience turning around financial situations.

I am going with the warts that give me the best opportunity to succeed by my hand and abilities.

I don't agree, he has experience in personally benefiting from bad situations but that is nothing like salvaging a situation for all involved.
 
I dont long for the times when the republicans gave these people free reign to fuck the entire worlds economy

I didn't start to experience that until the Democratic control of the legislature in 2006.

It made me think just like Clinton's success with Republican controlled legislature did.

Hmmm.
 

Forum List

Back
Top