CNN, NYT-Endorsed POTUS Candidate Indicted

Edgetho

Platinum Member
Mar 27, 2012
15,249
6,284
390
The Fast and Furious Michael Avenatti

“There is a God,” one follower suggested. “He sent us Avenatti.”

“You and Stormy,” another said, “may be the saviors of our democracy.”

Avenatti pecked at the keyboard: “We are just getting started. ... ”

“Should I send it?” he asked me. His finger, trembling with adrenaline, hovered above the laptop. “I’m going to send it.”

He stood up and began to pace. His face, steely and composed,


Before I pasted this, I thought -- 'This has got be a female posting this. It's almost like she's already on here knees'

I was mistaken. Some guy named Matthew Shaer which, I assume is what passes for a dim Male these days.

CNN's Brian Stelter, the fat little midget, was just as effusive in his worship of CPL (creepy porn lawyer) when endorsing him for prez....

And not just that fat little queef. A LOT of dims. Which, I suppose, is a lot of fat little queefs.

Flashback: Avenatti Was Heralded As A 2020 Dem That Could Take Down Trump

Oh well. Kinda tells you all you need to know about the average dim voter, doesn't it??

Oh....... The link to Avenatti being indicted -- Again --

Michael Avenatti indicted on charges of defrauding ex-client Stormy Daniels, identity theft

The biggest difference between CPL and the rest of the dim field -- He got caught.

That's about it. Otherwise, birds of a feather

Vote dim, people. You'll love living in Soviet Russia
 

That's funny, not sure if you realize this but you just implied Hillary isn't a criminal. Good for you, baby steps.
51oiLrLcK1L._SX331_BO1,204,203,200_.jpg
 

That's funny, not sure if you realize this but you just implied Hillary isn't a criminal. Good for you, baby steps.
51oiLrLcK1L._SX331_BO1,204,203,200_.jpg

You should reread your post, "for a change" <---hint.
 

That's funny, not sure if you realize this but you just implied Hillary isn't a criminal. Good for you, baby steps.
It was a spelling error on his part.

He meant. . . "Why not run another criminal, dims?" :auiqs.jpg:
 

That's funny, not sure if you realize this but you just implied Hillary isn't a criminal. Good for you, baby steps.
It was a spelling error on his part.

He meant. . . "Why not run another criminal, dims?" :auiqs.jpg:

Oh, yes, in alt-right world, sure, that's what he meant.
 

That's funny, not sure if you realize this but you just implied Hillary isn't a criminal. Good for you, baby steps.
It was a spelling error on his part.

He meant. . . "Why not run another criminal, dims?" :auiqs.jpg:

Oh, yes, in alt-right world, sure, that's what he meant.
Everyone knows, that if the justice system were applied evenly and fairly, everyone in D.C., both on the left, and on the right, with several few exceptions, would be behind bars. It would resemble the situation in Brazil.
 

That's funny, not sure if you realize this but you just implied Hillary isn't a criminal. Good for you, baby steps.
It was a spelling error on his part.

He meant. . . "Why not run another criminal, dims?" :auiqs.jpg:

Oh, yes, in alt-right world, sure, that's what he meant.
Everyone knows, that if the justice system were applied evenly and fairly, everyone in D.C., both on the left, and on the right, with several few exceptions, would be behind bars. It would resemble the situation in Brazil.

We'd have a new president, that's for sure.
 
CNN and NYT believed this imbecile when he was going to produce two more women who were raped by Kavanaugh too. What the media, Avenotti and the Dems did to that poor man should land them all in jail.
 

That's funny, not sure if you realize this but you just implied Hillary isn't a criminal. Good for you, baby steps.
It was a spelling error on his part.

He meant. . . "Why not run another criminal, dims?" :auiqs.jpg:

Oh, yes, in alt-right world, sure, that's what he meant.
Everyone knows, that if the justice system were applied evenly and fairly, everyone in D.C., both on the left, and on the right, with several few exceptions, would be behind bars. It would resemble the situation in Brazil.

We'd have a new president, that's for sure.
And no demoncraps.
 
That's funny, not sure if you realize this but you just implied Hillary isn't a criminal. Good for you, baby steps.
It was a spelling error on his part.

He meant. . . "Why not run another criminal, dims?" :auiqs.jpg:

Oh, yes, in alt-right world, sure, that's what he meant.
Everyone knows, that if the justice system were applied evenly and fairly, everyone in D.C., both on the left, and on the right, with several few exceptions, would be behind bars. It would resemble the situation in Brazil.

We'd have a new president, that's for sure.
And no demoncraps.
I'm not sure what a "demon crap," is, so I did a Google search. . .

This is what appeared.

Racist Mario
 

Forum List

Back
Top