Cluck Cluck Cluck!

pbel

Gold Member
Feb 26, 2012
5,653
449
130
Netanyahoo: Please America, fight our Wars!

Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, attends the weekly cabinet meeting in Jerusalem Sunday, Sept 2, 2012. (AP Photo/Baz Ratner, Pool)


JERUSALEM — Israel's prime minister, ratcheting up a public feud with the U.S. over Iran, made it clear Tuesday that he was dissatisfied with Washington's refusal to spell out what would provoke a U.S.-led military strike against Iranian nuclear facilities.

Washington wants to give diplomacy and bruising sanctions more time to try to pressure Tehran to abandon its suspect nuclear work. In a message aimed at Israel, it said several times this week that deadlines or "red lines" are counterproductive.

But Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu says peaceful methods are not working, and has warned repeatedly that Iran is getting perilously close to acquiring a nuclear bomb. His remarks have generated speculation Israel is readying to strike on its own to prevent that from happening.

"The world tells Israel, `Wait. There's still time,'" Netanyahu said Tuesday. "And I say: `Wait for what? Wait until when?' Those in the international community who refuse to put red lines before Iran don't have a moral right to place a red light before Israel."
 
Netanyahoo: Please America, fight our Wars!

Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, attends the weekly cabinet meeting in Jerusalem Sunday, Sept 2, 2012. (AP Photo/Baz Ratner, Pool)


JERUSALEM — Israel's prime minister, ratcheting up a public feud with the U.S. over Iran, made it clear Tuesday that he was dissatisfied with Washington's refusal to spell out what would provoke a U.S.-led military strike against Iranian nuclear facilities.

Washington wants to give diplomacy and bruising sanctions more time to try to pressure Tehran to abandon its suspect nuclear work. In a message aimed at Israel, it said several times this week that deadlines or "red lines" are counterproductive.

But Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu says peaceful methods are not working, and has warned repeatedly that Iran is getting perilously close to acquiring a nuclear bomb. His remarks have generated speculation Israel is readying to strike on its own to prevent that from happening.

"The world tells Israel, `Wait. There's still time,'" Netanyahu said Tuesday. "And I say: `Wait for what? Wait until when?' Those in the international community who refuse to put red lines before Iran don't have a moral right to place a red light before Israel."

Israel should strike Iran as soon as possible, and not wait for the green light from Washington.
 
When evaluating claims made by islamo nazis that the US FIGHTS ISRAEL's WARS it is important to note that the US never joined Israel in any of its wars with aggressive arab neighbors It is also important to note that before, during, and after world war II------the same class of people insisted, before that the JEWS WERE ENGAGED IN WAR MONGERING and THE FATE OF A FEW HUNDRED THOUSAND JEWS IS NOT OUR BUSINESS during----that we had entered the war at the INSISTENCE OF THE JEWS after That the war was a "WAR TO SAVE THE JEWS"

the filth of peeballs is nothing new anyone interested take a peek into some old bundist propaganda of the mid 1930s Peeballs et al could have written it
 
Why should Israel complain about nukes when she stole Nuclear secrets via Pollard and started this Nuclear arms race?

You get what you sow...
 
The peeballs statement that POLLARD has anything to do with the current nuclear arms race suggests that Peeballs did not pass High school physics
 
And Irose flunked Political Science and the lesson of Arms parity amongst enemies.
 
Netanyahoo: Please America, fight our Wars!

Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, attends the weekly cabinet meeting in Jerusalem Sunday, Sept 2, 2012. (AP Photo/Baz Ratner, Pool)


JERUSALEM — Israel's prime minister, ratcheting up a public feud with the U.S. over Iran, made it clear Tuesday that he was dissatisfied with Washington's refusal to spell out what would provoke a U.S.-led military strike against Iranian nuclear facilities.

Washington wants to give diplomacy and bruising sanctions more time to try to pressure Tehran to abandon its suspect nuclear work. In a message aimed at Israel, it said several times this week that deadlines or "red lines" are counterproductive.

But Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu says peaceful methods are not working, and has warned repeatedly that Iran is getting perilously close to acquiring a nuclear bomb. His remarks have generated speculation Israel is readying to strike on its own to prevent that from happening.

"The world tells Israel, `Wait. There's still time,'" Netanyahu said Tuesday. "And I say: `Wait for what? Wait until when?' Those in the international community who refuse to put red lines before Iran don't have a moral right to place a red light before Israel."

Israel should strike Iran as soon as possible, and not wait for the green light from Washington.

Netanyahu appears ready to go but he needs at least a majority vote within the 14 member security cabinet but with a decision as big as this Netanyahu would probably feel he needed a majority of the full 29 member cabinet to proceed, and there seems to be insufficient support in the cabinet and among the public for an Israeli strike without a US green light at this time. I believe that when Begin ordered the strike on Iraq's Osirak reactor, the security cabinet had only 8 members and when Eshkol ordered the attack in 1967 on Egypt there were only 6, so Netanyahu faces a greater political challenge than some his predecessors did.
 
Why should Israel complain about nukes when she stole Nuclear secrets via Pollard and started this Nuclear arms race?

You get what you sow...

Israel had nukes in the late 1960's and Pollard was not a spy until 1984. He would have been in high school when Israel produced its first nuke.
 
Lest anyone forget. Iran has already declared war on Israel and has comitted acts of war against Israel ------in the real world. Of course in peeballs world---an unprovoked incursion into a country ----the killing of several people and the obscene mutilation murders of a few AND a saturation bombing using bombs designed for the specific purpose of blowing the brains out of people is consistent with LOVE AND RELIGION THE REIGION OF PEEBALLS so long as the targets are jews ------jesus told him so
 
Then why blame the USA?

No one is blaming the US for Israel's nukes, but Obama will have to take the blame for Iran's nukes if Israel is not able to stop them.

Why would we worry? America has 20,000 H Bombs, Israel has at least 200. I'm sure Israel wants a Monopoly so that she can keep stealing Arab lands with impunity...

Maybe if Iran gets the bomb, she'll make peace.
 
Then why blame the USA?

No one is blaming the US for Israel's nukes, but Obama will have to take the blame for Iran's nukes if Israel is not able to stop them.

Why would we worry? America has 20,000 H Bombs, Israel has at least 200. I'm sure Israel wants a Monopoly so that she can keep stealing Arab lands with impunity...

Maybe if Iran gets the bomb, she'll make peace.

Not that it matters, the US has only about 5,000 nuclear weapons and less than 2,000 deployed. Not all of them are not H bombs. Worldwide there are less than 20,000 warheads. In all of WWII about 40,000,000 people were killed worldwide. In even a small nuclear war, that many people could be killed in less than hour.

Iran's Shahab 6 missile, currently under development, will be able to deliver a nuclear warhead to any target in Europe, and Iran's Shahab 7 missiles would be able to hit the US east coast and several hundred miles inland with a nuclear payload, putting more than 100,000,000 million Americans at risk. If Iran had only a small nuclear arsenal of 20 kt warheads, a first exchange between the US and Iran would kill more people than have died in all previous wars. No sane person would take comfort in having more warheads.

Iran Missiles
 
Then why blame the USA?

No one is blaming the US for Israel's nukes, but Obama will have to take the blame for Iran's nukes if Israel is not able to stop them.


Really??? how does that work? would you care to delve into that infinite analytical resource and explain the logic that dictates that Israel and its U.S. sponsor shoud determine which nations hold nukes? Isn't it ironic that the only nation to employ the atomic bomb on civilian cities---an incomparable precedent in state-sanctioned terrorism---should propose to decide who has nukes? Diffusion of wepaons technology in a progressive trend...it is only a matter of time before smaller, more unpredictable players join the nukes-club. israel's nuclear card is already folding
 
Netanyahoo: Please America, fight our Wars!

Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, attends the weekly cabinet meeting in Jerusalem Sunday, Sept 2, 2012. (AP Photo/Baz Ratner, Pool)


JERUSALEM — Israel's prime minister, ratcheting up a public feud with the U.S. over Iran, made it clear Tuesday that he was dissatisfied with Washington's refusal to spell out what would provoke a U.S.-led military strike against Iranian nuclear facilities.

Washington wants to give diplomacy and bruising sanctions more time to try to pressure Tehran to abandon its suspect nuclear work. In a message aimed at Israel, it said several times this week that deadlines or "red lines" are counterproductive.

But Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu says peaceful methods are not working, and has warned repeatedly that Iran is getting perilously close to acquiring a nuclear bomb. His remarks have generated speculation Israel is readying to strike on its own to prevent that from happening.

"The world tells Israel, `Wait. There's still time,'" Netanyahu said Tuesday. "And I say: `Wait for what? Wait until when?' Those in the international community who refuse to put red lines before Iran don't have a moral right to place a red light before Israel."

Israel should strike Iran as soon as possible, and not wait for the green light from Washington.

Netanyahu appears ready to go but he needs at least a majority vote within the 14 member security cabinet but with a decision as big as this Netanyahu would probably feel he needed a majority of the full 29 member cabinet to proceed, and there seems to be insufficient support in the cabinet and among the public for an Israeli strike without a US green light at this time. I believe that when Begin ordered the strike on Iraq's Osirak reactor, the security cabinet had only 8 members and when Eshkol ordered the attack in 1967 on Egypt there were only 6, so Netanyahu faces a greater political challenge than some his predecessors did.
Waterboarding the Cabinet would get some quick results, I betcha.
 

Forum List

Back
Top