Clinton News Network is Frustrated

[Kondor3]

I don’t get the Stormy outrage. Is it because of cheating? Because he cheated on the first ones so you can’t be surprised it happened again. Is it because she’s a porn star? Is that the outrage?

No... it's because Americans like their Presidents to be people of Good Character... and your boy fails even that basic sniff-test...

You mean like JFK [My avatar] - FDR [who died at his mistress home] - oh yes and let us not gforget Slick Willy and his executive asisstant in cahrge of Blow Jobs - Monica .... Is that the type of characters you are talking about - dumb ass ?

All of whom had the brains God gave a pi$$ant - unlike your boy - and kept their pekkers in their pockets when in public view.

Meaning they had a compliant press that did their bidding.

No... meaning those were different times... slower communications... more grace and decorum and style and class... more respect for the President.

There is a huge difference between a President who maintains a sense of public decorum, and one who wallows in the gutter with the pornographers, eh?

The difference is not favorable to the latter... you know that just as well as I do... I feel bad for you, feeling obliged to try (and fail) to defend such creatures.

 

[Kondor3]

...They had a compliant media and the internet didn't exist which allows people to bypass that biased media. Had those people been doing now, what they did then, they would have been just as exposed.

Yep. Different times. But different circumstances, as well. All or most of those examples kept their affairs off the grid.

None of them were diddling porn performers (sloppy seven-hundred-and-twenty-seconds) while their wives were nursing a newborn, then stupidly paying out hush-money at the last minute to avoid their stupidity becoming public knowledge right before a major election.

Also, the overall good character and behaviors of those men score vastly higher than the current object of the exercise.

 

[bripat9643]

...Post a link to a post where you attcked the Beast.

The DNC’s elephant in the room: Dems have a problem — it’s not Donald Trump

Lots more where that came from...

I don't see any attacks on Hillary in that.

FAIL.

 

[Marion Morrison]

"Why does nothing we say turn you against God's anointed (Trump)?"

This was so much fun to watch!

The "reporter" got her ass handed to her.

 

[westwall]

...They had a compliant media and the internet didn't exist which allows people to bypass that biased media. Had those people been doing now, what they did then, they would have been just as exposed.

Yep. Different times. But different circumstances, as well. All or most of those examples kept their affairs off the grid.

None of them were diddling porn performers (sloppy seven-hundred-and-twenty-seconds) while their wives were nursing a newborn, then stupidly paying out hush-money at the last minute to avoid their stupidity becoming public knowledge right before a major election.

Also, the overall good character and behaviors of those men score vastly higher than the current object of the exercise.

That's because they could. And the willing media helped them. Had they been alive in this era the story would have been completely different.

 

[GreenBean]

meaning those were different times... slower communications... more grace and decorum

You mean like woodward and bernstein . .... yup certainly different. All the Nixonians did was a bumbled bingled burgulary ... they were amateurs in comparison to the Clintonians and Obamaites - total amateurs

 

[Kondor3]

...I don't see any attacks on Hillary in that. FAIL.

...November 2016 saw us move a little closer to that White Monolithic Vote, when dumb-ass Shrillary labeled opposition supporters as "Deplorables"...

Incorrect... the above text is just that... not my fault that you missed it...

"Your Honor, the Defense rests."

And... like I said... lots more where that came from... but I've proven my point and invested all the time I care to in doing so.

Next slide, please.