Discussion in 'Education' started by Orange_Juice, Jan 18, 2009.
No more terrorists attacks while he was President
I guess the people who lost their lives or were injured in the WTC attack in 1993 don't count, huh? Not to mention the embassy bombings in Tanzania and Nigeria, the SS Cole bombings, can I continue?
It's too early to be drinking Vodka with your Orange Juice.
Gees, if we go by that standard, Bush really was a miserable failure. All those attacks pale SIGNIFICANTLY to all those during the Bush presidency. Thanks for pointing that out
Clinton really was a much better national security president than Bush
You mean when the Sudanese govt offerered to hand bin Laden over to the US and Clinton refused? That makes a better national security president? He was worried about how it would look. I wonder how he thought the Towers collapsing "looked".
You start a dishonest thread about President Clinton and then you talk about Bush.
That's horseshit. And just go by the numbers. Bush saw the twin towers fall, thousands dead in Iraq, attacks all over the world, what a disaster!
Clinton handled things really well, especially when compared to that idiot Bush
Clinton killed 500,000 people in Iraq with sanctions. He starved them to death. What horseshit? Did the Sudanese govt not offer Clinton bin Laden?
Didn't Bush 41 start that? Anyway, I'm talking about America. Clinton kept us safe from Radical Islam. It was the right wing domestic terrorists that struck OK City, and Clinton couldn't have stopped that
The WWII truck bombing in 1993 happened 20 days into Clintons first term.
Who should really get the blame for that one?
Separate names with a comma.