Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Donald Trump said Tuesday that he would no longer honor his pledge to support the eventual Republican nominee for president, while fellow candidates Ted Cruz and John Kasich refused to say whether they would back the party's pick.
More: Trump rescinds pledge to back Republican nominee; Cruz, Kasich refuse to commit support | Fox News
More proof that Trump's promises and pledges are meaningless.
who asked to hack an email account?and that law is?Bush leaked that Valerie Plame was a CIA agent putting her life at risk and compromising her and the CIA's work she was engaged in. Now Trump actually asks the head of state of an adversary of America to hack computers to garner US secrets to harm a political opponent of trump.
'dafuq happened to you conservatives. You have gone batshit crazy.
Trump is doing his civic duty, since obama couldn't deliver his transparent government pledge..
I call that a true patriot ....
The Law and Order candidate, breaking the law, is exactly the kind of guy I'd expect you to support.
I know letting four americans die in Benghazi is against some law, and yet here you are. funny, hypocrite.
Last I looked it was illegal to hack an email account.
but she did, she violated laws, and DOJ won't do anything cause they are on a stand down order to hillary. Let's call a duck a duck.Okay, but since our enemies don't seem to be having any trouble getting information off our "secured" systems, either, quit talking about it like she committed the crime of the century.Comey stated that more than likely that our enemies got top secret information from her unsecured emails.Too funny, Hillary claiming she is worried about someone else leaking information. Liberals are the stupidest life forms on the earth.“This isn’t a normal political story, and it’s not funny.”
PHILADELPHIA ― The chairman of Hillary Clinton’s campaign urged U.S. intelligence agencies on Wednesday to get an ironclad agreement from Donald Trump that he would not leak information to the Russians before providing him with presidential candidate briefings.
“I think it’s an issue that … Jim Clapper’s going to have to come to grips with,” John Podesta said in an interview with The Huffington Post, referring to the director of national intelligence. “And I think they’ll have to find a way to negotiate with him and with his campaign to get … more than assurances ― sort of some proof that they can be able to hold on to that information.”
Speaking from the site of the convention, Podesta’s remarks underscored the extent to which the event unfolding behind him had become upended by the latest controversial remarks from the other side of the ledger. Earlier that morning, Trump had encouraged Russian agencies to try to hack and leak information on Clinton’s emails, following a hack these same agencies apparently executed on the Democratic National Committee.
“This isn’t a normal political story, and it’s not funny ... And for Donald Trump to suggest that a foreign power should hack the candidate of the opposing power is beyond outrageous. I think it is really disqualifying,” Podesta said.
“I don’t know how the DNI assures himself that information that is being passed on to him is going to be secure,” he added.
More: Clinton Campaign: Trump Needs To Guarantee He Won't Leak Before Getting Briefed
How could anyone trust a "guarantee" from Trump? He has repeatedly proven that he can't be trusted - in business and politics. I think it's a major national security risk to brief him on classified intelligence.
What did Hillary leak? Please be specific with "credible" sources.
I'm never getting over it. bubba. she is a criminal, and responsible for four deaths in Benghazi.She wasn't prosecutable. GET OVER IT and start engaging your fine mind. Trump is a loose cannon and regardless of the stupid comment he made, which he didn't mean anything by, he is not capable of running this country anywhere but into the ground. Hating Clinton doesn't mean you have to give the reins to someone who will probably start WWIII.The Law and Order candidate, breaking the law, is exactly the kind of guy I'd expect you to support.
What law was broken?
I mean, Hillary broke dozens, but it turns out she isn't subject to the law.
will you need to take it away from Hillary first.Maybe Trump could be fitted with an explosive collar to guarantee his loyalty to America. The collar would contain all of Trump's briefings - and any violation would automatically trigger it. However, that wouldn't prevent him from writing them down and passing them along.
sure they are, how else do all those deals get done with russia for her? BTW, she is the only one dealing with Russia.She is a treasonous bitch, that should be hung for all to see.
How very Stalinist of you, to demand your political enemies be executed.
All Trump fans have started flying their Stalinist freak flags proudly. They used to hide their commie nature, but Trump has told them to be proud of it, and they've come out of the commie closet.
Of course, a few of them actually are Russian agents, as it's been confirmed the Russians use trolls on American social media and message boards.
Why are Russian trolls spreading online hoaxes in the U.S.?
None of the Hillary-hater cultists here are Russian agents, obviously, as Russian agents wouldn't be so hilariously stupid and whiny. The kooks here are just the patsies of the Russians.
Thread summary:
Trump and his cultists aren't even trying to defend their treason.
Keep it up, and thanks for the votes, Putin-patsies!
except that the republican candidate didn't do what you claim. So try again.To me both sides have serious problems here. The democrats no matter who leaked are being caught rigging or at least attempting to rig their primaries.The republicans have a problem since their nominee, apperently activly encourages a foreign country to conduct espionage. This OP rightfully puts in question the wisdom of giving higly classified information to such a candidate. You can debate if Clinton is a security risk herself but unless I'm mistaken, at best you can accuse her of carelessness, Trump said what he said delibarately. It seems a false equivalency to me. I can basicly garantee that after all the problems Clinton won't take classified material for granted, can the same be claimed of Trump after this statement?Too funny, Hillary claiming she is worried about someone else leaking information. Liberals are the stupidest life forms on the earth.“This isn’t a normal political story, and it’s not funny.”
PHILADELPHIA ― The chairman of Hillary Clinton’s campaign urged U.S. intelligence agencies on Wednesday to get an ironclad agreement from Donald Trump that he would not leak information to the Russians before providing him with presidential candidate briefings.
“I think it’s an issue that … Jim Clapper’s going to have to come to grips with,” John Podesta said in an interview with The Huffington Post, referring to the director of national intelligence. “And I think they’ll have to find a way to negotiate with him and with his campaign to get … more than assurances ― sort of some proof that they can be able to hold on to that information.”
Speaking from the site of the convention, Podesta’s remarks underscored the extent to which the event unfolding behind him had become upended by the latest controversial remarks from the other side of the ledger. Earlier that morning, Trump had encouraged Russian agencies to try to hack and leak information on Clinton’s emails, following a hack these same agencies apparently executed on the Democratic National Committee.
“This isn’t a normal political story, and it’s not funny ... And for Donald Trump to suggest that a foreign power should hack the candidate of the opposing power is beyond outrageous. I think it is really disqualifying,” Podesta said.
“I don’t know how the DNI assures himself that information that is being passed on to him is going to be secure,” he added.
More: Clinton Campaign: Trump Needs To Guarantee He Won't Leak Before Getting Briefed
How could anyone trust a "guarantee" from Trump? He has repeatedly proven that he can't be trusted - in business and politics. I think it's a major national security risk to brief him on classified intelligence.
who was talking hacking other than you?[
Last I looked it was illegal to hack an email account.
Oooohhh look, a lying fuck.
You must be a democrat.
Really? Hacking is legal now?
If you have no problem with hacking, then why don't you post your username and password to your main email account,
and let us see what you do from one day to the next.
Many people have explained it at a toddler level but it was out of your reach.Thread summary:
Trump and his cultists aren't even trying to defend their treason.
Keep it up, and thanks for the votes, Putin-patsies!
Piers MorganVerified account@piersmorgan
Were Trump to be elected maybe the best method of handling security would for the Republicans to appoint one or two in-betweens to decide what Trump should see and hear? Certainly Trump should not be allowed to make some security decisions like sending the bomb to any nation that questions his decisions.“This isn’t a normal political story, and it’s not funny.”
PHILADELPHIA ― The chairman of Hillary Clinton’s campaign urged U.S. intelligence agencies on Wednesday to get an ironclad agreement from Donald Trump that he would not leak information to the Russians before providing him with presidential candidate briefings.
“I think it’s an issue that … Jim Clapper’s going to have to come to grips with,” John Podesta said in an interview with The Huffington Post, referring to the director of national intelligence. “And I think they’ll have to find a way to negotiate with him and with his campaign to get … more than assurances ― sort of some proof that they can be able to hold on to that information.”
Speaking from the site of the convention, Podesta’s remarks underscored the extent to which the event unfolding behind him had become upended by the latest controversial remarks from the other side of the ledger. Earlier that morning, Trump had encouraged Russian agencies to try to hack and leak information on Clinton’s emails, following a hack these same agencies apparently executed on the Democratic National Committee.
“This isn’t a normal political story, and it’s not funny ... And for Donald Trump to suggest that a foreign power should hack the candidate of the opposing power is beyond outrageous. I think it is really disqualifying,” Podesta said.
“I don’t know how the DNI assures himself that information that is being passed on to him is going to be secure,” he added.
More: Clinton Campaign: Trump Needs To Guarantee He Won't Leak Before Getting Briefed
How could anyone trust a "guarantee" from Trump? He has repeatedly proven that he can't be trusted - in business and politics. I think it's a major national security risk to brief him on classified intelligence.
If his pledges are meaningless why do you want a pledge?
Correction.She wasn't prosecutable. GET OVER IT and start engaging your fine mind. Trump is a loose cannon and regardless of the stupid comment he made, which he didn't mean anything by, he is not capable of running this country anywhere but into the ground. Hating Clinton doesn't mean you have to give the reins to someone who will probably start WWIII.The Law and Order candidate, breaking the law, is exactly the kind of guy I'd expect you to support.
What law was broken?
I mean, Hillary broke dozens, but it turns out she isn't subject to the law.
Hillary voted to invade Iraq when she was a Senator and approved bombing Libya and several other ME countries when she was Sec of State. Trump opposed invading Iraq. Tell me more about who will probably start WWIII.
Don't forget the 241 US soldiers she allowed to die in Beirut!I'm never getting over it. bubba. she is a criminal, and responsible for four deaths in Benghazi.She wasn't prosecutable. GET OVER IT and start engaging your fine mind. Trump is a loose cannon and regardless of the stupid comment he made, which he didn't mean anything by, he is not capable of running this country anywhere but into the ground. Hating Clinton doesn't mean you have to give the reins to someone who will probably start WWIII.The Law and Order candidate, breaking the law, is exactly the kind of guy I'd expect you to support.
What law was broken?
I mean, Hillary broke dozens, but it turns out she isn't subject to the law.
I'm never getting over it. bubba. she is a criminal, and responsible for four deaths in Benghazi.She wasn't prosecutable. GET OVER IT and start engaging your fine mind. Trump is a loose cannon and regardless of the stupid comment he made, which he didn't mean anything by, he is not capable of running this country anywhere but into the ground. Hating Clinton doesn't mean you have to give the reins to someone who will probably start WWIII.The Law and Order candidate, breaking the law, is exactly the kind of guy I'd expect you to support.
What law was broken?
I mean, Hillary broke dozens, but it turns out she isn't subject to the law.
Were Trump to be elected maybe the best method of handling security would for the Republicans to appoint one or two in-betweens to decide what Trump should see and hear? Certainly Trump should not be allowed to make some security decisions like sending the bomb to any nation that questions his decisions.“This isn’t a normal political story, and it’s not funny.”
PHILADELPHIA ― The chairman of Hillary Clinton’s campaign urged U.S. intelligence agencies on Wednesday to get an ironclad agreement from Donald Trump that he would not leak information to the Russians before providing him with presidential candidate briefings.
“I think it’s an issue that … Jim Clapper’s going to have to come to grips with,” John Podesta said in an interview with The Huffington Post, referring to the director of national intelligence. “And I think they’ll have to find a way to negotiate with him and with his campaign to get … more than assurances ― sort of some proof that they can be able to hold on to that information.”
Speaking from the site of the convention, Podesta’s remarks underscored the extent to which the event unfolding behind him had become upended by the latest controversial remarks from the other side of the ledger. Earlier that morning, Trump had encouraged Russian agencies to try to hack and leak information on Clinton’s emails, following a hack these same agencies apparently executed on the Democratic National Committee.
“This isn’t a normal political story, and it’s not funny ... And for Donald Trump to suggest that a foreign power should hack the candidate of the opposing power is beyond outrageous. I think it is really disqualifying,” Podesta said.
“I don’t know how the DNI assures himself that information that is being passed on to him is going to be secure,” he added.
More: Clinton Campaign: Trump Needs To Guarantee He Won't Leak Before Getting Briefed
How could anyone trust a "guarantee" from Trump? He has repeatedly proven that he can't be trusted - in business and politics. I think it's a major national security risk to brief him on classified intelligence.
