Climategate U-Turn! Guess what, folks?

See you just keep sticking your fingers in your ears and clamping your eyes shut to IGNORE the DATA I have produced SEVERAL TIMES. You add NOTHING to the debate and have not even ATTEMPTED to dispute the data I have provided. This tells me ONE THING, you have NO data of your own, from a reputable source, to put up against the data I have provided.
 
The data has been faked....One of the chief ring leaders of the whole AGW scam, one Phil Jones, has admitted so.

That man's admissions are the central subject of this thread.

There's no shame in letting go and admitting that you've been hoodwinked.
 
The data from NASA has NOT been faked. I know you WANT to believe it has been but that doesn't make it so. Sorry!

Nope, it also needs to be vetted:

Global Warming Science and Public Policy - Surface Temperature Records: Policy Driven Deception?

...Recent revelations from the Climategate emails, originating from the Climatic Research Unit at the University of East Anglia, showed how all the data centers — most notably NOAA and NASA — conspired in the manipulation of global temperature records to suggest that temperatures in the 20th century rose faster than they actually did...

...the global surface station data is seriously compromised.

There was a major station dropout — and an increase in missing data from remaining stations — which occurred suddenly around 1990. Just about the time the global warming issue was being elevated to importance in political and environmental circles.

A clear bias was found towards removing higher elevation, higher latitude, and rural stations — the cooler stations — during this culling process, though that data was not also removed from the base periods from which “averages,” and then anomalies, were computed.

The data also suffers contamination by urbanization and other local factors, such as land-use/land-cover changes and improper siting.

There are also uncertainties in ocean temperatures. This is no small issue, as oceans cover 71% of Earth’s surface....
 
Good night Dude try to come up with some REASONABLE arguments the next time we meet.



s0n........nobody ever taught you that reality is 95% perception????:lol:

Heres the poop..............

The president is now planning to use executive powers to ram through his environmental agenda!! Why? Because he knows the perception of the American people on this global warming crap and it might not even be brought to the floor in Congress. Imagine the typical Democrat telling his constituents, "this legislation is necessary to save the planet from warming!!!". They might as well swing naked from the flagpole of the capitol!!!!:lol:

Heres the irony.......the worm has turned 180 degrees on this. Now the global warming fanatics look like dummies in the face of the conventional wisdom. Of course the religious fanatics on warming are going to cling to this like a child who wont give up thumb sucking.............but even the dim witted dont want to look like they have no common sense. Now at the neighborhood party, you'll look like the complete fool saying, "Of course global warming is man-made!!".

Of course, I called it ten years ago..........that the global warming k00ks would end up being a fringe group. It was just a matter of what year that was going to happen. Turns out its 2010...............:lol::funnyface::funnyface::funnyface:
 
NASA doesn't FAKE data they just report on their SCIENTIFIC DATA which is IRREFUTABLE!!!

The fight over climate science is about to cross the Atlantic with a U.S. researcher poised to sue NASA, demanding the release of the same kind of information that landed a leading British center in hot water over charges that it skewed its data.

Christopher C. Horner, a senior fellow at the Competitive Enterprise Institute, said NASA has refused for two years to provide information under the Freedom of Information Act that would show how the agency has shaped its climate data and explain why the agency has repeatedly had to correct its data dating as far back as the 1930s.

Global warming controversy reaches NASA climate data - Washington Times
 
The data from NASA has NOT been faked. I know you WANT to believe it has been but that doesn't make it so. Sorry!
According to the Climategate emails, they're just as complicit as Jones. Hide the decline.

Now I'm just waiting for these zealots to turn on their former priests and saints for heresy.
 
Old Rocks is taking the news very hard folks...

1220841422X78MkN.jpg


Cris is taking it even worse, but fortunately Dude swept in and told him to just shut the fuck up...



[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0-6Tn0Ie-AQ]YouTube - Giants Fan in Shambles[/ame]
 
The data has been faked....One of the chief ring leaders of the whole AGW scam, one Phil Jones, has admitted so.

That man's admissions are the central subject of this thread.

There's no shame in letting go and admitting that you've been hoodwinked.

Dude, If the warmers truly cared for the environment, when all of these admissions of faked/fudged data came in, they would be relieved the the world was not getting warmer. They would/should be happy that we are not on the road to global ruin and the polar bears will be safe after all/ However, because this scam is nothing more than a way to social engineer everyone into their way of living, they are completely beside themselves at the recent facts. The left's attempt to redistribute the wealth to many 3rd world countries will fail and they will have to come up with another way to force us to live the way they deem right.
 
You should click the link, below, and read the entire thing, not just these highlights. But for now, the highlights are cool, too:

Climategate U-turn as scientist at centre of row admits: There has been no global warming since 1995

By Jonathan Petre
Last updated at 5:12 PM on 14th February 2010

* * * *

* Data for vital 'hockey stick graph' has gone missing
* There has been no global warming since 1995
* Warming periods have happened before - but NOT due to man-made changes


Data: [picture caption] Professor Phil Jones admitted his record keeping is 'not as good as it should be' [Do'oh!]

The academic at the centre of the ‘Climategate’ affair, whose raw data is crucial to the theory of climate change, has admitted that he has trouble ‘keeping track’ of the information. [DO'OH!]

Colleagues say that the reason Professor Phil Jones has refused Freedom of Information requests is that he may have actually lost the relevant papers. [Do'oh!]

Professor Jones told the BBC yesterday there was truth in the observations of colleagues that he lacked organisational skills, that his office was swamped with piles of paper and that his record keeping is ‘not as good as it should be’. [Duh!]

The data is crucial to the famous ‘hockey stick graph’ used by climate change advocates to support the theory.

Professor Jones also conceded the possibility that the world was warmer in medieval times than now – suggesting global warming may not be a man-made phenomenon. [No shit, Sherlock!]

And he said that for the past 15 years there has been no ‘statistically significant’ warming.

* * * *

Climategate U-turn: Astonishment as scientist at centre of global warming email row admits data not well organised | Mail Online

Highlighting, re-sizing, color and bracketed editorial commentary all mine! :lol:





You don't really understand statistics very well, do you?
 

Forum List

Back
Top