Climategate 2.0

Fascinating how the ignoramouses are allways braying the end of 'global warming'. Yet, the glaciers keep receding, the ice caps continue to melt, and each decade is warmer than the last.
Handy, isn't it? Global warming makes it hotter, colder, wetter, dryer -- all at the same time.

:lol:
These people value their 'Conservative' ideology far more than reality or truth. Or their own childrens future.
Fear-mongering. It's what emotional people with no facts or logic do.

Fearmongering? The scientists predicted that we would see the melting of the glaciers, the mellting of the permafrost, and the rapid melting of the Artic Ice cap. We are seeing the increase in the number of extreme weather events, and are already seeing prices increase in the grocery store because of the events.

The scientists did get something wrong, they are all happening far more quickly than predicted.

But in the playbook of brain dead 'Consevatives' predictions that come true are fear mongering.
Say, are you bozos ever going to get around to proving your assertion that man is causing all of that?

Because, you know -- you haven't. It may be an article of faith for you cultists, but normal people need more before they're willing to shell out 14 trillion dollars for a "solution" that may or may not fix the problem it's supposed to but will certainly ruin the economies of the entire Western world.
 
Fascinating how the ignoramouses are allways braying the end of 'global warming'. Yet, the glaciers keep receding, the ice caps continue to melt, and each decade is warmer than the last.

These people value their 'Conservative' ideology far more than reality or truth. Or their own childrens future.

yeah...and? What's the point? Climate changes all the time. Better warmer like it is now than under a mile of ice like we were a short while ago.

You got some real science, otherwise STFU, Komrade

Why yes;

The Carbon Dioxide Greenhouse Effect

American Institute of Physcics. And we know who you have, an obese drugged out radio jock.

That's not science. That's not a repeatable experiment.

Moreover you link to Eugencist Svante Arrhenius who said that Global Warming is a good thing, "By the influence of the increasing percentage of carbonic acid in the atmosphere, we may hope to enjoy ages with more equable and better climates, especially as regards the colder regions of the earth, ages when the earth will bring forth much more abundant crops than at present, for the benefit of rapidly propagating mankind."
 
They investigated themselves. Would you have been as trusting if Nixon investigated Watergate?

Dumb ass, other scientists investigated them. And exonerated them. Other politicians investigated Nixon, and told him the resign or be impeached. Specifially Goldwater.
The "other scientists" that investigated the CRU/UCAR/Penn State fakery would be like Liddy, Hunt, Haldeman and Ehrlichman investigating Watergate and exonerating Nixon.

Helpful hint: If Michael Mann gets on the PA and summons you to the pavilion for a special assembly, don't go.

Lordy Oddie, you just get dumber every day. Many, many studies have confirmed Dr. Mann''s graph. Confirmed and refined it.

File:1000 Year Temperature Comparison.png - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 
yeah...and? What's the point? Climate changes all the time. Better warmer like it is now than under a mile of ice like we were a short while ago.

You got some real science, otherwise STFU, Komrade

Why yes;

The Carbon Dioxide Greenhouse Effect

American Institute of Physcics. And we know who you have, an obese drugged out radio jock.

That's not science. That's not a repeatable experiment.

Moreover you link to Eugencist Svante Arrhenius who said that Global Warming is a good thing, "By the influence of the increasing percentage of carbonic acid in the atmosphere, we may hope to enjoy ages with more equable and better climates, especially as regards the colder regions of the earth, ages when the earth will bring forth much more abundant crops than at present, for the benefit of rapidly propagating mankind."

Dumb fuck, just how is the measurement of the absorption bands of GHGs not repeatable?

The Plate Tectonic Theory is accepted throughout the Geological Community as correct, yet no one has yet to build a rifting or subduction zone. But the evidence and results are clear. Just as the evidence and results of creating major increaseses in the GHGs within the Earth's atmosphere are clear.

Svante Arrhenius was speaking from the perspective of 1896. We have learned a few things since then. Among them, what has happened in the past when there was a rapid increase in GHGs. They are called extinction events.
 
yeah...and? What's the point? Climate changes all the time. Better warmer like it is now than under a mile of ice like we were a short while ago.

You got some real science, otherwise STFU, Komrade

Why yes;

The Carbon Dioxide Greenhouse Effect

American Institute of Physcics. And we know who you have, an obese drugged out radio jock.

That's not science. That's not a repeatable experiment.

Moreover you link to Eugencist Svante Arrhenius who said that Global Warming is a good thing, "By the influence of the increasing percentage of carbonic acid in the atmosphere, we may hope to enjoy ages with more equable and better climates, especially as regards the colder regions of the earth, ages when the earth will bring forth much more abundant crops than at present, for the benefit of rapidly propagating mankind."
I've peer reviewed this post and find it 100% accurate! :thup:
 
Why yes;

The Carbon Dioxide Greenhouse Effect

American Institute of Physcics. And we know who you have, an obese drugged out radio jock.

That's not science. That's not a repeatable experiment.

Moreover you link to Eugencist Svante Arrhenius who said that Global Warming is a good thing, "By the influence of the increasing percentage of carbonic acid in the atmosphere, we may hope to enjoy ages with more equable and better climates, especially as regards the colder regions of the earth, ages when the earth will bring forth much more abundant crops than at present, for the benefit of rapidly propagating mankind."
I've peer reviewed this post and find it 100% accurate! :thup:

We have consensus!

Science = settled!
 
Why yes;

The Carbon Dioxide Greenhouse Effect

American Institute of Physcics. And we know who you have, an obese drugged out radio jock.

That's not science. That's not a repeatable experiment.

Moreover you link to Eugencist Svante Arrhenius who said that Global Warming is a good thing, "By the influence of the increasing percentage of carbonic acid in the atmosphere, we may hope to enjoy ages with more equable and better climates, especially as regards the colder regions of the earth, ages when the earth will bring forth much more abundant crops than at present, for the benefit of rapidly propagating mankind."
I've peer reviewed this post and find it 100% accurate! :thup:

You peer reviewed it? From which cell block?
 
That's not science. That's not a repeatable experiment.

Moreover you link to Eugencist Svante Arrhenius who said that Global Warming is a good thing, "By the influence of the increasing percentage of carbonic acid in the atmosphere, we may hope to enjoy ages with more equable and better climates, especially as regards the colder regions of the earth, ages when the earth will bring forth much more abundant crops than at present, for the benefit of rapidly propagating mankind."
I've peer reviewed this post and find it 100% accurate! :thup:

You peer reviewed it? From which cell block?

This is the AGW non-scientific method at work
 
*snert*....Wiki.....:lmao:

Yes, you lazy assed idiot, Wiki. With names on each of the studies lines. It only takes a bit of brains to check them out on Google. More than you possess, I guess.:eusa_whistle:

Oh, bwahahahahahahaha! Old Rocks.

The DNC sends out hunting parties to snipe at Republicans and conservatives, and wiki is their favorite place to change fact into pure dee genuine, certifiable fiction. They see to it the DNC is credited with RNC accomplishments, that RNC politicians are badmouthed to hell and back, while DNC liars are beatified.

Wiki changes everytime some DNC VIP farts out a new message to the apparatchiks to go to wiki and: (1) concealing no-nos the DNC leadership did (2) deleting terms such as "global warming" to insert the pc phrase "climate change" in its place (3) obfuscating all Republican contributions to the United States of America according to wikipedia.

You don't think they paid Sandy Berger the big bucks for nothing do you? (convicted of removing items from the national archives for Bill and Hillary Clinton to help them lie their damn asses off about George W. Bush to smear Republican supporters when they posted MEMORIES of newspaper clippings the lying cheating press removed on a regular basis when it didn't favor the Clinton idols)

You really have no idea what it's like dealing with omerta Democrats, but I do, pal. I've been dealing with their obfuscations every day of my life for 15 years. I know who they are, what they do to destroy evidence, their methods and modus operandi. It ain't pretty.

Then these same spinners turn around and villify Republicans of honor for reporting the truth.

Their aparatchiks who go around websites and "play like" the spin is true are thick as flies, and they even fool wannabes and some Republicans with the pretense there is no proof that exists to show any evidence that slime was done. Unfortunately for them, some of us archive their crud in our minds, and we learn not to forget the dirty deeds they do on a constant basis. There's so much of it they remind me of tarantulas crossing the highways in the desert at certain seasons. It's a scary sight.
 

Forum List

Back
Top