Climate Science Untarnished by Stolen E-mails

Concerning the Climategate e-mails, 99 out of 100 hoaxers agree that


there's nothing to see here.


Their opinions on this matter have been fully peer-reviewed!


So -- just move right on along. Go on, now. Scoot.
 
Concerning the Climategate e-mails, 99 out of 100 hoaxers agree that


there's nothing to see here.


Their opinions on this matter have been fully peer-reviewed!


So -- just move right on along. Go on, now. Scoot.

Yes....all of the snake oil salesmen agree that those emails are meaningless.

I wonder how long it will take the usual suspects to fool the American public into believing their lying asses again?
 
Last edited:

:cuckoo::cuckoo::cuckoo::cuckoo:

"I'm a Warmer..."

How are deminimus increases in the atmospheric trace element CO2 melting the polar ice caps -- on Mars?
Since no one supporting global warming has ever said CO2 was melting the polar ice caps on Mars, your resorting to a Straw Man shows that, no matter what you might say to the contrary, deep down in tour gut you believe in man-made global warming.
Thank you. :lol:
 
Concerning the Climategate e-mails, 99 out of 100 hoaxers agree that


there's nothing to see here.


Their opinions on this matter have been fully peer-reviewed!


So -- just move right on along. Go on, now. Scoot.

Yes....all of the snake oil salesmen agree that those emails are meaningless.

I wonder how long it will take the usual suspects to fool the American public into believing their lying asses again?
They are funny, though.

So was Baghdad Bob.

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TrXhxmQJSS0"]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TrXhxmQJSS0[/ame]
 
Since no one supporting global warming has ever said CO2 was melting the polar ice caps on Mars, your resorting to a Straw Man shows that, no matter what you might say to the contrary, deep down in tour gut you believe in man-made global warming.
Thank you.

Oops. There we go again. Forgetting what sport we're playing. You're too cool to be just moving the goal posts.
 
ABSTRACT

Carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is the product of oceanic respiration due to the well‑known but under‑appreciated solubility pump. Carbon dioxide rises out of warm ocean waters where it is added to the atmosphere. There it is mixed with residual and accidental CO2, and circulated, to be absorbed into the sink of the cold ocean waters. Next the thermohaline circulation carries the CO2‑rich sea water deep into the ocean. A millennium later it appears at the surface in warm waters, saturated by lower pressure and higher temperature, to be exhausted back into the atmosphere.

Throughout the past 420 millennia, comprising four interglacial periods, the Vostok record of atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration is imprinted with, and fully characterized by, the physics of the solubility of CO2 in water, along with the lag in the deep ocean circulation. Notwithstanding that carbon dioxide is a greenhouse gas, atmospheric carbon dioxide has neither caused nor amplified global temperature increases. Increased carbon dioxide has been an effect of global warming, not a cause. Technically, carbon dioxide is a lagging proxy for ocean temperatures. When global temperature, and along with it, ocean temperature rises, the physics of solubility causes atmospheric CO2 to increase. If increases in carbon dioxide, or any other greenhouse gas, could have in turn raised global temperatures, the positive feedback would have been catastrophic. While the conditions for such a catastrophe were present in the Vostok record from natural causes, the runaway event did not occur. Carbon dioxide does not accumulate in the atmosphere.
 
INTRODUCTION

Carbon dioxide, a benign gas, is now the hyper–volatile fuel of public policy, media hype, and world politics. Climatologists, undeterred by their inability to predict even the dominant features of the earth’s climate record – the ice ages and the glacial periods – have nonetheless scored a political coup by cobbling together three selected bits of science into a cataclysmic prediction: man is on the verge of destroying life on the planet.
 
The three cobblestones are (1) a smattering of greenhouse gas physics, (2) half a million years worth of data from Vostok ice cores and (3) half a century of data from Mauna Loa atmospheric CO2 monitoring. Presented here are new results from analysis of the second, the Vostok data, reductions which have a profound effect on the other two legs of the global warming stool, on the role of carbon dioxide, and ultimately on public policy.

{Begin rev. 6/29/08.} The IPCC said,

One family of hypotheses to explain glacial/inter-glacial variations of atmospheric CO2 relies on physical mechanisms that could change the dissolution and outgassing of CO2 in the ocean. The solubility of CO2 is increased at low temperature, but reduced at high salinity. These effects nearly cancel out over the glacial/inter-glacial cycle, so simple solubility changes are not the answer.

IPCC, Third Assessment Report (TAR), Box 3.4, Causes of glacial/inter-glacial changes in atmospheric CO2, p. 202. Contrary to the IPCC conclusion, "changes in solubility" and second order effects of salinity are irrelevant. Changes in CO2 concentration due to classical temperature effects on solubility between ice age epochs account for the measured variations. These are intra-epoch effects, and whether they "nearly cancel out" on a larger scale is immaterial. {End rev. 6/28/08.}

http://www.rocketscientistsjournal.com/2006/10/co2_acquittal.html
 

New Topics

Forum List

Back
Top