Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
But we do have;And why do we need to fool with the internal combustion engine any further?
Because we don’t have sufficient quantities of dilithium crystals for our antimatter engines.
And they all beat the pants off of the ICE's in their class.
Yea if you don't use the heater or A/C
Tesla's big lithium ion in Australia just saved them a major power failure from Coal fired plants dropping offline with no warning, twice. That technology, combined with renewables, will replace fossil fuels.
The 50 million dollar system restored power to the grid for 38 minutes before switching back to the coal plant.
Do you go to the gas station every time you go to the grocery store? Most Tesla's have a range of about 300 miles. Even the low range EV's are about 80 miles. More than enough to handle go to the grocery store, and back and forth to work for most of us. Plug it in every night, and you are ready to go in the morning. And drive for pennies on the dollar compared to ICE cars.But we do have;And why do we need to fool with the internal combustion engine any further?
Because we don’t have sufficient quantities of dilithium crystals for our antimatter engines.
And they all beat the pants off of the ICE's in their class.
Yea if you don't use the heater or A/C
And you don’t mind charging it up for hours before you can drive to the grocery store.
Lots of words, zero understanding of the meanings of them. What we are seeing now is going in the opposite direction of the Milankovic Cycles. And the TSI of the sun is, at present, declining slightly.One doesn't have to be a genius to figure out that fossil fuel efficiency is not and will never be a priority as long as profits are the primary motivator. There is a valid argument against providing cheap energy to the masses leading to population explosions but is has nothing to do with climate .Look up Calhoun's Rodent Paradise. The problem with Climate Change initiatives is that they function to enslave the multitudes with taxation and regulation using purchased, politicized junk science that ignores real, obvious causation like Sun cycles and changes in the Earth's rotation and polar wobble. Just follow the money. The $green$ everyone keeps talking about is the color of the wealth that is there for those who get in on the ground floor of a political, global pyramid scheme.
Lots of words, zero understanding of the meanings of them. What we are seeing now is going in the opposite direction of the Milankovic Cycles. And the TSI of the sun is, at present, declining slightly.One doesn't have to be a genius to figure out that fossil fuel efficiency is not and will never be a priority as long as profits are the primary motivator. There is a valid argument against providing cheap energy to the masses leading to population explosions but is has nothing to do with climate .Look up Calhoun's Rodent Paradise. The problem with Climate Change initiatives is that they function to enslave the multitudes with taxation and regulation using purchased, politicized junk science that ignores real, obvious causation like Sun cycles and changes in the Earth's rotation and polar wobble. Just follow the money. The $green$ everyone keeps talking about is the color of the wealth that is there for those who get in on the ground floor of a political, global pyramid scheme.
The Carnot cycle limits the efficiency of the ICE. It does not apply to the EV's. They are over 90% efficient if they are regen. As the price of the batteries comes down and their energy density goes up, an EV will be less costly to purchase than an ICE, far more dependable, and far, far cheaper to run. As well as running circles around the ICE's in performance and handling.
Lots of words, zero understanding of the meanings of them. What we are seeing now is going in the opposite direction of the Milankovic Cycles. And the TSI of the sun is, at present, declining slightly.One doesn't have to be a genius to figure out that fossil fuel efficiency is not and will never be a priority as long as profits are the primary motivator. There is a valid argument against providing cheap energy to the masses leading to population explosions but is has nothing to do with climate .Look up Calhoun's Rodent Paradise. The problem with Climate Change initiatives is that they function to enslave the multitudes with taxation and regulation using purchased, politicized junk science that ignores real, obvious causation like Sun cycles and changes in the Earth's rotation and polar wobble. Just follow the money. The $green$ everyone keeps talking about is the color of the wealth that is there for those who get in on the ground floor of a political, global pyramid scheme.
The Carnot cycle limits the efficiency of the ICE. It does not apply to the EV's. They are over 90% efficient if they are regen. As the price of the batteries comes down and their energy density goes up, an EV will be less costly to purchase than an ICE, far more dependable, and far, far cheaper to run. As well as running circles around the ICE's in performance and handling.
Anyone can go to a community college, take a course on statistics and then compose all kinds of complex charts and graphs on how to eat a doughnut. Oh, how impressive. Does it say anything useful? No.
...especially red!! ( that represents 0.3 degree's ) Nobody makes colorful graphs like the AGW crowd.......has become an art form.
@Moderators:
How do threads like this not get moved to the Conspiracy Theory section? It's one of the more absurd conspiracy theories that you'll find discussed on this site. Why legitimize this nonsense?
Empirical Facts Are nonsense?@Moderators:
How do threads like this not get moved to the Conspiracy Theory section? It's one of the more absurd conspiracy theories that you'll find discussed on this site. Why legitimize this nonsense?
, OK
). Paris got nuked because it could be. Nobody in congress is bringing bills to the floor on climate change...
...its a radioactive topic.
There comes a time when someone just has to state the obvious. Internal combustion engines are everywhere. They are a global phenomenon. If climate change is such a monstrous threat to the human race wouldn't the first order of business be to address the problem of archaic carburation that wastes energy and creates emissions in the upper atmosphere?
Why is this not happening? We can conclude that the oil industry does not want this to happen. The wealth in the oil industry depends upon vehicles that get 15 mpg. A redesigned internal combustion engine that could get 150 mpg. would reduce profits by 90 percent. It would be a financial disaster for privileged few who hold major stocks in the industry.
The oil industry essentially owns the world which includes all the countries that try to use climate change initiatives as an excuse for taxing and regulating the entire planet by what can only be termed as a world government.
The people need to demand that a Manhattan Project to engineer cleaner, more efficient internal combustion engines is put into action immediately. Real science could solve this problem virtually overnight.
The only thing being engineered is taxation and regulation on the people to keep the rich on top and the masses subservient to insulated wealth. Humans are not so delicate and incompetent that they can't figure out how to make better engines.
We put a man on the Moon and cracked the secret of the atom. We can't design and engineer better engines? We can if we demand it. Climate change has nothing to do with saving the Earth. It is a sinister plan to enslave the people.
wouldn't the first order of business be to address the problem of archaic carburation
wouldn't the first order of business be to address the problem of archaic carburation
One man’s archaic is another man’s awesome.
wouldn't the first order of business be to address the problem of archaic carburation
One man’s archaic is another man’s awesome.
Absolutely. I wish I had my 1965 Mustang convertible, teal green with black interior. It was an automatic with a t-handle stick shift. Man, what a chick magnet. I used to put it in neutral and rev the rpm's up to about 5,000 and jam it into 1st gear to race GTO's at stoplights. I dropped the driveshaft in the middle of the street in 1971. I sold it to my brother and his girlfriend got it stuck between two trees at 50 mph. I want to go back in time and get that car.
Isn't this totally opposite to what your OP is about? Now you see why people don't want to buy milquetoast cars, and you are part of that problem.Absolutely. I wish I had my 1965 Mustang convertible, teal green with black interior. It was an automatic with a t-handle stick shift. Man, what a chick magnet. I used to put it in neutral and rev the rpm's up to about 5,000 and jam it into 1st gear to race GTO's at stoplights. I dropped the driveshaft in the middle of the street in 1971. I sold it to my brother and his girlfriend got it stuck between two trees at 50 mph. I want to go back in time and get that car.
