Climate fake data

Well, since it is the noaa that collects the data in the first place they are the only ones that have real data. What does that put you, asshole? I'll tell you,,,your whines amount to a hill of shit in reality.


]Yep....they have the real data...then they torture it to make it support the narrative...of course all that is about to change...they are going to be asked to justify all that data torture to people who won't be fooled by smoke and mirrors.
 
Yep.......on the way down right now. How long do we have left this time? Now it is Global Cooling gonna get ya now. They were talking about that "upswing" prior.....

Nobody except the denier 'tards has ever talked about global cooling. You deniers have been predicting the imminent ice age for 40 years straight now. It never gets here. During that same period, all the real scientists predicted warming. We were right, you were wrong, and that's why the world laughs hard at you.

Now, your Russian graph was remarkably stupid, being that Russia isn't the world. Cherrypicking fallacy. You understand why that's bad, and why only stupid or dishonest people use such a tactic, right? And do you understand what "global" means?

And here's the full RSS data. It shows clear steady warming.

rss
 
Nobody makes money from grants, dumbasses. It's illegal to do so.

Do you 'tards really not know how grants work? The money has to be tracked, to the penny, and it's illegal for any of it to go to the scientists' salary. Grant money goes to the school or organization, not the scientist.

Hence, your grant conspiracy theory makes you all look like flaming retards.

I do agree we should follow the money. And we find all that money is flowing from the fossil fuel industry into the pockets of the few denier scientists. The only scientists coming out against AGW theory are getting paid to do so. All of the corruption is on the denier side.

So, why do you deniers on this thread kiss the butts of the corrupt money-grubbers, and spit hate at the honest scientists? Any honest scientist could instantly double their salary by lying for the deniers. They don't. They take a pay cut to tell the truth. They turn down the denier bribes that have been offered to them, which gives them added credibility.
 
Yep.......on the way down right now. How long do we have left this time? Now it is Global Cooling gonna get ya now. They were talking about that "upswing" prior.....

Nobody except the denier 'tards has ever talked about global cooling. You deniers have been predicting the imminent ice age for 40 years straight now. It never gets here. During that same period, all the real scientists predicted warming. We were right, you were wrong, and that's why the world laughs hard at you.

Now, your Russian graph was remarkably stupid, being that Russia isn't the world. Cherrypicking fallacy. You understand why that's bad, and why only stupid or dishonest people use such a tactic, right? And do you understand what "global" means?

And here's the full RSS data. It shows clear steady warming.

rss
rss

Yeah right, you got it from "WoodForTrees.org". Did you put something into his "charity tip jar" while you were at it?
After the e-mail hacks everybody knows how that trick is done

finger-ring-levitating-trick.jpg
 
I think they've been going after Exxon for having discovered what they discovered and then done everything they could to suppress knowledge and invent a false controversy, just as the tobacco industry and the creationists had done before them.

Do you know what a doomsday cult is?
 
Yep.......on the way down right now. How long do we have left this time? Now it is Global Cooling gonna get ya now. They were talking about that "upswing" prior.....

Nobody except the denier 'tards has ever talked about global cooling. You deniers have been predicting the imminent ice age for 40 years straight now. It never gets here. During that same period, all the real scientists predicted warming. We were right, you were wrong, and that's why the world laughs hard at you.

Now, your Russian graph was remarkably stupid, being that Russia isn't the world. Cherrypicking fallacy. You understand why that's bad, and why only stupid or dishonest people use such a tactic, right? And do you understand what "global" means?

And here's the full RSS data. It shows clear steady warming.

rss
rss

Yeah right, you got it from "WoodForTrees.org". Did you put something into his "charity tip jar" while you were at it?
After the e-mail hacks everybody knows how that trick is done

finger-ring-levitating-trick.jpg

Not everyone is capable of admitting that they were wrong. The climategate emails were released that proved the fraud. However, people like Crick, Oldrocks and other die-hard global warming doomsday cult members have such fragile egos they cannot even admit to themselves that they were tricked.
 
Yeah right, you got it from "WoodForTrees.org". Did you put something into his "charity tip jar" while you were at it?
After the e-mail hacks everybody knows how that trick is done

What are you babbling about?

Are you claiming WoodForTrees, a favorite site of the deniers here, faked the data?

Do you have anything to back that up? Besides your butthurt over seeing the denier "The satellites don't show warming!" big lie getting busted, that is.
 

Forum List

Back
Top