Climate Deniers: Still 'Going Down the Up Escalator'

Discussion in 'Environment' started by abu afak, Apr 23, 2018.

  1. SSDD
    Online

    SSDD Gold Member

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2012
    Messages:
    16,156
    Thanks Received:
    1,741
    Trophy Points:
    280
    Ratings:
    +9,828
    So lets see the evidence to support that hairball.....or is it like all your proclamations...just more made up bullshit..

    My bet is that if you actually got that from somewhere..you will be to embarrassed to actually provide a source for fear of being horse laughed off the board for being such a dupe.. Proce me wrong...
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  2. Billy_Bob
    Offline

    Billy_Bob Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2014
    Messages:
    19,221
    Thanks Received:
    4,115
    Trophy Points:
    1,010
    Location:
    Top Of The Great Divide
    Ratings:
    +20,776
    His 110% tells me he thinks all of the warming is man caused, and for good measure the magical heat fairy added in 10 more percent....
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
    • Funny and Agree!! Funny and Agree!! x 1
  3. CrusaderFrank
    Offline

    CrusaderFrank Diamond Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2009
    Messages:
    105,459
    Thanks Received:
    19,330
    Trophy Points:
    2,220
    Location:
    NYC
    Ratings:
    +73,428
    That's a Cult number and has nothing to do with science
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
    • Funny and Agree!! Funny and Agree!! x 1
  4. bear513
    Offline

    bear513 Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2012
    Messages:
    56,172
    Thanks Received:
    7,197
    Trophy Points:
    1,830
    Ratings:
    +37,326

    You never answered us, because no one knows and there is no way to figure it out, way to many variables.


    .

    .
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
  5. mamooth
    Offline

    mamooth Gold Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2012
    Messages:
    20,489
    Thanks Received:
    3,515
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Location:
    Indianapolis, Indiana
    Ratings:
    +13,297
    I always enjoy triggering the cultists with data and watching them weep uncontrollably. Let's keep doing that. Here's an overview of the science here. It's way over the heads of the deniers, obviously, but normal people will find it interesting.

    IPCC attribution statements redux: A response to Judith Curry

    [​IMG]
     
    • Winner Winner x 1
  6. abu afak
    Offline

    abu afak ALLAH SNACKBAR!

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2006
    Messages:
    2,912
    Thanks Received:
    614
    Trophy Points:
    315
    Ratings:
    +2,139
    `

    Scientific consensus on climate change - Wikipedia

    "Opposing" (the AGW Consensus)

    Since 2007, when the American Association of Petroleum Geologists released a revised statement,[29] NO national or international scientific body any longer rejects the findings of human-induced effects on climate change.[28][30]

    Surveys of scientists and scientific literature

    Various surveys have been conducted to evaluate scientific opinion on global warming. They have concluded that the majority of scientists support the idea of anthropogenic climate change.

    In 2004, the geologist and historian of science Naomi Oreskes summarized a study of the scientific literature on climate change.[131] She analyzed 928 abstracts of papers from refereed scientific journals between 1993 and 2003 and concluded that there is a scientific consensus on the reality of anthropogenic climate change.

    Oreskes divided the abstracts into six categories: explicit endorsement of the consensus position, evaluation of impacts, mitigation proposals, methods, paleoclimate analysis, and rejection of the consensus position. 75% of the abstracts were placed in the first three categories (either explicitly or implicitly accepting the consensus view); 25% dealt with methods or paleoclimate, thus taking no position on current anthropogenic climate change.

    None of the abstracts disagreed with the consensus position, which the author found to be "remarkable".
    According to the report, "authors evaluating impacts, developing methods, or studying paleoclimatic change might believe that current climate change is natural. However, none of these papers argued that point."....".

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_consensus_on_climate_change


    `


    `​
     

Share This Page



Search tags for this page

news