Climate Change to Continue to Year 3000 in Best Case Scenarios, Research Predicts

If the extreme enviro-wackos had their way, we'd all be driving horse and buggies again and dining by candle light every evening.
 
Bullshit. What we would like to see is the development of our technology so we do not depend on foreign oil, and do not create a less livable future for our children.
 
I see. Stating that poisoning the environment with the mercury and other heavy metals from the burning of coal is bad thing is bullshit? Stating that using energy that produces GHGs, and is creating a warming that is changing the climate is bullshit?

But then, I guess what a fat drugged out radio jock has to say trumps all the scientists in the world.
 
Stating that using energy that produces GHGs, and is creating a warming that is changing the climate is bullshit? .

Yes, it's bullshit, and the only people who still believe it are a swiftly declining minority mainly on the left.
 
Really dumb statement, Taz. Unless, of course, you are stating that the vast majority of scientists in the world are on the left. The challenge is still out there. Show me a Scientific Society, a National Academy of Science, or a major University that states that AGW is not a fact. Even one from Outer Slobovia.

But then, you denialists are great at showing what willfully ignorant asses you are.
 
On the contrary, our grandchildren and great-grandchildren will curse the most greedy and foolish of all generations. Our fathers and grandfathers belonged to the greatest generation, we to the most foolish. And you and Revere are prime examples of this generation.





Try again bozo, you would be talking about your great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great, greatX2 grandchildren and I gurantee you, they will pay us no mind at all. Or do you have a clue who your ancestors are that walked the Earth 300 years ago?

One thousand years from now man will be spread out through the solar system if not the local cluster of stars. The Earth will still be chugging along blissfully ignorant of the fleas
living on the surface.
 
Last edited:
Really dumb statement, Taz. Unless, of course, you are stating that the vast majority of scientists in the world are on the left. The challenge is still out there. Show me a Scientific Society, a National Academy of Science, or a major University that states that AGW is not a fact. Even one from Outer Slobovia.

But then, you denialists are great at showing what willfully ignorant asses you are.




Ahh yes the ever popular deference to the anointed ones. It's a shame that Trenberth can't seem to add, or that Jones can't seem to not lose his homework (I wonder if the dog ate it?) or that Mann likewise can't add and doesn't understand that water makes trees grow or not grow...not heat. Or how about that paragon of research ability Keith Briffa who can't reproduce his own work.

Yep, that's some high quality science there olfraud. No wonder the AGU had to bring on a English Prof. to spread the gospel. Regular climatologists can't seem to speak English anymore so a specialist had to be brought in to try and save the patient.
 
Really dumb statement, Taz. Unless, of course, you are stating that the vast majority of scientists in the world are on the left. The challenge is still out there. Show me a Scientific Society, a National Academy of Science, or a major University that states that AGW is not a fact. Even one from Outer Slobovia.

But then, you denialists are great at showing what willfully ignorant asses you are.

Climate Change theory is more politics than science
 
Really dumb statement, Taz. Unless, of course, you are stating that the vast majority of scientists in the world are on the left. The challenge is still out there. Show me a Scientific Society, a National Academy of Science, or a major University that states that AGW is not a fact. Even one from Outer Slobovia.

But then, you denialists are great at showing what willfully ignorant asses you are.

Climate Change theory is more politics than science



It happens...We are in a warm period right now...It is fact.:rock:
 
The US Energy Information Administration predicts that China’s share in global coal-related emissions will grow by 2.7% per year, from 4.9 billion tonnes in 2006 to 9.3 billion tonnes in 2030, some 52% of the projected world total. Total carbon dioxide emissions in China are projected to grow by 2.8% per year from 6.2 billion tonnes in 2006 to 11.7 billion tonnes in 2030 (or 28% of world total). In comparison, total US carbon dioxide emissions are projected to grow by 0.3% per year, from 5.9 billion tonnes in 2006 to 7.7 billion tonnes in 2030.
 
Im laughing.............there are some people on this forum who have waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay too much time on thier hands and have gotten mental because of it.

These k00ks are sitting home shitting in their shorts about climate change in the year 3,000. Can it get any more absurd than that? Meanwhile, there is a huge concern about the value of the dollar collapsing in the next 12 to 24 months, the consequences of which are unimaginable to virtually all Americans..........and we have oddballs out there worried about the climate 1,000 years from now..........as if technology is going to remain static.

Its a brain fcukk up...............
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top