CDZ Climate Change "almost entirely man's fault"!

[Where_r_my_Keys]

Well I will if you will. But my contribution was on topic and cogent. How that amounts to spam is known only to you.

That the conclusion doesn't bode well for the opposition, doesn't make it spam. Right?

 

[westwall]

Templar -

We have established that the Arctic is melting very steadily - around three times the rate of any gains in Antarctic Ice. Hence, your claim about polar caps gaining ice is obviously false. I suspect you knew that when you posted it.

And yes, Antarctic Ice seems to be unstable and unpredictable.

We have? It has reached a thirteen year high. What planet did you say you live on?


"The last time it was higher on day 307 was 2001 when it was 9.79070 million sq km"

Arctic Sea Ice Day 307 8211 Highest Since 2001 sunshine hours

 

[Saigon]

Westwall -

The links and info have all been posted for you to ignore.

Choosing one partciular day is of little interest when compared to longer term trends.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

In a lab setting, how much of a temperature increase is caused by 120PPM additional CO2?

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Westwall -

The links and info have all been posted for you to ignore.

Choosing one partciular day is of little interest when compared to longer term trends.

So the chart is a DENIER!!!!!!?

 

[Delta4Embassy]

UN climate panel delivers stark climate change warning CTV News

Read the link, and let's discuss the matter rationally.

Can't help but notice when ever someone disputes climate change or resists the things needing to be done it's always due to money. Never, "if we act to fight climate change people will die." They only care about money. So how much should we listen to their arguements if it's only about money and not protecting peoples' lives as the 'do something about it' side's is?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

UN climate panel delivers stark climate change warning CTV News

Read the link, and let's discuss the matter rationally.

Can't help but notice when ever someone disputes climate change or resists the things needing to be done it's always due to money. Never, "if we act to fight climate change people will die." They only care about money. So how much should we listen to their arguements if it's only about money and not protecting peoples' lives as the 'do something about it' side's is?

Lowering standards of living in poor countries, because rich liberals want to fight "climate change", will cause people to die.

 

[Saigon]

Lowering standards of living in poor countries, because rich liberals want to fight "climate change", will cause people to die.

Actually no - shoving your head in the sand and not doing anything about glacial melt and rising sea levels to rise will cause people to die.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Lowering standards of living in poor countries, because rich liberals want to fight "climate change", will cause people to die.

Actually no - shoving your head in the sand and not doing anything about glacial melt and rising sea levels to rise will cause people to die.

When you make then spend money on unreliable wind, when they can't afford clean water, they'll die long before sea levels rise.

 

[Wry Catcher]

UN climate panel delivers stark climate change warning CTV News

Read the link, and let's discuss the matter rationally.

Can't help but notice when ever someone disputes climate change or resists the things needing to be done it's always due to money. Never, "if we act to fight climate change people will die." They only care about money. So how much should we listen to their arguements if it's only about money and not protecting peoples' lives as the 'do something about it' side's is?

Lowering standards of living in poor countries, because rich liberals want to fight "climate change", will cause people to die.

Rich liberals? Whose the liberal in this case:

Chevron and Ecuador Fight a Long-Running Lawsuit Over Oil Pollution TIME.com

I suppose some may argue the oil companies raise the standard of living, but does it raise the quality of life? Would Todd allow his kids to play in the water described in the link?

 

[Saigon]

When you make then spend money on unreliable wind, when they can't afford clean water, they'll die long before sea levels rise.

Who is making anyone spend money on wind?

By all means list some examples of that.

Forget the politics, and forget electricity generation for a moment - what you have to consider is that people are living in sight of oceans that are rising, glaciers that are melting and fields that are lowly being rendered uncultivatable by drought and flood. These are facts. I've been to these places.

Doing nothing is not a great option.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Lowering standards of living in poor countries, because rich liberals want to fight "climate change", will cause people to die.

Actually no - shoving your head in the sand and not doing anything about glacial melt and rising sea levels to rise will cause people to die.

In a lab setting, how much of a temperature increase is caused by 120PPM additional CO2?