Class Warfare a Bust:Gallup 75% of voters don't care Romeny's rich

[tinydancer]

Whoooooooooo hoooooooooo! All that effort to malign Romney for being successful has freaking failed.

Check it out especially the independents. Somewhere tonight Axelrod is crying.


Gallup: Majority Say Romney’s Wealth Won’t Affect Their Vote

Thursday, 12 Jul 2012 09:59 AM

By Newsmax Wires


An overwhelming majority of voters – 75 percent – say that Mitt Romney’s $200 million net worth makes no difference in their choice between him and President Barack Obama, according to a new Gallup poll.

Meanwhile, 20 percent of voters say Romney’s wealth makes them less likely to vote for him, and 4 percent say it makes them more likely to vote for him.

Breaking it down by party affiliation, among Republicans, 89 percent say Romney’s riches make no difference, 8 percent say they are a reason to vote for him, and 4 percent say they are a reason to vote against him. Among Democrats, 62 percent don’t care about Romney’s wealth, 37 percent say it’s a negative factor, and 1 percent say it’s positive.

The sentiment of independents may be most important, as they are likely to decide the election’s outcome. In this demographic 76 are indifferent to Romney’s wealth, 19 percent say it makes them less likely to vote for him, and 4 percent say it makes them more likely to vote for him.

Read more on Newsmax.com: Gallup: Majority Say Romney’s Wealth Won’t Affect Their Vote

 

[JoeB131]

It was never an issue of his "Wealth".

It's an issue of how he got his wealth and how he used it to screw working people.

And when people hear about the sleazy actions of Bane, they generally are less inclined to like Romney.

He looks like the guy who laid off your dad.

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

It was never an issue of his "Wealth".

It's an issue of how he got his wealth and how he used it to screw working people.

And when people hear about the sleazy actions of Bane, they generally are less inclined to like Romney.

He looks like the guy who laid off your dad.

It's Bain, not Bane and only a dipshit gives a fuck about such stupidity... we're more worried about the sorry state of the U.S. economy than Romney's former employment.

 

[Plasmaball]

good job op, what a meaningless poll..

 

[whitehall]

Being rich used to be a good thing before Barry Hussein's mini socialist revolution. FDR was arguably the richest president in history and lefties love his legacy. JFK came from a line of pop-culture new money from rum-running and Hollywood decadence and the left called it "Camelot". Today we have a former dope dealing community activists in the White House and left tells us to tighten our belts and sooner or later we will all be working for the peoples republic if we don't elect a capitalist dog.

 

[JoeB131]

It was never an issue of his "Wealth".

It's an issue of how he got his wealth and how he used it to screw working people.

And when people hear about the sleazy actions of Bane, they generally are less inclined to like Romney.

He looks like the guy who laid off your dad.

It's Bain, not Bane and only a dipshit gives a fuck about such stupidity... we're more worried about the sorry state of the U.S. economy than Romney's former employment.

Oh, I think it's been the "Bane" of a lot of people's existence...

And amusingly enough, in a week, a movie with a bad guy named "Bane" is hitting the theatres...

Waiting for all the funny political cartoons from that one.

 

[Toro]

Another reason why America is so awesome.

 

[JoeB131]

Being rich used to be a good thing before Barry Hussein's mini socialist revolution. FDR was arguably the richest president in history and lefties love his legacy. JFK came from a line of pop-culture new money from rum-running and Hollywood decadence and the left called it "Camelot". Today we have a former dope dealing community activists in the White House and left tells us to tighten our belts and sooner or later we will all be working for the peoples republic if we don't elect a capitalist dog.

Being rich used to be a good thing when the rich didn't act like dicks.

When they didn't get draft deferments while poor people's kids went to wars.

When they used their wealth to open factories and create jobs, not to shut down factories and destroy jobs.

A wise rich guy, Henry Ford, once said, "If my employees don't make enough to buy my products, I don't have a business."

Mitt Romney is not that kind of rich guy.

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

It was never an issue of his "Wealth".

It's an issue of how he got his wealth and how he used it to screw working people.

And when people hear about the sleazy actions of Bane, they generally are less inclined to like Romney.

He looks like the guy who laid off your dad.

It's Bain, not Bane and only a dipshit gives a fuck about such stupidity... we're more worried about the sorry state of the U.S. economy than Romney's former employment.

Oh, I think it's been the "Bane" of a lot of people's existence...

And amusingly enough, in a week, a movie with a bad guy named "Bane" is hitting the theatres...

Waiting for all the funny political cartoons from that one.

Then they are in serious need of psychological help.

 

[WillowTree]

It was never an issue of his "Wealth".

It's an issue of how he got his wealth and how he used it to screw working people.

And when people hear about the sleazy actions of Bane, they generally are less inclined to like Romney.

He looks like the guy who laid off your dad.

Horseshit.

 

[WillowTree]

Being rich used to be a good thing before Barry Hussein's mini socialist revolution. FDR was arguably the richest president in history and lefties love his legacy. JFK came from a line of pop-culture new money from rum-running and Hollywood decadence and the left called it "Camelot". Today we have a former dope dealing community activists in the White House and left tells us to tighten our belts and sooner or later we will all be working for the peoples republic if we don't elect a capitalist dog.

Being rich used to be a good thing when the rich didn't act like dicks.

When they didn't get draft deferments while poor people's kids went to wars.

When they used their wealth to open factories and create jobs, not to shut down factories and destroy jobs.






A wise rich guy, Henry Ford, once said, "If my employees don't make enough to buy my products, I don't have a business."

Mitt Romney is not that kind of rich guy.

Draft? What draft? When did we last have a draft? Are you daft?

 

[Care4all]

wonder why Cons were so obsessed with John kerry for being rich and with his money and his and teresa heinz's tax returns?

 

[JoeB131]

Being rich used to be a good thing before Barry Hussein's mini socialist revolution. FDR was arguably the richest president in history and lefties love his legacy. JFK came from a line of pop-culture new money from rum-running and Hollywood decadence and the left called it "Camelot". Today we have a former dope dealing community activists in the White House and left tells us to tighten our belts and sooner or later we will all be working for the peoples republic if we don't elect a capitalist dog.

Being rich used to be a good thing when the rich didn't act like dicks.

When they didn't get draft deferments while poor people's kids went to wars.

When they used their wealth to open factories and create jobs, not to shut down factories and destroy jobs.

A wise rich guy, Henry Ford, once said, "If my employees don't make enough to buy my products, I don't have a business."

Mitt Romney is not that kind of rich guy.

Draft? What draft? When did we last have a draft? Are you daft?

Well, we had one when Romney was in his wonder years...

But oddly, he got deferrments.

Now, rich guys of an earlier age, sent their kids to war... but not Rich Assholes like Romney.

Dying in wars is for Poor People...


You're just a stupid person, aren't you?

 

[WillowTree]

wonder why Cons were so obsessed with John kerry for being rich and with his money and his and teresa heinz's tax returns?

but the liberals weren't but they are now,, so can you explain that? or knot?

 

[JoeB131]

It was never an issue of his "Wealth".

It's an issue of how he got his wealth and how he used it to screw working people.

And when people hear about the sleazy actions of Bane, they generally are less inclined to like Romney.

He looks like the guy who laid off your dad.

Horseshit.

Hey, you don't believe me, beleive Mike Huckabee..


"

Four years ago, Mike Huckabee contrasted his style as a candidate with that of Mitt Romney’s style: “I want to be a president who reminds you of the guy you work with, not the guy who laid you off.” It was a sharp quip because it hit close to home: Romney’s private-sector background involving laying off a lot of American workers.

The former Massachusetts governor has two broad flaws as a presidential candidate. The first is that he’s a craven, cowardly flip-flopper who shifts with the winds and demonstrates a practical allergy to principled stands. The second has to do with Romney’s record on jobs — specifically, how abysmal it is.

That's one of your guys...

 

[SniperFire]

The 20% who care are just Obama freeloaders anyways.

Obama Fail.

 

[WillowTree]

Being rich used to be a good thing when the rich didn't act like dicks.

When they didn't get draft deferments while poor people's kids went to wars.

When they used their wealth to open factories and create jobs, not to shut down factories and destroy jobs.

A wise rich guy, Henry Ford, once said, "If my employees don't make enough to buy my products, I don't have a business."

Mitt Romney is not that kind of rich guy.

Draft? What draft? When did we last have a draft? Are you daft?

Well, we had one when Romney was in his wonder years...

But oddly, he got deferrments.

Now, rich guys of an earlier age, sent their kids to war... but not Rich Assholes like Romney.

Dying in wars is for Poor People...


You're just a stupid person, aren't you?

 

[JoeB131]

The 20% who care are just Obama freeloaders anyways.

Obama Fail.

Again, all the polling shows that the Bane Bashing works just fine...

Just like it buried Mittens in 1994.

Almost got him in 2002.

Bain to Romney is like showing a cross to a vampire....

 

[WillowTree]

It was never an issue of his "Wealth".

It's an issue of how he got his wealth and how he used it to screw working people.

And when people hear about the sleazy actions of Bane, they generally are less inclined to like Romney.

He looks like the guy who laid off your dad.

Horseshit.

Hey, you don't believe me, beleive Mike Huckabee..


"

Four years ago, Mike Huckabee contrasted his style as a candidate with that of Mitt Romney’s style: “I want to be a president who reminds you of the guy you work with, not the guy who laid you off.” It was a sharp quip because it hit close to home: Romney’s private-sector background involving laying off a lot of American workers.

The former Massachusetts governor has two broad flaws as a presidential candidate. The first is that he’s a craven, cowardly flip-flopper who shifts with the winds and demonstrates a practical allergy to principled stands. The second has to do with Romney’s record on jobs — specifically, how abysmal it is.

That's one of your guys...

It's still horseshit.

 

[SniperFire]

The 20% who care are just Obama freeloaders anyways.

Obama Fail.

Again, all the polling shows that the Bane Bashing works just fine...

Just like it buried Mittens in 1994.

Almost got him in 2002.

Bain to Romney is like showing a cross to a vampire....

With the 20% who are voting for Obama anyways.